* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download subunits of succinyl CoA ligase of tomato
Survey
Document related concepts
Silencer (genetics) wikipedia , lookup
Protein–protein interaction wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression wikipedia , lookup
Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup
Plant virus wikipedia , lookup
Biochemistry wikipedia , lookup
Oxidative phosphorylation wikipedia , lookup
Endogenous retrovirus wikipedia , lookup
Plant nutrition wikipedia , lookup
Ridge (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Amino acid synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Biosynthesis wikipedia , lookup
Magnesium transporter wikipedia , lookup
Two-hybrid screening wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
Plant breeding wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Plant Molecular Biology (2005) 59:781–791 DOI 10.1007/s11103-005-1004-1 Springer 2005 Identification and characterisation of the a and b subunits of succinyl CoA ligase of tomato Claudia Studart-Guimarães1, Yves Gibon1, Nicolás Frankel2, Craig C. Wood3, Marı́a Inés Zanor1, Alisdair R. Fernie1,* and Fernando Carrari1,4 1 Max-Planck Institute for Molecular Plant Physiology, Am Mühlenberg 1, 14476 Golm, Germany (*author for correspondence; e-mail [email protected]); 2Laboratorio de Fisiologı´a y Biologı´a Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y NaturalesUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina; 3CSIRO-Plant Industry, P.O. Box 2601, Canberra, ACT, Australia; 4Present Address: CICV-INTA, Instituto de Biotecnologı´a, Las Cabañas y Los Reseros, B1712 WAA, Buenos Aires, Argentina Received 10 May 2005; accepted in revised form 16 July 2005 Key words: mitochondrial metabolism, Solanum lycopersicum, Succinyl CoA ligase, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Tricarboxylic acid cycle Abstract Despite the central importance of the TCA cycle in plant metabolism not all of the genes encoding its constituent enzymes have been functionally identified. In yeast, the heterodimeric protein succinyl CoA ligase is encoded for by two single-copy genes. Here we report the isolation of two tomato cDNAs coding for a- and one coding for the b-subunit of succinyl CoA ligase. These three cDNAs were used to complement the respective Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants deficient in the a- and b-subunit, demonstrating that they encode functionally active polypeptides. The genes encoding for the subunits were expressed in all tissues, but most strongly in floral and leaf tissues, with equivalent expression of the two a-subunit genes being expressed to equivalent levels in all tissues. In all instances GFP fusion expression studies confirmed an expected mitochondrial location of the proteins encoded. Following the development of a novel assay to measure succinyl CoA ligase activity, in the direction of succinate formation, the evaluation of the maximal catalytic activities of the enzyme in a range of tissues revealed that these paralleled those of mRNA levels. We also utilized this assay to perform a preliminary characterisation of the regulatory properties of the enzyme suggesting allosteric control of this enzyme which may regulate flux through the TCA cycle in a manner consistent with its position therein. Abbreviations: DAF, days after flowering; DAP, dihydroxyacetonephosphate; EST, expressed sequence tag; G3P, Glycerol-3-Phosphate; G3POX, Glycerol-3-Phophate Oxidase; G3PDH, Glycerol-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase; ScoAL, Succinyl CoA ligase; TCA, tricarboxylic acid Introduction Succinyl CoA ligase (SCoAL; E.C. 6.2.1.5) catalyses the interconversion of succinyl CoA, inorganic phosphate and dinucleotide to succinate, trinucleotide and CoA (Johnson et al., 1998). Little is known of the plant enzyme; however, all SCoALs studied consist of two types of subunit a; with a molecular mass of 29–34 kDa and b with a molecular mass of 41–45 kDa. Catalysis of all reactions in which succinyl CoA participates, proceeds via the intermediate transfer of a phosphoryl group to and from a conserved histidine residue within the a-subunit (Ryan et al., 1997). 782 There is growing evidence that in mammalian cells there are two ligases; one specific for ADP, the other for GDP and that the latter catalyses the synthesis of succinyl CoA during ketone body formation (Ryan et al., 1997). Recent evidence suggests that the b-subunit is important for conferring nucleotide specificity to the mammalian SCoAL, with relative transcript and polypeptide levels of the GDP and ADP specific ligases differing greatly with tissue type in rat (Lambeth et al., 2004). In contrast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli contain only single b-genes but are able to utilize both GDP and ADP (Przybyla-Zawislak et al., 1998; Fraser et al., 1999). In contrast to the microbial and mammalian enzymes which can also, by varying means, use guanine nucleotides as substrate, the plant ligase is specific for adenine nucleotides (Palmer and Wedding, 1966). The plant enzyme has been purified from spinach (Kaufmann and Alivisatos, 1955), artichoke (Palmer and Wedding, 1966) and soybean (Wider and Tigier, 1971), however, to date functional identification of the genes encoding the enzymes is lacking for plant species (Fernie et al., 2004). Early purification studies on the plant enzyme revealed that it was not only highly specific with regard to nucleotide usage but also with respect to the other substrates of the reverse reaction succinate and CoA (Kaufmann and Alivisatos, 1955). In the reverse direction it has been suggested that SCoAL is feedback inhibited by intermediates of the porphyrin pathway which it supplies (Wider and Tigier, 1971) as well as being competitively inhibited by malonate (Palmer and Wedding, 1966). Here we describe the first functional identification, by yeast complementation, of three plant open reading frames encoding subunits of succinyl CoA ligase. Sequence comparisons, expression analysis and mapping hybridisations confirmed the presence of two a- and one b-subunit of succinyl CoA in tomato. Both bioinformatic analysis and the expression of GFP fusion constructs suggested that the products of all three open reading frames are targeted to the mitochondria in Arabidopsis thaliana. Finally following development of a novel assay to measure succinyl CoA ligase activity in the forward direction (that of succinate formation), we performed a preliminary characterisation of regulatory properties of the enzyme. Material and methods Material Solanum lycopersicum cv. Moneymaker was obtained from Meyer Beck (Berlin, Germany). All enzymes were obtained from Roche Diagnostics (Mannheim, Germany) with the exception of glycerol kinase which was obtained from SigmaAldrich (Taufkirchen, Germany). All other chemicals used in biochemical assays were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Taufkirchen, Germany), with the exception of 5¢,5¢-diadenosinpentaphosphate obtained from Fluka Chemie Gmbh (Buchs, Switzerland). Putative succinyl CoA ligase ESTs were obtained from the S. lycopersicum EST collection of The Clemson University Genomics Centre (http://www.genome.clemson.edu). Molecular biological reagents and kits were purchased from Amersham Bioscience (Freiburg, Germany) or Invitrogen (Karlsruhe, Germany). Yeast mutant strains deficient in either the a- or b-subunit (DLSC1, DLSC2) of succinyl CoA ligase and the respective wild type strain (BY4741) were ordered from the EUROSCARF collection (http://web.unifrankfurt.de/fb15/mikro/euroscarf/index; PrzybylaZawislak et al., 1998). Cloning of the full length tomato cDNAs a1, a2, and b succinyl CoA ligase ESTs with high homology to the functionally characterised succinyl CoA ligase genes of yeast were selected. Full-length coding regions of the SCoAL a1, a2 and b genes (corresponding to ESTs cLES12N15, cLEY17J6 and cTOF2K12) were identified and subsequently cloned into the pENTR Directional TOPO vector (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) using the following primers: a1F 5¢CACCATGGCTCGCCAAGCG; a1R 5¢TTTCACAAGACCCCTCTGTTTGAAC; a2F 5¢CACCATGGCTCGCCAAGCC; a2R 5¢CGCAAGACCCCTCTGTTTG; bF 5¢CACCATGCTGCGTAAACTTGCCAATC; bR 5¢AGCTAAGGCCTTGACTGCC. Yeast growth, transformation and selection The above-mentioned yeast strains were maintained on YPD agar medium supplemented with 200 mg/ml of geneticin. Complementation assays 783 were performed by transforming the mutant yeast strains with a modified version of the pFL61 vector (Drager et al., 2004). The yeast mutant DLSC1 was transformed with vectors independently containing SlSCoAL a1 and 2, and the mutant DLSC2 was transformed with a vector containing SlSCoAL b. Plasmids were transferred into yeast using the lithium acetate heat shock transformation protocol (Schiestl and Gietz, 1989). The transformed colonies were subsequently selected by their ability to grow on uracil deficient medium. For the complementation test, transformed colonies were grown in liquid semisynthetic (SS) media (Przybyla-Zawislak et al., 1998) to an A600 of 0.9. Yeast suspensions were centrifuged and washed with water to remove residual glucose. Drops of yeast suspensions were then plated onto solid SS media, containing 3% glycerol as the sole carbon source and incubated for 4–6 days at 30 C. with a[-32P] dCTP by random priming, using the Random Prime Labelling System (Amersham Bioscience, Freiburg, Germany). For the differential expression analysis of SlSCoAL a1 and a2 a semiquantitative RT-PCR approach was followed: 3 lg of RNA from the same material were used for cDNA synthesis using SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany). Forward primers were designed on the variable segment of the SlSCoAL a1 (5¢ GACCAAACTGATCGCAAATCTGTC 3¢) and the SlSCoAL a2 (5¢ GGCATCAGTATCGCTACTTTGGATC 3¢). The reaction was performed using a common reverse primer (5¢ CTTGGGTGTCACTCCACCAACC 3¢) at an annealing temperature of 54 C. The reaction was calibrated by using serial dilutions of the cDNA samples assuming equal efficiency of primer annealing. Phylogenetic analysis The full length SlSCoAL a1, a2 and SlSCoAL b coding regions were cloned into pK7FWG2 vector (Karimi et al., 2002) and transformed into A. thaliana cv. Col-0. Young leaves were cut in small pieces and immediately transferred to a Petri dish containing 0.5 M mannitol solution for 1 h. The solution was then replaced by digestion solution (0.4 M mannitol, 0.33 % Cellulase ‘‘Onozuka’’ R )10, 0.17 % Macerozyme, 3 mM MES, pH 5.7 and 7 mM CaCl2) and kept in darkness at 37 C for 5 h. The resultant isolated protoplasts were treated with 1 lM of the mitochondrial specific dye MitoTracker Orange CMTMRos (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) for 1 h in the dark and on ice. Fluorescent signals were analyzed using a Leica TCS SPII confocal laser scan microscope (Leica Microsystems AG, Wetzlar, Germany) as detailed in Carrari et al. (2005). Protein sequences were retrieved from the GenBank through the BLASTp algorithm using SlSCoAL a1, a2 and b subunits as query. With the aim of establishing copy number, we only selected sequences from eukaryotes and prokaryotes with fully sequenced genomes. We also used the tBALSTn algorithm to search for non-annotated proteins. Sequences were aligned using the ClustalW software package (www.ebi.ac.uk/ clustalw) using default parameters. Neighbor Joining trees (Saitou and Nei, 1987) were constructed with MEGA2 software (Kumar et al., 2001). Distances were calculated using pair-wise deletion and Poisson correction for multiple hits, bootstrap values were obtained with 500 pseudo replicates. Subcellular localisation experiments Expression analysis Succinyl CoA ligase enzyme assay Total RNA from different tomato organs (root, stem, leaf and flower) and fruits at different developmental stages (25, 35, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65 and 70 days after flowering [DAF]) were extracted using the protocol described by Obiadalla-Ali et al. (2004). Northern blot analysis was performed under standard conditions (Sambrook et al., 1989). The membrane was probed with the specific PCR fragment of each coding region (0.9 kb for SlSCoAL a and 1.0 kb for SlSCoAL b), labelled Yeast isolated mitochondria were yeast/isolated in 0.6 M sorbitol, 2 mM PMSF and 20 mM Hepes– KOH (pH 7.4), whilst ground plant tissues were extracted as described in Gibon et al. (2004). Succinyl CoA ligase was assayed in the forward direction by measuring the succinyl CoA dependent production of ATP from ADP. Extracts, as well as ATP standards, freshly prepared in the extraction buffer, and ranging from 0 to 1 nmol, 784 were incubated in a microplate at 25 C in a medium containing: 100 mM Tricine/KOH pH 8, 10 mM MgCl2, 100 lM EDTA, 1 u ml)1 glycerokinase, 10 mM phosphate, 2.5 mM ADP (ATP free), 100 lM 5¢,5¢-diadenosinpentaphosphate, 120 mM glycerol, 0 (blank) or 100 lM (maximal activity) succinyl CoA. The reaction volume was set to 50 ll. Preliminary tests established that 5¢, 5¢-diadenosinpentaphosphate exerted no effect on the activity of succinyl CoA ligase. The reaction was stopped with 20 ll of 0.5 M HCl. After neutralisation with 20 ll NaOH, G3P (Glycerol3-Phosphate) was measured as described in Gibon et al. (2002), in the presence of 1.8 u ml)1 G3POX (Glycerol-3-Phophate Oxidase), 0.7 u ml)1 G3PDH (Glycerol-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase), 1 mM NADH, 1.5 mM MgCl2 and 100 mM Tricine/KOH pH 8. The absorbance was read at 340 nm and at 30 C in a Synergy microplate reader (Bio-Tek) until the rates were stabilised. The rates of reactions were calculated as the decrease of absorbance in mOD min)1 using KC4 software (Bio-Tek). Inhibitors were added as described in Results and discussion. full length cDNAs: the 1164-bp SlSCoAL a1 (clone cLES12N15), the 1322-bp SlSCoAL a (clone cLEY17J6) and the 1427-bp SlSCoAl b (clone cTOF212). Expression of SlSCoAL a1 or SlSCoAL a2 complemented growth of yeast DLSC1 on limiting media and SlSCoAl b complemented growth of DLSC2 (Figure 1). Dilution drop growth assay indicates that SlSCoAL a1 complements DLSC1 slightly better than SlSCoAL a2. In keeping with this when the enzyme activity of the yeast strains generated in this study was assayed alongside their respective control strains the total SCoAL activity, assayed in the direction of succinate production (see below for details), was intermediate between the subunit deficient yeasts and the parental strain (data not shown). Furthermore, analysis of the rate of respiration of the strains analysed here revealed that the mutants were severely compromised whilst complemented mutants regained wild type rates of respiration (data not shown). Oxygen consumption measurements in yeast strains An aliquot of 500 ll of a yeast culture in exponential growth face was transferred to the measuring chamber of the liquid phase oxygen electrode (Hansatech, Bachofer, Reutlingen, Germany) containing 1 ml of YPG and oxygen consumption was recorded under continuous stirring at 25 C. Results and discussion Identification of plant succinyl CoA ligase subunits by functional complementation of subunit-deficient yeast strains The Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains DLSC1 and DLSC2 which carry mutations in the a and b subunits of succinyl CoA ligase, respectively (but are otherwise identical to strain BY4741), require high concentrations of glycerol for efficient growth (Przybyla-Zawislak et al., 1998). Searching tomato EST collections (Van der Hoeven et al., 2003), on the basis of nucleotide structure and fragment length facilitated the isolation of three putative Figure 1. Functional complementation of succinyl CoA ligase subunit deficient yeast strains by the SlSCoAL open reading frames. Transformants were grown overnight on SSM with glucose as sole carbon source before being thoroughly washed. The culture was subjected to ten-fold serial dilutions and 4 ll of each dilution was spotted onto SSM with glycerol as sole carbon source. Plates were photographed after incubation at 30 C for 4 days. WT: BY4741 Genotype (strain) transformed with the empty vector; Dlsc1 (yeast mutant for the a subunit); Dlsc1)h (mutant transformed with the empty vector); Dlsc1)a1 (mutant complemented with the tomato open reading frame SlSCoALa1); Dlsc1)a2 (mutant complemented with the tomato open reading frame SlSCoALa2). Dlsc2 (yeast mutant for the b subunit); Dlsc2)h (mutant transformed with the empty vector); Dlsc2)b (mutant complemented with the tomato open reading frame SlSCoALb). 785 Sequence analysis of plant succinyl CoA ligase subunits Having identified that the clones encoded functional SCoAL subunits we next carried out DNA sequence comparison of the subunits with one another and with functionally characterised SCoAL subunits from other species. The amino acid sequence from SlSCoAL a1 and 2 is conserved in the known domains of SCoAL alpha from other species (Figure 2). SlSCoAL a1 (deposited in GenBank as AY167586) and SlSCoAL a2 (deposited in GenBank as AY650029) only shared 87% sequence similarity with one another suggesting that they are the product of different genes. In keeping with this, mapping studies of the cDNAs using a series of tomato introgression lines (Eshed and Zamir, 1994), revealed two independent loci on the Northern arm of chromosome 2 for the SlSCoAL a subunits. In contrast, a single locus, on the Southern arm of chromosome 6 was revealed for the SlSCoAL b subunit (deposited with GenBank as AY180975). SlSCoAL a1 encodes a protein with an open reading frame of 332 amino acids, whereas SlSCoAL a2 encodes a Figure 2. Alignment of SCoAL a amino acid sequences. The His residue located in the active site is indicated by an asterisk (*). The identification of the CoA-Binding domain and the active His residue is based on Johnson et al. (1998). Alignments were produced using MULTALIN software. protein of 337 amino acids and SlSCoAL b a protein of 417 amino acids. At the protein level, SlSCoAL a1 and SlSCoAL a2 exhibit 90% identity with the majority of differences being located in the first 43 amino acids, although the SlSCoAL a2 also contains additional residues at positions 27 and 41 of the SlSCoAL a1 gene. The SlSCoAL b protein is, in contrast, very distinct from both SlSCoAL a1 and SlSCoAL a2 exhibiting no significant similarity. SlSCoAL a1 and SlSCoAL a2 (in parenthesis) exhibit 75 (70), 72 (67), 71 (66) and 70 (66), % identity to the functionally characterized succinyl CoA ligases a from Dictyostelium discoideum, Rattus norvegicus, Mus musculus and Sus scrofa, respectively, whereas, SlSCoAL b showed 56, 53, 52 and 51% identity to the functionally characterized succinyl CoA ligase b from D. discoideum, Gallus gallus, M. musculus and R. norvegicus, respectively. Alignment of SlSCoAL a1 and 2 with other functionally characterized SCoALs revealed regions of high sequence conservation corresponding to the CoA binding domain and to the regulatory phosphohistidine residue previously identified via crystallography studies of the E. coli enzyme (Wolodko et al., 1994). Furthermore, in silico modeling of both possible ab hetero-dimers predicted from the sequences suggested very similar domain structures and folding patterns to those of the E. coli enzyme (Fraser et al., 1999). Analysis of all sequences homologous to the a-subunit of SlSCoAL in GenBank revealed that A. thaliana, Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans also contained two homologs of this gene. Phylogenetic analysis (Figure 3A), however, demonstrates that the four duplications arose independently in the Arabidopsis, tomato, Drosophila and C. elegans lineages. Analysis of sequences homologous to the b-subunit of SlSCoAL (Figure 3B) suggests that a unique duplication occurred prior to the separation of Drosophila from vertebrates. Therefore, Drosophila and the vertebrates have two copies of b-subunit, while the rest of the analyzed genomes, including plants, bear only a single copy of the gene. When this fact is taken into consideration alongside the diverse enzymatic properties reported below suggests considerable differences in the metabolic regulation of this enzyme across species. 786 Figure 4. Principles of the succinyl CoA ligase assay. Figure 3. DNA sequence analysis of succinyl-CoA ligase genes from S. lycopersicum. Phylogenetic tree of the a (A) and b (B) subunits of succinyl-CoA ligase. The annotated numbers represent bootstrap values for each node (500 replicates). Independent duplications of the a gene are indicated with arrows. Establishment of an assay for succinyl CoA ligase in the direction of succinate formation The basis for the new assay is the enzymic cycle between G3POX and G3PDH (Figure 4). G3POX catalyses an O2-mediated conversion of G3P into DAP, and G3PDH converts DAP back into G3P and simultaneously oxidises NADH and NAD+ (Figure 4B). This cycling system has been thoroughly validated and optimised in previous studies (Gibon et al., 2002, 2004), here we coupled the cycling system to the operation of succinyl CoA ligase in the direction of succinate formation by the action of glycerokinase (Figure 4A) which stoichiometrically converts the ATP produced by succinyl CoA ligase. The amount of plant material to be included in the assay was optimised to 50 lg per well (not shown), and a recovery of ATP was performed with floral extracts and found to be higher than 90%. Linearity with time was also checked. The sensitivity of the assay was found to be at least 50 pmol of ATP in the conditions described in Materials and Methods, which corresponds to 3–4 lg FW. The activity was found to range from 50 to 350 pmol per well, which is far below the linearity range provided by the cycling assay used (3 orders of magnitude). After determining that the complemented yeast mutants had elevated activity of succinyl CoA ligase (described above), we next evaluated the activity of succinyl CoA ligase in a range of tomato organs. The highest activity of this enzyme was observed in floral tissues (383 ± 16 nmol min)1 g FW)1), however the activity was still relatively high in leaves (141 ± 4 nmol min)1 g FW)1), whilst green (62 ± 3 nmol min)1 g FW)1) and red fruits (28 ± 4 nmol min)1 g FW)1) had relatively low activities. The activity in all organs is very low particularly when it is considered that the activities of aconitase and mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase in the same organs are typically an order of magnitude faster than this (Carrari et al., 2003; Nunes-Nesi et al., 2005). Expression analysis of plant succinyl CoA ligase subunits The mRNA levels of the SlSCoAL a1, a2 and b genes were determined by Northern blots as shown in Figure 5A. Single bands were observed when hybridising with SlSCoAL a and SlSCoAL b. Both genes are highly and equally expressed in root, stem and flowers, but are also expressed in leaves and during the whole fruit developmental process, peaking at 55 DAF coincident with the onset of fruit ripening. Given that the high degree of sequence similarity between SlSCoAL a1 and 2 does not allow us to distinguish differential expression between the two genes we next used an RT-PCR approach to determine the relative steady-state mRNA levels of the SlSCoAL a1 and 787 Figure 5. Expression analysis of SlSCoAL a and b subunits. (A) Total RNA of tomato fruit at different developmental stages (DAF) and tomato plant organs were hybridised with tomato full-length clones of SCoAL a and b subunits. R: Root; S: Stem; Ld: Leaf collected at day period; Ln: Leaf collected in the night period; F: Flower. Densitometry analysis was performed by using the Scion Image software package (Maryland, USA). (B) Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis of the two SlSCoALa genes. Relative abundance of a 1 and 2 subunits was measured in tomato plant organs. Values represent the ratios between mean quantifications of PCR band intensities from single tube amplifications using a common forward primer for both isoforms and two specific reverse ones. The vertical bar on the left represents the 95% confidence interval of the mean. 2. However, as illustrated in Figure 5B, differences in the expression of SlSCoAL a1 and 2 are within the confidence interval (95%), indicating that the expression of the isoforms is similar across all organs sampled. This is in agreement with what we observed when we performed the analysis of the expression pattern of the genes encoding for the succinyl CoA ligase alpha and beta subunits in Arabidopsis thaliana using publically accessible microarray data (Steinhauser et al., 2004; Zimmermann et al., 2004). The tissue specificity as well as the patterns of induction/repression of these genes under abiotic conditions (specially UV-B, salt and heat stress) follow very similar patterns meaning that the three genes are also apparently coexpressed in Arabidopsis. Subcellular localisation of succinyl CoA ligase in plants In order to investigate the cellular localization of the proteins encoded by the SlSCoAL a1 and 2 and SlSCoAL b genes we first analysed the peptide sequences by bioinformatic prediction (TargetP, Emanuelsson et al., 2000; Predotar, Small et al., 2004; SignalP, Bendtsen et al., 2004). Both SlSCoAL a- and the b-subunits were predicted to be targeted to the mitochondria. To confirm these results the complete coding regions were fused at the carboxyl terminal end, to an enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP, Karimi et al., 2003; Figure 6) and stably expressed in Arabidopsis plants. GFP fluorescence was detected in protoplasts prepared from leaves of these plants in coincidence with the MITOTrack dye (Figure 6C). These data are in keeping with the documentation of both succinyl CoA isoforms in the mitochondrial proteome (Millar et al., 2001; Sweetlove et al., 2002), and in fact they even suggest an exclusive mitochondrial localisation of these proteins. Preliminary characterisation of enzymatic properties of plant succinyl CoA ligase Given that succinyl CoA ligase seems to be present at relatively low activities in plant organs, and that the levels of its transcripts and protein have been 788 Figure 6. Expression of SlSCoALa1 and 2 and SlSCoAL b - GFP fusion in A. thaliana protoplasts. SlSCoAL a1-GFP, SlSCoAL a2-GFP and SlSCoAL b-GFP transformed protoplasts were used for confocal microscopy. (A) GFP fluorescence; (B) MitoTracker visualization (fluorescence excitation at 554 nm and emission at 576 nm) and (C) Merged image of A and B. Below each picture schemes of the constructs used to transform A. thaliana are shown. observed to be highly variable through development (Urbanczyk-Wochniak et al., 2003), and in response to biological processes such as oxidative stress (Sweetlove et al., 2002), suggests that it may be an important control point of the TCA cycle. In order to gain preliminary insight into the in vivo regulation of the succinyl CoA ligase we next determined Km for succinyl CoA and ADP for crude extracts from yeast and tomato flower (Figure 7 and data not shown). These studies revealed that the Km for both succinyl CoA and ADP were relatively similar in yeast and tomato, moreover they were also remarkably similar to those determined for other plant species (e.g. potato, data not shown). The fact that these data are in such close agreement with the data obtained by Palmer and Wedding (1966) on purified plant enzyme strongly suggests that our result are a good reflection of the actual Km. Having determined the Km of succinyl CoA and ADP we next attempted to determine the effects of the presence of varying the concentration of other organic acids, within the assay mixture, on the reaction rate of the enzyme operating in the forward direction. Whilst several early metabolites of the TCA cycle had no effect such as pyruvate and acetyl CoA (Table 1), the majority of the TCA cycle intermediates effected the activity of SCoAL. In contrast, the cytotoxic product of lipid peroxidation, 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE), which has previously been demonstrated to inhibit several enzymes of the mitochondrial TCA cycle (Millar and Leaver, 789 Table 1. I50 values for various metabolites in tomato flower protein extract. Compound I50 Pyruvate Acetyl CoA Citrate Isocitrate 2-Oxoglutarate Coenzyme A Succinate Fumarate Malate Oxaloacetate HNE Nd Nd 33.8 mM 41.3 mM a 307.1 lM 7.1 mM 11.2 mM 151.3 mM 1.8 mM Nd Assays were carried out in saturating conditions 100 lM succinyl CoA and 2.5 mM ADP. Nd: not detected. a 2-Oxoglutarate activated SCoAL in the range of 0.3 – 10 mM. Figure 7. Kinetic analysis of the SCoAL in the direction of succinate formation. (A) Dependence of SCoAL activity from crude extract of tomato flowers on succinyl CoA concentrations. (B) Dependence of SCoAL activity from crude extract of tomato flowers on ADP concentrations. The Km where determined by fitting a rectangular hyperbola curve. 2000), had no effect. The only metabolite that was capable of activating SCoAL was 2-oxoglutarate, whereas citrate and isocitrate and all metabolites downstream of SCoAL apparently inhibit its activity. However, caution must be taken in interpreting these data since in the majority of cases inhibition was only observed in concentrations far in excess of those reported in the literature (generally two orders of magnitude higher, Schauer et al. [2005], Bender-Machado et al. [2004]). The exceptions to this statement were the activation by 2-oxoglutarate which occurred even at low physiological concentration, succinate and fumarate which inhibit at relatively high physiological concentrations and citrate which inhibit at very high concentrations relative to those reported to be physiological. When taken together these properties of SCoAL suggest that it is inhibited by downstream intermediates of the TCA cycle. In summary, although a more detailed characterisation on purified plant enzymes will be required to confirm and extend these preliminary observations they suggest that the in vivo flux through SCoAL may be subject to allosteric regulation in a manner that would allow a high cyclic flux in times when carbon is in rich supply and a reduced flux in times of carbon deficiency. Moreover, the low activity of the enzyme, when considered alongside the observations that the transcription and protein stability of this enzyme vary both developmentally and in response to physiological processes such as oxidative stress (Sweetlove et al., 2002; Urbanczyk-Wochniak et al., 2003), suggest that this may be an important control point of the TCA cycle. Whilst we identified that there were two different genes encoding the a-subunit in plants, there appears to be little functional distinction between them since they are expressed in the same relative level in all plant organs tested and as expected are both targeted to the mitochondria. Our yeast complementation indicates that a- or b-subunits can operate independently but the presence of both subunits in all plant organs assayed may indicate a more complex enzyme structure in planta. Since this work constitutes the first functional identification of the genes encoding SCoAL in plants it also opens up the possibility to utilize the reverse genetic approach in order to characterise the role of this enzyme in plant metabolism and development. 790 Acknowledgements We thank Lothar Willmitzer and members of AG Kramer for support and discussion during the course of this work and would like to acknowledge the financial support of the KAS (Konrad Adenauer Stiftung) to CSG. We thank Amit Gur and Dani Zamir (Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel) for the information concerning the map position of the genes described in this report and Joachim Selbig (same institute) for help with protein structure predictions. FC is member of conicet. References Bendtsen, J.D., Nielsen, H., von Heijne, G. and Brunak, 2004. Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0 . J. Mol. Biol. 340: 783–795. Bender-Machado Bäuerlein, L. M., Carrari, F., Schauer, N., Lytovchenko, A., Gibon, Y., Kelly, A.A., Ehlers Loureiro, M., Müller-Röber, B, Willmitzer, L. and Fernie, A.R. 2004. Expression of a yeast acetyl CoA hydrolase in the mitochondrion of tobacco plants inhibits growth and restricts photosynthesis. Plant Mol. Biol. 55: 645–662. Carrari, F., Coll-Garcı́a, D., Schauer, N., Lytovchenko, A., Palacios-Rojas, N., Balbo, I. and Rosso And Fernie, M. A.R. 2005. Deficiency of a plastidial adenylate kinase in Arabidopsis results in elevated photosynthetic amino acid biosynthesis and enhanced growth. Plant Physiol. 137: 70–82. Carrari, F., Nunes-Nesi, A., Gibon, Y., Lytovchenko, A., Loureiro, M.E. and Fernie, A.R. 2003. Reduced expression of aconitase results in an enhanced rate of photosynthesis and marked shifts in carbon partitioning in illuminated leaves of wild species tomato. Plant Physiol. 133: 1322–1335. Drager, D.B, Debrosses-Fonrouge, A.G, Krach, C., Chardonnens, A.N., Meyer, R.C., Saumitou-Laprade, P. and Kramer, U. 2004. Two genes encoding Arabidopsis halleri MTP1 metal transport proteins co-segregate with zinc tolerance and account for high MTP1 transcript levels. Plant J. 39: 425–439. Emanuelsson, O., Nielsen, H., Brunak, S. and von Heijne, G. 2000. Predicting subcellular localization of proteins based on their N-terminal amino acid sequence. J. Mol. Biol. 300: 1005–1016. Eshed, Y. and Zamir, D. 1994. A genomic library of Lycopersicon pennellii in L. esculentum: A tool for fine mapping of genes. Euphytica 79: 175–179. Fernie, A.R., Carrari, F. and Sweetlove, L. 2004. Respiratory metabolism: glycolysis, the TCA cycle and mitochondrial electron transport chain. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 7: 254–261. Fraser, M.E., James, M.N.G., Bridger, W.A. and Wolodko, W.T. 1999. A detailed structural description of Escherichia coli succinyl-CoA synthetase. J. Mol. Biol. 285: 1633–1653. Gibon, Y., Blaesing, O.E., Hannemann, J., Carillo, P., Höhne, M., Hendricks, J.H.M., Palacios, N., Cross, J., Selbig, J. and Stitt, M. 2004. A robot-based platform to measure multiple enzyme activities in Arabidopsis using a set of cycling assays: comparison of changes of enzyme activities and transcript levels during diurnal cycles and in prolonged darkness. Plant Cell 16: 3304–3325. Gibon, Y., Vigeolas, H., Tiessen, A., Geigenberger, P. and Stitt, M. 2002. Sensitive and high throughput metabolite assays for inorganic pyrophosphate, ADPGlc, nucleotide phosphates, and glycolytic intermediates based on a novel cycling system. Plant J. 30: 221–235. Johnson, J.D., Mehus, J.G., Tews, K., Milavetz, B.I. and Lambeth, D.O. 1998. Genetic evidence for the expression of ATP- and GTP-specific succinyl-CoA synthetase in multicellular eucaryotes. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 27580– 27586. Karimi, M., Inze, D. and Depicker, A. 2002. GATEWAY vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Trends Plant Sci. 7: 193–195. Kaufman, S. and Alivisatos, S.G.A. 1955. Purification and properties of the phosphorylating enzyme from spinach. J. Biol. Chem. 216: 141–152. Kumar, S., Tamura, K., Jakobsen, I.B. and Nei, M. 2001. MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Bioinformatics 17: 1244–1245. Lambeth, D.O., Tews, K.N., Adkins, S., Frohlich, D. and Milavetz, I. 2004. Expression of two Succinyl-CoA synthetases with different nucleotide specificities in mammalian tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 36621–36624. Millar, A.H. and Leaver, C.J. 2000. The cytotoxic lipid peroxidation product, 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal, specifically inhibits decarboxylating dehydrogenases in the matrix of plant mitochondria. FEBS Lett. 481: 117–121. Millar, A.H., Sweetlove, L.J., Giegé, P. and Leaver, C. 2001. Analysis of the Arabidopsis mitochondrial proteome. Plant Physiol. 127: 1711–1727. Nunes-Nesi, A., Carrari, F., Lytovchenko, A., Smith, A.M.O., Loureiro, M.E., Ratcliffe, R.G., Sweetlove, L. and Fernie, A.R. 2005. Enhanced photosynthetic performance and growth as a consequence of decreasing mitochondrial Malate dehydrogenase activity in transgenic tomato plants. Plant Physiol. 137: 611–622. Obiadalla-Ali, H., Fernie, A.R., Kossmann, J. and Lloyd, J.R. 2004. Developmental analysis of carbohydrate metabolism in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum cv. Micro-Tom) fruits. Physiol. Plant 120: 196–204. Palmer, J.M. and Wedding, R.T. 1966. Purification and properties of succinyl-CoA synthetase from jerusalem artichoke mitochondria. Biochim. et Biophys. Acta 113: 167–174. Przybyla-Zawislak, B., Dennis, R.A., Zakharkin, S.O. and McCammon, M.T. 1998. Genes of succinyl-CoA ligase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eur. J. Biochem. 258: 736– 743. Ryan, D.G., Lin, T., Brownie, E., Bridger, W.A. and Wolodko, W.T. 1997. Mutually exclusive splicing generates two distinct isoforms of pig heart succinyl-CoA synthetase. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 21151–21159. Saitou, N. and Nei, M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4: 406–425. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F. and Maniatis, T. 1989. Extraction, purification, and analysis of messenger RNA from eukaryotic cells. In: N. Ford, C. Nolan and M. Ferguson (Eds.), Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, pp. 7.3–7.83. 791 Schauer, N., Zamir, D. and Fernie, A.R. 2005. Metabolic profiling of leaves and fruits of wild species tomato: A survey of the Solanum lycopersicon complex. J. Exp. Bot. 56: 297–307. Schiestl, R.H. and Gietz, R.D. 1989. High efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells using single stranded nucleic acids as a carrier. Curr. Genet. 16: 339–346. Small, I., Peeters, N., Legeai, F. and Lurin, C. 2004. Predotar: A tool for rapidly screening proteomes for N-terminal targeting sequences. Proteomics 4: 1581–1590. Steinhauser, D., Usadel, B., Luedemann, A., Thimm, O. and Kopka, J. 2004. CSB.DB: A comprehensive systems-biology database. Bioinformatics 20: 3647–3651. Sweetlove, L.J., Heazelwood, J.L., Herald, V., Holtzapffel, R., Day, D.A., Leaver, C.J. and Millar, A.H. 2002. The impact of oxidative stress on Arabidopsis mitochondria. Plant J. 32: 891–904. Urbanczyk-Wochniak, E., Luedemann, A., Kopka, J., Selbig, J., Roessner-Tunali, U., Willmitzer, L. and Fernie, A.R. 2003. Parallel analysis of a transcript and metabolic profiles: a new approach in systems biology. EMBO Reports 4: 989–993. Van der Hoeven, R., Ronning, C., Giovannoni, J., Martin, G. and Tanksley, S. 2003. Deductions about the number, organization and evolution of genes in the tomato genome based on analysis of a large expressed sequence tag collection and selective genomic sequencing. Plant Cell 14: 1441–1456. Wider, E.A. and Tigier, H.A. 1971. Porphyrin biosynthesis in soybean callus tissue. VIII. Isolation, purification and general properties of Succinyl CoA synthetase. Enzymologia 41: 217–231. Wolodko, W.T., Fraser, M.E., James, M.N.G. and Bridger, W.A. 1994. The crystal structure of succinyl-CoA synthetase from Escherichia coli at 2.5-A resolution. J. Biol. Chem. 269: 10883–10894. Zimmermann, P., Hirsch-Hoffmann, M., Hennig, L. and Gruissem, W. 2004. GENEVESTIGATOR. Arabidopsis microarray database and analysis toolbox. Plant Physiol. 136: 2621–2632.