* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download File
Pensions crisis wikipedia , lookup
Greeks (finance) wikipedia , lookup
Present value wikipedia , lookup
Internal rate of return wikipedia , lookup
Interest rate wikipedia , lookup
Securitization wikipedia , lookup
Business valuation wikipedia , lookup
Rate of return wikipedia , lookup
Investment fund wikipedia , lookup
Moral hazard wikipedia , lookup
Beta (finance) wikipedia , lookup
Modified Dietz method wikipedia , lookup
Systemic risk wikipedia , lookup
Financial economics wikipedia , lookup
Investment management wikipedia , lookup
CHAPTER 5 Risk and Rates of Return 5-1 5.1 Rates of Return Holding Period Return: Rates of Return over a given period Ending price Beginning price Cash dividend HPR Beginning price Suppose the price of a share is currently $100, and your time horizon is one year. You expect the cash dividend during the year to be $4. Your best guess about the price of the share is to be $110 after one year from now. So, $110 $100 $4 HPR 14% $100 5-2 Measuring Investment Return over Multiple Period Year Annual Holding Period Return 2000 0.2 2001 0.05 2002 -0.05 2003 0.15 2004 0.3 Arithmetic Mean (20+5-5+15+30)/5 Geometric Mean (1.2*1.05*.95*1.15*1.3)1/5-1 =0.13 =0.1 5-3 5.2 Risk and Return Risk is the concept of fluctuations. This fluctuations can be (i) a deviation of the actual return from the expected return, or (ii) a deviation of average return from the year to year return. Higher the fluctuations, higher is the risk. Measures of risk are: i. Standard Deviation ii. Coefficient of Variance iii. Beta 5-4 Calculation of Risk-Return R Expected Return E ( R) R (R * P ) n i i Risk Risk 2 ( R R ) i n 1 i ( For time series data) 2 ( P ) ( R R ) ( for probabilit y distribution) i i 5-5 Calculation of Risk-Return (Historical Data) Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Mean Return= Stand.Deviation2 Stand.Deviation= Return (%) 20 5 Dev. (Ri-E(R)) 7 -8 Dev. Square 49 64 -5 15 30 13% -18 2 17 324 4 289 730 Sum of Dev sq= 730/(5-1)= Square root (182.5)= 182.5 13.5% 5-6 Calculation of Risk-Return: Scenario Analysis (Probability Distribution) State of Economy Boom Normal Recession Probability Return (Ri) (Pi) (%) 0.25 Exp. Value (Pi*Ri) 25 0.5 14 0.25 0 i 1 Return =13.25% Risk=8.9% Deviation Square Dev sq* Pi 6.25 (25-13.25) =11.75 (11.25)2 =138.0625 (138*.25) =34.52 7 (14-13.25) =0.75 (0.75)2 =0.5625 (.56*.5) =0.28 0 (0-13.25) =-13.25 (-13.25)2 =175.5625 (175*.25) =43.89 m m E ( R) Pi Ri Deviation (Ri-E(R)) pi {[( Ri E ( Ri )]2 } 2 13.25% i 1 Stand Dev 78.69 8.87 5-7 Figure:5.3:Normal Distribution A normal distribution looks like a bell-shaped curve. Probability Mean=13.25% Standard Deviation=8.87% – 3 – 13.36% – 2 – 4.5% – 1 4.4% 0 13.25% + 1 22.12% + 2 31% + 3 39.86% 68.26% 95.44% 99.74% 5-8 5.3 THE HISTORICAL RECORD Bills, Bonds, and Stocks:1926-2006 5-9 Figure 5.1 Frequency Distributions of Holding Period Returns 5-10 Probability distributions With the same average return more standard deviation means more risk. Shown graphically. Note that as risk increases height goes down and width increases. Firm X x 10% y 40% Firm Y -70 0 15 Expected Rate of Return 100 Rate of Return (%) 5-11 Effectiveness of Diversification of Portfolio Climate Probability Rainy 0.25 Moderate Dry E(R) = Risk Return Ice-cream Portfolio Return 25 -5 10 0.5 14 10 12 0.25 0 15 7.5 13.3% 7.5% 10.4% 8.9% 7.5% 1.9% R * P i i 2 ( R R ) i Pi Return of Umbrella 5-12 Portfolio Effects on Risk and Return 14 12 Return 10 8 Series1 6 4 2 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 Risk 5-13 Optimum portfolio and CML: Given the feasible set highest possible utility function gives us O.P. and the tangency is CML . U1 O.P CML Return Borrowing Feasible set Lending Risk (σ) 5-14 Investor attitude towards risk Risk aversion – assumes investors dislike risk and require higher rates of return to encourage them to hold riskier securities. Risk premium – the difference between the return on a risky asset and less risky asset, which serves as compensation for investors to hold riskier securities. 5-15 P2 Risk Premiums and Risk Aversion If T-Bill denotes the risk-free rate, rf, and variance, denotes volatility of returns then: The risk premium of a portfolio is: 2, To quantify the degree of risk aversion with parameter A: P2 If the risk premium of a portfolio is 8%, and the standard deviation is 20%, then risk aversion of the investor is: A=.08/(.5x.22)=4. Compare this with risk premium of 10%, and A=.1/(.5x.22)=5 5-16 The Sharpe (Reward-to-Volatility) Measure 5-17 Coefficient of Variation (CV) A standardized measure of dispersion about the expected value, that shows the risk per unit of return. When, both return and risk increase then coefficient of variance (CV) should be used. Std dev CV ^ Mean k 5-18 Use of coefficient of variance Example: We have 2 alternatives to invest. Security A has a mean return of 10% and a standard deviation of 6%, and security B has a mean return of 13% with a standard deviation of 8%. Which investment is better. 6% CVA *100 60% 10% 8% CVB *100 61.5% 13% So, security A is better as the Coefficient of variance of A is less than the that of B. 5-19 5.4 INFLATION AND REAL RATES OF RETURN 5-20 Real vs. Nominal Rates Fisher effect: Approximation Let, nominal rate=R Real rate=r Inflation rate (CPI)=i nominal rate = real rate + inflation rate: R ≈ r + i or r = R - i Example r = 3%, i = 6% R = 9% = 3% + 6% or 3% = 9% - 6% Fisher Effect: 2.83% = (9%-6%) / (1.06) 5-21 5.5 ASSET ALLOCATION ACROSS RISKY AND RISK-FREE PORTFOLIOS 5-22 Risk tolerance: Slope of Indifference curves Return Conservative Normal 15% Aggressive 10% 7% 6% Risk (σ) 5-23 Optimum portfolio with different risk tolerance Return CML Efficient Frontier Rm σm Risk (σ) 5-24 Risk Aversion and Allocation Greater levels of risk aversion lead to larger proportions of the risk free rate Lower levels of risk aversion lead to larger proportions of the portfolio of risky assets Willingness to accept high levels of risk for high levels of returns would result in leveraged combinations 5-25 Allocating Capital Possible to split investment funds between safe and risky assets Risk free asset: proxy; T-bills Risky asset: stock (or a portfolio) Issues Examine risk/ return tradeoff Demonstrate how different degrees of risk aversion will affect allocations between risky and risk free assets 5-26 The Risky Asset: Text Example (Page 149) Total portfolio value = $300,000 Risk-free value = 90,000 Risky (Vanguard and Fidelity) = 210,000 Vanguard (V) = 54% =$113,400 Fidelity (F) = 46% = $96,600 Total =$210,000 y=210,000/300,000 =0.7 (portfolio in risky assets) 1-y=90,000/300,000 =0.3 (proportion of Risk-free investment) Vanguard Fidelity Portfolio P Risk-Free Assets F Portfolio C 113,400/300,000 = 0.378 96,600/300,000 = 0.322 210,000/300,000 = 0.700 90,000/300,000 = 0.300 300,000/300,000 = 1.000 5-27 Change in risk exposure (p.150) Suppose, the investor decides to decrease the risk exposure from 0.7 to 0.56. Now, the risky portfolio would be=0.56*300,000=$168,000 This requires a sale of (210,000-168,000)=$42,000 of risky holdings, and use the sale proceeds to purchase risk-free asset How would the investment of risky asset change? Sale of Vanguard=42,000*.54=$22,680; New Vanguard holding=113,400-22,680=$90,720 Sale of Fidelity=42,000*.46=$19,320 New Fidelity holding=96,600-19,320=$77,280 Total Vanguard & Fidelity=90,720+77,280=$168,000 y=168,000/300,000=.56 5-28 Capital Allocation Line (CAL) (Test of linearity) rf 7% rf 0% E (rp ) 15% p 22% y % in risky portfolio; (1 y ) % in rf E (r c ) Expected return of complete portfolio y.E (rp ) (1 y )rf ; c y. p ; slope E (rc ) rf c Example, If , y 1; E (rc ) 15%, c 1* .22 .22; slope Lending E (rp ) rf p .15 .07 0.36 .22 case : 50 : 50 y .5; E (rc ) (0.5 * .15) (.5 * .07) .11, c y * p (0.5 * .22) .11; slope .11 .07 0.36 .11 Borrowing case; If , leverage 50% : y 1.5; E (rc ) (1.5 * .15) (.5 * .07) .19; c 1.5 * .22 .33; slope .19 .07 .036 .33 5-29 Figure 5.5 Investment Opportunity Set with a Risk-Free Investment 5-30 return CAL and CML Efficient Frontier Rm rf m P CAL1 is dominant over CAL2, CAL2 is dominant over CAL3. CML is dominant over CAL1. 5-31 5.6 PASSIVE STRATEGIES AND THE CAPITAL MARKET LINE 5-32 Table 5.5 Average Rates of Return, Standard Deviation and Reward to Variability 5-33 Use of historical data to predict CML Use of old data is popular Old data may not be representative for future Weight of old data keeps changing Correction of old data for future is largely subjective, but customary. 5-34 Costs and Benefits of Passive Investing Active strategy entails costs Free-rider benefit Involves investment in two passive portfolios Short-term T-bills Fund of common stocks that follows a broad market index. Diversification can be based on asset allocation like industry classification, large and small firms, local and foreign firms 5-35