* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Long-Term Climate Change
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Global warming hiatus wikipedia , lookup
Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup
Climate sensitivity wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the Arctic wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Instrumental temperature record wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
John D. Hamaker wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Snowball Earth wikipedia , lookup
Years of Living Dangerously wikipedia , lookup
Future sea level wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
The Geography Magazine Long-term climate change Davyth Fear There is a common saying in Geology that “the present is the key to the past”, because it is only by studying how rocks and landforms are created nowadays that one can find out about past environments. It might equally be said that, in studying climate change, “the past is the key to the present”, because we can only put the present industrially-induced global warming into context, and extrapolate what future effects are likely to be by looking at what has happened in past times. For the purposes of this article, long-term climate change is taken to mean time periods greater than the last 150 years. The pattern of temperature rise over the last 150 years has been described as a ‘hockey stick’, with a period of relative stability followed more recently by a more sudden rise. Climate change since 1880 1945 Global temperatures begin a slow 30-year slide. One likely cause: sun-blocking pollutants from postwar industry Average global temperature 0.6 CO2 level (data from ice cores) 2005 Kyoto Protocol goes into force; global temperatures match 1998 record 1991 Mount Pinatubo erupts in Philippines, cooling Earth by about 0.2°C (0.36°F) for two years 390 CO2 level (measured in atmosphere) 0.4 0.2 380 1930s Flooding in China kills over 400,000; dust bowl rages across US; global temperatures hit global highs 370 1972 Intense drought hits the Africa Sahel region; millions die. More drought follows in the mid-1980s 360 350 1896 Swedish chemist Svante Arrhenius calculates that a doubling of carbon dioxide could warm the planet 5°C (9°F) 340 330 0.0 - 0.2 1957-58 Interstate highways and suburbia sweep the US; Charles Keeling begins measurements of CO2 in Hawaii. - 0.4 1880 1 2003 More than 40,000 Europeans die in unprecedented heat wave 1900 1920 1940 1960 1976-77 Historic drought in Europe; severe winters in US; global temperature bottoms out 1997-98 Kyoto Protocol finalizes after intense negotiations; “El Niño of the century” triggers floods and drought, helps make 1998 record-warm year 320 310 300 290 280 270 1980 2000 Atmospheric CO2 level (parts per million) Global temperature (change from 1951-1980 mean )°C 0.8 1988 Mississippi River dries up; Yellowstone burns; James Hansen testifies before US Congress that human-induced warming has likely begun The future The UN’s intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts a temperature rise of between 1.1 and 6.4°C (2.0 and 11.5°F) by 2080– 2099 compared to 1980–1999, depending on how much the world reduces or increases its emissions of greenhouse gases, and how sensitive the climate proves to be to those gases The Geography Magazine But how does this compare with the past, and why did the climate change in the past if recent change is because of human interference? There are several reasons, and scientists have been finding out more and more about them using evidence from tree rings, pollen, deep sea oozes, ice cores, silt, rocks and patterns of vegetation. Reasons for change in the climate, in essence cause and effect, are termed ‘forcing’ and ‘response’ by climate scientists. There are three fundamental kinds of natural climate forcing in existence, all operating on different timescales. These are: • changes to the strength of the Sun’s radiation occurring over the age of the Earth, but also shorter period cycles, with change over decades and centuries. • changes to tectonic processes or plate tectonics, operating over millions of years. • and changes to the Earth’s orbit, operating over tens to hundreds of thousands of years. This mystery, called the faint young Sun paradox, means that something must have kept the Earth warm whilst the Sun was not so active. The answer is that the level of greenhouse gases must, at one time, have been much higher than now. A comparison of Earth and Venus shows that although both planets have similar amounts of carbon, the Earth now stores most of it in rocks, while on Venus it is stored in the atmosphere, creating the fiercely hot conditions there today. The intense volcanism of the early Earth pumped large amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, so how and when was it removed? It was chemical weathering that helped remove carbon from the atmosphere, creating clay minerals which were then stored in the crust, or it was removed through the processes of plate tectonics, within the mantle. Earth’s thermostat? The faint young Sun paradox In the 4.55 billion years since the formation of the Solar System, the Sun has gradually been converting hydrogen to helium by nuclear fusion and has therefore been getting brighter and larger than in its early days (between 25% and 30% according to most theories). The faint young Sun paradox (A) The most plausible explanation of the faint young Sun paradox is that the weakness of the early Sun was compensated for by a stronger carbon greenhouse in the atmosphere. (B) When the Sun later strengthened, increased chemical weathering deposited the excess greenhouse carbon in rocks, and the greenhouse effect weakened enough to keep Earth’s temperatures moderate. Astrophysical models of the Sun’s evolution indicate it was 25% to 30% weaker early in Earth’s history (left above). Climate models show this situation would have produced a completely frozen Earth for well over half its early history if the atmosphere had the same composition as it has today (right above). Only a very small decrease in the Sun’s present strength would be required to cause global freezing of all surface water. An analysis of the Earth’s early history via the geological record, sparse though it is, indicates that the creation of sedimentary rocks by rivers has always been important, suggesting temperatures were roughly similar to today. 2 Weathering acts as a negative feedback loop, regulating the temperature of the atmosphere. Some researchers believe that evolution has helped in this process because, when the Sun was weaker, simple organisms played a much smaller role in the process of chemical weathering, while the development of more advanced organisms accelerated the weathering process and enabled the removal of more carbon from the atmosphere. This idea is called the Gaia hypothesis. The Geography Magazine Plate tectonics and supercontinents The theory of plate tectonics, the idea that the world’s land surfaces could come together as supercontinents, then break up and re-assemble, means that the global patterns of ocean currents, winds, rain and temperatures could also change over time. Scientists can track the positions of continents by analysing traces of magnetism preserved in rocks when they form. In this way, when large land masses are situated near the poles, major ice sheets can develop (the Polar Position Hypothesis). However, this is not enough in itself to produce ice ages. Continents have been on or near the South Pole for most of the last 250 million years, mostly without producing ice ages. Two more recent theories, the spreading rate hypothesis and the uplift weathering hypothesis fit the available evidence more completely. The first links the speed of formation of new crust at mid-ocean ridges to the input of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. The carbon dioxide is removed by weathering and deposited in the ocean as carbonate rocks, being returned to the upper mantle via subduction. This process has a time lag of several tens of millions of years. The second theory states that the global rate of chemical weathering depends upon the amount of fresh rock available, as well as upon the usual factors of temperature, precipitation and vegetation. Mass-movement in mountain ranges, the frequency of earthquakes in fold mountain chains and the high precipitation rates of mountain areas all combine to produce very rapid weathering rates in high mountain areas. Greenhouse and Icehouse Earth By 100 mya, our Earth could rightly be called a greenhouse world. No record of permanent ice is to be found in the geological record. Global sea levels were 200 metres above present levels, flooding low-lying continental margins. Mid Cretaceous 120 million years ago 3 The Geography Magazine During this geological era (the Cretaceous), chalk and limestone were deposited in many shallow seas. Temperatures at that time were warmer at all latitudes, but especially at polar ones. Atmospheric CO2 concentrations were believed to have been between 4 and 10 times higher than today, and temperatures were over 5°C warmer than now. It is thought that the extra CO2 came both from active spreading ridges and from methane hydrates stored in cold ocean seabeds. Over the last 55 million years (from the mid Eocene period), the Earth has been cooling down, with sea levels dropping and continents reaching their present position. During the middle of the Pleistocene Ice Age, CO2 levels had decreased to reach a low of about 50% of present day levels. Mid-ocean ridge spreading rates slowed down, but perhaps more importantly, the Tibetan Plateau started rising as India and Asia collided. South America and Antarctica separated circa 20 mya and, with the circulation of air and water around Antarctica unimpeded, permanent ice formed on Antarctica about 13 mya. After the joining of North and South America nearly 4 mya, the currents of the Atlantic and Pacific shifted, intensifying the movement of warm water northwards, via the Gulf Stream and away from Antarctica. Changes in the Earth’s orbit During the Pleistocene Ice Age, we can clearly see another climate forcing mechanism, i.e. changes to the Earth’s orbit. The Ice Age is divided into dozens of glacial and inter-glacial periods, and these are linked to the complicated series of changes that describe the Earth’s orbit through space. Scientists have known for a long time that the gravity of the Sun, Moon and other planets cause changes to the Earth’s angle of tilt, the eccentricity of orbit and the relative positions of the solstices and equinoxes within the orbit. Firstly, the angle of tilt of the Earth (23.5° at present and slowly decreasing) may vary between 22.2° and 24.5° because of the gravitational tug of large planets such as Jupiter. This changes the amount of solar insolation received, especially at high latitudes, amplifying or suppressing the seasons. As the tilt decreases, glacial periods tend to set in because the cooler summers cannot melt the winter’s snow. Similarly increasing tilt can help end a glacial period. Effects of increased tilt on polar regions Increased tilt brings more solar radiation to the two summer-season poles and less radiation to the two winter-season poles. Long-term changes in tilt Changes in the tilt of Earth’s axis have occurred on a regular 41,000-year cycle. 4 The Geography Magazine The shape of the Earth’s orbit also varies between more circular and more elliptical shapes. At present, the eccentricity is fairly circular. There are two main cycles of change, with one cycle having a period of 100,000 years and the other 413,000 years. Precession of Earth’s axis Earth’s slow wobbling motion causes its rotational axis to point in different directions through time, sometimes (as today) toward the North Star, Polaris, but at other times toward other stars. Long-term changes in eccentricity The eccentricity (ε) of Earth’s orbit varies at periods of 100,000 and 413,000 years. Presently, the Earth is about 3% closer to the Sun in early January than in early July, and this means that 7% more solar energy reaches Earth. The last eight glacial periods have coincided with the 100,000 year cycle, although previous to this, the 41,000 cycle of tilt seemed to be dominant, as analysis of microscopic shells (foraminifera) in deep sea sediments shows. The reasons for this change will be dealt with later in the article. Finally, the Earth wobbles in its orbit like a spinning top. This movement is called precession and operates on a cycle of 26,000 years. On top of this, the elliptical shape of the orbit rotates, causing the solstices and equinoxes to slowly move round the orbit in a cycle of 23,000 years. 5 Precession of the ellipse The elliptical shape of Earth’s orbit slowly precesses in space, so that the major and minor axes of the ellipse slowly shift through time. The Geography Magazine These two movements combine to magnify or suppress contrasts in Earth-Sun distance around the orbit. For instance, 10,000 years ago, the stronger summer Sun in the Northern Hemisphere meant much wetter monsoons. As the amount of insolation changes with these changes in the Earth’s orbit, ice sheets are able to grow or shrink in polar latitudes. Their response is not immediate however, but shows a time lag calculated to be between 5,000 and 8,000 years. Changes in greenhouse gas concentration The record of global atmospheric CO2 and methane concentrations also shows regular fluctuations. Analysis of ice cores from Greenland and Antarctica enable measurements to be made of ice layers dating back thousands of years. Methane concentrations show regular cycles at intervals of 23,000 years, mainly because the wetter monsoons increased the amount of standing water in bogs, thus creating oxygen-free conditions needed for the creation of methane. Long-term C02 changes A 400,000-year record of C02 from Vostok ice in Antarctica shows four large-scale cycles at a period of 100,000 years similar to those in the marine ∂18 O (ice volume) record. CO2 is removed from the atmosphere during colder periods because: Methane and the monsoon The methane record from Vostok ice in Antarctica shows regular cycles at intervals near 23,000 years (left). This signal closely resembles the monsoon-response signal driven by low-latitude insolation (right). CO2 concentrations do not show the same pattern as methane. There is a general match between CO2 and ice sheet volume, with interglacial periods showing 90 ppm greater concentrations than glacial periods. 6 • it dissolves more readily in colder seawater • the increased upwelling of cold water in tropical areas stimulates the growth of plankton • cold water in Antarctic areas stays at the surface for longer, again stimulating higher productivity. But is it changes in CO2 which drive ice volume change, or do changes in ice sheet cover drive change in CO2 levels during glacial periods? It is the latter which scientists favour because CO2 levels are connected to changes in circulation and carbon storage in the deep ocean, changes which can respond relatively quickly to climatic forcing. As has already been stated earlier, however, the Pleistocene Ice Age displayed cycles of 41,000 and 23,000 years in the expansion and contraction of ice sheets up to 0.9 mya. Following this, a 100,000 year cycle took over. The Geography Magazine from a glacial period to an interglacial one, and vice versa? Data, initially from the deep oceans, but later from pollen records in soils around the world, indicates that conditions could change much more rapidly than previously envisaged. These oscillations happen over periods of a few thousand years at most, and are called Dansgaard-Oeschger cycles if they represent rapid warming (with 23 such episodes recognized between 110,000 and 23,000 years ago), and Heinrich cycles if they represent cooling (with 6 such episodes identified). During D-O cycles, air temperatures rose rapidly, up to 8°C in 40 years, returning to glacial conditions more slowly, over hundreds of years. A Heinrich cycle occurs when vast quantities of icebergs flow into the North Atlantic disrupting the ocean conveyer belt. ‘The emergence of this new data during the 1990s made it clear to scientists that warm and cold swings during the ice age were far more widespread and could unfold far more rapidly than they had thought before.’* Following the end of the Ice Age 15,000 years ago, when the orbital cycles of the Earth’s tilt and changes in the position of the Earth’s axis synchronised, there have been less extreme climatic changes. However, this does not mean that the climate has been static. The Younger Dryas period (named after an alpine flower, Dryas octopetala, that flourished during conditions too cold for most other life) started about 13,000 years ago, lasting for just over 1,000 years. Evidence of ice sheet evolution: ∂18 O A North Atlantic Ocean sediment core holds a 3-Myr ∂18 O record of ice volume and deep-water temperature change. After a pre-glaciation phase with no major ice sheets before 2.75 Myr ago, small ice sheets grew and melted at cycles of 41,000 and 23,000 years until 0.9 Myr ago, and then large ice sheets grew and melted at a cycle of 100,000 years. The diagonal white line shows a gradual long-term ∂18 O trend toward more ice and colder temperature. The marine geologist John Imbrie has produced a model which hypothesizes that the size of the ice sheets gradually became larger and larger, passing a threshold which made them resistant to melting on the warm summer side of the 41,000 year cycle. The size of the ice sheets increased the flow of deep water in the oceans, providing positive feedback to their own growth and melting. The change in ice sheet volume mostly affected the Northern Hemisphere because there is little room for expansion of ice sheets in Antarctica. Dryas octopetala (Mountain avens) Dansgaard-Oeschger and Heinrich cycles The Pleistocene Ice Age has produced many different glacial and interglacial periods. But how quickly can the climate flip 7 * Adapted from page 218 in The Rough Guide to Climate Change, Robert Henson, January 2008, by kind permission of Penguin Group UK The Geography Magazine According to ice core information from Greenland, it took only 10 years or so for it to start and to finish. Average temperatures in Britain during this period were as low as -5°C. Many climatologists believe that the massive Lake Agassiz, made up of meltwater from the Laurentide Ice Sheet across Northern Canada, sent large pulses of fresh water into the North Atlantic, disrupting the global circulation of water (fresh water is less dense than salt water, therefore it does not sink so easily). Gradual warming and peaks in summertime sunshine, caused by changes in orbital cycles, produced intense monsoons across North Africa and South Asia. Much of the Sahara was green. But from 5,000 years ago, gradual cooling and drying created the conditions we see in the Sahara today. Sea ice on the coast of Iceland The frequency of sea ice along the coast of Iceland increased into the nineteenth century, then declined precipitately in the twentieth century. Sunspot history from telescopes Measurements made with telescopes over the last several hundred years show an 11-year sunspot cycle, as well as earlier intervals such as the Maunder minimum, when sunspots were absent for several decades. The longer-term average number of sunspots resembles observed temperature changes during the twentieth century (top). 8 More recent climatic change The last 1,000 years has also seen changes. From 1000 to 1300, a period of warm conditions called the Medieval Climatic Optimum existed. This period was warm enough for people from Scandinavia to settle on the coast of Greenland and farm the land. Subsequent cooling affected the period from 1400 to 1850. This period is known as the Little Ice Age. Glaciers expanded in the Alps, the Thames froze over and frost fairs were held on the river, and sea ice became more common off the coast of Iceland. When considering the causes of natural variation in the climate over the last 1,000 years, one further cause of climatic change can be established. Satellite measurements of the Sun’s radiation have shown variations of 0.15% over a cycle 11 years in length. Changes over this length of time do not allow the Earth’s climate to respond fully before the cycle is reversed. This corresponds to changes in the number of sunspots (with greater radiation when sunspot numbers are high because of increased emission in the bright areas surrounding sunspots). But there have been periods when sunspot activity has virtually ceased (the Maunder minimum from 1645 – 1715 and the Sporer minimum from 1460 – 1550). Some astronomers estimate that the Sun’s radiative output was 0.25% weaker during these periods, which could produce temperatures 0.5°C below late 20th century temperatures. The Geography Magazine The past is the key to the future? So what does all this information about the past tell us about what might happen in the future? This depends upon decisions being made at present. Optimistic projections consider a doubling of CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere when compared with pre-industrial levels. A projection of current trends estimates a larger rise in emissions to a fourfold concentration of CO2. The CO2 emitted by humans will eventually be mixed into the subsurface ocean. Certainly, the excess CO2 will last in the atmosphere for several hundred years. Projected temperature changes with a doubling of CO2 vary from study to study, but a consensus indicates a rise of 2.5°C. CO2 levels of this magnitude have not existed for 7 million years. A fourfold increase might perhaps mean a 5°C rise. CO2 levels of this order are unprecedented during the last 40 million years of Earth history, and possibly not since the Cretaceous greenhouse world of 100 mya. However, we cannot use our records of past climate as the only predictors for future events. Not all parts of the climate system will be in equilibrium. For example, the large ice sheets will not have enough time during the few hundred years of our man-made CO2 pulse to be destroyed. Even so, climatic modelling indicates that with a 2 x CO2 world, Arctic sea ice will disappear. Most of the permafrost and tundra will also be absent. The Greenland and West Antarctic ice sheets will be affected on their margins by increased glacial flow and this will increase global sea level by 30 cm or so. A 4 x CO2 world should see increased rates of melting, perhaps of the order of 1 metre sea level rise. All mountain glaciers should disappear, and conifer forests will be making their way northwards, taking over from the tundra. Increased rates of melt-water entering the North Atlantic, lowering its salinity and density, might shut off the ocean conveyer belt which brings abnormally warm water to Western Europe. This would mean atmospheric CO2 levels rising even faster as the North Atlantic is one of the major sinks for CO2 to leave the atmosphere. It can therefore be seen that our present human-induced change of the climate is of unprecedented scale and suddenness, perhaps even beyond the capabilities of scientists to predict its full impact. Do we really want to live in a world experiencing the same climate as the age of the dinosaurs? 9 Suggested questions for consideration: 1 Describe and explain the factors that may have influenced long-term climate change. 2 Contrast the level and speed of climate change during the last 200 years with that during the geological past. Web sites for further investigation http://www.climatechange.com.au/ http://muller.lbl.gov/pages/IceAgeBook/history_of_ climate.html http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/ climate-change/ http://gcmd.gsfc.nasa.gov/KeywordSearch/Keywords. do?Portal=GCMD&KeywordPath=Parameters%7C PALEOCLIMATE&MetadataType=0 The Geography Magazine Acknowledgements Thank you to the following for permission to reproduce figures: Penguin Group UK/Swanston Publishing Limited, from The Historical Atlas of the Earth: A Visual Exploration of the Earth’s Physical Past, eds. R. Osborne and Donald Tarling, 1996: p.1(t), 3(b) Penguin Group UK, from The Rough Guide to Climate Change, Robert Henson, 2008: p.1(b) W.H. Freeman and Company/Worth Publishers, from Earth’s Climate: Past and Future, William F. Ruddiman, © 2001/adapted from Environmental Geology, D. Merritts et al, W.H. Freeman and Company, ©1997: p. 2(l) W.H. Freeman and Company/Worth Publishers, from Earth’s Climate: Past and Future, William F. Ruddiman, © 2001 / adapted from Greenhouse Puzzles, W. Broecker and T.-H. Peng, Eldigio Press, 1993, by permission of Professor Wallace Broecker: p. 2(r) W.H. Freeman and Company/Worth Publishers, from Earth’s Climate: Past and Future, William F. Ruddiman, © 2001: p. 3(t), 4, 5(l) W.H. Freeman and Company/Worth Publishers, from Earth’s Climate: Past and Future, William F. Ruddiman, © 2001/adapted from Ice Ages: Solving the Mystery, John Imbrie and Katherine Palmer Imbrie. Copyright © 1979 by John Imbrie and Katherine Palmer Imbrie. Published by Enslow Publishers, Inc., 40 Industrial Road, Box 38, Berkeley Heights, NJ. All rights reserved.: p. 5(t,r) W.H. Freeman and Company/Worth Publishers, from Earth’s Climate: Past and Future, William F. Ruddiman, © 2001/adapted from Orbital Geometry, C02 and Pleistocene Climate, N. Pisias and J. Imbrie, in Oceanus 29 (1986-87), 43-49, by permission of Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution: p. 5(b,r) W.H. Freeman and Company/Worth Publishers, from Earth’s Climate: Past and Future, William F. Ruddiman, © 2001/adapted from Ice Core record of Atmospheric Methane over the Last 160,000 Years, J. Chapellaz et al, in Nature 345 (1990), 127-131, by permission of Nature Publishing Group: p. 6(methane) W.H. Freeman and Company/Worth Publishers, from Earth’s Climate: Past and Future, William F. Ruddiman, © 2001/adapted from Age Dating and the Orbital Theory of the Ice Ages: Development of a High-Resolution 0 to 300,000 Year Chronostratigraphy, Douglas Martinson et al, in Quaternary Research 27 (1987), 1-29, by permission of Elsevier Limited: p. 6(Monsoon signal) W.H. Freeman and Company/Worth Publishers, from Earth’s Climate: Past and Future, William F. Ruddiman, © 2001/adapted from Climate and Atmospheric History of the Past 420,000 Years from the Vostok Ice Core, Antarctica, J.R. Petit et al, in Nature 399 (1999), 429-436, by permission of Nature Publishing Group: p. 6(r) 10 W.H. Freeman and Company/Worth Publishers, from Earth’s Climate: Past and Future, William F. Ruddiman, © 2001 /adapted from The Initiation of Northern Hemisphere Glaciation, M.E. Raymo, in Annual Reviews of Earth and Planetary Sciences 22 (1994) 353-383, by permission of Annual Reviews: p. 7(l) Gwasg Dwyfor/Islwyn Williams, from Blodau’r Mynydd, Drawings by Islwyn Williams, Text by Twm Elias, 1987: p. 7(r) W.H. Freeman and Company/Worth Publishers, from Earth’s Climate: Past and Future, William F. Ruddiman, © 2001 /adapted from Climate – Past, Present and Future, Volume 2, H.H. Lamb, Methuen, 1977, by permission of Cengage Learning: p. 8(l) W.H. Freeman and Company/Worth Publishers, from Earth’s Climate: Past and Future, William F. Ruddiman, © 2001/adapted from Solar Signals in Global Climatic Change, C.D. Schoenwiese et al, in Climatic Change 27, 1994, 259-281, by permission of Christian-D. Schoenwiese: p. 8(r) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: p. 9 Every effort has been made to trace and acknowledge ownership of copyright. The publishers will be pleased to make suitable arrangements with any copyright holders who have not been contacted. Editor: Gwenda Lloyd Wallace Designer: Richard Huw Pritchard Thank you to Davyth Fear, Glyn Owen, Mari Jackson, Janet Cadogan, David Griffiths and Nicola Hawley (the monitors) for their valuable guidance.