Download Spin-orbit interaction (or “coupling”)

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Quantum state wikipedia , lookup

Matter wave wikipedia , lookup

Ionization wikipedia , lookup

Dirac equation wikipedia , lookup

Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup

Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup

Magnetic monopole wikipedia , lookup

Nitrogen-vacancy center wikipedia , lookup

Magnetoreception wikipedia , lookup

Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup

T-symmetry wikipedia , lookup

Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup

Atomic orbital wikipedia , lookup

Spin (physics) wikipedia , lookup

History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization wikipedia , lookup

Electron configuration wikipedia , lookup

Electron scattering wikipedia , lookup

Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup

Bohr model wikipedia , lookup

Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Ferromagnetism wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Spin-orbit interaction (or “coupling”)
H&W Chapter 12
This interaction is weaker than the Coulomb interaction and is
responsible for the fine-structure of atomic lines.
How do we understand the spin-orbit interaction?
• The electron has a spin s, as well as orbital angular momentum l.
• For each angular momentum, there is an associated
magnetic moment, µ l and µ s
• Spin-orbit = interaction between µ l and µ s
Let’s start with the definition of magnetic moment….
Magnetic moment
µl
electron orbit = current loop
the magnetic moment is defined as
and A the area of the orbit.
µl = I ⋅ A where I is the current
µ l is a vector perpendicular to the plane of the orbit.
Now let’s show that µ l is linked to the orbital angular momentum:
orbit
period
T=
2π
ω
− e − eω
I=
=
T
2π
r
l
A
− eω 2
1
µl = I ⋅ A =
πr = − eωr 2
2π
2
orbital
ang. mom.
r r r
l = r × p = m0 vr = m0ωr 2
+
r
r
e
v
µl
e r
µl = −
l
2m0
r
r
Note that µ l and l point in opposite directions because the electron is
r
negatively charged.
Let’s consider the case l = h : this is the orbital angular
momentum of the ground state in Bohr’s theory, and is therefore
taken as the unit of angular momentum in atoms.
The modulus of the corresponding magnetic moment is known as
Bohr magneton:
eh
µB =
2mo
Bohr magneton
It is unit of magnetic moments in atoms.
More generally, for a state with quantum numbers l and ml :
r
Modulus l = h l (l + 1)
r
e
µl =
h l (l + 1) = µ B l (l + 1)
2mo
Component along z
µl , Z
e
=−
l z = − µ B ml
2mo
lZ = ml h with ml = 0,±1,±2.... ± l magnetic quantum number
We also can apply these definitions to the electron spin….
Electron spin
• An intrinsic property like charge or mass.
• Its existence proven by Stern-Gerlach experiment (see later), and
justified by Dirac’s relativistic quantum theory.
1
• It’s an intrinsic angular momentum with quantum number s =
2
Hence we can apply the same theory that we saw for the orbital
angular momentum (see Hydrogen atom- angular momentum aside).
r
3
h
Modulus s = s ( s + 1)h =
2
Component along z sZ = ms h
1
(with ms = ± )
2
Spin magnetic moment
r
e r
µs = − gs
s
2mo
Where g s = 2.0023 is a numerical factor known as the Lande factor
(or “g factor”). Classically it should be 1, but is 2 according to
Dirac’s relativistic quantum theory.
( g l = 1 for orbital angular momentum)
Next, let’sr consider the magneticrinteraction of a magnetic
moment µ with a magnetic field B :
r
µ
r
torque τ = µ × B
r
α
r
B
Magnetic potential energy:
α
Vmag
α
r
r
= ∫ ( µ × B )dα = ∫ µB sin αdα = − µB[cos α ]απ / 2 =
π /2
r r
= − µB cos α = − µ ⋅ B
π /2
Vmag
r r
= −µ ⋅ B
(Note that the potential energy is minimised if magnetic moment is
parallel to B, i.e. α=0.)
Spin-orbit interaction
r
Vl , s = − µ s ⋅ Bl
r
r
s
Orbiting proton
produces a field
Bl at the site of
the electron.
r
Bl
-r
r
Bl
s
r
Bl
r
The spin, hence µ s , has two possible orientations with respect
to the field: “parallel”, with lower energy, and “anti-parallel” with
higher energy
we expect energy levels in atoms to split in two (fine structure).
Note that this is not the only magnetic interaction that is taking place in an atom. The nucleus
also has a spin, hence a magnetic moment. The nuclear magnetic moment interacts with the
magnetic field produced by the orbiting electron. This interaction is much weaker than the
spin-orbit interaction considered here, and is responsible for the hyperfine structure of the
energy levels – see later.
Our goal is to determine
an expression for the fine structure starting
r
r
from Vl , s = − µ s ⋅ Bl . Let’s start by writing the B-field in terms of the
orbital angular momentum:
Biot-Savart law:
r r
r
l = r × m0 v
r
r r
− l = m0 v × r
r Zeµ 0 r
r
Zeµ 0 r r
Bl =
[v × (− r )] = −
[v × r ]
3
3
4πr
4πr
The – sign here is because we are
in the electron’s frame of reference,
see previous slide
r
Zeµ 0 r
Bl =
l
3
4πr m0
r 1 Zeµ 0 r
Bl = ×
l
3
2 4πr m0
from full relativistic
calculation
(“Thomas factor”)
r
e r
e r
µs = − g s
s ≈−
s
2mo
mo
( g s ≈ 2)
2
r
Ze µ 0 r r
e r
Vl , s =
( s ⋅ Bl ) =
(s ⋅ l )
2 3
m0
8πm0 r
We define the spin-orbit coupling constant a:
Ze 2 µ 0 h 2
a=
2 3
8π m0 r
a r r
Vl , s = 2 l ⋅ s
h
(With this definition a has the dimension of an energy.)
The constant a is measurable from spectra. We won’t do the
calculation, but it can be shown that
from expectation value
Z4
a∝
1
1
* 1
3 
= ∫ψ 3ψdV
n l  l + (l + 1)
3
r
r
 2
Heavier atoms
Larger n
larger spin-orbit coupling
smaller spin-orbit coupling
r r r r
… let’s now consider the scalar product l ⋅ s = l s cos(l , s ) .
It is possible to express this in terms of the total angular momentum:
r
s
r r r
j =l +s
rr
r2 r2 r2
j = l + s + 2 l s cos(l , s )
r
l
r
j
a r2 r2 r2
Vl , s = 2 ( j − l − s )
2h
(These vectors are operators
in quantum mechanics)
ˆj 2
lˆ 2
sˆ 2
Properties of
r
j:
• It is an angular momentum, hence we can apply the results
we saw in the “angular momentum aside”.
new quantum numbers j and m j such that:
modulus^2:
ˆj 2 Ψ = h 2 j ( j + 1)Ψ
projection along z-axis: ˆj z Ψ = hm j Ψ
• We have the commutation relations
[ ] [
with j =
with
integer 1
3
= , 1, , ...
2
2
2
m j = j , j − 1,..,− j
[ˆj , lˆ ] = 0 , [ ˆj , sˆ ] = 0
2
2
2
2
]
(which follow from ˆji , lˆ 2 = ˆji , sˆ 2 = 0 where i = x, y, z )
hence we can choose a set of common eigenfunctions of
lˆ 2 , sˆ 2 , ˆj 2 , and calculate Vl , s on these eigenfunctions….
… and so we can replace the operators with the corresponding
eigenvalues:
a r2 r2 r2
a
Vl , s = 2 ( j − l − s ) = [ j ( j + 1) − l (l + 1) − s( s + 1)]
2h
2
This is our final result for spin-orbit coupling:
shift in energy due
a
Vl , s = [ j ( j + 1) − l (l + 1) − s ( s + 1)]
to spin-orbit coupling
2
But we still haven’t discussed how to calculate j….
From the theory of coupling of angular momenta, it turns out that
j = l±s = l±
1
2
e.g. for a p state (l=1)
j=1/2
j=3/2
Example:
fine structure of sodium atoms
j = 1 / 2 and Vl , s = 0
• state 3s (l=0)
there is no fine structure
(physically, there is no angular momentum,
hence no “current loop” and Bl = 0 )
• state 3p
a 3 5
1 3 a
j=3/2 and Vl , s =  ⋅ − 2 − ⋅  =
2 2 2
2 2 2
a 1 3
1 3
j=1/2 and Vl , s =  ⋅ − 2 − ⋅  = −a
2 2 2
2 2
fine structure for 3p
a/2
a
j=3/2
j=1/2
3
a
2
3s
3p transition is split into a doublet
(D lines: D1 and D2)
Sodium doublet viewed in a FabryPerot interferometer:
Nomenclature for naming energy terms:
spin term
principal
quantum
number
n
2 s +1
lj
total angular
momentum
orbital angular momentum
from earlier =s,p,d,f etc...
e.g. ground state of sodium is
2
3 s1/ 2
(the spin term is sometimes omitted, like in the previous slide, because
it’s the same for all the levels.)
Let’s see how the spectral lines split
due to fine-structure:
• series 3s np: pairs of lines
(all p states are double)
• series 3p nd: triple lines
This is because:
j=5/2
d state (l=2)
j=3/2
and furthermore we have a new selection rule on j
hence only these three transitions are allowed:
3 p3 / 2
3 p1/ 2
n d5/ 2
n d3/ 2
∆j = ±1,0
Summary for FINE STRUCTURE
r
a r r
• Vl , s = − µ s ⋅ Bl = 2 l ⋅ s spin-orbit coupling
h
r
• all energy states (except s-states) are split into dublets
• split
∝Z
4
(larger split in heavy atoms)
But this is not the end with fine structure….
…Hydrogen is a special case:
Small spin-orbit
comparable to relativistic corrections
(remember Bohr-Sommerfeld:
in that model the fine structure was due to relativistic effects)
In heavier atoms, spin-orbit coupling is stronger and relativistic
effects can be neglected.
For the H-atom:
gross
structure
− Ry / n 2
fine structure E FS
6474
8
}
E = En + Erel + El , s
relativistic
mass change
spin-orbit coupling
e µ0 r r
(s ⋅ l )
2 3
8πm0 r
2
Result from Dirac’s relativistic theory:
EFS
Enα 2  1
3 

=−
− 
n  j + 1 / 2 4n 
e2
1
=
where the dimensionless quantity α =
2ε 0 hc 137
is the fine structure constant.
(You can verify that α=v/c with v= velocity of 1st Bohr orbit.)
Example: let’s apply this result to the n=2 level of Hydrogen.
Here we have an s state and a p state:
l = 0 ⇒ j = 1/ 2
l = 1 ⇒ j = 1 / 2, 3 / 2
Bohr
Can calculate E FS
for these values of j
Dirac
QED
(relativistic QM)
n=2
2 2 p3 / 2
l=1, j=3/2
2 2 s1/ 2
≈ 10GHz
l=0,1, j=1/2
1057 MHz
2 2 p1/ 2
This is a further splitting that
can only be explained by
Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)…
… this is known as the Lamb shift of the s level.
It was first observed in 1947-1952 and was crucial
for the development of QED.
Significance of Lamb shift
In QED the electromagnetic field is quantised.
A quantised field has a zero point energy (analogous to the ground
state of the simple harmonic oscillator). This means that even in the
case of number of photons=0 (“vacuum”), there is a fluctuating
electric field.
Due to this fluctuating field the electron performs small oscillations
and its charge is effectively smeared out. It can be shown that the
Coulomb potential acting on the electron is different than that for a
point charge. This difference causes the Lamb shift.
(Note: this fluctuating electric field is also responsible for
spontaneous emission.)