* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download KS-DFT formalism
Ensemble interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Dirac equation wikipedia , lookup
Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Atomic orbital wikipedia , lookup
Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup
Hartree–Fock method wikipedia , lookup
Quantum state wikipedia , lookup
Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup
Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup
Perturbation theory (quantum mechanics) wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Orchestrated objective reduction wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Perturbation theory wikipedia , lookup
Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup
Density functional theory wikipedia , lookup
Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup
Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup
Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup
EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup
Topological quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Coupled cluster wikipedia , lookup
Introduction to gauge theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Electron configuration wikipedia , lookup
Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia , lookup
Tight binding wikipedia , lookup
Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup
Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup
Electron scattering wikipedia , lookup
Yang–Mills theory wikipedia , lookup
Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Wave function wikipedia , lookup
Matter wave wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup
Accurate energy functionals for evaluating electron correlation energies 鄭載佾 國家理論科學研究中心物理組, 新竹‧ Outline (提綱) • • • • • History and context. Theory. Example 1. Homogeneous Electron Gas. Example 2. Metal slabs. Conclusions and perspectives. 2 + Earlier achievements Discovery of the electron Could anything at first sight seem more impractical than a body which is so small that its mass is an insignificant fraction of the mass of an atom of hydrogen? J.J. Thompson (18561940) discovers the electron. (Cambridge, UK) Nobel Prize in Physics, 1906 4 Advent of new physics Quantization of energy Nobel Prize in Physics, 1918 Photoelectric effect Nobel Prize in Physics, 1921 M. Planck (1858-1947) 5 Measurement of electron charge and photoelectric effect. Nobel Prize in Physics, 1923 Robert Millikan (1868-1953) Disintegration of radiactive elements Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 1908 6 Development of quantum mechanics Niels Bohr (1885-1962) Quantum theory of the atom. Nobel Prize in Physics, 1922 7 Development of quantum mechanics 1929 Louis De Broglie (1892-1987) Statistical mechanics of electrons W. Pauli (19001958) 1945 E. Fermi (19011954) Paul Dirac (1902-1984) 1938 1938 8 Development of quantum mechanics 1932 W. Heisenberg (1901-1976) 1933 Erwin Schrodinger (1887-1961) 9 Applications in solids 1952 Forbidden region Felix Bloch 1905-1983 10 First attempts in electronic structre calculation • Egil Hylleraas. Configuration interaction, correlated basis functions. • Douglas Hartree and Vladimir Fock. Mean field calculations. • Wigner and Seitz. Cellular method. 11 More milestones (According to D. Pines) • Bohr & Mottelson. Collective model of nucleus. (1953) • Bohm & Pines. Random Phase Approximation. (1953) • Gell-Mann & Brueckner. Many body perturbation theory. (1957) 12 More milestones (According to P. Coleman) • BCS theory of superconductivity. • Renormalization group. • Quantum hall effect, integer and fractionary. • Heavy fermions. • High temperature superconductivity. 13 More is different “At each level of complexity, entirely new properties appear, and the understanding of these behaviors requires research which I think is as fundamental in its nature as any other” P. W. Anderson. Science, 177:393, 1972. 14 Theory First principles electronics structure calculation Quotation from H. Lipkin “We can begin by looking at the fundamental paradox of the many-body problem; namely that people who do not know how to solve the three-body problem are trying to solve the N-body problem. Our choice of wave functions is very limited; we only know how to use independent particle wave functions. The degree to which this limitation has invaded our thinking is marked by our constant use of concepts which have meaning only in terms of independent particle wave functions: shell structure, the occupation number, the Fermi sea and the Fermi surface, the representation of perturbation theory by Feynman diagrams. All of these concepts are based upon the assumption that it is reasonable to talk about a particular state being occupied or unoccupied by a particle independently of what the other particles are doing. This assumption is generally not valid, because there are correlations between particles. However, independent particle wave functions are the only wave functions that we know how to use. We must therefore find some method to treat correlations using these very bad independent particle wave functions.” Annals of Physics 8, 272 (1960) 16 Currently available methods • Configuration Interaction. Quantum Monte Carlo. (Wave function) • Many-body perturbation theory. (Green’s function) • Kohn-Sham Density Functional Theory (Density). 17 Configuration Interaction (Wave function method) 18 + Currently available methods • Configuration Interaction. Quantum Monte Carlo. (Wave function) • Many-body perturbation theory. (Green’s function) • Kohn-Sham Density Functional Theory (Density). 19 Many-body theory • Electronic and optical experiments often measure some aspect of the one-particle Green’s function • The spectral function, Im G, tells you about the singleparticle-like approximate eigenstates of the system: the quasiparticles Im G non-interacting interacting E1 E2 • Can formulate an iterative expansion of the self-energy S in powers of W, the screened Coulomb interaction, the leading term of which is the GW approximation • Can now perform such calculations computationally for real materials, without adjustable parameters. 20 + Currently available methods • Configuration Interaction. Quantum Monte Carlo. (Wave function) • Many-body perturbation theory. (Green’s function) • Kohn-Sham Density Functional Theory (Density). 21 KS-DFT formalism • It provides an independent particle scheme that describes the exact ground state density and energy. 22 KS-DFT formalism • Given the KS orbitals of the system we have. 23 KS-DFT formalism • The effective potential associated to the fictitious system is 24 KS-DFT formalism • The effective potential associated to the fictitious system is • The effective potential associated to the fictitious system is 25 26 27 28 Example 1 Homogeneous Electron Gas Independent electron approximation 3 tS F 5 k F 3 n 3 1 2 2 2 2 k F k F F 2m 2 1 4 3 rS n 3 30 Exchange energy EX 1 X N N p p F , q qF 2e 2 3 e2k F pq 4 31 Correlation energy • • • • • • RPA. Bohm and Pines. (1953) Gell-Mann and Brueckner. ( 1957) Sawada. (1957) Hubbard. (1957) C Nozieres and Pines. (1958) Quinn and Ferrel. (1958) TOT tS X • Ceperley and Alder. (1980) 此事古難全 32 Ground-state energy of HEG Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 566 (1980) 33 Exchange-Correlation energy 1 XC n 0 d int H n r dr d g r, r; 2 r r 0 1 1 2n2 r, r; nr1 nr2 g ( r, r; ) nr1 nr2 34 Structure factor 35 Density-density response function. (or Polarization) G0 G0 36 Density-density response function. (or Polarization) RPA response function 37 Density-density response function. (or Polarization) Exact response function 38 Density-density response function. (or Polarization) Hubbard response function Hubbard local field factor 39 Hubbard vertex correction Considers the Coulomb repulsion between electrons with antiparallel spins. 40 Many-body effects Local field factor ~ TDDFT fxc kernel • Let’s remember that 41 Approximations for fxc • The simplest form is ALDA HEG f XC r r , w [n ] f XC [n ] r r • But it gives too poor energy when used with the ACFD formula. Reminder 1 1 C d du Tr wˆ ˆ ˆ 0 20 0 42 HEG Correlation energies Phys. Rev. B 61, 13431, (2000) 43 Energy optimized kernels • Dobson and Wang. • Optimized Hubbard. where 44 Performance of kernels Phys. Rev. B 70, 205107 (2004) 45 Example 2 Jellium metal slabs 47 One Jellium Slab Thickness L = 6.4rs 48 Two slabs • Binding energies. (mHa/elec) • Surface energies. (erg/cm2) 49 Interaction energies Thickness L = 3rs and rs = 1.25 50 Cancellation of errors 51 Conclusion and perspectives Conclusions 53 Perspectives • TDDFT for excited states • Development of fxc kernels • Transport and spectroscopic properties cond-mat/0604317 54