* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download MRI (radio) phenotypes - Cancer Imaging Archive Wiki
Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Oncogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Molecular Inversion Probe wikipedia , lookup
Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup
Genomic library wikipedia , lookup
Gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
ASNR 2012 Radiogenogram: MR Imaging as a Screening Tool for Uncovering Novel Genomic Drug Targets Rivka R. Colen, M.D.1, Ferenc A. Jolesz, M.D.1, Pascal O. Zinn, M.D.2 1 Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 2 M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 Disclosures No Disclosures. R25 CA089017(RRC) P41 RR019703 (FAJ) © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 Glioblastoma Multiforme Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) is most common, most aggressive primary brain tumor Despite current treatment with Surgery, Chemotherapy, and Radiotherapy, the median survival remains < 2 years. © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 Genomic Analysis • Gene and microRNA microarrays is a method allowing for analysis of thousands of genomic expression events. • This has allowed for greater insight into gliomagenesis, treatment response, and patient prognosis. • As an example, MGMT portends a better patient response to Temozolomide and increase in pseudoprogression. Another example, IDH-1. © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 Genomic Analysis However, otherwise, the large plethora of genomic information remains largely unused and drug development based on genomics has been limited. This is largely due to the inability for early identification of genomic targets through which clinically meaningful and applicable therapeutic targets can be developed. The current selecting a genetic target to pursue after sifting through myriads of genomic data will not necessarily result in a clinically applicable or clinical meaningful target for drug development and this trial and error method is not cost- effective. © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 Imaging Genomics In order to address this, we are developing MRI as a screening method, similar to mammography, to screen genomic targets. Given that MRI reflects both underlying biological process and tumor microenvironment and can do a step further and be correlated with genomic information, it can be anticipated to yield clinically meaningful and applicable targets by which therapeutics can be developed. Furthermore, MRI is non-invasive and cost-effective, as in the latter case done on a routine basis in the work up of a brain tumor patient. © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 Imaging Genomics MRI (radio) phenotypes( necrosis, edema/tumor infiltration, contrast enhancement, perfusion, diffusion) correlated with underlying genomic composition (genes, microRNAs, etc). This can be correlated in a bidirectional manner as well (from genome to phenome) © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 Purpose • In this study, we seek to validate MRI as a screening tool to screen for glioblastoma genomic targets for subsequent pharmaceutical development of gene based therapeutics. • We seek to develop an efficient, cost-effective system to uncover clinically meaningful genomic targets from the present overwhelmingly vast genomic data. © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 Methods and Materials • Retrospective study • Using 78 treatment naïve GBM patients with imaging data obtained from The Cancer Imaging Archive (http://cancerimagingarchive.net/) sponsored by the Cancer Imaging Program, DCTD/NCI/NIH, segmentation were performed. • The volumes of these were then correlated with Gene- and micoRNA- expression profiles obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 Methods and Materials • Image Analysis was done in Slicer 3.6 (slicer.org) using the Segmentation module - T2/FLAIR was registered to the post- contrast T1WI. - Volumetric segmentation was performed in a simple hierarchical model of anatomy, proceeding from peripheral to central. - 3 distinct structures were segmented: • edema/invasion • enhancing tumor • necrosis © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 Methods and Materials Tumor Segmentation. 65 year old male patient with a right temporal GBM. Segmentation of tumor edema (blue), enhancement (yellow) and necrosis (red) was performed and edema volume was obtained. © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 Methods and Materials • Image Genomic- Biostatistics analysis - 12,764 genes and 555 microRNAs were analyzed (Affymetrix/Agilent chip technology) in each patient and correlated to selected imaging radiophehotypes - Comparative Marker Selection (Broad Institute) identified preferentially upregulated genomic events in one vs. another predefined patient group (high_low volumes groups in each radiophenotype) Low (left) and High (right) FLAIR phenotype (colored in blue) reflecting tumor infiltration/edema © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 Results Screening done using the MRI-FLAIR radiophenotype identified genes and microRNAs involved in tumor infiltration/edema. These are concordant with the underlying biological processes evaluated on MRI in the edema/tumor infiltration zone as depicted by the non-enhancing T2/FLAIR hyperintensity in the surrounding peritumoral region. © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 Results • Our MRI screen identified top upregulated and down regulated genes and microRNAs which were novel and not previously described in the literature. These were concordant with the underlying biologic processes of edema/invasion, necrosis, and enhancing tumor MRI phenotypes. • In some cases, the gene expression was a stronger prognostic variable than either molecular subtype (as defined by Veerkak and colleagues) in the Cox proportional hazards ratio (P = 0.0001). • In vitro and in vivo animal models as well as loss and gain of function models subsequently confirmed the genomic target’s function which was concordant with the underlying biologic processes measured by MRI. © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 Results In vitro and in vivo studies in mice confirmed these genomic targets. © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 Conclusion • MR imaging is an effective screening tool to uncover clinically meaningful genomic targets that can be used in drug development of therapeutic targets for GBM treatment. • Effectively, MRI used in this way, we have termed this the Radiogenogram. © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 Conclusion Thank you for your interest! Acknowledgements: This work was supported by NIH grant R25 CA08901706A2 (RRC). Any questions please email: [email protected]. © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012