* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 7.2.4. Normal Ordering
Geiger–Marsden experiment wikipedia , lookup
Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup
Second quantization wikipedia , lookup
Quantum state wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantum key distribution wikipedia , lookup
Coherent states wikipedia , lookup
Quantum teleportation wikipedia , lookup
Quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Wave function wikipedia , lookup
Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Wheeler's delayed choice experiment wikipedia , lookup
Quantum entanglement wikipedia , lookup
Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup
Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia , lookup
Molecular Hamiltonian wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Density matrix wikipedia , lookup
X-ray fluorescence wikipedia , lookup
Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup
Delayed choice quantum eraser wikipedia , lookup
Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Electron scattering wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup
Matter wave wikipedia , lookup
Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup
Identical particles wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
7.2.4. Normal Ordering In the last section, we get rid of an infinite vacuum energy on the ground that only relative energies have physical meaning. However, if the structure of spacetime is to be determined by matter distribution, the vacuum must be at zero energy. Therefore, we must impose some rules in the construction of the Hamiltonian operator so that this is achieved automatically. The standard procedure is to write Ĥ entirely in normal ordering, i.e., with all creation operators to the left of all annihilation operators. Using : : to denote normal ordering for the product of operators , eq(7.21a) becomes Hˆ d 3k 2 2k 3 k : aˆ k â k ĉ k cˆ k : d 3k 2 2k 3 k â k â k ĉ k ĉ k Since the terms in the square bracket are simply the number of particles and antiparticles with momentum k, the total energy is always positive. Obviously, the technique should be applied to all “total” operators that involve integration over all degrees of freedom. defined by [see (7.4)], For example, the number operator is i 3 ˆ 0 ˆ : d x : N̂ d 3 x : ˆj 0 : 2m After some tedious but straightforward manipulations, we get [cf §7.2.3], N̂ d 3k 2 2k 3 â k â k ĉ k ĉ k (7.22) As in the 1st quantization case, ĵ 0 x is not non-negative so that it cannot represent the probability density of finding a particle at x. Now, we define an anti-particle as a “particle” whose attribute quantum numbers are all equal but of opposite signs to those of its particle partner. Some examples of attribute quantum numbers are lepton numbers, baryon numbers, charge, isospin, strangeness, etc. Thus, ĵ 0 x is the net probability density so that the equation of continuity denotes the conservation of net number of “particles”. Finally, we mention that some neutral particles are identical to their anti-particles. Notable examples are photons and neutral pions. Since one can call any given photon a particle as well as anti-particle, the net number of “particles” is always conserved as long as the total number of photons present is always odd (or even). In other words, the number of photons is not conserved. Note that this is necessarily the case if photons are to be interpreted as quanta of electromagnetic fields.