Download Chapter One: Moral Reasons

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Aristotelian ethics wikipedia , lookup

Jurisprudence wikipedia , lookup

Paleoconservatism wikipedia , lookup

Arthur Schafer wikipedia , lookup

Happiness wikipedia , lookup

Business ethics wikipedia , lookup

Internalism and externalism wikipedia , lookup

Cosmopolitanism wikipedia , lookup

Divine command theory wikipedia , lookup

Virtue ethics wikipedia , lookup

Bernard Williams wikipedia , lookup

Relativism wikipedia , lookup

Neohumanism wikipedia , lookup

Kantian ethics wikipedia , lookup

John Rawls wikipedia , lookup

Utilitarianism wikipedia , lookup

Cultural relativism wikipedia , lookup

Ethics wikipedia , lookup

Speciesism wikipedia , lookup

Individualism wikipedia , lookup

School of Salamanca wikipedia , lookup

Consequentialism wikipedia , lookup

Ethics in religion wikipedia , lookup

Lawrence Kohlberg wikipedia , lookup

Ethics of artificial intelligence wikipedia , lookup

Emotivism wikipedia , lookup

Alasdair MacIntyre wikipedia , lookup

Moral disengagement wikipedia , lookup

Morality and religion wikipedia , lookup

Ethical intuitionism wikipedia , lookup

Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development wikipedia , lookup

Moral development wikipedia , lookup

Morality throughout the Life Span wikipedia , lookup

Moral responsibility wikipedia , lookup

Morality wikipedia , lookup

Secular morality wikipedia , lookup

Moral relativism wikipedia , lookup

Thomas Hill Green wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Chapter One:
Moral Reasons
Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10th ed.)
Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry
Cengage Learning/Wadsworth
Moral Reasoning
Considering certain kinds of reasons:
moral reasons
Trying to arrive at the best moral reasons
for acting
Choosing the morally right course of action
Ethical Relativism
Ethical relativism: Moral truths are not absolutely true but
true relative to some particular standards.
Cultural relativism: Moral truths are not absolutely true
but are relative to a particular society.
– Whether an act is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of
society and not on an absolute standard.
Individual relativism: Moral truths are not absolute but
relative to individuals.
– Whether an act is right or wrong depends on the convictions of
the person performing it and not on an absolute standard.
The Principle of Utility
(The Greatest Happiness Principle)
The moral principle that we should produce the
greatest balance of happiness over
unhappiness, giving equal consideration to the
happiness and unhappiness of everyone who
will be affected by our actions.
A test that can be applied to:
– Individual acts
– Individual ethical rules
Fairness
The Golden Rule
Kantian respect for persons
– Never use other people merely as a means to
your own end
– Recognize that persons are autonomous
beings
Proper Human Excellences:
Virtues
Character traits and activities that are
distinctively human
Eudaimonia
– Happiness, total well-being
– The human being’s natural purpose
– Fulfilling our social roles, making proper use
of reason
The Will of God
Natural law: the system of divine moral
laws (Aquinas)
Differing religious traditions
Can statements based on faith be the
basis of moral reasoning and argument?
Principles of Social Morality
Social Justice: what makes a society a just one?
Individual Rights:
– Natural Rights: rights we are all born with (Locke,
Jefferson, Nozick)
– Mutual Agreement behind the Veil of Ignorance
(Rawls)
Equality principle
Difference principle
More Principles of Social Morality
Equality
– Equal treatment under the law
– Equal opportunity
The General Welfare
– Public Decency and Morality
Pluralism and Freedom
– Individual Freedom
– Social Utility of Pluralism
“Moral Virtue”
Aristotle
Moral virtues: acquired by exercising them
Moral goodness: a quality disposing us to act in
the best way when we are dealing with
pleasures and pains
“Virtue” defined: a disposition of the soul in
which, when it has to choose among actions and
feelings, it observes the mean relative to us
“Respect for Persons”
Immanuel Kant
The ultimate worth of persons
Moral agents: law-givers to themselves
Realm of ends
Categorical Imperative
– Never act in such a way that I could not also will that
my maxim should be a universal law
– Act so that you treat humanities as an end and never
merely as a means
– The idea of the will of every rational being as making
universal law
“Utilitarianism”
John Stuart Mill
Principle of utility (greatest happiness
principle): choose the action that creates
the greatest happiness for all concerned
“Happiness”: pleasure and the absence of
pain
“A Theory of Justice”
John Rawls
A conception of justice as fairness
– Based on social contract theory
– Assumes original position of equality
– But all are behind a “veil of ignorance”
Two principles of justice
– Each has equal right to most extensive basic
liberty compatible with similar liberty for others
– Inequalities are to everyone’s advantage and
attached to positions open to all
“The Ethics of Care”
Virginia Held
Feminist approach to ethics
Features of the ethics of care
– Moral salience of attending to needs of others for
whom we take responsibility
– Values emotion, rather than rejecting it
– Questions universalistic and abstract theories,
favoring individualistic approaches
– Rethinks public and private spheres
– Conception of “person” as relational and
interdependent, not individualistic