* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Ethical egoism
Divine command theory wikipedia , lookup
Lawrence Kohlberg wikipedia , lookup
Neohumanism wikipedia , lookup
Philosophy of history wikipedia , lookup
Utilitarianism wikipedia , lookup
Moral development wikipedia , lookup
Ethics of eating meat wikipedia , lookup
Cosmopolitanism wikipedia , lookup
Compliance and ethics program wikipedia , lookup
Individualism wikipedia , lookup
Sexual ethics wikipedia , lookup
Bernard Williams wikipedia , lookup
Moral disengagement wikipedia , lookup
J. Baird Callicott wikipedia , lookup
Virtue ethics wikipedia , lookup
Accounting ethics wikipedia , lookup
Morality throughout the Life Span wikipedia , lookup
Aristotelian ethics wikipedia , lookup
Declaration of Helsinki wikipedia , lookup
Kantian ethics wikipedia , lookup
Marketing ethics wikipedia , lookup
Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development wikipedia , lookup
Medical ethics wikipedia , lookup
Clare Palmer wikipedia , lookup
Alasdair MacIntyre wikipedia , lookup
Critique of Practical Reason wikipedia , lookup
Moral relativism wikipedia , lookup
Ethics of technology wikipedia , lookup
Morality and religion wikipedia , lookup
Arthur Schafer wikipedia , lookup
Moral responsibility wikipedia , lookup
Organizational technoethics wikipedia , lookup
Jewish ethics wikipedia , lookup
Business ethics wikipedia , lookup
Ethical intuitionism wikipedia , lookup
Consequentialism wikipedia , lookup
Secular morality wikipedia , lookup
NAME: OJINIKA SANDRA CHINEMEREM DEPARTMENT: LAW COLLEGE: LAW COURSE: GST113, LOGIC, PHILOSOPHY AND HUMAN EXISTENCE ETHICS AND HUMAN CONDUCTS IN THE SOCIETY Aristotle in his famous book ’politics’, aimed at the portrayal of human beings as social beings, which gave rise to the conception of man as ‘zoon politikon’ which means ‘political animal’. No man is an island; therefore everyone needs others to pursue their goals in all spheres. As Aristotle said ‘he who is unable to live in society, or who has no need because he is sufficient for himself must be either a beast or a god. In such a situation, living together gives rise to challenges and these challenges, relate to having a code of conduct that will regulate individual activities, acting as a guide against the situation of ‘war of all against all’, as found in the state of nature which is nasty, brutish and short as written by Thomas hobbies. Such codes of conducts tell people how to behave within and outside the society with both humans and animals and sometimes celestial beings. The realization of moral rules in the society hence has lead to the systematic study of what is right or wrong, good or bad, just or unjust called ethics. Ethics and its goals: there are so many questions to consider when talking about ethics such as, what is ethics? Of what importance is its study? These are questions to be considered when on the quest to see how it can shape human conduct in the society. Ethics is a field of study where the analytical and critical tools of philosophy are focused on human actions. It is a field the seeks to unearth the nature of morality and what moral judgement entails. A definition of ethics conceives it as ‘an inquiry into the moral worth of human conducts.’ As an inquiry, it touches every facet of life where one can point to one human conduct or the other. Hence, the ethics of everything. This type of ethics recognise challenges that involve them and how to give effective response in order to ensure that moral principles and sustained in human society. Ethics is not just plain inquiry but rational inquiry in the aspect of moral conducts, which stands in contrast to means of obtaining answers to moral questions. Humans are believed to be rational beings hence their judgements are expected to also be rational. The main aim of ethics is to show humans the standard of how to go about their behaviours, knowing what is right or wrong or good or bad. With the main of channelling their thinking towards moral behaviours, by dividing such behaviours into two categories for them to be able to identify positive ones and choose from it, leading to the principle of good behaviour that people should subscribe to in their relationship with others in the society. This is what ethics aims to achieve. Metaethics: According to bodunrin, ‘the first step of philosophical reasoning is conceptual.’ The main aim of metaethics is to understand concepts and terms widely used in ethics to enable better understanding of the subject and avoid linguistic muddle. Metaethics is concerned with the meaning of ethical statements and clarifying concepts such as good, bad wrong, right, moral and statements like ‘stealing is wrong.’ Which under EMOTIVISM, that is an ethical theory would interpret as revealing the emotion of the speaker, and at the same time, bringing attention to shearing the same idea of stealing as the person making claim. PRESCRIPTIVISM: is another ethical theory that suggests how ethical statements should be understood like which one says stealing is wrong this theory is only suggesting that stealing is bad and should be avoided, hence the aim is to understand what makes an action moral or immoral. THE DIVINE COMMAND THEORY: is an example of metaethical theories addressing this issue. This theory sees God as the determinant of our moral actions, good and bad are all based on what he says and what he decides is good or bad. ETHICAL RELATIVISM: this is determines on the position of the source to justify whether such an action is right or wrong. Hence percept of what is right or wrong differs from person to person, time to time, state to state. Hence morals of a people are justified based on their own culture and what they themselves believe to be right or wrong, some definitions of ethics reduces all of ethics to what is done in metaethics. This explains why Simon Blackburn defined ethics as ‘the study of concepts involved in practical reasoning: good, right, duty, obligation, virtue, freedom, rationality, choice. Since moral philosophers do not only clarify concepts but in addition, generate normative theories that ought to guide moral decision. A reductionist uses approaches such as the second-order study of objectivity, subjectivity e.t.c. NORMATIVE ETHICS Normative ethics is a sub-branch of moral philosophy that deals with actions whose right or wrongness cannot be clearly defined unlike, stealing etc. Hence standards or norms will stipulate criteria that make an action wrong or right. The main focus of this division of ethics is on determining and formulating principles that ought to guide human conduct, leading to the formulation of normative theories by philosophies. The first set of theories is Telelogical ethical theories. These theories have in common the emphasis placed on the consequence of an action in determining in wrongness or rightness. Ethical hedonism is an ethical theory that interprets the rightness or wrongness of an action this way the position of ethical hedonists is that pleasure is the only intrinsic good worth seeking the pain the only intrinsic bad that should be avoided. Eudaemonism in ethics is used to capture the idea that happiness is the chief good. However, one may ask: happiness or pleasure for whom? Should it be for the performer or audience or both? Three different normative theories are attempts to answer these questions. Ethical egoism recommends that the performer of an action should seek to maximise pleasure of happiness for himself. Hence wrongness or rightness is based on what favours the individual countering the stance of ethical altruism which states that rightness or wrongness of an action is determined by the fact of if the deed prompts the interest of others and not the individual alone. The agent is meant to take actions that interest and benefit others. However, mediating between these two extreme theories is the position of utilitarianism, which holds that an action is morally right if it promotes the greatest number of pleasure for the greatest number of people. Hence, a major distinct between utilitarianism, ethical egoism and ethical altruism is the scope of the consequence. Utilitarianism believes that the good that must be maximised is the overall good, which requires that the actor considers the good of others and his own good. Teleological ethical theories have some short comings. One is that they require foreseeing the outcomes of our action, which incidentally is what humans are largely incapable of. Benevolent actions might end up favouring one and sometimes others, which is not expected. The fact is that the demarcation is not often an easy one to make. Another major failure of consequentialism (or the teleological theory) is that it makes it appear that the end justifies the means and the problem is that an evil means cannot justify a good end, making some philosophers favour deontological theories. Deontological ethical theories reject the use of the outcome of an action in judging its rightness or wrongness. Moderate deontological ethical theories hold that ‘consequences do matter, but only as one of the factors relevant in determining the moral rightness of an action, while extreme deontological ethical theories totally reject the relevance of consequences in determining if an action is morally right or wrong instead placing importance on rules, motives, and the nature of an action. Kant’s moral theory is an example of deontological ethical theories. Immanuel Kant believes ‘we are responsible for our motives to do well or bad, and thus it is for this we are held morally accountable.’ To back up his view that the outcome of an action matters less than the will or motive informing an action to be performed. CONCLUTION: This essay has been on examining how human conduct is influenced by ethics. And the influence that ethics has could be in two dimensions. The first could be through enabling persons have better understanding of terms, concepts and statements employed in moral reasoning. The other is that ethics makes available frameworks of action in form of normative theories that can guide human actions and, if adhered to, enables people to act rationally and morally.