* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Part 11
Survey
Document related concepts
Military of ancient Rome wikipedia , lookup
Alpine regiments of the Roman army wikipedia , lookup
Food and dining in the Roman Empire wikipedia , lookup
Roman army of the late Republic wikipedia , lookup
Berber kings of Roman-era Tunisia wikipedia , lookup
Education in ancient Rome wikipedia , lookup
Switzerland in the Roman era wikipedia , lookup
Roman funerary practices wikipedia , lookup
Roman economy wikipedia , lookup
Culture of ancient Rome wikipedia , lookup
Romanization of Hispania wikipedia , lookup
Roman historiography wikipedia , lookup
Roman agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Roman Republican governors of Gaul wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
AFTER THE FIRST PUNIC WAR 1. THE FOLLOWING DECADES a) Having lost Sicily and Sardinia and Corsica and with a large war indemnity to pay to Rome for the next ten years, CARTHAGE focused its attention fully on the IBERIAN PENINSULA and expanded its control not just along the coasts but much further inland – especially in order to exploit the rich silver and gold mines of the interior. b) As part of this expansion modern Cartagena was refounded in 228 BC as QART HADASHT (“New City”) Carthage’s empire at the beginning of the ‘First Punic War’ in 264 BC DARK BLUE What Carthage lost by 238 BC BRIGHT GREEN Carthaginian expansion 238 - 219 BC 2. a) In the years during which Carthage was expanding its control in the Iberian Peninsula, the Roman state’s interest in what Hamilcar Barca (acting very much on his own authority with little reference to the government in Carthage) had been doing seems to have been limited - as long as Carthage continued to pay the war indemnity annually. b) But, because of demands elsewhere on its attention and resources, Rome did, in 226 BC, seek to limit Carthage’s advance northwards by signing with HASDRUBAL ‘the FAIR’ “the EBRO TREATY” by which the River Ebro (Iberus) would be a point beyond which the Carthaginians would not go under arms. 3. In fact, the Roman state was very occupied elsewhere during this time: i) in ILLYRIA (on the other side of the Adriatic), and ii) in the PO VALLEY against GALLIC tribes. ILLYRIA 1. In 229 BC the Roman state became involved along the Illyrian coast against persistent piracy – especially after the autocratic Queen Teuta had one of the two Roman envoys (who had been sent to seek an explanation from her) killed. 2. It was never Rome’s intention to subjugate Illyria - only to end Illyrian control over the coastlines where piracy was being tolerated. 3. Rome reached agreements of “friendship” with various coastal communities and inland tribes before clearing the coastlines. 4. Clashes saw the Illyrians suing for peace in 228 – although there was a subsequent flare-up in 220 BC. ILLYRIA The approximate territory of Queen Teuta, queen of the Ardiaei, is the area marked in reddish hashing. THE PO VALLEY 1. Between 226 and 220 BC the Roman state was heavily involved militarily against the GALLIC TRIBES of the far north of Italy. Although frequently warring against one another, the Gallic tribes of the Po Valley united in 226 BC against increasing Roman encroachments into their territory. 2. a) An army of Gauls, perhaps 70,000 strong (50,000 infantry, 20,000 cavalry, and war chariots), headed in the direction of Rome through Etruria, plundering and looting. b) Although they inflicted quite heavy losses on a Roman army, they then headed home out of concern that they might lose their plunder. PO VALLEY (Roman ‘Cisalpine Gaul’) 4. a) On their way back, they became trapped between two Roman armies - one of which had returned unexpectedly from Sardinia. b) Some 40,000 Gauls were killed and 10,000 taken prisoner. 5. The Romans were now able to carry the war forward into the home territory of the Gauls. 6. Fighting during 221 and 220 BC led to ‘Cisalpine Gaul’ (“Gaul this side of the Alps”) – the Po Valley – falling totally into Roman hands. 7. By this time, HANNIBAL (who had succeeded HASDRUBAL in Iberia) was becoming embroiled with SAGUNTUM (modern Sagunto) about half way between CARTHAGO NOVA (Cartagena) and the RIVER EBRO. 1. THE SECOND PUNIC WAR: THE WAR WITH HANNIBAL (218-201 BC) a) After the Carthaginian state had brought to an end its war against rebel mercenaries and disaffected “allies” in North Africa (over by 237 BC), and b) with a large war indemnity to pay to Rome annually for ten years after the end of the First Punic War in 241 BC, CARTHAGE [as we have seen] did not prevent HAMILCAR BARCA from pursuing what was virtually an independent policy expanding Carthaginian control in IBERIA where, in particular, its rich deposits of silver (and gold) could be exploited. BRIGHT GREEN Carthaginian expansion in Iberia after 237 BC 2. Hamilcar Barca’s command in Iberia passed to HASDRUBAL the FAIR (his son-in-law) after his death in battle in 228 BC. 3. HASDRUBAL the FAIR continued Carthaginian expansion, especially through diplomacy (reaching agreements with Celto-Iberian tribes) and re-founded CARTHAGO NOVA (modern Cartagena) as the region’s capital before being assassinated in 221 BC. 4. The command then passed to HANNIBAL. [Note: Hamilcar had three prominent sons – Hannibal, Hasdrubal, and Mago, and a prominent son-in-law, Hasdrubal the Fair] Bust reputedly of HANNIBAL from CAPUA 5. Earlier, in 226 BC, Rome and Hasdrubal the Fair had signed a new treaty – “the Ebro Treaty” – in some way making the River Iberus (modern Ebro) a boundary in Spain. 6. It is with “the Ebro Treaty” that the “problem” over legality and international agreement lies: a) The pro-Roman but generally objective POLYBIUS (mid100s BC) says [Book 2. 13. 7] that Roman envoys made a treaty with Hasdrubal the Fair “in which no mention was made of the rest of Spain but the Carthaginians agreed not to cross the River Ebro under arms.” b) i) Later writers like LIVY (end of 1st c BC) and APPIAN (fl. AD 140) believed that the state of SAGUNTUM either was already an “ally” of Rome in 226 BC or became an “ally” within a few years of the signing of the Ebro Treaty. ii) Livy, for example, writes [Book 21. 2] that the agreement was that “the River Ebro should be the boundary between the two empires and that Saguntum, which lies between the territory of the two states, should have its liberty preserved.” 7. i) Polybius will have known that what Livy later wrote was the general Roman view even in his own day but he clearly knew of no evidence to back up this claim. ii) Even Livy’s acccount implies that the Carthaginians had not yet expanded their control even as far as Saguntum when “the Ebro Treaty” was agreed. RIVER EBRO SAGUNTUM CARTHAGO NOVA THE EVENTS THAT SPARKED A WAR In 220 BC Saguntum, concerned that HANNIBAL (in command since 221 BC) would attack the city, sent envoys to Rome to ask for help, the Senate (allegedly) having ignored several previous appeals. 2. The Roman state was slow to react but sent an embassy to Hannibal urging him a) to refrain from attacking Saguntum; and b) to refrain from crossing the River Ebro. 3. a) There is no way to know Hannibal’s reaction. b) If he did not have plans to attack Saguntum or to cross the Ebro, he could well have reacted adversely to this approach. 1. 4. An argument has been made that Hannibal’s view may have been: a) Rome had ‘interfered’ in SICILY and had forced Carthage in the end to surrender its interests there. b) Rome had forced Carthage to surrender its interests in SARDINIA and CORSICA while it was weak because it was confronted by its rebel mercenaries (in North Africa). c) Rome was now starting to interfere with Carthaginian interests in Spain. d) Perhaps he had to take a stand before Rome tried to deprive Carthage of more territory. 5. Be this as it may, Hannibal laid siege to SAGUNTUM in 219 BC on the grounds that an anti-Carthaginian faction there had led to some of Carthage’s allies in the area being attacked. 6. Hannibal took Saguntum after an eight month siege, during which Rome sent no help. 7. When Carthage, despite Roman demands, refused to take any action against Hannibal (who seems to have acted very much on his own authority), Rome declared war formally in 218 BC.