Download (known biologically to reflect a mixture of edema and tumor

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
ASNR 2012
ASNR 2012
An Introduction into Imaging Genomic Mapping in
Brain Tumors
Rivka R. Colen, M.D.1, Bhanu Mahajan, M.B.B.S.1, Ferenc A. Jolesz, M.D.1 , Pascal O.
Zinn, M.D.2
1
Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
2 M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
© NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012
ASNR 2012
Disclosures
No Disclosures.
R25 CA089017(RRC)
P41 RR019703 (FAJ)
© NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012
ASNR 2012
Introduction
• Imaging genomics (also termed radiogenomics) has emerged as a new field which
links the specific imaging traits (radiophenotypes) with gene-expression profiles.
•
The different MRI characteristics (also termed radiophenotypes, phenotypes or
biomarkers) can be correlated with the underlying genomic composition in tumors,
in this case Glioblastoma (GBM).
•
The different MRI radiophenotypes/ MRI biomarkers are obtained from
conventional( T1 and T2- weighted images) or advanced (MRI- diffusion, MRIperfusion, MRI spectroscopy) techniques.
•
For stand alone genomic analysis, large scale gene- and microRNA based cancer
microarray analysis is commonly not performed due to high cost, time and
manpower required for large dataset analysis and interpretation.
© NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012
ASNR 2012
Introduction
• In order to leverage genomic data for therapy so that
personalized medicine transpire, a cost-effective
biomarker that accurately reflects underlying
molecular cancer compositions is urgently needed.
• Imaging, specifically MRI is a promising biomarker to
reflect underlying tumor pathology and biological
function.
© NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012
ASNR 2012
Introduction
• It follows that if imaging phenotypes of tumors
obtained from routine clinical MRI studies can be
associated with specific gene and microRNA
expression signatures, imaging phenotypes can
serve as non-invasive surrogates for tumor gene
expression information and routinely provide
information at a large-scale genomic level regarding
the diagnosis, prognosis, and optimal treatment
indicated.
• Thus, the new field of imaging genomics can be
anticipated to be instrumental in identifying genomic
tumor compositions.
© NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012
ASNR 2012
Purpose
•
In this presentation, we seek to introduce, define and detail the concept of
imaging genomics and how to perform imaging genomic mapping in brain
tumors, specifically Glioblastoma, using large scale- genomic and imaging
analysis.
•
Here, we present the first quantitative imaging genomic mapping largescale study in GBM
© NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012
ASNR 2012
Purpose
•
Imaging genomic analysis can be bidirectional:
•
Correlating imaging to genomic data ( phenome to genome)
• Correlating genomic to imaging data (genome to phenome)
Phenome
(Imaging)
© NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012
Genome
(Genomics)
ASNR 2012
Purpose
We present the first quantitative imaging genomic mapping large- scale study
in GBM
© NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012
ASNR 2012
Methods and Materials
•
Retrospective study
•
Using 78 treatment naïve GBM patients with imaging data obtained from The Cancer
Imaging Archive (http://cancerimagingarchive.net/) sponsored by the Cancer Imaging
Program, DCTD/NCI/NIH, segmentation were performed.
•
The volumes of these were then correlated with Gene- and micoRNA- expression
profiles obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA).
© NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012
ASNR 2012
Methods and Materials
•
Image Analysis was done in Slicer 3.6 (slicer.org) using the Segmentation
module
- T2/FLAIR was registered to the post- contrast T1WI.
- Volumetric segmentation was performed in a simple hierarchical model of
anatomy, proceeding from peripheral to central.
- 3 distinct structures were segmented:
• edema/invasion
• enhancing tumor
• necrosis
© NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012
ASNR 2012
Methods and Materials
Tumor Segmentation. 65 year old male patient with a right temporal GBM. Segmentation of tumor edema (blue),
enhancement (yellow) and necrosis (red) was performed and edema volume was obtained.
© NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012
ASNR 2012
Methods and Materials
•
Image Genomic- Biostatistics analysis
- 12,764 genes and 555 microRNAs were analyzed (Affymetrix/Agilent
chip technology) in each patient and correlated to selected volumes
-
Comparative Marker Selection (Broad Institute) identified
preferentially upregulated genomic events in one vs. another
predefined patient group (high_low volumes groups)
Low (left) and High (right) FLAIR phenotype (colored in blue) reflecting tumor infiltration/edema
© NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012
ASNR 2012
Results
•
Top upregulated and downregulated genes and microRNAs not previously
described in the literature were identified which had underlying concordant
biological processes of edema/invasion, necrosis, and enhancing tumor
MRI phenotypes.
In this example, patients with a high
volume of peritumoral non-enhancing
FLAIR hyperintensity (known
biologically to reflect a mixture of
edema and tumor infiltration) had
increases in genes and microRNAs
associated with tumor invasion.
© NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012
ASNR 2012
Results
•
Kaplan Meier Analysis survival curves demonstrated that these associated
genes and microRNAs were associated with patient overall- and
progression-free survival.
POSTN and miR-219
© NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012
ASNR 2012
Results
•
Furthermore, this gene expression was a stronger prognostic
variable than either molecular subtype (as defined by Veerkak and
colleagues) in the Cox proportional hazards ratio.
© NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012
ASNR 2012
Conclusion
•
It allows for bidirectional imaging phenotype-genotype correlations and
discoveries.
•
Imaging genomics links imaging phenotypes to underlying genotypes in
GBM patients and vice versa.
•
Imaging genomic mapping can be used to discover biologically
meaningful genes and microRNA that can be used for
•
•
•
the development of therapeutic targets
identify candidates which have the target gene
help predict response and nonresponse to specific target therapies
based on genomic targets and tumor genetic composition.
© NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012
ASNR 2012
Conclusion
Thank you for your interest!
Acknowledgements: This work was supported by NIH grant R25 CA089017-06A2 (RRC).
Any questions please email: [email protected].
© NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012