* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download coal use and climate change - Colorado Mining Association
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Climate-friendly gardening wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Fossil fuel phase-out wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup
Economics of climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in New Zealand wikipedia , lookup
Views on the Kyoto Protocol wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Carbon governance in England wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Decarbonisation measures in proposed UK electricity market reform wikipedia , lookup
Biosequestration wikipedia , lookup
Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Business action on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
COAL USE AND CLIMATE CHANGE We’ve all heard of “climate change” or “global warming.” Global warming is the theory that increased levels of greenhouse gas emissions, including carbon dioxide or CO2, trap heat in the earth’s atmosphere, causing ocean levels to rise and other effects, such as decreased rainfall, or snow melts at higher elevations in Colorado. Yet the earth has always been in a state of change. The hot, humid conditions that created swamps and rainforests disappeared as various cooling periods, including the Ice Age, took place. The moderate warming period we currently enjoy established itself in the 1860s. Emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) come from both natural and manmade sources, and there is continued debate on the extent to which human activities influence climate change. The bulk of greenhouse gas emissions – more than 99 per cent - occur naturally – mostly from the release of water vapor from the oceans. Less than one per cent results from human activity. While some scientists believe that human activities may result in catastrophic changes to the earth’s climate, i. e. hurricane activity, other respected scientists, including Dr. William Gray of Colorado State University, confirm that the hurricane activity of 2005 did not result from global warming. Fears over rising ocean levels are also not supported by science, according to Dr. Patrick Michaels, Research Professor of Environmental Sciences at the University of Virginia. Dr. Roger Pielke, a respected climate scientist at CSU, also notes that, even if the United States were to embrace mandatory restrictions on greenhouse gases, the positive effects might not be felt for generations. For this reason, careful evaluation of the impacts of the various policy choices in dealing with global warming is required. The principal man made sources are emissions of CO2 from mobile sources (cars and trucks, for example) and power plants that use coal and other fossil fuels to generate electricity. As a result, some have suggested either the elimination of coal use for the generation of electricity or regulations that would mandate reductions in carbon dioxide from these sources through a “carbon tax” or other “emissions cap.” Regulating CO2 through emissions caps or carbon taxes - as a means of addressing climate change concerns is ineffective and comes at a huge cost to the economies of our nation and of Colorado. Carbon Taxes would have a severe impact in Colorado In Colorado alone, the costs of achieving greenhouse gas emissions through command and control measure would harm our economy and raise the cost of producing coal, our lowest cost, most reliable and abundant energy fuel, by more than $18 billion. As coal is the fuel that is used to generate more than 72% of Colorado’s electricity, these increased costs would translate into dramatically higher electricity rates. Colorado’s coal industry – which generates nearly $1 billion in direct sales and pays average wages in excess of $91,000 annually to its workers – would also be adversely affected. Climate Change Is A Global Problem Requiring A Global Solution CO2 regulation through taxation or mandatory regulation is ineffective because most of the projected growth in emissions will occur in countries with rapidly-developing economies (China, India, and others). For instance, the Kyoto Treaty to which some European nations have subscribed, will only decrease carbon dioxide by 483 million tons per year, while new emissions from China alone (one of the countries not subject to the Treaty) will increase from between 844 and 1,926 million tons per year. And, nations which have committed to the Treaty are learning that they cannot meet its reductions without adverse impact to their economies. Thus far, proposed international agreements to reduce emissions have exempted these developing countries from taking action. Moreover, analysis by the Energy Information Administration during the Clinton Administration found that regulating CO2 could cost the U.S economy more than $350 billion a year (beginning in the year 2010). Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Developing Nations Dwarf Kyoto “Savings” Climate Policies Must Focus On Voluntary Technology Based Solutions To Balance The Economic Impacts Given these high costs, if you think there is a better way to responsibly address climate change concerns ... you're right. America continues to invest in technologies that will improve efficiencies and reduce the carbon intensity in the energy sector. And we can't overlook nature's potential role in helping balance the growth in atmospheric concentrations of CO2. Sequestration is the process by which carbon is captured and stored before it is emitted into the atmosphere. Sequestration is a part of the natural carbon cycle. Independent research shows that helping natural carbon reservoirs (like plants, forests, and soils) to more productively capture and store carbon can effectively help reduce CO2 concentrations, improve soil quality and plant yields ... all without the high cost of regulation. The realization that coal will need to remain a part of America's energy future, however, has led many experts to believe that sequestration, in the near-term, can provide the bridge necessary for the development and deployment of new carbon-neutral energy technologies - such as FutureGen, the demonstration of the first zero-pollution, carbonneutral coal-based energy facility. Climate Policies Must Encourage Reliance On Coal, The Nation’s Most Abundant Energy Fuel The United States has more than 27% of the world’s coal reserves – natural gas is much more scarce and the cost of producing electricity from natural gas is more than double the cost of coal. Our energy policy must encourage and maximize the consumption of electricity from domestic sources and not rely on foreign and politically unstable areas of the world to meet our basic energy needs. Climate policies must be enlightened and focus on developing the technologies to reduce carbon emissions, not costly mandates. What we are doing here in Colorado Colorado Mining Association member companies are working individually and with other industries to develop and employ energy efficiency and new technology to reduce greenhouse gases while continuing to supply coal, our most abundant fossil fuel resource, to utility plants nationwide. CMA has also developed a first of its kind Pollution Prevention Program where companies achieve recognition for their efforts in protecting the environment, reducing chemical use, and controlling greenhouse gas emissions, just to name a few examples. In 2003, the Environmental Protection Agency recognized the CMA program with a Friend of EPA Award. CMA also supports statewide initiatives to study greenhouse gas emissions and how they might impact Colorado. Finally, CMA, our utility customers and the environmental community have worked together to promote clean air legislation, including the recently enacted House Bill 06-1281, which will authorize the Public Utilities Commission to approve the first Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) power plant, using an exciting yet unproven technology that will bring us closer to producing zero emissions electricity from coal. This legislation would authorize Xcel Energy to submit bids to the Department of Energy to test this technology in a high altitude environment.