* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Introduction
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Frameshift mutation wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup
Fetal origins hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Population genetics wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Tay–Sachs disease wikipedia , lookup
Medical genetics wikipedia , lookup
Behavioural genetics wikipedia , lookup
Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup
Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Genetic testing wikipedia , lookup
Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup
Heritability of IQ wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Genome-wide association study wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis wikipedia , lookup
Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup
Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of neurodegenerative diseases wikipedia , lookup
Parkinson Syndromes Christine Klein, MD Institute of Neurogenetics and Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck; Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany; Tel: +49-451-2903-353; Fax: +49-451-2903-355; Email: [email protected] Several genes are well validated as causes of a typical Parkinson’s disease (PD) phenotype. However, known monogenic causes and genetic risk factors only partly explain the observed familial aggregation of PD. Not surprisingly, the application of new techniques such as next generation sequencing (NGS) and GWAS meta-analyses have allowed for the discovery of new genes and genetic risk factors for PD. In addition, clinico-genetic studies have been used to improve genotype-phenotype correlations and to reveal the earliest disease signs. Furthermore, there has been significant progress in the development of new disease models, particularly through the use of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell-derived neurons. According to a recently revised system of the genetic nomenclature of PD, there are ten confirmed monogenic forms of parkinsonism with a PARK designation. Three follow an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance, and seven are recessively inherited. The most common forms are late-onset autosomal dominant parkinsonism with mutations in the LRRK2 gene and early-onset parkinsonism caused by mutations in the Parkin gene. The three dominant forms and three of the seven recessive forms of parkinsonism (Parkin, PINK1, DJ-1) are associated with a clinical picture closely resembling that of idiopathic PD with its cardinal motor features of bradykinesia, resting tremor, rigidity and postural instability. The remaining four recessive forms (ATP13A2, FBOX07, DNAJC6, and SYNJ1) usually have a juvenile onset and present with atypical, multisystem features including early dementia, eye movement abnormalities, pyramidal signs etc. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been a major advance in genetic research, enabling the assessment of genetic risk factors associated with PD and other disorders via largescale, population-based studies. The third and most comprehensive meta-analysis included data from seven million polymorphisms originating either from GWAS datasets and/or from smaller-scale PD association studies and was supplemented with unpublished data to include >100,000 patients and controls. Many previously reported risk loci, including SNCA and MAPT, were confirmed and evidence for a new risk variant in the ITGA8 gene was found. The risk factors identified by these studies provide clues to the underlying molecular mechanisms and offer potential targets for novel treatments. Both the monogenic and the idiopathic forms of Parkinson disease share common pathophysiological mechanisms converging on oxidative modification, impaired protein degradation, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Therefore, monogenic forms of Parkinson disease can serve as human model diseases for the idiopathic form. 1