Download The Evolution of Populations CHAPTER 23 Microevolution Change

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Tag SNP wikipedia , lookup

Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup

Behavioural genetics wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup

Inbreeding wikipedia , lookup

Deoxyribozyme wikipedia , lookup

Designer baby wikipedia , lookup

Genetics and archaeogenetics of South Asia wikipedia , lookup

Epistasis wikipedia , lookup

Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup

History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Dual inheritance theory wikipedia , lookup

Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup

Dominance (genetics) wikipedia , lookup

Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup

Heritability of IQ wikipedia , lookup

Polymorphism (biology) wikipedia , lookup

Group selection wikipedia , lookup

Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup

Natural selection wikipedia , lookup

Hardy–Weinberg principle wikipedia , lookup

Genetic drift wikipedia , lookup

Population genetics wikipedia , lookup

Microevolution wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
1/18/2013
1
The Evolution of Populations
CHAPT ER 23
2
Microevolution
 Change in allele frequencies over generations
 Three mechanisms cause allele frequency change:
Natural selection (leads to adaptation)
Genetic drift
Gene flow

3
In contrast to macroevolution
4
Genetic variation makes evolution possible
 Some phenotypic variation is environmental and is not heritable
5
Genetic variation within a population
 Variation can be discrete
Mendel’s pea flower color
Controlled by one locus
Either/or trait
 Variation and be quantitative
Most variation is quantitative
Eye color
Controlled by two or more genes
Continuous variation in trait
 A locus is fixed if all individuals in a population are homozygous for the same allele


6
Measuring variability
 Genetic diversity is measured in terms of average heterozygosity
The average percentage of loci that are heterozygous

7
Genetic variation between populations
8
A cline is a spatial gradual change in a character
9
Generation of genetic diversity
 Mutation is the ultimate generation of genetic diversity
Point mutation
Chromosomal rearrangements
 Mutation rate is higher in rapidly reproducing organisms and in organisms with RNA
genome
 Sexual reproduction shuffles genetic diversity
Crossing over, fertilization, independent sorting of chromosomes
10
Populations share a gene pool
11
Allele frequency
 In two-allele system, designated as p and q

1
Chromosomal rearrangements
 Mutation rate is higher in rapidly reproducing organisms and in organisms with RNA
genome
 Sexual reproduction shuffles genetic diversity
Crossing over, fertilization, independent sorting of chromosomes
10
Populations share a gene pool
11
Allele frequency
 In two-allele system, designated as p and q

12
Genotype frequency
13
Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium is used to determine if evolution is occurring
 For a given p and q, the genotype frequency will be p2 + 2pq + q2 if a population is
in Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (i.e., a population is not evolving)
p2 and q2 represent the frequencies of the homozygous genotypes and 2pq
represents the frequency of the heterozygous genotype
 Natural populations can evolve at some loci, while being in Hardy-Weinberg
equilibrium at other loci
1/18/2013
14
 In a study of enzyme variation in a species of grasshopper, you find 15 A1A1, 65
A1A2 and 20 A2A2 in a sample of 100 moths. What is the allele frequency of each
allele? What is the genotype frequency of each genotype? What is the expected
genotype frequency under Hardy- Weinberg Equilibrium? Is the population in Hardy
Weinberg Equilibrium? What can you conclude about this population in terms of
evolution?
15
 In the pea plant, red individuals may be either homozygous (R1R1) or heterozygous
(R1R2), whereas white flowers are homozygous (R2R2). In a sample of plants,
there are 35 red flowers and 65 white flowers. Assume that the population is not
evolving. What are the allele frequencies? What proportion of red flowers is
heterozygous (i.e, what percentage of the red flowers are heterozygous)?
16
A population not in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium indicates that one or more
of the five evolutionary agents are operating in a population
17
Natural selection
 Natural selection causes adaptive evolution (i.e., the evolution of traits that make
organisms better matched to their environment)
18
Genetic drift
 Random fluctuation in allele frequencies over time by chance
Important in small populations
Leads to loss of genetic variation, causing alleles to become fixed (even
maladaptive alleles)
Two types
Founder effect
Bottleneck effect
19
20
Founder effect
21
Founder effect
 Few individuals found new population (small allelic pool)

22
Bottleneck effect
2
Bottleneck effect
1/18/2013
19
20
Founder effect
21
Founder effect
 Few individuals found new population (small allelic pool)

22
Bottleneck effect
23
Bottleneck effect
24
Gene flow
 A movement of alleles from one population to another
Powerful agent of change
Tends to homogenize allele frequencies
25
Gene flow can counter adaptation
26
Mutation
 A random change in a cell’s DNA
Mutation rates have little effect on H-W equilibrium
Ultimate source of genetic variation

27
Non-random mating
 Mating with specific genotypes
Shifts genotype frequencies but has little change on allele frequencies
Assortative mating increases the proportion of homozygous individuals
Disassortative mating produces excess of heterozygotes
28
Natural selection
 Natural selection is not evolution
 Differential survival and/or reproduction
 Differences in survival and/or reproduction are not due to chance, but due to a
heritable trait that increases fitness
29
Directional selection
 Selection against one extreme
 Shifts the mean of a population
30
Negative phototropism in Drosophila
31
Disruptive selection
 Selection against mean
 Increases variation
32
Black-bellied seedcracker finch of west Africa
33
Stabilizing selection
 Selection against extremes
 Reduces variation but does not change mean
34
Birth weight in humans
35
Sexual selection
 A type of natural selection driven by interactions between the sexes
 Leads to sexual dimorphism
36
Intrasexual selection
37
Intersexual selection
38
Male traits may advertise good genes
3
 Reduces variation but does not change mean
34
Birth weight in humans
35
Sexual selection
 A type of natural selection driven by interactions between the sexes
 Leads to sexual dimorphism
36
Intrasexual selection
37
Intersexual selection
38
Male traits may advertise good genes
39
Maintenance of genetic variation
 Directional and stabilizing selection reduce genetic variation
 Balancing selection (heterozygote advantage, oscillating selection and frequency
dependent selection) maintain variation
40
Oscillating selection
 Selection favors one phenotype at one time and a different phenotype at another
time
 Fitness of a phenotype does not depend on its frequency
 Environmental changes lead to oscillation in selection
41
Oscillating selection
 Galapagos Islands ground finches
Wet conditions favor smaller bills
Dry conditions favor larger bills
42
Heterozygote advantage
 Heterozygotes may exhibit greater fitness than homozygotes
 Keeps deleterious alleles in a population

43
Malaria
 Malaria caused by Plasmodium falciparum that infects red blood cells
 Heterozygote advantage arises from balance of opposing selective factors – anemia
and malaria
44
Anemia/malaria
45
Distribution of sickle cell allele and malaria
46
Frequency dependent selection
 Depends on how frequently a phenotype occurs in a population

47
Why aren’t all organisms perfectly matched with their environment?
 Must be existing variation
 Evolutionary constraints
 Trade-offs (i.e., compromises) occur
1/18/2013
48
4