* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Local Immune Responses in Human Tuberculosis: Learning From
DNA vaccination wikipedia , lookup
Lymphopoiesis wikipedia , lookup
Molecular mimicry wikipedia , lookup
Polyclonal B cell response wikipedia , lookup
Immune system wikipedia , lookup
Adaptive immune system wikipedia , lookup
Sjögren syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Hygiene hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Immunosuppressive drug wikipedia , lookup
Cancer immunotherapy wikipedia , lookup
Adoptive cell transfer wikipedia , lookup
Innate immune system wikipedia , lookup
SUPPLEMENT ARTICLE Local Immune Responses in Human Tuberculosis: Learning From the Site of Infection Susanna Brighenti1 and Jan Andersson1,2 1Center for Infectious Medicine, and 2Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden Host–pathogen interactions in tuberculosis should be studied at the disease site because Mycobacterium tuberculosis is predominately contained in local tissue lesions. Although M. tuberculosis infection involves different clinical forms of tuberculosis, such as pulmonary tuberculosis, pleural tuberculosis, and lymph node tuberculosis, most studies of human tuberculosis are performed using cells from the peripheral blood, which may not provide a proper reflection of the M. tuberculosis–specific immune responses induced at the local site of infection. A very low proportion of M. tuberculosis–specific effector T cells are found in the blood compared with the infected tissue, and thus there may be considerable differences in the cellular immune response and regulatory mechanisms induced in these diverse compartments. In this review, we discuss differences in the immune response at the local site of infection compared with the peripheral circulation. The cell types and immune reactions involved in granuloma formation and maintenance as well as the in situ technologies used to assess local tuberculosis pathogenesis are also described. We need to strengthen and improve the exploratory strategies used to dissect immunopathogenesis in human tuberculosis with the aim to accelerate the implementation of relevant research findings in clinical practice. Decades of immunological studies on tuberculosis, both in humans and animal models, have identified a number of immune mechanisms potentially involved in protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Despite this progress, studies of immune responses in tuberculosis, including local production of inflammatory mediators and induction of different immune cells involved in disease progression, have lagged behind, particularly in humans. Most studies on human tuberculosis involve cells from the peripheral blood, which may not provide a representative image of the specific immune responses present at the site of the infected organ or in the microenvironment of the granulomatous lesions. To explore pathogenesis in human tuberculosis with the aim to develop new strategies for prevention and treatment of disease, we Correspondence: Susanna Brighenti, PhD, Department of Medicine, Center for Infectious Medicine (CIM), Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden ([email protected]). The Journal of Infectious Diseases 2012;205:S316–24 Ó The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: [email protected] DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jis043 S316 d JID 2012:205 (Suppl 2) d Brighenti & Andersson must intensify research to study the important host– pathogen interactions at the local site of M. tuberculosis infection. For this purpose, ex vivo and in situ studies on relevant clinical materials obtained from M. tuberculosis– infected patients should be given greater attention and be properly compared with the vast amount of data available from experimental animal models and in vitro cell culture systems. In this review, we describe current knowledge regarding cellular immune effector functions in human tuberculosis and discuss the contribution and value of studies performed at the local site of infection. CELLULAR IMMUNE EFFECTOR MECHANISMS IN HUMAN TUBERCULOSIS Cellular immunity and, in particular, T-cell–mediated responses are central in the regulation of specific host– M. tuberculosis interactions. Protective immunity in tuberculosis has been shown to be dependent on Th1 CD41 T cells producing interferon c (IFN-c) and tumor necrosis factor a (TNF-a) as well as cytolytic T cells (CTLs) producing granule-associated cytolytic effector molecules such as perforin, granzymes, and granulysin [1]. Upon antigen-specific T-cell activation, effector cytokines are produced that promote macrophage activation and control of M. tuberculosis growth, mainly through the production of nitric oxide (NO) and antimicrobial peptides including human cathelicidin, LL37 [1]. These innate and adaptive antimicrobial effector functions are regulated by a complex network of cells and immune mediators that may be negatively affected by microbe-specific virulence factors. M. tuberculosis–infected macrophages that fail to eradicate the bacteria recruit T cells to the area of infection and promote the generation of chronic inflammation and formation of granulomas in an attempt to wall off and contain the infection [2]. Importantly, the onset of adaptive immunity in human tuberculosis is delayed compared with other infections, which allows the bacterial load in the lung to expand significantly at the early stages of infection [3]. Studies from the site of tuberculosis infection in the murine lung have demonstrated defective trafficking of M. tuberculosis–infected dendritic cells (DCs) to the lung-draining lymph nodes where antigen-specific T cells are primed [4]. Furthermore, virulent mycobacteria may delay T-cell responses by inhibiting apoptosis of infected macrophages, which will reduce crosspresentation of M. tuberculosis antigens to bystander DCs and subsequent priming of T cells [5]. There is also evidence that early induction of regulatory T (Treg) cells delay local effector T-cell responses in the lung [6], either by inhibition of DC function or by direct suppression of T-cell effector functions. Induction of suppressive immunoregulatory pathways, including excessive Th2 responses, could disturb the balance of protective host immunity and result in progression of tuberculosis disease. IMMUNE RESPONSES AT THE LOCAL SITE OF M. TUBERCULOSIS INFECTION VERSUS THE SYSTEMIC CIRCULATION In chronic infections such as tuberculosis, it is of significant relevance to study host–pathogen interactions in the infected tissue because effector T cells are recruited to and accumulate at the local site of bacterial replication [7–11]. Immune cells use the bloodstream as a transportation system to traffic into lymphoid and peripheral tissues in response to microbial antigens, where their true activated morphology and function are demonstrated. Blood is often sampled to study pathological conditions because it is easily accessible, although functional analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) normally requires antigen-specific restimulation in vitro. Importantly, circulating lymphocytes in the blood represent only about 2% of the total lymphocyte pool, whereas most lymphocytes are confined to lymphoid organs but are also found in nonlymphoid tissues such as the lung and bone marrow during steady-state conditions [12]. During an infection, most microbe-specific T cells migrate to the local tissue site in response to chemoattractant signals, where they expand and exert their effector functions. Such compartmentalization of T-cell responses also seems to be the result of preferential homing of activated cells back to their inductive sites. These activated effector T-cell populations can be studied without in vitro restimulation or other manipulation. For the reasons summarized in Table 1, immune responses detected in the peripheral circulation may be different compared with those in the disease sites, which underlines the importance of using complementary methods to assess systemic and local immune responses. Accordingly, a number of important studies on human tuberculosis have reported significant differences in T-cell responses at the site of M. tuberculosis infection compared with blood. Most of these experiments have taken advantage of cells and fluids from the pleura or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), whereas available data from M. tuberculosis–infected tissue, such as tissue from the lung, pleura, and lymph nodes, are more limited. Previous studies of tuberculosis patients demonstrate similar T-lymphocyte subset profiles in lung tissue and BAL [13] as well as in pleural biopsies and pleural effusions [8], indicating that BAL and pleural fluid samples accurately reflect cell populations present in granulomatous lesions. Accumulation of IFN-g–Producing CD41 T cells at the Site of M. tuberculosis Infection Compared to peripheral blood, a general increase in the proportion of total CD31 T cells and particularly IFNc–producing CD41 T-cell subsets can be found in pleural effusions from patients with a local tuberculosis pleuritis [14–16]. Interestingly, the purified protein derivative response of peripheral blood T cells from pleural tuberculosis patients was lower than from pleural fluid T cells but also lower than from blood T cells from healthy individuals [17]. Furthermore, compartmentalization of ESAT-6–specific, IFN-c–producing T cells has been shown to be highly enriched to about 15-fold in both lung [9, 18] and pleura [7] compared with blood of patients with active tuberculosis. These findings are consistent with other clinical observations that M. tuberculosis–specific IFN-c–producing CD41 T cells were markedly elevated at the site of tuberculosis disease [8, 10, 11, 19, 20]. Similarly, CD41 T cells are collected at M. tuberculosis–infected sites in the lungs of both macaques [21] and mice [22]. These results confirm that potent effector T cells accumulate at the site of tissue inflammation in vivo and are only present in low levels among peripherally circulating lymphocytes. This selective accumulation is likely a result of both active recruitment and local expansion of T cells at sites of bacterial replication. Importantly, the antigen specificity of M. tuberculosis–reactive T cells has been Immune Responses to M. tuberculosis in Humans d JID 2012:205 (Suppl 2) d S317 Table 1. Differences in Local and Systemic Immune Responses Local Site of Infection Systemic Circulation Cells kept in a physiological milieu in the presence of stromal cells and soluble factors Lack of 3-dimensional tissue–organ structure Close cellular interactions, paracrine signaling, granuloma formation, necrosis, and caseation in the tissue No granuloma formation or other organized cellular interactions Presence of M. tuberculosis bacilli and infected cells Lack of M. tuberculosis bacilli and infected cells (except for miliary tuberculosis patients) Compartmentalization of different immune cell subsets Migration of naive immune cells to local sites Morphological modifications of immune cells including epitheliod and giant cells No epitheliod or giant cell formation Tissue macrophages with high bactericidal activity or regulatory function Undifferentiated monocytes with low bactericidal activity High frequencies of in vivo–activated M. tuberculosis–specific T cells that express different effector functions Low frequencies of M. tuberculosis–specific T cells that require in vitro restimulation with antigen to become activated Snapshot of a specific temporal window of tuberculosis disease Easily accessible clinical samples, possible to perform longitudinal analysis shown to be significantly different in the lung versus blood of pulmonary tuberculosis patients [23]. Additionally, differences in bactericidal activity of alveolar macrophages and blood monocytes of these tuberculosis patients emphasize that there is a fundamental compartmentalization of immune effector cells in the M. tuberculosis–infected lung [23]. Differences in Cytokine Profiles at the Site of M. tuberculosis Infection Versus the Peripheral Blood Mycobacterium tuberculosis–specific Th1 and Th17 cells activate antimicrobial effector functions in infected macrophages as well as in M. tuberculosis–specific CTLs to promote innate and adaptive bacterial killing and aid containment of tuberculosis infection. However, elevated IFN-c levels and augmented apoptosis of cells in the pleural space compared with peripheral blood may suggest that immune activation and loss of M. tuberculosis–specific T cells occur concomitantly, thus favoring persistence of M. tuberculosis locally at the site of infection [16]. This is consistent with the findings, which demonstrate enhanced IFN-c and interleukin 2 (IL-2) production but also elevated interleukin 10 (IL-10) levels in pleural fluid versus serum [24]. Similarly, a significant rise in IFN-c as well as IL-10 [25] or interleukin 4 (IL-4) [26] levels was found in culture supernatants from M. tuberculosis– stimulated BAL cells, but not in PBMCs, obtained from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Patients with miliary tuberculosis (extensive tuberculosis disease), instead, possessed significantly lower IFN-c levels but higher IL-4 levels in BAL fluid cells compared with the peripheral blood [27]. Correspondingly, a predominant IFN-c response in BAL CD41 T cells was observed in patients with noncavitary tuberculosis (mild tuberculosis disease), whereas IL-4 levels were relatively higher in cavitary tuberculosis (moderate–advanced tuberculosis disease) [28]. These results suggest that there may be a gradual dysregulation of the local cytokine profile toward a Th2 S318 d JID 2012:205 (Suppl 2) d Brighenti & Andersson response, especially in patients with severe forms of tuberculosis disease [27]. Induction of Immunoregulatory Mechanisms at the Site of M. tuberculosis Infection Inflammatory responses, including IFN-c, interleukin 12 (IL-12), and Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), but low levels of NO synthase in cells from sputum of active tuberculosis patients were found to be associated with anti-inflammatory mediators such as IL-10, Suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS), and Transforming growth factor (TGF-bRII) at the local site [29]. In this regard, both human and experimental animal models provide evidence that Treg cells redistribute from the blood to the lungs and draining lymph nodes upon M. tuberculosis infection, where they are retained within granulomas along with effector T cells [21, 22, 30]. A significantly higher proportion of CD41CD251FoxP31 Treg cells in pleural fluid compared with peripheral blood of tuberculosis patients was also found to be inversely correlated with local IFN-c production [31]. Hence, although Treg cells migrate to sites of bacterial replication to modulate local inflammation and prevent tissue pathology, inhibition of IFN-c production could also prevent the induction of important antimicrobial effector functions. Altogether, these results illustrate that in patients with active tuberculosis a cellular immune response is mounted and organized primarily at the inflammatory site where a productive M. tuberculosis infection has been established. The presence of anti-inflammatory cytokines or other negative regulators may compete with and counteract innate as well as Th1-mediated immunity at infected sites. Compartmentalization of mixed Th1 and immunosuppressive responses at the site of disease could provide important clues to elucidate the mechanisms responsible for impaired tuberculosis control that would not be possible to detect only from studies of the Figure 1. Schematic illustration of cells and effector molecules at the local site of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. (1) Upon infection, activated monocytes and effector T cells as well as regulatory T (Treg) cells migrate from the blood and accumulate in the area of bacterial replication. The proportion of M. tuberculosis–specific effector T cells producing cytokines and antimicrobial effector molecules are significantly higher at the disease sites compared with the circulation. (2) M. tuberculosis infection induces both morphological and functional changes of immune cells present at the disease sites. M. tuberculosis–infected macrophages can transform into epitheliod cells and also fuse to form multinucleated giant cells (MGCs). Classically activated macrophages (CAMs) are more bactericidal and control M. tuberculosis replication better than do alternatively activated macrophages (AAMs). Secretion of chemokines and cytokines result in expansion and activation of M. tuberculosis–specific T cells with different effector functions. Stromal cells (ie, epithelial cells and fibroblasts) present in the tissue may also induce regulatory components in the local millieu at the site of infection. (3) An organized collection of tightly clustered M. tuberculosis–infected macrophages forms the core of the tuberculosis granuloma. Chemokines and Th1 cytokines participate in the recruitment of T cells, monocytes, and other immune cells that are contained in the mature granuloma. (4) Extensive inflammation in the granulomatous area triggers cellular apoptosis that contribute to central necrosis (yellow mass ) and extracellular growth of M. tuberculosis (pink rods ). Excessive Th1-mediated immune responses could also become potentially harmful and lead to uncontrolled immune activation. (5) The ratios of Th1/Th2 cells, CAMs/AAMs, and effector T (Teffector)/Treg cells are of vital importance to maintain the immunological balance in the tissue and prevent the progression of tuberculosis disease. A shift in the local immune response will tip the balance toward suboptimal immunity and impaired control of tuberculosis disease but can also result in excessive cellular immunity and tissue destruction. Abbreviations: IL-2, interleukin 2; IL-4, interleukin 4; IL-10, interleukin 10; IL-13, interleukin 13; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; LL-37, TGF-b, transforming growth factor-b; TNF-a, tumor necrosis factor a. systemic circulation. Importantly, age-related differences in the immune system seen in children and adults will affect the susceptibility and outcome of tuberculosis infection [32]. Thus, assessment of local immune responses across the varying spectrum of tuberculosis disease at different ages may unravel valuable information about some of the host-specific factors that contribute to immunopathogenesis in clinical tuberculosis. LOCAL IMMUNE RESPONSES IN THE GRANULOMA AT THE SITE OF M. TUBERCULOSIS INFECTION Chronic tuberculosis gives rise to a granulomatous inflammation involving morphological and functional changes of immune cells, which creates a range of local microenvironments in infected organs that must be considered upon analysis of M. tuberculosis–specific immune responses (Figure 1) [2]. Formation of granulomas is a typical hallmark of human tuberculosis and is defined as an organized collection of immune cells with the aim to contain M. tuberculosis infection. However, pathogenic mycobacteria may also exploit early granuloma formation and promote spreading of bacteria to uninfected macrophages that are recruited to the infected area [33]. Hence, the granuloma may have a beneficial function for the host as well as the bacteria, depending on the stage of infection. Macrophage Activation and Granuloma Formation in M. tuberculosis–Infected Tissue Initial granuloma formation is characterized by continuous activation of M. tuberculosis–infected macrophages, which Immune Responses to M. tuberculosis in Humans d JID 2012:205 (Suppl 2) d S319 Figure 2. Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression in human tuberculosis. Alveolar macrophages in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis–infected lung and macrophages present in lymph node granulomas (solid line ) express CD68 and high levels of iNOS. In contrast, iNOS and nitric oxide (NO) are very difficult to induce in human macrophages in vitro. Note the confluent granulomas in the cross-section of a lymph node (lower left image ). Immunohistochemistry was used to show positive staining (brown; diaminobenzidine staining) and negative staining (blue; nuclear hematoxylin staining). Magnification, 350 and 3125, respectively. Tissue samples from tuberculosis lung lesions were obtained from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–negative adults with chronic, active noncavitary tuberculosis disease [35], whereas tuberculosis lymph nodes were collected from HIV-negative children with a local tuberculosis lymphadenitis (neck region) [36]. Complete tables including clinical and bacteriological demographics of tuberculosis patients have been published elsewhere [35, 36]. induces the cells to adhere closely together, assuming an epitheliod shape and sometimes fusing to form multinucleated giant cells with a yet unknown functional role. Evidently, macrophages could enter different differentiation programs, depending on the organ-specific location as well as the microbial stimuli [34]. Here, classically activated macrophages (CAMs) produce NO and are highly bactericidal, whereas alternatively activated macrophages (AAMs) can produce immunosuppressive cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-b and are poorly microbicidal. It is very difficult to induce NO production in human blood–derived macrophages in vitro, even though NO expression can be detected in macrophages in vivo in lung [35] and lymph nodes [36] of tuberculosis patients (Figure 2). Whereas IFN-c promotes classical macrophage activation and a hostile milieu in the tuberculosis granuloma, Th2 cytokines, including IL-4 and interleukin 13 (IL-13), could promote alternative macrophage activation characterized by arginase activation and collagen deposition in the inflamed tissue [37], which are typical traits of advanced tuberculosis disease. Importantly, inducible NO synthase (iNOS) and arginase compete for the same substrate in activated macrophages to produce NO or collagen, respectively. Accordingly, it was recently described that initial induction of iNOS-expressing CAMs was followed by arginase-expressing AAMs in the lung, which would support a switch in macrophage polarization upon progression of tuberculosis disease [38]. A shift in the CAM/AAM ratio in S320 d JID 2012:205 (Suppl 2) d Brighenti & Andersson human tuberculosis granulomas may modulate T-cell effector functions and/or promote the expansion of Treg cells that reduce the ability of the host to control M. tuberculosis infection [2]. Granulomas are highly dynamic structures with multiple appearances in infected organs during active tuberculosis disease, including solid nonnecrotizing and caseous necrotic granulomas [36, 39]. These heterogenous lesions are perceived as palpable nodules in the infected organs, and the vigorous inflammation induced at the site of infection could ultimately destroy and displace the normal surrounding tissue. Upon progressive disease, small, early cellular aggregates of nonnecrotic granulomas will advance to form large, mature necrotic granulomas with little cellular content [40]. Numerous extracellular bacteria persist in the caseous necrotic fluid that will drain into the infected tissue upon rupture of mature granulomas [41]. Efficient spread of the infection is accomplished when viable bacteria reach the airways and are expelled from pulmonary tuberculosis patients as contagious aerosols. Thus, extensive apoptosis in caseating granulomas may also contribute to and enhance the immunopathogenesis of tuberculosis [42]. Consequently, even though macrophage and Th1-cell responses are important to induce inflammation and immune protection in tuberculosis, uncontrolled activation of these cells results in massive necrosis and loss of normal tissue architecture, which can lead to cavity formation in pulmonary tuberculosis. Figure 3. Impaired cytolytic T-cell (CTL) responses in human tuberculosis granuloma. Low expression of CD81 CTLs and the cytolytic and antimicrobial effector molecules perforin and granulysin in serial cryosections of a human lymph node granuloma (solid line ). In situ immunohistochemical images show an abundance of CD681 macrophages and CD41 T cells surrounding the necrotic core of the granuloma. A multinucleated giant cell (MGC) with nuclei in a characteristic horseshoe shape is also depicted in the tissue. In contrast to the low expression of cytolytic effector molecules inside the granuloma, granzyme A, perforin, and granulysin can be detected in the parafollicular areas of the lymph node. Note that there is no expression of perforin and granulysin in the B-cell follicles (Bc foll), which do not contain any CD81 T cells. Positive staining (brown; diaminobenzidine staining) and negative staining (blue; nuclear hematoxylin staining) are shown. Arrows depict some of the positive cells in the images with a low level of positive staining. Magnification, 3125. Tuberculosis lymph node tissues were collected from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–negative children with a local tuberculosis lymphadenitis (neck region) [36]. Complete tables including clinical and bacteriological demographics of tuberculosis patients have been published elsewhere [36]. Effector Cell Responses and Immunoregulation in the Tuberculosis Granuloma The specific host and bacterial factors that regulate granuloma development and function are still poorly defined. Abundant coexpression of IFN-c–inducible chemokines, as well as IFN-c and TNF-a with M. tuberculosis 16S RNA in pulmonary granulomas, suggests that continuous cell recruitment and chronic inflammation are involved in granuloma formation and maintenance [43]. Accordingly, Th17 cells promote infiltration of IFN-c–producing CD41 T cells in the lung and support proper granuloma formation at the site of infection [44]. Fenhalls et al used in situ hybridization to demonstrate mixed expression of IFN-c and IL-4 transcripts in granulomas, whereas high levels of TNF-a were always associated with necrotic granulomas [45]. T-cell–produced cytokines were absent in necrotic granulomas, which supports the assumption that T-cell responses are downregulated upon progressive tuberculosis disease [46]. A negative association between IL-4 and TLR2 expression in pulomonary granulomas also implies that Th2 cytokines could counteract important TLR-activating signals [47]. Using in situ image analysis, we have previously discovered that the abundance of CD81 CTLs expressing the important antituberculosis effector molecules perforin and granulysin is very low in human granulomatous lesions both in lung [35] and lymph nodes [36], indicating that CTL activation is impaired at the site of bacterial persistence (Figure 3). Th1 cytokines, including IFN-c, TNF-a, and interleukin 17, were not upregulated in M. tuberculosis–infected lymph nodes obtained from Immune Responses to M. tuberculosis in Humans d JID 2012:205 (Suppl 2) d S321 patients with ongoing disease, whereas there was a significant induction of TGF-b and IL-13. Several studies have shown that the predominating lymphocyte population in the core of the granuloma is memory CD41 T cells, whereas a lower number of CD81 T cells are mainly located in the outer lymphocytic mantel surrounding the tuberculosis granuloma [8, 41, 48]. One hypothesis is that IFN-c–producing CD41 T cells could be involved in macrophage activation and macrophage-mediated elimination of bacteria in the center of the granuloma. However, we found that the levels of CD41FoxP31 Treg cells and TGF-b were significantly elevated in the tuberculous granulomas, suggesting that a substantial proportion of the CD41 T cells may be Treg cells and not activated effector T cells [36]. Such local compartmentalization of T-cell responses may prevent the expansion and activation of CD81 CTLs and also contactdependent killing of M. tuberculosis–infected cells in the center of the granuloma [39]. As described above, M. tuberculosis–specific, IFN-c–secreting T cells but also FoxP31 Treg cells were previously found to be particularly concentrated at the disease sites compared with matched blood samples from patients with different clinical forms of tuberculosis [30, 31]. Interestingly, stromal cells in the tissue have been shown to direct local differentiation of regulatory DCs that can induce IL-10–producing Treg cells and suppress imperative T-cell responses, especially in the presence of an intracellular infection [49]. Thus, Treg-mediated suppression of effector responses may be significantly enhanced in the microenvironment of the infected tissue. Similar to a Th1/Th2 or CAM/AAM shift, a shift in the effector T-cell/ Treg cell ratio could promote immunosuppressive signals and bacterial persistence in the tuberculosis lesions, providing a protective survival niche for the bacteria (Figure 1). QUANTITATIVE IN SITU IMAGE ANALYSIS TO MEASURE IMMUNE RESPONSE AT THE LOCAL SITE OF M. TUBERCULOSIS INFECTION To increase the understanding of pathogenesis in human tuberculosis, it is necessary to develop new models and refine existing technology to explore effector mechanisms at the site of infection in general and in the tuberculosis granuloma in particular. In contrast to peripheral blood, in situ image analysis of patient tissue samples provides the opportunity to study the spatial anatomical expression of different proteins and the organ-specific cell–cell interactions in local compartments where the numbers of pathogen responder cells are high. Immunocytochemical staining and in situ quantitative computerized image analysis enable local assessment of immune cells and effector molecules in cryopreserved cells and tissues. Complementary analysis of protein and messenger RNA (mRNA) expression in tissue using in situ image analysis, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and in situ hybridization can be combined with the corresponding analysis of blood and fluids or homogenized tissue samples using multicolor S322 d JID 2012:205 (Suppl 2) d Brighenti & Andersson flow cytometry, multiplex protein, and mRNA analyses. All these methodologies require a minimal amount of cells or tissue, which enables complex studies of very rare clinical materials. The common view is that in situ techniques are descriptive in nature, but basically it is possible to analyze the functional expression and distribution of mRNA and protein in the context of a physiologically relevant milieu that is difficult to reproduce in cell-culture models. Protein expression can be quantified at the single-cell level using microscopy and a highly sensitive digital image analysis system with the ability to detect and separate 16.7 million different colors (Figure 4) [35, 36]. This is a well-established quantitative method that has been extensively used primarily in humans and nonhuman primates for analysis of a wide range of proteins, including cell surface and secreted proteins and cytoplasmic, granule-associated, or nuclear proteins, to describe the phenotype and function of different cell types present in tissue. Multicolor staining can be used to study coexpression of proteins in the immunological synapse. In addition, identification of mycobacterial DNA or RNA transcripts [43] as well as mycobacterial proteins [36] within human tuberculosis granulomas offers the advantage of gauging the spatial interplay between mycobacteria and local host cells and relating certain expression profiles to bacterial persistence and progression of disease. Thus, this methodology provides important information about the regulation of immune responses in the microenvironment of the tuberculosis granuloma that complements the knowledge gained from animal and in vitro experiments. The development of novel humanized tissue culture systems and the implementation of system biology approaches involving assessments of genes and proteins affected by this microbial invasion will further improve our opportunities to dissect relevant signalling pathways at M. tuberculosis– infected sites. CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF STUDIES AT THE LOCAL SITE OF M. TUBERCULOSIS INFECTION A major challenge to the scientific community is to improve diagnostic methods that can discriminate between active and latent tuberculosis. Importantly, the accumulation of effector T cells at the site of infection can be used for an accurate and rapid immunodiagnosis of active tuberculosis using M. tuberculosis–specific IFN-c release assays (IGRAs). Here, it has been demonstrated that cells from the site of M. tuberculosis infectiondthat is, BAL [18, 50] or pleura fluid cells [11]dcan be successfully used to increase the sensitivity of an M. tuberculosis– specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay (ELISPOT) to distinguish sputum smear–negative active tuberculosis from latent tuberculosis cases. In contrast, low levels of effector memory T cells may persist in the blood of individuals with active as well as latent tuberculosis, and, consequently, IGRAs cannot differ between active and latent tuberculosis detection of active tuberculosis in routine clinical practice in countries with low tuberculosis incidence. In vaccinology, evaluation of M. tuberculosis–specific immune responses at the site of infection also provides unique information about novel biomarkers or immune correlates that can be used to monitor vaccine efficacy, as vaccination may change the frequency, phenotype, and functional properties of immune cells in local sites compared with blood. Many studies also suggest that the type of immune response detected at the site of infection strongly correlates with different clinical symptoms and severity of disease or disease outcome. Enhanced knowledge of the cellular responses involved in protective immunity as well as disease progression in human tuberculosis will generate superior insights into bacterial pathogenesis and facilitate the implementation of relevant findings in clinical practice. Notes Financial support. This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council; the Heart and Lung Foundation; the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency; the Swedish Society for Medical Research; the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research; and the von Kantzow Foundation. Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed. References Figure 4. Illustration of quantitative in situ image analysis. A blank immunohistochemical image showing CD31 T cells in a small nonnecrotic lymph node granuloma is used to set the threshold for the positive staining (diaminobenzidine, brown ). Next, the total cellular area (hematoxylin, blue ) is depicted, and thereafter it is possible for the computer software to determine the percentage of positive area of the total cell area. A summary of the field statistics is as follows: Field number 1; Total area measured (lm2): 1.29e1005; cell area measured (lm2): 51116.54; percentage of cell area in the total area: 45.56; stained area measured (lm2): 8062.68; percentage of stained area in the cell area: 20.77; mean intensity of the positive area: 131.50; total intensity of the positive area: 1.06. Normally, average values from 10–50 microscopic fields of a tissue section will be included in the analysis. Magnification, 3125. when performed on PBMCs alone [11, 18, 50]. Local immunodiagnosis using ELISPOT is an important advancement for 1. Brighenti S, Andersson J. Induction and regulation of CD81 cytolytic T cells in human tuberculosis and HIV infection. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2010; 396:50–7. 2. Flynn JL, Chan J, Lin PL. Macrophages and control of granulomatous inflammation in tuberculosis. Mucosal Immunol 2011; 4:271–8. 3. Urdahl KB, Shafiani S, Ernst JD. Initiation and regulation of T-cell responses in tuberculosis. Mucosal Immunol 2011; 4:288–93. 4. Wolf AJ, Desvignes L, Linas B, et al. Initiation of the adaptive immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis depends on antigen production in the local lymph node, not the lungs. J Exp Med 2008; 205:105–15. 5. Divangahi M, Desjardins D, Nunes-Alves C, Remold HG, Behar SM. Eicosanoid pathways regulate adaptive immunity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Immunol 2010; 11:751–8. 6. Shafiani S, Tucker-Heard G, Kariyone A, Takatsu K, Urdahl KB. Pathogen-specific regulatory T cells delay the arrival of effector T cells in the lung during early tuberculosis. J Exp Med 2010; 207:1409–20. 7. Wilkinson KA, Wilkinson RJ, Pathan A, et al. Ex vivo characterization of early secretory antigenic target 6–specific T cells at sites of active disease in pleural tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 40:184–7. 8. Barnes PF, Mistry SD, Cooper CL, Pirmez C, Rea TH, Modlin RL. Compartmentalization of a CD41 T lymphocyte subpopulation in tuberculous pleuritis. J Immunol 1989; 142:1114–9. 9. Jafari C, Ernst M, Strassburg A, et al. Local immunodiagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis by enzyme-linked immunospot. Eur Respir J 2008; 31:261–5. 10. Schwander SK, Torres M, Sada E, et al. Enhanced responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens by human alveolar lymphocytes during active pulmonary tuberculosis. J Infect Dis 1998; 178:1434–45. 11. Nemeth J, Winkler HM, Zwick RH, et al. Recruitment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis specific CD41 T cells to the site of infection for diagnosis of active tuberculosis. J Intern Med 2009; 265:163–8. Immune Responses to M. tuberculosis in Humans d JID 2012:205 (Suppl 2) d S323 12. Blum KS, Pabst R. Lymphocyte numbers and subsets in the human blood. Do they mirror the situation in all organs? Immunol Lett 2007; 108:45–51. 13. Law KF, Jagirdar J, Weiden MD, Bodkin M, Rom WN. Tuberculosis in HIV-positive patients: cellular response and immune activation in the lung. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 153:1377–84. 14. Shiratsuchi H, Tsuyuguchi I. Analysis of T cell subsets by monoclonal antibodies in patients with tuberculosis after in vitro stimulation with purified protein derivative of tuberculin. Clin Exp Immunol 1984; 57:271–8. 15. Ribera E, Ocana I, Martinez-Vazquez JM, Rossell M, Espanol T, Ruibal A. High level of interferon gamma in tuberculous pleural effusion. Chest 1988; 93:308–11. 16. Hirsch CS, Toossi Z, Johnson JL, et al. Augmentation of apoptosis and interferon-gamma production at sites of active Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in human tuberculosis. J Infect Dis 2001; 183: 779–88. 17. Fujiwara H, Okuda Y, Fukukawa T, Tsuyuguchi I. In vitro tuberculin reactivity of lymphocytes from patients with tuberculous pleurisy. Infect Immun 1982; 35:402–9. 18. Jafari C, Thijsen S, Sotgiu G, et al. Bronchoalveolar lavage enzymelinked immunospot for a rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis: a Tuberculosis Network European Trials group study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009; 180:666–73. 19. Place S, Verscheure V, de San N, et al. Heparin-binding, hemagglutininspecific IFN-gamma synthesis at the site of infection during active tuberculosis in humans. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 182:848–54. 20. Walrath J, Zukowski L, Krywiak A, Silver RF. Resident Th1-like effector memory cells in pulmonary recall responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2005; 33:48–55. 21. Green AM, Mattila JT, Bigbee CL, Bongers KS, Lin PL, Flynn JL. CD4(1) regulatory T cells in a cynomolgus macaque model of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J Infect Dis 2010; 202:533–41. 22. Scott-Browne JP, Shafiani S, Tucker-Heard G, et al. Expansion and function of Foxp3-expressing T regulatory cells during tuberculosis. J Exp Med 2007; 204:2159–69. 23. Sable SB, Goyal D, Verma I, Behera D, Khuller GK. Lung and blood mononuclear cell responses of tuberculosis patients to mycobacterial proteins. Eur Respir J 2007; 29:337–46. 24. Barnes PF, Lu S, Abrams JS, Wang E, Yamamura M, Modlin RL. Cytokine production at the site of disease in human tuberculosis. Infect Immun 1993; 61:3482–9. 25. Gerosa F, Nisii C, Righetti S, et al. CD4(1) T cell clones producing both interferon-gamma and interleukin-10 predominate in bronchoalveolar lavages of active pulmonary tuberculosis patients. Clin Immunol 1999; 92:224–34. 26. Herrera MT, Torres M, Nevels D, et al. Compartmentalized bronchoalveolar IFN-gamma and IL-12 response in human pulmonary tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2009; 89:38–47. 27. Sharma SK, Mitra DK, Balamurugan A, Pandey RM, Mehra NK. Cytokine polarization in miliary and pleural tuberculosis. J Clin Immunol 2002; 22:345–52. 28. Mazzarella G, Bianco A, Perna F, et al. T lymphocyte phenotypic profile in lung segments affected by cavitary and non-cavitary tuberculosis. Clin Exp Immunol 2003; 132:283–8. 29. Almeida AS, Lago PM, Boechat N, et al. Tuberculosis is associated with a down-modulatory lung immune response that impairs Th1-type immunity. J Immunol 2009; 183:718–31. 30. Guyot-Revol V, Innes JA, Hackforth S, Hinks T, Lalvani A. Regulatory T cells are expanded in blood and disease sites in patients with tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 173:803–10. 31. Chen X, Zhou B, Li M, et al. CD4(1)CD25(1)FoxP3(1) regulatory T cells suppress Mycobacterium tuberculosis immunity in patients with active disease. Clin Immunol 2007; 123:50–9. S324 d JID 2012:205 (Suppl 2) d Brighenti & Andersson 32. Donald PR, Marais BJ, Barry CE 3rd. Age and the epidemiology and pathogenesis of tuberculosis. Lancet 2010; 375:1852–4. 33. Davis JM, Ramakrishnan L. The role of the granuloma in expansion and dissemination of early tuberculous infection. Cell 2009; 136:37–49. 34. Day J, Friedman A, Schlesinger LS. Modeling the immune rheostat of macrophages in the lung in response to infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:11246–51. 35. Andersson J, Samarina A, Fink J, Rahman S, Grundstrom S. Impaired expression of perforin and granulysin in CD81 T cells at the site of infection in human chronic pulmonary tuberculosis. Infect Immun 2007; 75:5210–22. 36. Rahman S, Gudetta B, Fink J, et al. Compartmentalization of immune responses in human tuberculosis: few CD81 effector T cells but elevated levels of FoxP31 regulatory t cells in the granulomatous lesions. Am J Pathol 2009; 174:2211–24. 37. Gordon S, Martinez FO. Alternative activation of macrophages: mechanism and functions. Immunity 2010; 32:593–604. 38. Redente EF, Higgins DM, Dwyer-Nield LD, Orme IM, GonzalezJuarrero M, Malkinson AM. Differential polarization of alveolar macrophages and bone marrow–derived monocytes following chemically and pathogen-induced chronic lung inflammation. J Leukoc Biol 2010; 88:159–68. 39. Kaplan G, Post FA, Moreira AL, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis growth at the cavity surface: a microenvironment with failed immunity. Infect Immun 2003; 71:7099–108. 40. Fenhalls G, Stevens L, Moses L, et al. In situ detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis transcripts in human lung granulomas reveals differential gene expression in necrotic lesions. Infect Immun 2002; 70:6330–8. 41. Ulrichs T, Kosmiadi GA, Trusov V, et al. Human tuberculous granulomas induce peripheral lymphoid follicle-like structures to orchestrate local host defence in the lung. J Pathol 2004; 204:217–28. 42. Keane J, Balcewicz-Sablinska MK, Remold HG, et al. Infection by Mycobacterium tuberculosis promotes human alveolar macrophage apoptosis. Infect Immun 1997; 65:298–304. 43. Fuller CL, Flynn JL, Reinhart TA. In situ study of abundant expression of proinflammatory chemokines and cytokines in pulmonary granulomas that develop in cynomolgus macaques experimentally infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun 2003; 71:7023–34. 44. Umemura M, Yahagi A, Hamada S, et al. IL-17-mediated regulation of innate and acquired immune response against pulmonary Mycobacterium bovis bacille Calmette-Guerin infection. J Immunol 2007; 178:3786–96. 45. Fenhalls G, Stevens L, Bezuidenhout J, et al. Distribution of IFN-gamma, IL-4 and TNF-alpha protein and CD8 T cells producing IL-12p40 mRNA in human lung tuberculous granulomas. Immunology 2002; 105:325–35. 46. Fenhalls G, Wong A, Bezuidenhout J, van Helden P, Bardin P, Lukey PT. In situ production of gamma interferon, interleukin-4, and tumor necrosis factor alpha mRNA in human lung tuberculous granulomas. Infect Immun 2000; 68:2827–36. 47. Fenhalls G, Squires GR, Stevens-Muller L, et al. Associations between Toll-like receptors and interleukin-4 in the lungs of patients with tuberculosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2003; 29:28–38. 48. Gonzalez-Juarrero M, Turner OC, Turner J, Marietta P, Brooks JV, Orme IM. Temporal and spatial arrangement of lymphocytes within lung granulomas induced by aerosol infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun 2001; 69:1722–8. 49. Svensson M, Maroof A, Ato M, Kaye PM. Stromal cells direct local differentiation of regulatory dendritic cells. Immunity 2004; 21: 805–16. 50. Jafari C, Ernst M, Kalsdorf B, et al. Rapid diagnosis of smear-negative tuberculosis by bronchoalveolar lavage enzyme-linked immunospot. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 174:1048–54.