* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Genetic Drift - Carol Lee Lab
Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup
Genetics and archaeogenetics of South Asia wikipedia , lookup
Viral phylodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Medical genetics wikipedia , lookup
Behavioural genetics wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Dual inheritance theory wikipedia , lookup
Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup
Group selection wikipedia , lookup
Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Heritability of IQ wikipedia , lookup
Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup
Genetic testing wikipedia , lookup
Dominance (genetics) wikipedia , lookup
Inbreeding avoidance wikipedia , lookup
Hardy–Weinberg principle wikipedia , lookup
Polymorphism (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup
Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
Carol Eunmi Lee 9/20/16 Hardy-Weinberg Principle Hardy-WeinbergTheorem • Mathematical description of Mendelian inheritance Godfrey Hardy (1877-1947) Inanon-evolvingpopulation, frequencyofallelesand genotypesremainconstant over generations You should be able to predict the genotype frequencies, given the allele frequencies Wilhem Weinberg (1862 – 1937) Evolutionary Mechanisms (will put population out of HW Equilibrium): DEVIATION • • • • from Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium Indicates that *Epigenetic modifications change expression of alleles but not the EVOLUTION frequency of alleles themselves, so they won’t affect the actual inheritance of alleles However, if you count the phenotype frequencies, and not the genotype frequencies , you might see phenotypic frequencies out of HW Equilibrium due to epigenetic silencing of alleles. (epigenetic modifications can change phenotype, not genotype) Is happening 3 Requirements of HW Large population size Violation Evolution à Epigenetic modification could affect which alleles are exposed to natural selection (no effect of Genetic Drift) Inbreeding & other No Mutations Mutations No Natural Selection Natural Selection No Migration Migration An evolving population is one that violates Hardy-Weinberg Assumptions 4 ExamplesofDeviationfrom Hardy-WeinbergEquilibrium Genetic drift Random Mating Title goes here Genetic Drift Natural Selection Mutation Migration Generation1 Generation2 Generation3 Generation4 AA 0.64 0.63 0.64 0.65 Aa 0.32 0.33 0.315 0.31 aa 0.04 0.04 0.045 0.04 IsthispopulationinHWequilibrium? Ifnot,howdoesitdeviate? Whatcouldbethereason? 6 1 Carol Eunmi Lee 9/20/16 Sources of Genetic Variation Evolutionary Mechanisms Mutation generates genetic variation Genetic Drift (and Inbreeding) Natural Selection Natural Selection acts on genetic or epigenetic variation in a population 7 Without genetic or epigenetic variation, Natural Selection cannot occur Without genetic or epigenetic variation, Natural Selection cannot occur 8 (1)Migration Mutation generates genetic variation Natural Selection acts on genetic or epigenetic variation in a population Genetic Drift causes fluctuations in allele frequencies and can reduce genetic variation Today’s OUTLINE: Sources of Genetic Variation Natural Selection Epigenetic modification changes expression of genes (2)GeneticDrift Epigenetic modification changes expression of genes (3)EffectivePopulationSize (4)ModelofGeneticDrift Genetic Drift causes fluctuations in allele frequencies and can reduce genetic variation (5)Heterozygosity (6)AConsequenceofGeneticDrift:Inbreeding 9 10 Migration (fairly obvious) § Impact of Migration Can act as a Homogenizing force (If two populations are different, migration between them can reduce the differences) § A population could go out of HW equilibrium with a lot of migration ■ ■ 11 Title goes here Immigration: could introduce genetic variation into a population Emigration: could reduce genetic variation in a population 12 2 Carol Eunmi Lee 9/20/16 Sewall Wright (1889-1988) • Sewall Wright worked on agricultural stocks (e.g. cows), and was consequently interested in small, inbred populations Random Genetic Drift • Thus, he regarded Inbreeding and Genetic Drift as particularly important genetic mechanisms • Genetic Drift and Inbreeding could generate new gene interactions 13 • These new gene interactions (epistasis caused by new recombinations) are the main substrate for selection “Null Model” “Null Model” ■ ■ No Evolution: Null Model to test if no evolution is happening should simply be a population in Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium ■ No Selection: Null Model to test whether Natural Selection is occurring should have no selection, but should include Genetic Drift ◆ 14 This is because Genetic Drift is operating even when there is no Natural Selection 15 Evenafterthesynthesistherelativeimportanceof NaturalSelectionandGeneticDriftweredebated • DuringtheEvolutionarySynthesis,SewallWrightfocused moreonimportanceofGeneticDrift,whereasFisherfocused onNaturalSelection No Selection: A model that tests for the presence of Natural Selection should include Genetic Drift ◆ This is because Genetic Drift is operating even when there is no Natural Selection ◆ So the null model that tests for natural selection should include demography, population growth and decline, as population size directly affects the level of genetic drift acting on a population 16 Motoo Kimura (1924-1994) The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution • ShortlyaftertheEvolutionarySynthesismanyfocusedon selectiontothepointofassumingthatmostphenotypeswere theresultofNaturalSelection • EmphasisonGeneticDriftresurgedinthe1970s,80swith Kimura’s“NeutralTheory” Classic Paper: Kimura, Motoo. 1968. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature. 217: 624–626. • Theninthe2000sand2010sinterestinSelectionincreased withtheabilitytodetectsignaturesofNaturalSelectionin genomesequencedata Classic Book: Kimura, Motoo (1983). The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge University Press. Title goes here 17 18 3 Carol Eunmi Lee 9/20/16 Molecular Clock Observationsofaminoacidchangesthatoccurredduringthedivergence betweenspecies,showthatmolecularevolution(mutations)takesplaceat aroughlyconstantrate. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution • TheNeutraltheorypositsthatthevastmajority ofevolutionarychangeatthemolecularlevelis causedbyrandomgeneticdriftratherthan naturalselection. Thissuggeststhatmolecularevolutionisconstantenoughtoprovidea “molecularclock”ofevolution,andthattheamountofmolecularchange betweentwospeciesmeasureshowlongagotheysharedacommon ancestor. • NeutraltheoryisnotincompatiblewithDarwin'stheoryof evolutionbynaturalselection:adaptivechangesare acknowledgedaspresentandimportant,buthypothesizedtobea smallminority ofevolutionarychange. Fromthis,Kimuraconcludedthatnot muchselectionisgoingon(because thepatternofregularmutationsisnot obscuredbyselection),andthatmost evolutionisinfluencedbyGeneticDrift. Figure:therateofevolutionofhemoglobin. Eachpointonthegraphisforapairof species,orgroupsofspecies.FromKimura (1983). • Recenttestsofselectionhavefoundthatinmanycasesevolution isnotneutral,eveninnon-codingregionsofthegenome. • Nevertheless,theneutraltheoryisusefulas thenullhypothesis, fortestingwhethernaturalselection isoccurring. 19 ■ Definition: Changes in allele frequency from one generation to the next simply due to chance (sampling error). ■ This is a NON ADAPTATIVE evolutionary force. ■ ■ 20 Genetic Drift I. Random Genetic Drift ■ Motoo Kimura Darwin did not consider genetic drift as an evolutionary force, only natural selection. ■ Genetic Drift happens when populations are limited in size, violating HW assumption of infinite population size When population is large, chance events cancel each other out When population is small, random differences in reproductive success begin to matter much more 21 22 Effective Population Size Effective Population Size ■ The concept of effective population size Ne was introduced by Sewall Wright, who wrote two landmark papers on it (Wright 1931, 1938). In Evolution, when we talk about population size, we mean effective population size ■ ■ 23 Title goes here Sewall Wright defined it as "the number of breeding individuals in an idealized population that would show the same amount of dispersion of allele frequencies under random genetic drift or the same amount of inbreeding as the population under consideration” OK, easier definition: Effective population size is the number of individuals in a population that actually contribute offspring to the next generation. 24 4 Carol Eunmi Lee 9/20/16 Effective Population Size ■ Why do we care about effective population size Ne? The effective population size is always either equal to or less than the census population size (N). The effective population size is usually smaller than the real census population size because not everyone breeds and leaves offspring. ■ Unequal sex ratio, variation in number of offspring, overlapping generations, fluctuations in population size, nonrandom mating could lead to an effective population size that is smaller than the census size. ■ ■ Ne = ■ 4Nm Nf (Nm + Nf ) where Nm = number of males, Nf = number of females from this equation, you can see that unequal sex ratio would lead 25 to lower N e Because Ne is the actual unit of evolution, rather than the census size N Why? Because only the alleles that actually get passed onto the next generation count in terms of evolution… the individuals that do not mate or have offspring are evolutionary dead ends… 26 Example of sampling error Chance Events (no Selection) Green fur: Blue fur: There is always an element of chance, in: ■ ■ G (dominant) b (recessive) IfGb x Gb mate,thenextgenerationisexpectedtohave:3:1 Ratioof Green to blue (GG, Gb, bG, bb) Who leaves Offspring Butthismightnothappen ■ ■ # of Offspring Onefamilycouldgetthisunusualfrequencyjustduetochance: Youmightget:bb, bb, bb, bb And,soyoumightaccidentallylosetheGallelenotforany reason,butjustduetochance Which Offspring survive (which gametes, which alleles) 27 Thelargerthepopulation,themoretheseeffectsaverageout, andfrequenciesapproachHWequilibrium 28 Consequences of Genetic Drift Why is this not Selection? Random fluctuations in allele frequency Selection happens when some survive for a reason: better adapted. If population size is reduced: Genetic Drift is just a numbers game. Which gamete gets fertilized, which allele gets passed on is RANDOM 1. At the Allelic level: Random fixation of Alleles (loss of alleles) 2. At the Genotypic level: Loss of Heterozygosity (because of fewer alleles) 29 Title goes here 30 5 Carol Eunmi Lee 9/20/16 Random Shift in Allele Frequencies across Generations Probability of loss of alleles is greater in smaller populations ■ ■ ■ 31 For example, if there are 50 different alleles in population …and a new population is founded by only 10 individuals Then the new population will be unable to capture all 50 alleles, and many of the alleles will be lost 32 Bottleneck Effect Random fixation of alleles FIXATION: When an allele frequency becomes 100% The other alleles are lost by chance Fluctuations are much larger in smaller populations 33 Probability of fixation of an allele ■ ■ Probability of fixation of an allele Probability of fixation of an allele = the allele’s starting frequency (Sewall Wright 1931) That is, if the frequency of an allele is 0.10 (10% in the population), then its probability (chances) of fixation (going to 100% in the population) is 0.10, or 10% Title goes here 34 ■ ■ 35 Probability of fixation of an allele = the allele’s starting frequency (Sewall Wright 1931) That is, if the frequency of an allele is 0.10 (10% in the population), then its probability (chances) of fixation (going to 100% in the population) is 10% WHY? 36 6 Carol Eunmi Lee 9/20/16 Probability of fixation of an allele ■ ■ Ifapopulationhas2N alleles Theprobabilityofeachallelebeing fixed= 1 2N ■ IfthereareX #copiesofthatallelein € thepopulation,thentheprobabilityof fixationforthatalleleis ■ X 2N Thisistheproportion(%)ofallelesin thepopulation € 37 Genetic Drift: Random Fixation 38 Genetic Drift: Random Fixation Genetic Drift: Random Fixation As populations get smaller, the probability of fixation goes up After 7 generations, all allelic diversity was lost… the population became fixed for allele #1 just due to chance 39 40 Heterozygosity ■ ■ ■ ■ 41 Title goes here Heterozygosity: frequency of heterozygotes in a population (% of heterozygotes) Often used as an estimate of genetic variation in a population HW expected frequency of heterozygotes in a population = 2p(1-p) As genetic drift drives alleles toward fixation or loss, the reduction in number of alleles causes 42 the frequency of heterozygotes to go down 7 Carol Eunmi Lee 9/20/16 Heterozygosity Grey line = theoretical expected heterozygosity: TheExpectedHeterozygosity followingapopulation bottleneck (frequencyofHeterozygotesinthenextgeneration =Hg+1): g+1 g+1 g e g e Note in this equation that as population size 2Ne gets small, heterozygosity in the next generation Hg+1, goes down Blue line = observed heterozygosity (% heterozygotes in population) 43 44 Loss of Variation Allele frequencies Heterozygosity declines faster in smaller populations 0.36 0.16 Lots of Alleles: 0.20 0.24 0.04 45 Lots of alleles --> Lots of genotypes: 46 Loss of Allelic Variation Possible genotype combinations Allele frequencies ■ Due to Genetic Drift 0.53 0.067 0.20 0.20 0 47 Title goes here 48 8 Carol Eunmi Lee 9/20/16 No Genetic Variation = No Natural Selection Loss of Allelic Variation due to Genetic Drift results in Increased Homozygosity Fewer possible genotype combinations Increase in homozygosity 49 No Genetic Variation = No Natural Selection 50 Genetic Drift and Natural Selection ■ ■ Because of the randomness introduced by Genetic Drift, Natural Selection is less efficient when there is genetic drift Thus, Natural Selection is more efficient in larger populations, and less effective in smaller populations Selection has nothing to act on 51 52 How do you detect Genetic Drift? Allele A1 Demo ■ ■ • Impact of Effective Population Size • Impact of starting allele frequency ■ • Interaction between Natural Selection and Genetic Drift ■ 53 Title goes here Randomfluctuationsinallelefrequencies Fluctuationsinnon-codingandnon-functional regionsofthegenome Thesamepatternoffluctuationsacrossthese regionsofthegenome(samedemographicfactors wouldactacrossthegenome)- butmtDNAnot same Fluctuationsinallelefrequenciescorrespondto demographyofthepopulation(populationsize) 54 9 Carol Eunmi Lee 9/20/16 Dilemma for Conservationists Consequences of Genetic Drift ---> Random fluctutations in allele frequency If population size is reduced and Drift acts more intensely, we get: • It is easier to remove genetic diversity than create it… especially variation that is potentially adaptive 1. At the Allelic level: Random fixation of Alleles (loss of alleles) Census size: Roughly 2000-3000 cheetahs live in Namibia today 2. At the Genotypic level: Inbreeding, Reduction in Heterozygosity (because of fewer alleles) 55 The effective population size is much lower 56 2. Genetic Drift often leads to Inbreeding With small population size, heterozygosity goes down, homozygosity goes up ■ ■ Inbreeding is a consequence of Genetic drift in small populations, resulting from loss of alleles Due to loss of alleles, there is an increase in homozygosity 57 58 Calculationsliketheseareusedingeneticcounseling andanimalbreedingto calculateF,thecoefficientof inbreeding(developedbySewallWright) Inbreeding Mating among genetic relatives, often because of small population size Alleles at a locus will more likely become homozygous A consequence of loss of alleles due to genetic drift (reduction in population size) 59 Title goes here F=fixationindex,ameasureofhomozygosity;theprobability thattwogenesatanylocusinanindividualareidenticalby descentfromthecommonancestor(s)ofthetwoparents (homozygous,ratherthanheterozygous). 60 10 Carol Eunmi Lee 9/20/16 Probability of getting two triangles Probability of getting two squares Probability of getting the same allele from the grandmother Mate between half-siblings Mate between full-siblings Slightly different from textbook 7.36, where 2 nd generation mates between full siblings The probability for identity by descent for both alleles Probability of getting grandma’s allele Probability for identity by descent for both alleles Textbook 7.36 Probability of getting grandpa’s allele Mate between full-siblings small population size à genetic drift à loss of alleles à decrease in heterozygosity à increase in homozygosity à à increase of exposure of deleterious alleles Textbook 7.36 The probability of getting grandma or grandpa’s allele Consequences of Inbreeding ConsequencesofInbreeding • Deleteriousrecessiveallelesareexposedas homozygotes (andlessmaskedintheheterozygousstate) § Increase in Homozygosity: Exposure of recessive alleles (that could be subjected to selection) Inbreeding Depression • Thesedeleteriousrecessiveallelesgetremovedoutof aninbredpopulationmorerapidly,becausetheyare exposedtonaturalselection (reduction in survival and fitness) § Lower genotypic diversity (poor response to natural selection) --->thisprocessisaidedbySex,discussedinNext Lecture(onVariation) 65 Title goes here 64 66 11 Carol Eunmi Lee 9/20/16 Mechanism: ■ ■ ■ ■ Increasing genetic distance Fitness Most deleterious alleles are recessive On average each of us carries 35 lethal recessive alleles These deleterious alleles are expressed in inbred individuals In Heterozygotes, these deleterious recessives are masked, and not exposed to selection Alleles Locus1 A a Locus2 B b Locus3 C c Inbreeding Depression Hybrid Vigor Outbreeding Depression 67 68 Examples of Inbreeding 69 Inbreeding and Conservation 70 Inbreeding and Agriculture: Vexing Problem: § How do we prevent extinctions? Because we have focused excessively on a few breeds, effective population sizes of many crops are incredibly small § How do we maximize genetic variance in a population? § What should we preserve? (species, populations, habitats, ecosystems???) 600 breeds of livestock have disappeared ~78 breeds lost each year 71 Title goes here 1000-1500 breeds of livestock are considered at risk of extinction (30% of current breeds) 72 12 Carol Eunmi Lee 9/20/16 Recent efforts have focused on outcrossing to increase fitness in agricultural stocks 8 million Holstein cows are descendents of 37 individuals!!! Neurological disorders Autoimmune diseases Fertility problems Duvick, D. N. 2002. Biotechnology in the 1930s: the development of hybrid maize. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2: 69-74. 73 Bruce, W. B., G. O. Edmeades, and T. C. Barkre. 2002. Review Article: Molecular and physiological approaches to maize improvement for drought 74 tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany. 53: 13-25. Genetic Diseases due to Inbreeding have afflicted many Royal Families Inbreeding depression in humans George III Insane due to Porphyria Examples: Porphyria: accumulation of porphyrin precursors, causes insanity; Dominant, but more intense in the homozygous form Mary, Queen of Scots George III, loss of American colony Acromegaly: Overproduction of GH by the pituitary gland; recessive Charles II, King of Spain (1665-1700) 75 Porphyria in the Royal Families of Europe Charles II Hemophilia: “Victoria’s Secret” “Hapsburg Jaw” X-linked, shows up in males Cognitively disabled Daughters spread it among the royals, impotent 76 downfall of Russian monarchy Royal Pedigree of the “Hapsburg Jaw” George III In small populations, individuals tend to mate with relatives Dominant, but more intense in the homozygous form Title goes here 77 = expression of the disorder 78 13 Carol Eunmi Lee 9/20/16 Inbreeding within Royal Families has been reduced in recent years Royal Pedigree of Hapsburg Jaw = expression of the disorder = m arriage with close relative Diana was a 7 th cousin of Charles, rather than a first or second cousin (which was the normal practice previously) Inbreeding within the Royal Families of Europe was genetically “disasterous” Kate Middleton is neither an aristocrat nor a royal, but the marriage was approved given the modern recognition of the perils of inbreeding… this marriage is an example of genetic immigration (Migration) 80 into an enclosed population 79 Amish in Lancaster County, PA Articles on British Royalty and Inbreeding: Descendents of ~200 Swiss who emigrated mid-1700s. News Article: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/e urope/spain/5158513/Inbreeding-causeddemise-of-the-Spanish-Habsburg-dynastynew-study-reveals.html Closed genetic population for 12+ generations. Original Scientific Article: http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/jou rnal.pone.0005174 Host to 50+ identified inherited disorders (many more uncharacterized) 81 Examples of Diseases that Afflict Amish Populations High levels of infant mortality High Incidence of brain damage Large number of metabolic disorders, such as PKU 82 There is nothing special about the Amish, genetically speaking (or Royal Families). • There are about ~200 of you here, similar to the size of the Ellis-van Creveld (dwarfism) syndrome 1/14 in Amish founding Amish population in Lancaster county, Pennsylvania. Glutaric aciduria type I 1/200 in Amish descendents would be related and mating with one another. • If all of you were stranded on a desert island, eventually your • Each of us carries 3-5 lethal recessive alleles. High incidence of bipolar disorder Polydactyly (6 fingers) Title goes here • If 200 people each had 3-5 different recessive lethals and started forming a closed population, eventually, hundreds of genetic disorders would emerge. 83 84 14 Carol Eunmi Lee 9/20/16 Summary Dating Service FIND Your Genetically Most Distant Mate!!!! (For example, Scientificmatch.com matches people that differ in their MHC loci; people that differ at these loci tend to be more attracted to one another) (1) Genetic Drift occurs when a population is small, and leads to random loss of alleles due to sampling error (2) Inbreeding, an extreme consequence of Genetic Drift, results in increases in homozygosity at many loci, including recessive lethals 85 86 CONCEPTS Genetic Drift Effective population size Fixation Heterozygosity Inbreeding Inbreeding Depression Heterozygote advantage 1. When is Genetic Drift LEAST likely to operate? (A) When there are migrants between populations (B) When populations are fragmented and isolated (C) When population size is small (D) When population size is very very large 87 2. Which of the following is FALSE regarding inbreeding? 3. Which of the following is FALSE regarding Genetic Drift? (A) Inbreeding could result as a consequence after genetic drift has acted on a population (B) Populations with lower allelic diversity tend to have lower genotypic diversity (more homozygous) (C) Selection acts more slowly in inbred populations to remove deleterious recessive alleles (D) One way to reduce inbreeding in a population is to bring in migrants from another population Title goes here 88 89 (A) Genetic Drift occurs more rapidly in smaller populations (B) In populations of finite size, random changes in allele frequency occur at each generation (C) Genetic Drift could lead to inbreeding due to loss of alleles (D) Genetic Drift occasionally leads to the generation of favorable alleles 90 15 Carol Eunmi Lee 9/20/16 ■ ■ ■ ■ Answers to sample exam questions: 1D 2C 3D 91 Title goes here 16