* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download high level forum on aid effectiveness
Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup
Heaven and Earth (book) wikipedia , lookup
Economics of climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
ExxonMobil climate change controversy wikipedia , lookup
German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup
Climate resilience wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate sensitivity wikipedia , lookup
Climate change denial wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
United Nations Climate Change conference wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Paris Agreement wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on Australia wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
HIGH LEVEL FORUM ON AID EFFECTIVENESS, BUSAN How to ensure wide and active participation of different stakeholders? WHO IS INVOLVED IN ENHANCING AID EFFECTIVENESS? • Paris Declaration addressed partner countries and traditional DAC donors. • AAA recognised wide range of partnerships and actors including South-South cooperation, middleincome countries, CSOs and global funds. • Wide participation is not new: objective in Busan is to deepen the engagement of different actors involved in enhancing development results. NON-TRADITIONAL DAC DONORS • Particular focus is on deeper engagement of China, India and Brazil. • Increasingly important partners, but critical on labels such as ‘donor’ or ‘aid’. Also recipients of ODA. • Possible contributions in Busan: Champions of SouthSouth cooperation. Pragmatic experience on transition to Middle-Income-Country (MIC) status. PRIVATE SECTOR • Divided into non-profit and for-profit private sector. • Non-profit (global funds) are addressed in AAA (par 19c) • For-profit private sector has experience on how to work with aid (aid as a catalyst, public-private partnerships). • Possible contribution in Busan: deepened commitment to AE (non-profit) and participation in discussion and consensus-building on development partnerships (forprofit). HOW TO OPERATIONALISE WIDE PARTICIPATION IN BUSAN OUTCOME? • Challenge in Busan: how to combine inclusiveness and ambition. • Ways to operationalise participation: taking part in preparations, taking part in the event, adherence to Busan outcome and commitments. • One solution is to agree on global principles and differentiated responsibilities expressed in the outcome document. • View of partner countries is important but so far partner countries have not been vocal on the wide participation in Busan. SESSION III: QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION • How to combine ambition and inclusiveness in Busan outcome? • Should Busan outcome differentiate responsibilities and commitments between different stakeholders? • What could be the specific contributions of the non-traditional donors and private sector for Busan? HIGH LEVEL FORUM ON AID EFFECTIVENESS, BUSAN Themes for wider agenda: climate change finance and countries in fragile situations ADDRESSING AID EFFECTIVENESS IN WIDER DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT • Consensus on addressing aid effectiveness in wider development context in an operational manner. • We have to selective in the themes to be included. Criteria to be used: added-value feasibility political relevance linkages with ODA • Views of partner countries important but not yet clear. CLIMATE CHANGE FINANCE • Climate change finance represents significant and growing development finance with complex aid architecture. • EU Council Conclusions on Climate Change (2009) calls special attention to the application of PD and AAA. • ‘Bangkok Call for Action’ (2010) lists aid effectiveness commitments in climate change finance. • Follow-up to Copenhagen/Cancun takes place at the same time as Busan. Cooperation with UNFCCC is important. COUNTRIES IN FRAGILE SITUATIONS • Countries in fragile situations showcase differentiated country contexts. • Several international inputs: OECD Principles for Good International Engagement (2007) and their monitoring. Dili Declaration (2010) International Dialogue on peacebuilding and statebuilding • EU Council Conclusions on situations of fragility (2007) emphasises division of labour. CLIMATE CHANGE FINANCE AND SITUATIONS OF FRAGILITY IN BUSAN OUTCOME • Climate Change Finance Aid Effectiveness principles and commitments for climate change Agreement on monitoring framework Providing input to Durban negotiations and beyond • Countries in fragile situations International objectives on peacebuilding and statebuilding Agreement on commitments Agreement on monitoring framework SESSION III: QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION • Should specific principles and commitments on climate change finance and countries in fragile situations be included in the Busan outcome? • How to organise the monitoring of differentiated commitments on climate change finance and countries in fragility? • What else should be included in Busan outcome on the wider development agenda? How could it be addressed in an operational manner?