* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download BACILLUS SPHAERICUS TOXINS: Molecular Biology and Mode of
Survey
Document related concepts
Interactome wikipedia , lookup
Community fingerprinting wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression wikipedia , lookup
Gene regulatory network wikipedia , lookup
Magnesium transporter wikipedia , lookup
Biochemistry wikipedia , lookup
Protein–protein interaction wikipedia , lookup
Expression vector wikipedia , lookup
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup
Western blot wikipedia , lookup
Silencer (genetics) wikipedia , lookup
Endogenous retrovirus wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Proteolysis wikipedia , lookup
Two-hybrid screening wikipedia , lookup
Tetrodotoxin wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
BACILLUS SPHAERICUS TOXINS: Molecular Biology and Mode of Action ZHOU Xian-zhi PERSPECTIVES AND OVERVIEW The use of microorganisms as a source of biological compounds for insect pest control started after the discovery of the highly insecticidal bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis . The discovery of the strain of B.thuringiensis serovar israelensis (38,44) made possible efficient microbiological control of Diptera Nematocera vectors of diseases, such as mosquitoes (Culicidae) and black flies (Simuliidae). The first reported Bacillus sphaericus strain active against mosquito larvae was isolated from moribund mosquito larvae (49). The larvicidal activity of this isolate was so low that their use in mosquito control would never have been considered. The identification of the strain SSⅡ-1 in India (70) renewed the search for more active strains. But only after the isolation (in Indonesia from dead mosquito larvae) of strain 1593which exhibited a much higher level of mosquitocidal activity (71) was the potential of B.sphaericus as a biological control agent for mosquitoes taken seriously (72). More than 380 B. sphaericus strains which are toxic to the larvae of mosquitoes in at least three genera (Culex, Aedes, and Anopheles) have been identified (7, 36). These strains have been subdivided into the low-toxicity strains (50% lethal concentration [LC50], ~105 cells per ml) and the high-toxicity strains (LC50, 102 to 103 cells per ml) (7, 63). Until recently, only two types of mosquitocidal toxin have been found in B.sphaericus a binary toxin (comprising 51.4- and 41.9-kDa proteins) produced during sporulation in high-toxicity strains (7) and Mtx toxin (compring 100-, 31.8- and 35.8-kDa proteins) synthesized in both the low- and high toxicity strains (54, 77). B.sphaericus (56) is an aerobic bacterium that produces terminal spherical spores. It lacks several biochemical pathways and thus can not use sugars as metabolites. The findings of various genetic and biochemical studies indicate that this species is heterogeneous. The increasing number of isolated strains has made differentiating between toxic and atoxic strains. And between the toxic strains themselves, difficult. Numerous methods have been used to classify this very heterogenic species. For exemble, relationships between strains of B.sphaericus have been examined in terms of DNA homology (50). Based on the percentage of homology, five groups were identified, and group Ⅱ was further subdivided into ⅡA (related over 79% homology and almost contain all toxic strains) and ⅡB. Classification via two other systems, bacteriophage typing (82, 83) and serotyping using flagellar antigens (36, 39), yielded a similar grouping for the group ⅡA mosquito pathogenic strains. Nine serotypes ( list in table 1) are known to contain active strains. Such as numerical classification based on taxonomy of phenotypic features (2, 45), cellular fatty acid composition analysis (43) ribotyping (3) and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis (80)are recently developed techniques, indicate most toxic strains are recovered in a few groups. None of these methods allows us to predict the level of toxicity of a given strain. The three mosquitocidal activity levels do not correspond to the groups defined by any other method classification (Table 1). The genes encoding various toxins have been cloned, and they might be used in hybridization experiments to predict activity (4). However, some strains react positively with toxin genes but display only weak larvicidal activity. Therefore, to identify potentially valuable strains and to further elucidate the nature of the mosquito-larvicidal activity, we must continue to determine toxicity levels by using mosquito larvae. Table1 Characterization of some mosquito-larvicidal B.sphaericus* strain origin serotype Phage DNA Toxici- Crystal type group ty** genes Mtx1 Mtx2 Mtx3 Kellen K USA H1 1 ⅡA L - + + + Kellen Q USA H1 1 ⅡA L - + + + BS-197 India H1 NA NA M + NA NA NA SSⅡ-1 India H2 2 ⅡA L - + + + IAB881 Ghana H3 - NA H + - NA NA LP1-G Singapore H3 8 ⅡA H + - NA NA 2362 Nigeria H5 3 ⅡA H + + + + 2317-3 Thailand H5 -*** NA H + + + NA C3-41 China H5 NA NA H + NA NA NA IAB-59 Ghana H6 3 NA H + + + + 31 Turkey H9 8 NA L - + + + 2297 Sri Lanka H25 4 ⅡA H + + + + 2173 India H26 -*** ⅡA M - - - NA IAB872 Ghana H48 3 NA H + NA NA NA 14577 USA H4 -*** Ⅰ - - NA NA NA Data compiled from references23, 40, 52, 54, 66; ** Based on the lethal concentrition 50% after 48h on the fourth-instar larvae of Culex quinquefasciatus L≥10-3 spore crystal complex dilution; M≈10-4; H≤10-6: -*** inactive to all bacteriophages;+present; -absent;NA : no information available B.sphaericus strains are generally highly active against larvae of Anopheles and Culex species and are poorly or not toxic to larvae of Aedes species. However, susceptibility appears to depend on the species of mosquito and can thus vary within a genus (13). Toxitity levels vary among the larvicidal serotypes and even within the same serotype (79). Therefore, the relative potency of each strain is currently evaluated and described in terms of specific activity titers on the different mosquito species and in terms of activity ratios derived from such titers (79). Like B.thuringiensis Lepidoptera. Singer (70) first suggested that B.sphaericus acts by toxemin rather than septicemia. A few years later, Davidson and Myers (32) reported the presence of parasporal inclusions, which they suspected participate in the toxic action of B.sphaericus. Indeed, all of the mpst toxic strains produce parasporal inclusions during sporulation. These inclusions have a crystalline ultrastructure and are released into the medium along with the spore after the completion of sporulation. The relationship between sporulation, crystal formation, and mosquitocidal activity was first clearly established for strains belongings to serotypes H5a5b (16, 56), H25 (36, 48, 81), and H6 (38). Later, the partial purification of crystals toxic to mosquito larvae (62), and the study of mutants blocked at early stages of sporulation that fail to make crystals and are not mosquitocidal (21), confirmed the toxic nature and protein composition of the crystals, more recently, the identification of a group of toxins different from crystal toxins, the Mtx toxins, renewed interested in B.sphaericus as a mosquitocidal agent (77, 78). Two other reviews discuss the genetics of B.sphaericus toxins and their mode of action (10, 63). And an overview of each is given below. BIOCHEMISTRY AND GENETICS OF B. SPHAERICUS TOXINS Two kinds of toxins (crystal and Mtx toxins) seem to account for the larvicidal activity of B.sphaericus. They differ both in their composition and time of synthesis. The crystal toxins are present in all highly active strains and are produced during sporulation. The Mtx toxins are responsible for the avtivity of most of the weakly active strains. Mtx proteins synthesized only during the vegetative phase. Crystal Toxins The crystal toxin is composed of two proteins that are synthesized in equmolar amounts and assembled in crystal structures visible at about stage Ⅲ of sporulation (11, 49, 81). The proteins are designated as P51 and P42 on the basis of their predicted molecular masses of 51.4 and 41.9 kDa (5, 8, 9, 12, 14, 46, 47). and they also named BinA and BinB, respectively. The genes encoding both proteins have been cloned from sverval high-toxicity strains. They appear to be organized in an operon with a 174- to 176-base pair (bp) intergenic region. A stem-loop structure (characteristic of transcription terminators) lies downstream from the P42 gene (figure 2a) (8, 46). No sequence similar to Bacillus subtilis sporulation promoters have been found upstream from the gene encoding P51. however, both the P51 and P42 genes are expressed only during sporulation in B.subtilis (6). Moreover, lacZ fusions to the promoter of the crystal protein genes indicate that, in B.sphaericus, transcription begins immediately before the end of exponential growth and continues into stationary phase (1). Thus, enough protein for crystal formation accumulates before stage Ⅲ. The genes for P51 and P42 are chromosomal, at least in strains 1593, 2362, and 2297, although these strains contain plasmids (3). Both genes have been reported in diverse strains, and all highly toxic strains tested contain similar sequences as assessed using DNA hybridization (4). The reverse is not true: moderately toxic strains such as LPI-G also contain these genes (Table 1). The toxin-coding and flanking regions of strains 1593, 2362, and 2317-3 are identical over a span of 3479 nucleotides, whereas the sequences in strains IAB59 and 2297 differ by 7 and 25 nucleotides, respectively (14). The resulting differences in amino acid sequences of P51 are 5 and 3 amino acids, respectively and those for P42 are 1 and 5. these variations appear to be responsible for the differences in specificity of these strains (see below). Interestingly, LPI-G is only weakly active , although it produces the crystal toxin (Table 1). The sequence of crystal-toxin genes from this strain may indicate which regions of the protein are involved in the loss of toxicity. The amino acid sequences of P51 and P42 are not similar to those of any other bacterial toxins, including those produced by B.thuringiensis serovar israelensi (Bti). However , P51 and P42 share four segments of sequence similarity (8) , the significance of which remains unclear . therefore, P51 and P42 of B.sphaericus constitute a separate family of insecticidal toxins (8). The aggregation of both P51 and P42 has been analyzed using crystal-toxin components expressed separately or together in homologous or heterologous Bacillus hosts. When expressed independently in B.subtilis and B.sphaericus or in B.thuringiensis crystal-negative hosts, the proteins form amorphous inclusions (20, 58); in contrast, crystals similar to those produced by naturely occurring, highly toxic B.sphaericus strains are produced when the two genes are simultaneously expressed in either B.sphaericus or B.thuringiensis (20, 58). No crystal can be detected in B.thuringiensis contain factors that help stabilize the proteins and subsequent crystallization of the toxin. In vivo, P42 is slowly converted into a stable protein of ~39kDa, whereas P51 is rapidly converted into a stable fragment of ~43kDa (11, 16). In vitro deletion analysis led to the delineation of the minimal active fragments of both proteins, which indeed correspond to the activated fragments (18, 25, 61, 67 ). At the N and C terminus of P51, 32 and 53 amino acids, respectively, can be eliminated without loss of toxicity (25); deletions of 10 and 17 amino acids at the N and C terminus of P42, respectively, result in a protein similar to the 39-kDa activated fragment (18) (Figure 2a). Subcloning experiments have shown that P42 alone is toxic for mosquito larvae (Culex pipiens pipiens), although the activity is weaker than that of crystals containing both proteins (58). In contrast, P51 alone is not toxic, but its presence enhances the larvicidal activity of P42, suggesting synergy between the polypeptides (18, 40, 58,61). In vitro assays on mosquito cell lines also revealed that the activated form of P42 alone is toxic to Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus cells, whereas P51 appears to be inactive; however, no synergy between the components was observed in vitro (7). Although simultaneous presence of both proteins appears necessary for full toxicity, the activity strains depends on the origin of P42, as shown by analysis of toxins mutated in vitro (13). For example, when amino acids were substituted in a region centered around position 100 of P42, the IAB59 and 2297 P42 proteins became similar to the protein from strain 2362,: the activity and specificity of the mutant toxins toward Culex and Aedes larvae were comparable, un like those of the wild-type. This finding indicates that this region is involved in specificity. Together, these observations suggest that P42 is the most important determinant of specificity and activity. Based on their larvicidal activity and compose of amino acids, binary toxin divided into four types. TypeⅠ: high toxic to Culex, medium toxic to Anopheles, nontoxic to Aedes; typeⅡ: high toxic to Culex, medium toxic to Anopheles, low toxic to Aedes; typeⅢ: high toxic to Culex and Anopheles, nontoxic to Aedes; type Ⅳ: nontoxic to all mosquito larvae. Table 2 Comparison of Bin amino acid sequences from various B.sphaericus strains Polypeptide Amino acid typeⅠ typeⅡ typeⅢ typeⅣ IAB59 1593 2297 LP-G 2362 2317-3 C3-41 41.9kD 51.4 93 Leu Leu Leu Ser 99 Val Val Phe Val 104 Glu Ala Ser Ser 125 His His Asn Asn 135 Tyr Tyr Phe Phe 267 Arg Arg Lys Lys 69 Ala Ser Ser Ser 70 Asn Asn Lys Asn 110 Thr Thr Ile Ile 314 His Leu Tyr His 317 Leu Phe Leu Leu 389 Leu Leu Met Met Mtx Toxins Three types of Mtx toxins have been described to date: Mtx1, Mtx2 and Mtx3, with molecular masses of 100, 31.8 and 35.8 kDa, respectively ; genes for these toxins have been cloned from the medium-toxicity strain SSⅡ-1 (77, 78). DNA hybridization suggested the Mtx1 and Mtx2 toxins do not display any similarity to each other or to the crystal proteins or any other other insecyicidal proteins. The genes encoding Mtx are wildly distributed in both high-and low-toxicity strains of B.sphaericus (54) .In contrast to the crystal toxin genes, Mtx genes are expressed during the vegetative and growth phase, and sequences resembling vegetative promoters of B.subtilis have been found upstream from each gene (77, 78). Fusions of the lacZ gene to the mtx promoter also firmed vegetative expression, because β-galactosidase activity was restricted to the early exponential phase, at least in B.sphaericus (1). However, Mtx proteins possess short N-terminal leader sequences, which is characteristic of gram-positive bacterial signal peptides (77, 78). The Mtx1 toxin can be further processed by gut proteases into two fragments of 27 and 70-kDa that correspond to the N- and C-terminal regions, respectively (76). The 70-kDa fragment from Mtx1 posses three repeated regions ~90amino acids each, the function of which is unknown; the 27-kDa fragment contains a short region corresponding to a transmembrane domain. The 27-kDa part of Mtx1 shares weak similarity with the catalytic domain of several ADP-ribosylating toxins (76, 77). Mtx2 has 34 and 29% similarity to two toxins active against mammalian cells, namely the ε-toxin from Clostrium perfringens and the cytotoxin from pseudomonas aeruginosa, respectively (78). and Mtx3 has 30 and 27% similarity to the two toxins, respectively (54). The 35.8kDa protein from B.sphaericus exhibits 38% identity to the 31.8kDa Mtx2 toxin of B.sphaericus SSⅡ-1 (55). The toxicity of Mtx1 has been measured using fusion proteins synthesized in Escherichia coli : it is highly active against mosquito larvae (76), with an LC50 value comparable to that of the crystal toxin (15ng protein/ml). Deletion analysis suggests that the 27-kDa fragment from Mtx1 can ADP-ribosylate itself, whereas the 70-kDa fragment is responsible for toxicity to cultured C.pipiens quinquefasciatus cells; however, both regions are necessary for toxicity to mosquito larvae (76). MODE OF ACTION OF THE CRYSTAL TOXIN The mode of action of B.sphaericus crystal toxin has only been studied in mosquito larvae. However, in one report, the toxin was active in adults of C.pipiens quinquefasciatus, but not in A.aegypti adults, after introduced enema into the midgut (74). Investigations into the mode of action of the B. sphaericus crystal toxin on Culex pipiens, a highly susceptible species, have demonstrated that following ingestion, the crystal is solubilized under the alkaline pH in the larval midgut, where the serine- proteases promote the proteolytic activation of the protoxin into toxin (17, 28, 57). B.sphaericus crystals release the toxin in all species, even in nonsusceptible species such as A. aegypti. Indeed, some studies report that the differences in solubilization and /or activation of the crystal toxin (11, 28, 57). Cytopathology and Physiological Effects Bti toxins completely break down the larval midgut epithelium, whereas B.sphaericus toxins do not. Nevertheless, midgut alterations start as soon as 15 min after ingestion of the B.sphaericus spore –crystal complex (24,32, 49, 73 ). Midgut damages in culex pipiens are the same after ingestion of spore crystals of either strain 1593 or strain 2297 (24, 32, 73). In contast, the symptoms of intoxication produced by these two strains differ in other mosquito species. Large vacuoles (and/or cytolysosomes) appear in C.pipiens midgut cells, whereas large areas of low electron density appear in Anopheles stephensi midgut cells. A generally occurring symptom is mitochondrial swelling, described for C.pipiens pipiens and A.stephensi, as well as for A.aegypti when intoxicated with a very high dose of spore crystals (24). The midgut cells, especially those of the posterior stomach and the gastric caecae, are the cells most severely damaged by the toxin, BinA (P42) and BinB (P51) can form pores or channels in the membrane(65). In vitro assays proved that the Bin toxin could permeabilize receptor-free large unilamellar phospholipid vesicles and planar lipid membranes, by a mechanism of pore formation(65). And the work showed that the BinA is more efficient than BinB to provoke pore formation, the BinB can improve the ability of BinA to permeabilize the large unilamellar vesicles. The C-terminal region of the BinA of binary toxin, Particularly the residue 312R for biological activity against mosquito larvae (42). and singh & Gill (74) also report late damage in neural tissue and in skeletal muscles. Ultrastructural effects have been reported in cultured cells of C.pipiens quinquefasciatus within a few minutes of treatment with soluble and activated B.sphaericus toxin..these alterations consisted mainly of swelling of mitochondrial cristae and endoplasmic reticula, followed by enlargement of vacuoles and condensation of the mitochondrial matrix (30). The physiological effects of B.sphaericus crystal toxin have been poorly documented. Lakshmi Narasu & Gopinathan (51) report that oxygen uptake by mitochondria isolated from B.sphericus-treated C.pipiens quinquefasciatus larvae is inhibited, as is the activity of larval choline acetyl transferase in the presence of toxin. In addition, B.sphericus toxin decreases oxygen uptake by mitochondria isolated from rat liver (51). Binding to a Specific Receptor in the Brush-Border Membrane As the differences in susceptibility between mosquito species do not seem related to the ability to solubilize and /or activate the binary toxin, this variation presumably results from differences at the cellar level. Indeed, studies report the binging of fluorescently labeled toxin to the gastric caecae and the posterior stomach only in very susceptible Culex species. P51 does not bind to the gut of A.aegypti, whereas P42 binds weakly and nonspecifically in this species. No regional binding was observed in Anopheles spp. (31, 33, 34, 61). Furthermore, these studies showed that, in C.pipiens quinquefasciatus, only P51 binds specially to the caecum and posterior stomach, whereas P42 binds nonspecifically throughout the midgut. When the proteins together, the binding of P42 appears to depend on the binding of P51. in vivo binding studies using nontoxic deletion mutants of the crystal toxin (61) support the hypotheses that the N-terminal region of P51 is involved in regional binding of this protein in the larval midgut and that the C-terminal region of P51 and the N- and C-terminal regions of P42 are involved in the interaction of the two components that causes P42 to bind in the same regions as P51. these authors also report that internalization of toxin only seems to occur when both components are present. However, further intracellular investigations are required to elucidate whether one or both components are internalized. The hypothesis that a specific receptor was involved in the toxin binding was confirmed by in vitro binding assays using 125I-labeled activated crystal toxin and midgut brush-border membrane fractions (BBMFs) isolated from either susceptible or nonsusceptible mosquito larvae (59). The interaction of the binary toxin with C. quinqaefasciatus larvae midgut, investigated through qualitative binding assays of the fluorescent-labled toxin, demonstrated a distinct and regionalized toxin binding localized in the gastric caeca and posterior stomach (33, 34). And immunocytochemical localization of the binary toxin confirmed that again (69). Indeed, direct binding experiments with C.pipiens pipiens BBMFs indicated that the toxin binds to a single class of specific receptor. A single 60kDa midgut membrane protein is identified as the binding protein, this protein is anchored in the mosquito midgut membrane via a glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor, and is partially released by phosphatidylinositol specific-phospholipase C (PI-PLC). And the peptide sequence showed a very high degree of similarity with enzymes belonging to the а-amylase family (68). Reference 1. Ahmed HK, Mitchell WJ, Priest FG. 1995. Regulation of mosquitocidal toxin synthesis in Bacillus sphaericus. APPL. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 43:310-14 2. Alexander B, Priest FG. 1990. Numerical classification and identification of Bacillus sphaericus including some strains pathogenic for mosquito larvae. J. Gen. Microbiol. 136:367-76 3. Aquino de Muro M, Michell WJ, Priest FG. 1992. Differentiation of mosquito-pathogenic strains of Bacillus sphaericus from non-toxic varieties by ribosomal RNA gene restriction Patterns. J. Gen. Microbiol. 138:1159-66 4. Aquino de muro M, Priest FG. 1994. A colony hybridization procedure for the identification of mosquitocidal strains of Bacillus sphaericus on isolation plates. J.Invertebr. Pathol. 63:310-13 5. Arapinis C, de la Torre F, Szulmajster J. 1998. Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence of the bacillus sphaericus 1593M gene encoding a 51.4 kD polypeptide which acts synergistically with the 42kD protein for expression of the larvicidal toxin. Nucleic Acids Res. 16:7731 6. Baumann L, Baumann P. 1989. Expresssion in Bacillus subtilis of the 51- and 42- kilodalton mosquitocidal toxin genes of Bacillus sphaericus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55:252-53 7. Baumann L, Baumann P. 1991. effects of components of the Bacillus sphaericus toxin on mosquito larvae and mosquito-derived tissue culture-grown cells. Curr. Microbiol. 23:51-57 8. Baumann L, Broadwell AH. Baumann P. 1988. Sequence analysis of the mosquitocidal toxin genes encoding 51.4- and 41.9-kilodalton proteins from Bacillus sphaericus 2362 and 2297. J. bacterial. 170:2045-50 9. Baumann P, Baumann L, Bowditch RD, Broadwell AH. 1987. cloning of the gene for the larvicidal toxin of Bacillus sphaericus 2362: evidence for a family of related sequences. J. bacterial. 169: 4061-67 10. Baumann P, Clark MA, Baumann L, Broadwell AH. 1991. bacillus sphaericus as a mosquito pathogen: properties of the organism and its toxins. Microbiol Res. 11. 55:425-36 Baumann P, Unterman BM, Baumann L, Broadwell AH, Abbene SJ. Et al.1985. purification of the larvicidal toxin of Bacillus sphaericus and evidence for high-molecular-weight precursors. J. Bacteriol. 163:738-47 12. Berry C, Hindley J. 1987. Bacillus sphaericus strain 2362 :identification and nucleotide sequence of the 41.9 kDa toxin gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 15: 5591 13. Berry C, Hindley J. Ehrhardt AF, Grounds T, de Souza I, et al. 1993. Genetic determinants of hosts ranges of Bacillus sphaericus mosquito larvicidal toxins. J. Bacterial. 175:510-18 14. Berry C, Jackson-Yap J, Oei C, Hindley J. 1989. Nucleotide sequence of two toxin genes from Bacillus sphaericus IAB59: sequence comparisons between five highly toxinogenic strains. Nucleic Acids Res. 17: 7516 15. Broadwell AH, Baumann L, Baumann P. 1990. Lavicidal properties of the 42 and 51 kilodalton Bacillus sphaericus proteins expressed in different bacterial hosts: evidence for a binary toxin. Curr. Microbiol. 21:361-66 16. Broadwell AH, Baumann P. 1986. Sporulation-associated activation of Bacillus sphaericus lavicide. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 52:758-64 17. Broadwell AH, Baumann P. 1987. Proteolysis in the gut of mosquito larvae results in further activation of the Bacillus sphaericus toxin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53:1333-37 18. Broadwell AH, Clark MA, Baumann L, Baumann P. 1990. Construction by site-directed mutagenesis of a 39-kilodalton mosquitocidal protein similar to the larva-processed toxin of Bacillus sphaericus 2362. J. Bacterial. 172: 4032-36 19. Charles J-F, de Barjac H. 1981. Variation du pH de I’intestin moyen d’Aedes aegypti en relation avec I’intoxication par les cristaux de Bacillus thuringiensis Var israelensis (sérotype H 14). Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exol. 74:91-95 20. Charles J-F, Hamon S, Baumann P. 1993. Inclusion bodies and crystal of Bacillus sphaericus mosquitocidal proteins expessed in various bacterial hosts. Res. Microbiol. 144:411-16 21. Charles J-F, Kalfon A, Bourgouin C, de Barjac H. 1988. Bacillus sohaericus asporogenous mutants: ultrastructure, mosquito larvicidal activity and protein analysis. Ann. Inst. Pasyeur/Microbiol. 139: 243-59 22. Charles J-f, Nicolas L. 1986. Recycling of Bacillus sphaericus 2362 in mosquito larvae: a laboratory study. Ann. Inst. Pasteur/Microbiol. 137B:101-11 23. Charles J-F, Nielsen-Leroux C, Delecluse A. 1996. Bacillus sphaericus toxin: molecular biology and mode of action. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 41:451-72 24. Charles J-F. 1987. Ultrastructural midgut events in Culicidae larvar fed with Bacillus sphaericus 2297 spore/crystal complex. Ann. Inst. Pasteur/Microbiol. 138-471-84 25. Clark MA, Baumann P. 1990. Deletion analysis of the 51-kilodalton protein of the Bacillus sphaericus 2362 binary mosquitocidal toxin: construction of derivatives equivalent to the larva—processed toxin. J. Bacterial. 172:6759-63 26. Cokmus C, Davidson EW< Cooper K. 1997. Electrophysiological effects of Bacillus sphaericus binary toxin on cultured mosquito cells. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 69: 197-204 27. Dadd RH. 1975. Alkalinity within the midgut of mosquito larvae with alkaline-active digestive enzymes. J. Insect. Physiol. 21:1847-53 28. Davidson EW, Bieger AL, Meyer M, Shellabarge RC. 1987. Enzymatic activation of the Bacillus sphaericus mosquito lavicidal toxin. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 50:40-44 29. Davidson EW, Oei C, Meyer M, Bieber Al, Hindley J, et al. 1990. interaction of the Bacillus sphaericus mosquito larvicidal proteins. Can. J. Microbiol. 36:870-78 30. Davidson EW, Titus M. 1987. Ultrastructural effects of the Bacillus sphaericus mosquito larvicidal toxin on cultured mosquito cells. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 50: 213-20 31. Davidson EW, Yousten AA. 1990. The mosquito larval toxin of Bacillus sphaericus . See Ref. 38a, pp. 237-55 32. Davidson Ew. 1981. A review of the pathology of bacilli infecting mosquitoes, including an ultrastructural study of larvae fed bacillus sphaericus 1593 spores. Dev. Ind. Microbiol. 22: 69-81 33. Davidson EW. 1988. Binding of the Bacillus sphaericus (Eubacteriales: Bacillaceae) toxin to midgut cells of mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) larvae: relationship to host range. J. Med. Entomol. 25: 151-57 34. Davidson EW. 1989. Variation in binding of Bacillus sphaericus toxin and wheat germ agglutinin to larval midgut cells of six species of mosquitos. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 53: 251-59 35. de Barjac H, Charles J-F. 1983. une nouvelle toxine active sur les moustiques, présente dans des inclusions cristallines produites par Bacillus sphaericus. C. R.Acad. Sci. Paris sér. Ⅲ 296: 905-10 36. de Barjac H, Larget-Thiéry I, Cosmao Dumanoir V, Ripouteau H. 1985. Serological classification of Bacillus sphaericus strains in relation with toxicity to mosquito larvae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 21: 85-90 37. de Barjac H, Thiéry I, Cosmao Dumanoir V, Frachon E, Laurent P, et al. 1988. Another Bacillus sphaericus serotype harbouring strains very toxic to mosquito larvae: serotype H6. Ann. Inst. Pasteur/Microbiol. 139:363-77 38. de Barjac H. 1978. Une nouvelle variété de Bacillus thuringiensis trés toxique pour les moustiques: B.thuringiensis var. israelensis sérotype H14. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. D 286:797-800 39. de Barjac H. 1990. Classification of Bacillus sphaericus strains and comparative toxicity to mosquito larvae. See Ref. 38a, pp. 228-36 40. de la Torre F, Bennardo T, Sebo P, Szulmajster J. 1989. on the respective roles of the two proteins encoded by the Bacillus sphaericus 1593M toxin genes expressed in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. Biochem.. Biophys. Res. Commun. 164: 1417-22 41. Delecluse A, Barloy F, Rosso ML. 1996. Les bacteries pathogens des larvaes de Diteres: structure er specificite des toxins. Ann. Instit. Pasteur Microbiol. 7:217-31 42. Elangovan G, Shanmugavela M, Rajamohan F, Dean DH, Jayaraman K. 2000. Identification of the functional site in the mosquito larvicidal binary toxin of Bacillus sphaericus 1593M by site-directed mutagenesis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Common. 276:1048-55 43. Frachon E, Hamon S, Nicolas L, de Barjac H. 1991. Cellular fatty acid analysis as a potential tool for predicting mosquitocidal activity of Bacillus sphaericus strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57:3394-98 44. Goldberg LH, Margalit J. 1977. A bacterial spore demonstrating rapid larvicidal activity against Anopheles sergentii, Uranotaenia unguiculata,Culex univitatus, Aedes aegypti and Culex pipiens. Mosp. News 37:355-58 45. Guerineau M, Alexander B, Priest FG. 1991. Isolation and identification of Bacillus sphaericus strains pathogenic for mosquito larvae. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 57: 325-33 46. Hindley J, Berry C. 1987. Identification, cloning, and sequence analysis 1593 41.9kD larvicidal toxin gene. Mol. Microbiol. 1: 187-94 47. Hindley J, Berry C. 1988. Bacillus sphaericus strain 2297: nucleotidic sequence of a 41.9kDa toxin gene. Nucleic Acids. Res. 16: 4168 48. Kalfon A, Charles J-F, Bourgouin C, de Barjac H. 1984. Sporulation of Bacillus sphaericus 2297: an electron mocroscope study of crystal-like inclusion biogenesis and toxicity to mosquito larvae. J. Gen. Microbiol. 130: 893-900 49. Karch S, Coz J. 1983. Histopathologie de Culex pipiens Linné (Diptera, Culicidae) soumis ã I’ activité larvicide de Bacillus Sphaericus 1593-4. Cah. OrSTOM Sér. Entomol. Méd. Parasitol. 21:225-30 50. Kellen W, Clark T, Lindergrén J, HoB, Rogoff M, et al. 1965. Bacillus sphaericus Neide as a pasthogen of mosquitoes. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 7:442-48 51. Lakshmi Narasu M, Gopinathan Kp. 1988. Effect of Bacillus sphaericus 1593 toxin on choline acetyl transferase and mitochondrial oxidative activities of the mosquito larvae. Ind. J. Biochem. Biophys. 25: 253-56 52. Lecader MM. 1996. La lutte bacteriologique control les insects: une vielle histoire tres actuelle. Ann. Instit. Pasteur Microbiol. 74: 200-16 53. Liu Jw, Hindley J, Porter Ag, Priest FG. 1993. New high-toxicity mosquitocidal strains of Bacillus sphaericus lacking a 100-kilodalton-toxin gene. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59:3470-73 54. Liu JW, Porter AG, Wee By, Thanabalu T. 1996. New gene from nine Bacillus sphaericus strains encoding highly conserved 35.8-kilodalton mosquitocidal toxins. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2174-76 55. Myers P, Yousten AA, Davidson EW. 1979. comparative studies of the mosquito-larval toxin of Bacillus sphaericus SS Ⅱ-1 and 1593. Can. J. Microbiol. 25:1227-31 56. Neide E. 1904. Botanische Beschreibung einiger sporenbildenden Bacterien. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenkd. Infektionskr. Hyg. Abt. (pt.1)12:1-11 57. Nicolas L, Lecroisey A, Charles J-F. 1990. Role of the gut proteinases from mosquito larvae in the mechanism of action and specificity of the Bacillus sphaericus toxin. Can. J. Microbiol. 36: 804-7 58. Nicolas L, Nielsen-LeRoux C, Charles J-F, Delécluse A. 1993. Respective role of the 42- and 51-kDa component of the Bacillus sphaericus toxin overexpressed in Bacillus thuringiensis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 106:275-80 59. Nielsen-LeRoux C, Charles J-F, Thiéry I, Georghiou GP. 1995. Resistance in a larboratory population of Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) to Bacillus sphaericus binary toxin is due to a change in the receptor on midgut brush-border membranes. Eur. J. Biochem. 228: 206-10 60. Nielsen-LeRoux C, Charles J-F. 1992. Binding of Bacillus sphaericus binary toxin to specific receptor on midgut brush-border membranes from mosquito larvae. Eur. J. Biochem. 210: 585-90 61. Oei C, Hindley J, Berry C. 1990. An analysis of the genes encoding the 51.4- and 41.9-kDa toxins of Bacillus sphaericus 2297 by deletion mutagenesis : the constrction of fusion proteins. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 72:265-74 62. Payne Jm, Davidson EW. 1984. Insecticidal activity of crystalline parasporal inclusions and other components of the Bacillus sphaericus 1593 spore complex. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 43:383-88 63. Porter AG, Davidson EW, Liu JW. 1993. mosquitocidal toxins of bacilli and their genetic manipulation for effective biological control of mosquitoes. Microbiol. Rev. 57: 838-61 64. Priest FG. 1992. Biological control of mosquitoes and other biting flies by Bacillus sphaericus and Bacillus thuringiensis. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 72:357-69 65. Schwartz J-L, Povin L, Charles J-F, Berry C, et al. 2001. Menestrina, permaabilization of model lipid membranes by Bacillus sphaericus mosquitocidal binary toxin and its individuals components. J. Membrane. Biol. 184:171-83 66. Sěbo P, Bennardo T, de la Torre F, Szulmajsteer J. 1990. Delineation of the minimal portion of the Bacillus sphaericus 1593M toxin required for the expression of larvicidal activity. Eur. J. Biochem. 194:161-65 67. Silva-Filha MH, Nielsen-Leroux C, Charles J-F. 1997. Binding kinetics of Bacillus sphaericus binary toxin to midgut brush border membranes of Anopheles and Culex sp mosquito larvae. Eur. J. Biochem. 247: 754-61 68. Silva-Filha MH, Nielsen-Leroux C, Charles J-F. 1999. Identification of the receptor for Bacillus sphaericus crystal toxin in the brush border membrane of the mosquito Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae). Insect. Biochem. Molec. Biol. 29: 711-21 69. Silva-Filha MH, Pexoto C. 2003. Inmunocytochemical localization of the Bacillus sphaericus binary toxin components in Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) larvae midgut. Pstici. Biochem. Physiol. 77:138-46 70. Singer S. 1973. Insecticidal activity of recent bacterial isolates and their toxins against mosquito larvae. Nature 244: 110-11 71. Singer S. 1974. Entomogenous bacilli against mosquito larvae. Dev. Ind. Microbiol. 15: 187-94 72. Singer S. 1977. Isolation and development of bacterial patheogens in vectors. In Biological Regulation of Vectors, DHEW publ No. (NIH) 77-1180, pp. 3-18. Bethesda, MD: NIH 73. Singh GJP, Gill SS. 1988. An electron microscope study of the toxic action of bacillus sphaericus in Culex quinquefasciatus larvae. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 52:237-47 74. Stray JE, Klowden MJ, Hurlbert RE. 1988. toxicity of Bacillus sphaericus crystal toxin to adult mosquitoes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54: 2320-21 75. Thanabalu T, Berry C, Hindley J. 1993. Cytotoxicity and ADP-ribosylating activity of the mosquitocidal toxin from Bacillus sphaericus SSⅡ-1: possible roles of the 27-kilodalton anf 70-kilodalton peptides. J. Bacteriol. 175: 2314-20 76. Thanabalu T, Hindley J, Berry C. 1992. Proteolytic processing of mosquitocidal toxin from Bacillus sphaericus SSⅡ-1. J. Bacteriol. 174: 5051-56 77. Thanabalu T, Hindley J, Jackson-Yap J, Berry C. 1991. Cloning, Sequencing and expression of a gene encoding a 100-kilodalton mosquitocidal toxin from Bacillus sphaericus SSⅡ-1. J. Bacteriol. 173: 2776-85 78. Thanabalu T, Porter AG. 1995. Bacillus sphaericus gene encoding a novel class of mosquitocidal toxin with homology to Clostridium and Pseudomonas toxins. Gene. In press 79. Thiéry I, Barjac H. 1989. Selection of the most potent Bacillus sphaericus strains, based on activity ratios determined on three mosquito species. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 31: 577-81 80. Woodburn Ma, Yousten AA, Hilu KH. 1995. Random amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting of mosquito-pathogenic and nonpathogenic strains of Bacillus sphaericus. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 45: 212-17 81. Yousten AA, Davidson EW. 1982. Ultrastructural analysis of spores and parasporal crystals formed by Bacillus sphaericus 2297. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 44: 1449-55 82. Yousten AA, de Barjac H, Hedrick J, Cosmao Dumanoir V, Meyers P. 1980. Comparision between bacteriophage typing and serotyping for the differentiation of Bacillus sphaericus strains. Ann. Microbiol. 131B: 297-308 83. Yousten AA. 1984. Bacteriophage typing of mosquito pathogenic strains of Bacillus sphaericus. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 43: 124-25