* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 1 Marketing – the often overlooked ingredient necessary for a
Product planning wikipedia , lookup
School choice wikipedia , lookup
Bayesian inference in marketing wikipedia , lookup
Neuromarketing wikipedia , lookup
Food marketing wikipedia , lookup
Affiliate marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing channel wikipedia , lookup
Marketing communications wikipedia , lookup
Target audience wikipedia , lookup
Sports marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing research wikipedia , lookup
Youth marketing wikipedia , lookup
Ambush marketing wikipedia , lookup
Digital marketing wikipedia , lookup
Multi-level marketing wikipedia , lookup
Target market wikipedia , lookup
Guerrilla marketing wikipedia , lookup
Viral marketing wikipedia , lookup
Integrated marketing communications wikipedia , lookup
Marketing strategy wikipedia , lookup
Advertising campaign wikipedia , lookup
Direct marketing wikipedia , lookup
Sensory branding wikipedia , lookup
Multicultural marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing mix modeling wikipedia , lookup
Marketing plan wikipedia , lookup
Green marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing – the often overlooked ingredient necessary for a school’s success. I come from a family of school teachers. Growing up in the central west of NSW, I lived in a succession of primary principal’s residences as my father ascended the promotional ladder in what is purported as one of the biggest educational bureaucracies in the world – the NSW Department of Education. I’m old enough to remember the ‘good old days’, not so long ago, when terms like promotion and marketing were considered tainted. Such activities might be necessary in the crass world of commerce, but certainly not acceptable in the hallowed halls of education! In the ‘good old days’, a child automatically went to her or his nearest school – state or Catholic. In the ‘good old days’, there was a clear separation between home and school. Parents knew their rightful place – heating pies in the tuckshop, selling raffle tickets for the fete, sizzling sausages, and forming a captive audience for he annual speech night. Teachers were the educational experts and their authority was unquestioned. There was no need for justification, or even clear communication with the parents of the kids. They would keep turning up to the local school. No other options were even considered. Choice in education hadn’t been invented in the ‘good old days’, unless you were wealthy enough to send your heirs to expensive independent day or boarding establishments. Attracting students wasn’t a priority for these schools either. It was only natural for the progeny of old girls and old boys to keep up the family tradition by following in their educational footsteps – entrenching the ‘old school tie’ and its connections. In the ‘good old days’, Catholic schools had a captive market. Encouraged by edicts from the pulpit, Catholic parents sent their children to the parish school as a matter of course in spite of huge class sizes and poor facilities. Marketing and promotion were almost unheard of in Catholic schools. Extolling one’s virtues was seen as contrary to the Christian virtue of humility. In the ‘good old days’, Catholic schools operated in the belief that the ‘good news’ would spread itself and didn’t need a helping hand. Many Catholic schools still follow this maxim today. But, like it or not, the ‘good old days’ have well and truly gone. Marketing – as everyone in this room will agree – is absorbing more and more time and energy in an already overcrowded agenda – and for many, there is still a strong resistance to the very notion of marketing in a school context. 1 In my experience, marketing is a concept that tends to polarise educators. Some educators energetically embrace the activity, while others reject it with equal intensity. Teachers as a group have finely tuned crap detectors. They are usually deeply concerned about the welfare of their students, so it’s no surprise that they are reluctant to become involved in an activity that could be associated with rampant consumerism – the values we are trying to teach our students to avoid. I believe that much of the resistance to marketing in schools comes from a basic misunderstanding of the concept. It’s often defined too narrowly and carries negative, exploitative and unethical associations. Many people confuse marketing with promotion or selling, but in practice, there is a big difference. In its simplest form, marketing is about developing long term relationships with your clients. It begins long before the ‘sale’ is made, and continues long after. Real marketing is a healthy ethical activity that benefits all concerned, providing, as it does, that all important link between school a school and its customers. Taken in its broadest sense, marketing touches every aspect of your school and its performance. It is integral to a school’s operation. “Marketing is about the ways the Principal presents herself, about leadership style, the way she connects with parents, about the appearance of the school, the students, their behaviour in and out of school. It’s about every conversation and speech you make – every written communication. It’s also about the breadth of your school’s curriculum and extra-curricular activities. Marketing is especially about the effectiveness of classroom teaching and learning.” Marketing is happening all the time in every school. It’s often not as effective as it could be, but it’s occurring nevertheless. You’re all no doubt aware of the massive changes that have taken place in the last decade or so in the social, economic and political environment that have impacted on the school sector. Globalisation, greater demands made by parents, changes in government funding for non-government schools, greater focus on consumer choice leading to increased competition, more emphasis on consumerism and so on. The way marketing is perceived has also changed over the years. 2 With the arrival of mass production in the early 1900s, marketing was perceived as a method of selling. It was thought that if you promoted a product well, it would sell in large quantities. The focus was on promotion and recruiting new students. This is the attitude of many schools today with the emphasis on recruiting more students. At this level, if the numbers drop, the knee-jerk reaction is to promote – to place and ad or produce a brochure. Around 1950s, people came to realise that rather than merely focusing on product promotion, sales could be enhanced by focusing on product quality. Attention turned to improving product quality. Applied to schools, this meant that the marketing strategies were more proactive, moving from visual identity (eg. prospectus, presentation) to systems, processes and courses. More recently, in the 1990s, it was realised that quality can only be measured through customer satisfaction. Therefore, the benefits that customers see in products and services have become the true measure of marketing effectiveness. Promotion and product quality are still important, however are now seen in perspective as parts of a more integrated approach that incorporates a range of strategies. For schools, emphasis changed to customer benefits - looking at ways to add value for the customer. The attention shifts to customer service, relationship and loyalty development, course design, staff development in which everyone has joint responsibility. In this scenario, everyone is continually asking the question: How can we best satisfy the wants and needs of our customers? Relationship marketing recognises that it is just as important to focus on current customers as it is to gain new customers and that long term relationships are more important than one-off transactions. Good word of mouth is perhaps our most powerful promotional tool, and only comes from satisfied clients. They say good marketing is about giving the customer what they expect, but excellent marketing is giving more than they anticipate! The changes I’ve outlined are reflected in the content and direction of the two books I’ve written on school marketing over the last decade. SuperMarketing your School (1996) concentrated on promotional strategies – 34 case studies of best practice from around Australia. It’s a ‘how-to’ manual with lots of ideas to help schools with their marketing. Marketing for Better Schools (2003) builds on its predecessor and shows how attitudes to marketing in schools are becoming more mature. 3 The narrow focus on promotion is slowly being replaced by a mind-set in principals and staff that seriously considers the customers – finding out who they are, what they really want and how their needs can be met. This awareness of the needs of the customer is a big step for those schools still locked into a model of marketing from the past that told the customers – mainly parents – what, when and how much they should have. Generally, today’s customers, after a century of conditioning in consumerism, have strong views, are prepared to go the hard yards in research, make it their business to become well-informed, and consequently, demand and expect the best, and will complain bitterly if they don’t get it (or worse still, take their business elsewhere!). Dealing with the customer of today is very different from even a generation ago, as most principals will attest, after being grilled by a prospective parent who is leaving no stone unturned in the quest for the best school for their child. My experience in working with 150 Sydney Catholic schools for 17 years indicates strongly to me that schools that have an active marketing orientation have fewer enrolment pressures, better resources, a highly regarded image and cohesive community relationships, as well as some evidence of strong performance outcomes from students. This personal experience now has academic support from a PhD research project undertaken by Lawrie Drysdale of the University of Melbourne. His study or seven Victorian schools, each with a varying degree of marketing effectiveness, pointed the pivotal role of the principal in adopting a focus on marketing, and confirmed a high correlation between a strong marketing orientation and school performance. Marketing for Better Schools is divided into three sections, all illustrated with comprehensive case studies of Sydney schools The first part looks at the importance of mind-set in developing a customer orientation. This is crucial for the effectiveness of the marketing program. The second part looks at research – or the ways schools can really find out just what the needs and wants of parents are. This involves asking and listening carefully. The third part deals with strategies – or the ways in which a school can actually meet the needs of customers. A theme that threads its way through the book is the importance of planning. Every school needs a detailed written marketing plan, and the book explains how this can be done. Planning is something schools usually do very well, but in my experience, evidence of marketing planning is very rare. 4 As the title of this presentation suggests – the importance of the contribution of marketing to the success of a school IS very often overlooked – but when a school develops a marketing orientation, performance over a whole range of measures improves. The 12 case studies in the book provide examples. The former principal of LaSalle Catholic College at Bankstown (boys, 7 to 12) Br Ambrose Payne said after the College’s first year into a five year strategic marketing plan that there is ample evidence of increased performance as a result of their adoption of a marketing orientation. He cited increased enrolments, stronger links with feeder schools, evidence of value adding in a variety of courses, higher ‘school esteem’ and steadily improving student performances across the board. There isn’t time to detail the strategies used in this brief address, but an increase in enrolments from 607 in 1999 to 836 in 2006 is a sure sign of success. In another primary school case study – in the inner west of Sydney – tiny St Brendan’s was on the verge of extinction – with enrolments dropping to just 70 students. A new principal, with no marketing background, but who had the flair and energy required to develop personal relationships with current and prospective parents boosted enrolments to 180 plus in just five years. The positive word-of-mouth about this school and its principal spread like wildfire through the parent grapevine. In a matter of a few years, it was transformed from a school on its last legs to first choice in a competitive inner city marketplace – with a long waiting list to get in. All the case studies in the book have the same theme with variations of strategy. The theme in all cases is that the principal has a strong marketing mind-set; is intent on finding out what the clients want; and works tirelessly with her/his staff to satisfy consumer needs. Each understands that marketing is about building enduring relationships with every part of the community. The strategies to meet the need vary in each case according to needs, resources and the personality and skills of the principal. The end result of a successful marketing program will be a customer who is satisfied with your school, believes they have made the right choice, is happy to remain there and recommends it to others – becomes an advocate! When that happens, everyone is satisfied. 5 What is the situation in Australia now? There’s evidence everywhere – including the attendance here today – that school marketing is taking off – and is receiving more attention across all sectors than ever before. However, in my experience, marketing effectiveness in most schools is patchy, to say the most. Few schools develop marketing plans. Most are reactive and adopt an ad hoc approach. Most schools still mistake marketing as promotion – equating it with and advertisement in the paper or a letter box drop. If enrolments are healthy, I hear principals say time and time again; “Oh, we don’t need to market our school,” when that’s just the time when marketing should be proactive to maintain enrolments. There are still large pockets of resistance in the nation’s staff rooms and it’s rare for marketing to have a regular place on a school’s agenda. How might this situation be improved? 1. Selection of principals Firstly I’d look long and hard at the criteria used for selection of principals. Given the pivotal role the principal plays in the success or otherwise of the marketing process in any school, awareness, understanding and skills about marketing should be included in the selection process. A newly-appointed principal to a Sydney school experiencing falling enrolments told me recently that he was spending up to 80 per cent of his time on marketing, a workload necessary to keep the school open. He also said that prior to his appointment; he was given no indication that marketing would be such an all consuming issue in the school. Marketing skills were not part of selection criteria for the principal’s role. This same principal is learning fast, by the seat of his pants, and is succeeding. This is not an uncommon experience. A recent report on the shortage of applicants for principalship by the Australian Research Council says that their data suggests strongly that the pool of principal applicants, under the existing selection system, has become somewhat self-selecting. Only those willing to fit into preferred models, especially the model of conformity (except in areas where progressive directors hold sway), tend to remain in the selection game. It goes on to say that it is not easy for a different kind of applicant to get a hearing and that new ideas are not always welcome. How would imaginative skills in marketing go down with a normal selection panel? Would a marketing mind-set be seen as an asset of hindrance? 2. Marketing planning 6 Every school needs to develop a marketing plan either as a separate process or as part of its normal Strategic Management Plan. This then needs to be included in the regular staff meetings as an on-going process. A marketing plan that is developed collaboratively by the staff also has the effect of galvanising support. 3. Assistance with marketing Limited financial resources are a fact of life in all schools, but if the marketing program is to be really effective, the principal needs help. Executing marketing strategies is time consuming and should not take a principal away from their role as educational leader. A marketing officer or my preferred title of Community Relations Coordinator will help enormously. 4. Formal training Principals and key staff would benefit from any kind of formal training in aspects of marketing. 5. Working together Given the shortage of funds for marketing – cooperative programs between noncompeting schools is a way to save money and have more impact. Many Sydney schools are now organised into District School Councils which might include a secondary school and its feeder primary schools. Many of these councils undertake joint marketing activities such as advertisements in local papers drawing attention to the Kindergarten through Year 12 pathway that exists for Catholic schools in a particular area. There are many other imaginative ways that schools can work together. 6. Developing partnerships Schools might enter into partnerships with commercial organisations to extend their resources, improve educational programs and gain community exposure. An example could be a partnership with a technology company. This is rarely done in Australia to date, but is becoming increasingly prominent in the UK and USA. Imagination and drive from the right people could make this happen for mutual advantage. To conclude, there is enormous potential for marketing to improve a school’s success and it’s a sad fact that it’s so often overlooked. But, at least, today has been a start. Good luck and better management. Ted Myers Head, Communications Unit Catholic Education Office, Sydney (18 May 2006) 7