* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Amino acid sequence alignment of a `small` citrate synthase from
Survey
Document related concepts
Oxidative phosphorylation wikipedia , lookup
Ridge (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Community fingerprinting wikipedia , lookup
Multilocus sequence typing wikipedia , lookup
Promoter (genetics) wikipedia , lookup
Genomic library wikipedia , lookup
Endogenous retrovirus wikipedia , lookup
Ancestral sequence reconstruction wikipedia , lookup
Citric acid cycle wikipedia , lookup
Protein structure prediction wikipedia , lookup
Molecular ecology wikipedia , lookup
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
Genetic code wikipedia , lookup
Biochemistry wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Structural alignment wikipedia , lookup
Biosynthesis wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Biochemical Society Transactions ( 1 996) 24 46s Amino acid sequence alignment of a ‘small’ citrate synthase from Aeudomonas aeruginosa PAC 514, with other citrate synthase sequences. COLIN G MITCHELL and SEAN CK ANDERSON Biomedicine and Biotechnology Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Napier University, Edinburgh, EHlO SDT, U.K. A complex diversity relating to the Krebs cycle enzyme citrate synthase (CS), has been shown to exist regarding the nature and molecular interactions of its subunits [I]. Gram-negative bacteria contain a hexameric ’large’ (L) enzyme (Mr 240000) which is subject to allosteric control by NADH. Eukaryotes and Gram-positive bacteria contain a dimeric ‘small’ (S) enzyme (Mr IOOOOO) which is subject to isosteric control by ATP. Both types of CS have a single subunit type, suggesting that the quaternary structure determines regulatory properties. A strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was shown to possess both the L- and S-forms of CS This was an unusual finding and further studies of the Pseudomonas group revealed a more complex diversity, where species possessed all L-form, all S-form or varying proportions of both CS types [2]. In those Pseudomonads which possessed both isoenzymes, several questions arise: (a) are the amino acid sequences of the CS isoenzymes similar? (b) are there distinct CS structural genes? (c) what is the sequence identity with other CS sequences, particularly from the archaebacteria? 5 b O F l P 4a h 1 D K K A O L I I E B S A P V E L P V L S G T Figure 1. Alignment of N-terminal amino acid sequences of citrate synthases. The CS’s were from the following sources: a. porcine heart (‘small’); b. Bacillus sp C4 (‘small’); c. E.coli K12 (wildtype, ‘large’); d. Rickettsia prowarakii (‘small’); e. Thermoplasma acidophilum (‘small’); f E.coli (mutant of K12, ‘small’); g. Ps. aeruginosa PAC514 (‘small’ ); h. Ps. aeruginosa 13474(‘large’). The molecular size of each CS from which the amino acid sequence data was derived, is given after the source. The hyphens (-) represent gaps made to maximise alignment and the ‘?’ are undetermined residues. Although the existence of two CS genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is well documented [3], evidence has now been provided suggesting the presence of two CS genes in Escherichia coli [4] and Bacillus subtilis [S], organisms considered for many years to contain a single molecular form of CS. There is also evidence that CS isoenzymes may have different metabolic roles [6]. Citrate synthase isoenzymes have recently been purified to homogeneity, from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAC514 [7]. We have determined the N-terminal 23 amino acids from the ‘small’ CS isoenzyme (the sequence for the ‘large’ CS has not yet been determined) and compared this to other CS’s of known sequence. The multiple alignment of these sequences have shown high percentage identities within the Eukaryotes (up to 92%), and the Gram-negative bacteria (up to 75%). However, identities between the Eukaryotes, eubacteria and the archaebacteria are low (less than 26%). Figure 1 shows the alignment of these CS’s and several features are worth noting: (a) there is significant homology (36%) with the ‘small’ CS from E.coli, and Bacillus (27%) but there is <5% homology with a ’large’ CS from Ps. aeruginosa UM74; (b) although the homology with the archaebacterium T.acidophilurn is low ( 18%). there are sufficient similarities between these CS’s and the ‘small’ E.colr CS to suggest that further sequencing may reveal a more significant homology; (c) the ‘small’ CS from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAC514 appears to be about 40 residues shorter at the N-terminus than the porcine CS and other eubacterial CS’s as is the case for Bacillus sp CJ, Tacidophilum and the ‘small’ CS from E.coli. Our previous work [7] has shown that the CS isoenzymes from Pseudomonas aerugrnosa PAC514 are distinct and suggest that they are derived from different structural genes. The low homology of the ‘small’ CS with the sequence from a ‘large’ CS from Ps. aeruginosa UM74 and the significant homology with the ‘small’ CS from E.coli , which has been shown to possess distinct CS genes [4], supports this view. We would like to thank Napier University Research and Consultancy Committee for a Research Studentship to S.C.K.A. and research support to C.G.M. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Weitzman, P.D.J. (1981). Adv. Microb. Physiol., 22, 185-244. Mitchell, C.G. and Weitzman, P D.J. (1983) J. Gen. Microbiol., 132, 737-742. Rosenkrantz, M.T., Alam, K., Kim, K., Clark, B.J., Srere, P.A. and Guarente, L.P. (1986). Mol. Cell Biol., 6, 4509-4515. Patton, A.J., Hough, D.W.,Towner, P. and Danson, M.J. (1993). Eur. I. Biochem., 214.75-81. Jin, S. and Sonenshein, A.L. (1994). J. Bacteriol., 176, 4669-4679. Jin, S. and Sonenshein, A.L. (1994). J. Bacteriol., 176,4680-4690. Mitchell, C.G., Anderson, S.C.K. and El-Mansi, E.M.T. (1995). Biochem. J., 309, 507-51 1