* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download ETHICS IN GENERAL PRACTICE - South Bristol GP trainers workshop
Moral responsibility wikipedia , lookup
Cosmopolitanism wikipedia , lookup
Moral relativism wikipedia , lookup
Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development wikipedia , lookup
Sexual ethics wikipedia , lookup
Compliance and ethics program wikipedia , lookup
Bernard Williams wikipedia , lookup
J. Baird Callicott wikipedia , lookup
Consequentialism wikipedia , lookup
Aristotelian ethics wikipedia , lookup
Morality and religion wikipedia , lookup
Virtue ethics wikipedia , lookup
Declaration of Helsinki wikipedia , lookup
Marketing ethics wikipedia , lookup
Critique of Practical Reason wikipedia , lookup
Ethics of technology wikipedia , lookup
Accounting ethics wikipedia , lookup
Kantian ethics wikipedia , lookup
Alasdair MacIntyre wikipedia , lookup
Primary care ethics wikipedia , lookup
Clare Palmer wikipedia , lookup
Secular morality wikipedia , lookup
The Morals of Chess wikipedia , lookup
Arthur Schafer wikipedia , lookup
Ethical intuitionism wikipedia , lookup
Ethics of artificial intelligence wikipedia , lookup
Thomas Hill Green wikipedia , lookup
Jewish ethics wikipedia , lookup
ETHICS IN GENERAL PRACTICE Bristol Trainers –Saunton Sands Thursday 13th March 2008 Dr. Bill Foster Aims for this session….. To discuss the relevance of teaching ethics to GPs in training (and to our daily work) To consider some principles and theories To provide a practical framework (Illustrated by two scenarios) To apply this to some ethical scenarios To consider how we teach ethics to GP trainees. PLAN FOR THE SESSION Some questions from me An interactive presentation (slides on handout) Two ethical dilemmas (applying theory) More examples (split into smaller groups) BREAK Teaching rehearsal – working in trios with your ethical dilemmas What have we leant? LUNCH Some questions for you……. What teaching have you had on medical ethics? How is medical ethics relevant to your work as a GP? Is medical ethics the special preserve of doctors? Will the advance of scientific medicine reduce the need for ethical debate? Why bother? What problems? No clear solutions provided A mish-mash of conflicting opinions Increases complexity, excessive choice It all takes time Decisions can be delayed What’s wrong with pragmatism anyway? (We all use our experience, intuition and common sense) Why learn about ethics? ESSENTIAL IN DIFFICULT CASES Almost all consultations have an ethical dimension SENSITIVITY More sensitive to individual situations and more self-critical. This helps to balance EBM. Paternalism replaced by partnership Greater range of options considered RISK REDUCTION – Reducing risk of complaint and litigation HELPS PASS THE nMRCGP EXAM!! What is meant by Ethics “The philosophical study of the moral value of human conduct and the rules and principles that ought to govern it …a code of behaviour considered correct especially that of a particular group, profession or individual” Collins English Dictionary 1994 How does it relate to philosophy? Philosophy - is the study of beliefs and ideas. It deals with theories Ethics (moral philosophy) is a branch of philosophy with practical application. Ethical and moral refer to behaviour – good and bad, right and wrong An attempt to make judgements objectively SORTING RIGHT FROM WRONG MORAL THEORIES ……... VIRTUE….Individuals with intrinsic good character follow their conscience (Aristotle) DUTIES….obligations we owe to each other based on respect for others. Morality depends on intention (Kant) UTLITY…. Right / wrong judged only by the consequence. The greatest good for the greatest number (John Stuart Mill) RIGHTS….A more recent theory. What a citizen can expect to be provided.Stated in law. Illustration of the theories….. VIRTUE…. A Doctor’s decisions are strongly influenced by an intuitive sense of moral right. If we follow this we feel virtuous and our self respect is enhanced. If others see us in this light we attract support and respect. What if the doctor’s religious belief prohibits any referral of a woman seeking abortion? More illustration of theory… UTILITY theory fits well with resource allocation, Use of Q.U.A.L.Y.s shows funding for CABG best targeted at non-smokers. NICE decides on new treatments for cancer But if we consider DUTIES….(obligations we owe to each other based on respect for others) …….what of our duty of care to the smoker who wants a CABG? Kant’s categorical imperative says that individual’s treatment is just as important as that of a non-smoker. Whose rights take precedence? Our concept of respect for the rights of others often means that the particular patient we are dealing with in a consultation has paramount rights, e.g. patients have a right to confidential consultations. But what about our concerns for the safety of others when an elderly patient with reduced vision is desperate to drive to maintain an independent existence? Some principles to guide you… Four irreducible principles that govern all decision making in clinical practice (Beauchamp and Childress 1994, USA, Ethicists) (Gillon 1994, UK GP) Autonomy Beneficence Non-maleficence Justice AUTONOMY The capacity of people to make their own decisions To be fully autonomous you might need to have all the information and feel free and un-coerced BENEFICENCE This encourages the GP focus on what he feels is “acting in the patient’s best interest” This may not necessarily coincide with what the patient wants NON-MALEFICENCE “Primum non nocere” Firstly do no harm Gross harm….. Shipman Subtle harm…. Side effect of drugs given for self-limiting conditions (eg NSAIDS, SSRIs) JUSTICE Nothing to do with legal retributive justice Is population based This refers to distributive justice Helps authorities and organisations to allocate resources fairly according to need Three helpful friends…. REALISM…. About what can be changed, and who can change it COMPLEXITY… Try shifting the focus and the view point SHARING…Responsibility with the patient, relatives, friends, other professionals “It would be too much for her…” Mrs Lyons is 82, frail but still looking after her dementing husband. She has an iron deficiency anaemia and you refer her for investigation. Colonoscopy and USS show inoperable Ca colon with mets. The specialist tells her daughter, Carol, but has arranged for the patient to see you for results. Carol sees you. She is insistent that you should not tell her mother she has cancer as, “It would be too much for her to bear” What do you do? Drinking on duty…. Janet had a stroke and is housebound Daughter, Liz, lives with her and is her carer You are the family GP and are called to see her when she has become chesty again Liz seems relieved that it is you. She tells you that last week she called out a GP from the OOH service. He was rude to her and hasty and rough in his examination of Janet. He also smelt of alcohol. This GP is a partner in a neighbouring practice.He is well respected. Do you take any action? If so, what do you do In summary…… Life , and GP, are full of ethical dilemmas 4 moral theories – Virtue / Duty / Utility / Rights 4 principles to guide you Autonomy/Beneficence/Non-maleficence/Justice 3 helpful friends – Realism / Complexity / Sharing You can apply these to any problem Time to take a breather…. Split Into small groups More dilemmas Elect a spokesperson to present the group’s discussion of one case Meet back in the main room at …….. Further reading suggestions “Ethics in General Practice – a practical handbook for personal development” by Ann Orme-Smith and John Spicer: Radcliffe Medical Press Ltd, 2001 “Medical Ethics Today” The BMA’s handbook of ethics and law, 2nd Ed. BMA Ethics Dept . An excellent resource for the practice library and includes a CD-Rom. Available www.bmjbooks.com “Patient-centred Ethics and Communication at the End of Life” by David Jeffrey: Radcliffe Publishing, 2006 Idea to consolidating your learning Before your next appraisal……. Something for the Toolkit! Apply your new knowledge and skills by identifying an ethical dilemma from your own practice and by production of a written discussion of the dilemma and arguments for the best resolution. One side of A4, briefly describe the dilemma, and give your analysis.