Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
ASNR 2012 ASNR 2012 An Introduction into Imaging Genomic Mapping in Brain Tumors Rivka R. Colen, M.D.1, Bhanu Mahajan, M.B.B.S.1, Ferenc A. Jolesz, M.D.1 , Pascal O. Zinn, M.D.2 1 Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 2 M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 ASNR 2012 Disclosures No Disclosures. R25 CA089017(RRC) P41 RR019703 (FAJ) © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 ASNR 2012 Introduction • Imaging genomics (also termed radiogenomics) has emerged as a new field which links the specific imaging traits (radiophenotypes) with gene-expression profiles. • The different MRI characteristics (also termed radiophenotypes, phenotypes or biomarkers) can be correlated with the underlying genomic composition in tumors, in this case Glioblastoma (GBM). • The different MRI radiophenotypes/ MRI biomarkers are obtained from conventional( T1 and T2- weighted images) or advanced (MRI- diffusion, MRIperfusion, MRI spectroscopy) techniques. • For stand alone genomic analysis, large scale gene- and microRNA based cancer microarray analysis is commonly not performed due to high cost, time and manpower required for large dataset analysis and interpretation. © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 ASNR 2012 Introduction • In order to leverage genomic data for therapy so that personalized medicine transpire, a cost-effective biomarker that accurately reflects underlying molecular cancer compositions is urgently needed. • Imaging, specifically MRI is a promising biomarker to reflect underlying tumor pathology and biological function. © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 ASNR 2012 Introduction • It follows that if imaging phenotypes of tumors obtained from routine clinical MRI studies can be associated with specific gene and microRNA expression signatures, imaging phenotypes can serve as non-invasive surrogates for tumor gene expression information and routinely provide information at a large-scale genomic level regarding the diagnosis, prognosis, and optimal treatment indicated. • Thus, the new field of imaging genomics can be anticipated to be instrumental in identifying genomic tumor compositions. © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 ASNR 2012 Purpose • In this presentation, we seek to introduce, define and detail the concept of imaging genomics and how to perform imaging genomic mapping in brain tumors, specifically Glioblastoma, using large scale- genomic and imaging analysis. • Here, we present the first quantitative imaging genomic mapping largescale study in GBM © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 ASNR 2012 Purpose • Imaging genomic analysis can be bidirectional: • Correlating imaging to genomic data ( phenome to genome) • Correlating genomic to imaging data (genome to phenome) Phenome (Imaging) © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 Genome (Genomics) ASNR 2012 Purpose We present the first quantitative imaging genomic mapping large- scale study in GBM © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 ASNR 2012 Methods and Materials • Retrospective study • Using 78 treatment naïve GBM patients with imaging data obtained from The Cancer Imaging Archive (http://cancerimagingarchive.net/) sponsored by the Cancer Imaging Program, DCTD/NCI/NIH, segmentation were performed. • The volumes of these were then correlated with Gene- and micoRNA- expression profiles obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 ASNR 2012 Methods and Materials • Image Analysis was done in Slicer 3.6 (slicer.org) using the Segmentation module - T2/FLAIR was registered to the post- contrast T1WI. - Volumetric segmentation was performed in a simple hierarchical model of anatomy, proceeding from peripheral to central. - 3 distinct structures were segmented: • edema/invasion • enhancing tumor • necrosis © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 ASNR 2012 Methods and Materials Tumor Segmentation. 65 year old male patient with a right temporal GBM. Segmentation of tumor edema (blue), enhancement (yellow) and necrosis (red) was performed and edema volume was obtained. © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 ASNR 2012 Methods and Materials • Image Genomic- Biostatistics analysis - 12,764 genes and 555 microRNAs were analyzed (Affymetrix/Agilent chip technology) in each patient and correlated to selected volumes - Comparative Marker Selection (Broad Institute) identified preferentially upregulated genomic events in one vs. another predefined patient group (high_low volumes groups) Low (left) and High (right) FLAIR phenotype (colored in blue) reflecting tumor infiltration/edema © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 ASNR 2012 Results • Top upregulated and downregulated genes and microRNAs not previously described in the literature were identified which had underlying concordant biological processes of edema/invasion, necrosis, and enhancing tumor MRI phenotypes. In this example, patients with a high volume of peritumoral non-enhancing FLAIR hyperintensity (known biologically to reflect a mixture of edema and tumor infiltration) had increases in genes and microRNAs associated with tumor invasion. © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 ASNR 2012 Results • Kaplan Meier Analysis survival curves demonstrated that these associated genes and microRNAs were associated with patient overall- and progression-free survival. POSTN and miR-219 © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 ASNR 2012 Results • Furthermore, this gene expression was a stronger prognostic variable than either molecular subtype (as defined by Veerkak and colleagues) in the Cox proportional hazards ratio. © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 ASNR 2012 Conclusion • It allows for bidirectional imaging phenotype-genotype correlations and discoveries. • Imaging genomics links imaging phenotypes to underlying genotypes in GBM patients and vice versa. • Imaging genomic mapping can be used to discover biologically meaningful genes and microRNA that can be used for • • • the development of therapeutic targets identify candidates which have the target gene help predict response and nonresponse to specific target therapies based on genomic targets and tumor genetic composition. © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012 ASNR 2012 Conclusion Thank you for your interest! Acknowledgements: This work was supported by NIH grant R25 CA089017-06A2 (RRC). Any questions please email: [email protected]. © NlH National Center for Image Guided Therapy, 2012