Download Full-Text PDF

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 11030-11039; doi:10.3390/ijms150611030
OPEN ACCESS
International Journal of
Molecular Sciences
ISSN 1422-0067
www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms
Review
Contribution of Chitinase A’s C-Terminal Vacuolar Sorting
Determinant to the Study of Soluble Protein Compartmentation
Egidio Stigliano 1,2,3, Gian-Pietro Di Sansebastiano 4 and Jean-Marc Neuhaus 1,*
1
2
3
4
Laboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Neuchâtel; Rue Emile-Argand 11,
Neuchâtel CH-2000, Switzerland; E-Mail: [email protected]
Institute of Biosciences and Bioresources, National Research Council of Italy (CNR–IBBR),
Corso Calatafimi 414, Palermo 90129, Italy
ALSIA (Lucan Agency of Innovation and Technological Development)—Metapontum Agrobios
Research Center, S.S. jonica 106, km 448.2, Metaponto 75012, Italy
DiSTeBA (Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies),
University of Salento, Campus ECOTEKNE, S.P. 6, Lecce-Monteroni, Lecce 73100, Italy;
E-Mail: [email protected]
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected];
Tel.: +41-32-718-2207; Fax: +41-32-718-3001.
Received: 28 March 2014; in revised form: 6 June 2014 / Accepted: 9 June 2014 /
Published: 18 June 2014
Abstract: Plant chitinases have been studied for their importance in the defense of crop
plants from pathogen attacks and for their peculiar vacuolar sorting determinants.
A peculiarity of the sequence of many family 19 chitinases is the presence of a C-terminal
extension that seems to be important for their correct recognition by the vacuole sorting
machinery. The 7 amino acids long C-terminal vacuolar sorting determinant (CtVSD) of
tobacco chitinase A is necessary and sufficient for the transport to the vacuole. This VSD
shares no homology with other CtVSDs such as the phaseolin’s tetrapeptide AFVY
(AlaPheValTyr) and it is also sorted by different mechanisms. While a receptor for this
signal has not yet been convincingly identified, the research using the chitinase CtVSD
has been very informative, leading to the observation of phenomena otherwise difficult to
observe such as the presence of separate vacuoles in differentiating cells and the existence
of a Golgi-independent route to the vacuole. Thanks to these new insights in the
endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-to-vacuole transport, GFPChi (Green Fluorescent Protein
carrying the chitinase A CtVSD) and other markers based on chitinase signals will
continue to help the investigation of vacuolar biogenesis in plants.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15
11031
Keywords: chitinase; GFPChi; vacuole sorting; endoplasmic-to-vacuole (ERV)-pathway
1. Introduction
Over the past few decades, glycosyl hydrolases of families 18 and 19, commonly known as
chitinases (EC 3.2.1.14), have been studied for their importance in the defense of crop plants from
pathogen attacks and for their peculiar vacuolar sorting determinants. While family 18 chitinases are
found in all organisms, family 19 chitinases are mostly found in plants, although they have been
found in a few animals, fungi, protists and in many bacteria. Until January 2014, 3374 chitinase DNA
sequences were present in the NCBI database while the Pfam database revealed for Viridiplantae 569
sequences from 111 species for family 18 and 1047 sequences from 204 species for family 19 chitinases.
They catalyze the hydrolysis of internal β-1,4-bonds between monomers of N-acetylglucosamine
of chitin, the major cell wall structural polysaccharide of many fungi. This activity can evidently
contribute to the defenses against fungal pathogens.
Unfortunately, the chitinases in cultivated plants can also have negative effects on human health
since they may trigger allergic responses. Chitinases are major allergens in several food plants like
banana, avocado or apple, as well as in rubber. Like many allergens, they are resistant to proteolytic
degradation in the acidic environment of the stomach. This resistance favors entry into the bloodstream
triggering the allergic response. The use of heterologous chitinases to engineer pathogen-resistant crop
plants requires that the proteins are suitably modified to be optimized for pathogen resistance as well
as to be properly hydrolyzed in an acidic environment [1].
Full understanding of the post-translational modifications (PTMs) of the engineered transgenic
product is necessary both for the development of plants over-expressing defense proteins, and for the
increase of nutritional value. Glycosylation certainly possesses a considerable importance, being the
most abundant PTM in plant cells [2] and the most frequent post-translational modification related
to the allergenic potential. However chitinases are rarely glycosylated. The catalytic domain shows a
lysozyme-like folding in which two glutamates, Glu67 (number in barley chitinase) located in the third
helix and Glu89 located in a more variable loop-like structure, act as main reactive groups for the
inverting acid-base catalysis [3]. Additionally, Glu203 and Arg215 are both coordinated with Glu67.
Not surprisingly, a similar triplet is shared with glycosyl hydrolases of families 46 (chitosanases) and
17 (β-1,3-glucanases) [4].
Family 19 chitinases have been subdivided in seven classes depending on the presence of a
chitin-binding domain and on the presence of four loops within the catalytic domain. X-ray structures
of several plant class I and II chitinases indicate a compact fold of the catalytic domain where the
C-terminus is extended along the surface in such a way that additional residues would stick out over
the catalytic cleft [5,6]. It is thus to be expected that the C-terminal propeptides found in many
vacuolar class I chitinases are easily accessible to the sorting machinery as well as easily removed by
endo- or exo-peptidases.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15
11032
2. Chitinase Sorting, a Hidden Path
The vacuolar sorting determinant (VSD) residing in the C-terminal 7 amino acids long propeptide
of tobacco chitinase A is both necessary and sufficient for the transport to the vacuole [7]. Fusion of
this C-terminal propeptide to enzymatic or fluorescent reporters (rat β-glucuronidase and Green
Fluorescent Protein (GFP)) confirmed these early evidences [8,9]. Only few other C-terminal VSDs (CtVSD)
have been demonstrated to be involved in vacuolar sorting: a barley lectin [10], a β-1,3-glucanase and
an osmotin from tobacco [11–13], 2S albumin storage proteins from Brazil nut [14], pea [15] and
bean phaseolin [16].
Contrary to ssVSDs (sequence-specific Vacuolar Sorting Determinants, as identified, e.g., in barley
for aleurain or sweet potato for sporamin), no specific sequence motif is needed for vacuolar sorting
and different amino-acid substitutions led to different efficiencies of delivery to the vacuole.
The importance of the C-terminus for the sorting machinery is stressed by the fact that the C-terminal
Met of chitinase A could be replaced by a Phe or a Lys or even deleted, but not replaced by a Gly [7].
Similarly, addition of 1 or 2 Gly to the barley lectin propeptide or C-terminal addition of an
N-glycosylation site caused a total secretion of the lectin [11].
The tobacco chitinase VSD has been less widely used than another C-terminal targeting signal, the
tetrapeptide AlaPheValTyr (AFVY) from bean phaseolin [16]. There is no homology between these
two CtVSDs but they now appear also to be sorted by different mechanisms [17]. The research using
the chitinase CtVSD has been very informative, leading to the observation of otherwise neglected
phenomena, such as the possible formation of two ontogenically distinct vacuoles [18], the presence
of separate vacuoles in differentiating cells [19] and the existence of a Golgi-independent route
to vacuoles [17].
Vacuoles are multifunctional organelles showing a high plasticity according to physiological/
environmental needs [20,21]. The coexistence of two functionally and morphologically distinct
vacuoles in single plant cells was confirmed by several studies involving different species [22–25].
Distinct vacuoles with different contents can certainly answer to specific physiological needs [19,25].
There is still a debate whether they derive by fragmentation from a pre-existing unique vacuole or
develop from different prevacuolar compartments [26–29]. In some cases, as in programmed cell death
(PCD) during pathogen response, vacuoles can fragment and acquire new functions that require specific
membrane characteristics [30]. As for distinct biogenesis pathways, de Marchis and co-workers [31]
recently reviewed several Golgi-independent pathways involved in the trafficking of different types of
vacuolar proteins.
A recent electron microscopy study of Arabidopsis thaliana root tips using trafficking inhibitors [32]
supports a model in which the lytic vacuole tonoplast forms from membranes derived from the
endoplasmic reticulum, forming (empty) provacuoles. Similar models for the de novo biogenesis of a
lytic vacuole had already been suggested long ago [33,34]. The provacuoles fuse with the pre-existing
vacuolar network. Soluble contents then fill the vacuoles by the classical route via the Golgi. This
corresponds well with the pattern observed with mini-protoplasts regenerating their central vacuole [18],
when using the fluorescent vacuolar marker AleuGFP targeted with the sequence-specific VSD
(ssVSD) of barley aleurain, a marker for lytic vacuoles, but not to what could be seen with the
fluorescent vacuolar reporter GFPChi targeted with the CtVSD of tobacco chitinase-A [8]. This study
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15
11033
also revealed that the regenerating central vacuole responsible for cell turgor is generated mainly by
the lytic vacuolar compartment, labeled by AleuGFP. In contrast, GFPChi labeled small peripheral
vacuoles, which we called pre-vacuoles. These fused with the central vacuole in a second step,
probably at the end of cell expansion. In transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing either marker, it
could be seen that in nascent and expanding root hairs the central vacuole was labeled by AleuGFP,
while GFPChi was excluded, while in fully expanded root hairs the latter marker also made it to the
central vacuole [19]. This observation was not confirmed by other research groups using other
vacuolar markers but can now be better understood considering the recent data [17] showing that
GFPChi is a marker of a Sar1-independent traffic to the central vacuole. In our opinion, the central
vacuole initially formed in mini-protoplasts [18] was filled by the standard Sar1-dependent pathway
only, while the Sar1-independent pathway formed peripheral pre-vacuoles, supporting the idea of
ontogenically distinct vacuoles.
In Arabidopsis plants accumulating anthocyanins, Brefeldin A (BFA) treatment did not alter the
trafficking of either anthocyanins or GFPChi while it affected the trafficking of AleuGFP [35].
Similarly, for the enzymatic marker rat β-glucuronidase fused to the chitinase CtVSD (RGUSChi) it
was wortmannin and not BFA that completely impaired vacuolar targeting in protoplasts [9]. The drug
BFA is often used to demonstrate the involvement of Golgi in vacuolar trafficking (for a review see [36])
but it is also acting on endosomal compartments and on recycling to the plasmalemma, causing the
formation of BFA bodies [37]. Recent results in Nicotiana [17], indirectly confirmed in tomato [38],
indeed suggest that GFPChi transits via an intermediate compartment independent from the trans-Golgi
Network (TGN) but involved in the late events of BFA bodies formation.
Other studies have however convincingly argued that GFPChi follows the canonical pathway
through the Golgi–TGN–PVC (PreVacuolar Compartment). The functional studies of AtVPS45 [39]
and AtVTI12 [40] showed that these proteins influence GFPChi sorting but mutants do not fully
impair its transport to the central vacuole leaving open the possibility of a close interaction between
the two pathways. Both AtVPS45 and AtVTI12 are positive regulators for vacuolar trafficking of
cargoes carrying a CtVSD, being responsible for fusion processes at the tonoplast: AtVPS45 is a
member of Sec1/Munc18 family and forms with AtVTI12 SNARE a multimeric complex also
including SYP41/SYP61. In a vps45 null mutant, the vacuole forms small concentric multilayer
compartments stressing the involvement of post-Golgi trafficking in provacuole release and/or
provacuole fusion [41] and opening to future model re-interpretation. The authors did not exclude the
interference of an unbalanced SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor associated protein
receptor) complex, composed of VAMP727, SYP22, VTI11, and SYP51. In fact it is known that the
absence of both SYP22 and VAMP727 lead to vacuole fragmentation [42]. Over-expression of
AtSYP51 also specifically interferes with GFPChi sorting to the vacuole [43,44]. SYP51 belongs to a
new functional class of SNAREs with interfering activity, the i-SNAREs [45]. The i-SNARE activity
of SYP51 is not shared by other related SNAREs such as SYP61 [43] and may be related to vacuole
separation. SYP51 was localized on compartments of a different nature [43], which are distinct from
Golgi and differently associated with free TGN [46], multivesicular bodies (MVB) (colocalizing with
TGN and PVC markers) or tonoplast. For the investigation and characterization of the endoplasmic
reticulum (ER)-to-vacuole pathways it is essential to identify valuable markers, such as chitinase. Even
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15
11034
so many years after the discovery of the latter’s vacuolar targeting, the thorough study of the
related-marker GFPChi leaves many unanswered questions.
A main issue is that putative vacuolar sorting receptor(s) for CtVSD proteins have been identified,
but their sorting mechanism remains unclear. The CtVSD are not specifically recognized by the
well-characterized Vacuolar Sorting Receptors (VSRs), which have a strong affinity for ssVSD [47,48].
These receptors have a similar structure to other vacuolar or lysosomal sorting receptors in animals or
yeast, with a luminal cargo-binding domain, a single transmembrane domain and a short cytosolic tail
with sorting signals controlling their incorporation into coated vesicles [48]. In 2000 [49], a new class
of putative receptors, the RMRs (Receptor-like Membrane RING-H2), was identified in Arabidopsis
based on the homology of its PA (Protease Associated) domain, with the PA domain, which is a part of
the cargo-binding luminal domain of VSRs. In vitro binding assays of the luminal domain of RMRs
have demonstrated an affinity for CtVSDs and not for ssVSDs, supporting their role as vacuolar sorting
receptors for CtVSDs involved in sorting to the storage vacuole [50–52]. Co-immunoprecipitation and
in vitro binding assays of AtRMR1 with phaseolin also support an in vivo interaction between proteins
with a CtVSD and some members of the RMR family [51] (For a review on RMRs, see [53]). GFPChi
may be targeted to the vacuole in an aggregated form as already shown for phaseolin [54,55].
The localization of RMRs is not clear yet: they have been localized in a DIP-labeled organelle (Dark
Intrinsic Protein [49]), in the vacuolar lumen [56], in a new type of prevacuolar compartment [52]
or different isoforms in either ER or a prevacuolar compartment (Occhialini, Gouzerh and Neuhaus,
manuscript in preparation). These different results may be due to the different experimental approaches
or organisms used and the discrepancies remain to be resolved.
3. Conclusions
The unclear results about sorting of markers with the chitinase A CtVSD suggests the existence of
two different pathways for the chitinase: a classical pathway passing via the Golgi and the TGN and an
alternative pathway in which soluble cargoes exit the ER by another Sar1-independent mechanism,
delivering cargoes to the vacuoles without passing through the Golgi [17]. This pathway seems
particularly important in developing seeds and involves the formation of dense vesicles. Already in
1993 Hara-Nishimura and co-workers demonstrated the existence of such an alternative pathway for
the accumulation of 2S albumin and 11S globulins in pumpkin seeds via dense precursor-accumulating
compartment (PAC) vesicles [57]. Over the years the number of proteins seen to bypass the Golgi has
increased, including also the calcineurin B-like proteins [58], γ-gliadins [59], α-globulins [60],
legumin-1 [61]. In rice, the formation of two distinct types of protein storage vacuoles involves the
formation of PAC-like vesicles and of a new prevacuolar compartment [52,60].
In vivo observation of tobacco (Figure 1) or Arabidopsis protoplasts expressing GFPChi fluorescent
shows that this marker is distributed among ER, punctate structures, and in either small vacuoles or in
the central vacuole. In developing seeds, GFPChi accumulates in dense vesicles, while such vesicles
are not observed in germinating cotyledons and GFPChi accumulates in ER bodies (Giselbert Hinz,
unpublished observations). In vegetative tissues these dense vesicles do not seem to exist. How CtVSD
proteins are sorted in these tissues remains to be determined. Combined with the use of new pathway
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15
11035
selective inhibitors [62], GFPChi will continue to help dissect the mechanisms of vacuolar biogenesis
in plants.
Figure 1. In this 10 μm projection of confocal images, two tobacco protoplasts over-expressing
the Green Gluorescent Protein harboring the C-terminal Vacuolar Sorting Determinant of
chitinase A (GFPChi, in green) accumulate the transgene following the two most described
patterns. In the upper cell the transgene labels the endoplasmic reticulum (as the nuclear
envelope is visible) but efficiently reaches the central vacuole. Several smaller compartments
are also visible; In the lower cell the transgene also labels the ER but is not accumulated in
the central vacuole. On the other hand, it is strongly accumulated in small vacuoles [8].
The red fluorescence of chlorophyll labels chloroplasts. N, nucleus; CV, central vacuole;
SV, small vacuole. Scale bar = 20 μm.
Acknowledgments
G.-P. Di Sansebastiano activity was supported by the Italian national grant PON a3_00334.
J.-M. Neuhaus was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation grant FN 31003A-141257.
Author Contributions
E. Stigliano wrote the first draft of this manuscript, which was then revised by the two other authors
and finalized by J.-M. Neuhaus.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15
11036
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Thomas, K.; Aalbers, M.; Bannon, G.A.; Bartels, M.; Dearman, R.J.; Esdaile, D.J.; Fu, T.J.;
Glatt, C.M.; Hadfield, N.; Hatzos, C.; et al. A multi-laboratory evaluation of a common in vitro pepsin
digestion assay protocol used in assessing the safety of novel proteins. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.
2004, 39, 87–98.
Helenius, A.; Aebi, M. Roles of N-linked glycans in the endoplasmic reticulum. Annu. Rev. Biochem.
2004, 73, 1019–1049.
Huet, J.; Rucktooa, P.; Clantin, B.; Azarkan, M.; Looze, Y.; Villeret, V.; Wintjens, R. X-ray structure
of papaya chitinase reveals the substrate binding mode of glycosyl hydrolase family 19 chitinases.
Biochemistry 2008, 47, 8283–8291.
Ohnishi, T.; Juffer, A.H.; Tamoi, M.; Skriver, K.; Fukamizo, T. 26 kDa endochitinase from barley
seeds: An interaction of the ionizable side chains essential for catalysis. J. Biochem. 2005, 138,
553–562.
Kezuka, Y.; Kojima, M.; Mizuno, R.; Suzuki, K.; Watanabe, T.; Nonaka, T. Structure of
full-length class I chitinase from rice revealed by X-ray crystallography and small-angle X-ray
scattering. Proteins 2010, 78, 2295–2305.
Neuhaus, J.-M. Plant chitinases (PR-3, PR-4, PR-8, PR-11). In Pathogenesis-Related Proteins in
Plants; Datta, S.K., Muthukrishnan, S., Eds.; The CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1999;
pp. 77–105.
Neuhaus, J.-M.; Pietrzak, M.; Boller, T. Mutation analysis of the C-terminal vacuolar targeting
peptide of tobacco chitinase: Low specificity of the sorting system, and gradual transition between
intracellular retention and secretion into the extracellular space. Plant J. 1994, 5, 45–54.
Di Sansebastiano, G.P.; Paris, N.; Marc-Martin, S.; Neuhaus, J.-M. Specific accumulation of GFP
in a non-acidic vacuolar compartment via a C-terminal propeptide-mediated sorting pathway.
Plant J. 1998, 15, 449–457.
Di Sansebastiano, G.; Rehman Reiaz, U.L.; Neuhaus, J.-M. Rat β-glucuronidase as a reporter
protein for the analysis of the plant secretory pathway. Plant Biosyst. 2007, 141, 329–336.
Dombrowski, J.E.; Schroeder, M.R.; Bednarek, S.Y.; Raikhel, N.V. Determination of the functional
elements within the vacuolar targeting signal of barley lectin. Plant Cell 1993, 5, 587–596.
Melchers, L.S.; Sela-Buurlage, M.B.; Vloemans, S.A.; Woloshuk, C.P.; van Roekel, J.S.C.;
Pen, J.; van den Elzen, P.J.M.; Cornelissen, B.J.C. Extracellular targeting of the vacuolar tobacco
proteins-AP24, chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase in transgenic plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 1993, 21,
583–593.
Neuhaus, J.M.; Sticher, L.; Meins, F.; Boller, T. A short C-terminal sequence is necessary and
sufficient for the targeting of chitinases to the plant vacuole. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88,
10362–10366.
Sticher, L.; Hinz, U.; Meyer, A.D.; Meins, F. Intracellular transport and processing of a tobacco
vacuolar β-1,3-glucanase. Planta 1992, 188, 559–565.
Saalbach, G.; Jung, R.; Kunze, G.; Saalbach, I.; Adler, K.; Müntz, K. Different legumin protein
domains act as vacuolar targeting signals. Plant Cell 1991, 3, 695–708.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15
11037
15. Higgins, T.J.V.; Chandler, P.M.; Randall, P.J.; Spencer, D.; Beach, L.R.; Blagrove, R.J.;
Kortt, A.A.; Inglis, A.S. Gene structure, protein structure, and regulation of the synthesis of a
sulfur-rich protein in pea seeds. J. Biol. Chem. 1986, 261, 11124–111130.
16. Frigerio, L.; de Virgilio, M.; Prada, A.; Faoro, F.; Vitale, A. Sorting of phaseolin to the vacuole is
saturable and requires a short C-terminal peptide. Plant Cell 1998, 10, 1031–1042.
17. Stigliano, E.; Faraco, M.; Neuhaus, J.-M.; Montefusco, A.; Dalessandro, G.; Piro, G.;
di Sansebastiano, G.P. Two glycosylated vacuolar GFPs are new markers for ER-to-vacuole
sorting. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 73, 337–343.
18. Di Sansebastiano, G.P.; Paris, N.; Marc-Martin, S.; Neuhaus, J.-M. Regeneration of a lytic central
vacuole and of neutral peripheral vacuoles can be visualized by green fluorescent proteins
targeted to either type of vacuoles. Plant Physiol. 2001, 126, 78–86.
19. Flückiger, R.; de Caroli, M.; Piro, G.; Dalessandro, G.; Neuhaus, J.-M.; di Sansebastiano, G.P.
Vacuolar system distribution in Arabidopsis tissues, visualized using GFP fusion proteins.
J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 54, 1577–1584.
20. Xiang, L.; Etxeberria, E.; van den Ende, W. Vacuolar protein sorting mechanisms in plants.
FEBS J. 2013, 280, 979–993.
21. Marty, F. Plant vacuoles. Plant Cell 1999, 11, 587–600.
22. Di Sansebastiano, G.; Renna, L.; Gigante, M.; de Caroli, M.; Piro, G.; Dalessandro, G.
Green fluorescent protein reveals variability in vacuoles of tree plant species. Biol. Plant. 2007,
51, 49–55.
23. Faraco, M.; di Sansebastiano, G.P.; Spelt, K.; Koes, R.E.; Quattrocchio, F.M. One protoplast is
not the other! Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 474–478.
24. Irani, N.G.; Grotewold, E. Light-induced morphological alteration in anthocyanin-accumulating
vacuoles of maize cells. BMC Plant Biol. 2005, 5, 7.
25. Epimashko, S.; Meckel, T.; Fischer-Schliebs, E.; Lüttge, U.; Thiel, G. Two functionally different
vacuoles for static and dynamic purposes in one plant mesophyll leaf cell. Plant J. 2004, 37,
294–300.
26. Pedrazzini, E.; Komarova, N.Y.; Rentsch, D.; Vitale, A. Traffic routes and signals for the
tonoplast. Traffic 2013, 14, 622–628.
27. Robinson, D.G. Response to Rogers letter. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146, 1026.
28. Jolliffe, N.A.; Craddock, C.P.; Frigerio, L. Pathways for protein transport to seed storage
vacuoles. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2005, 33, 1016–1018.
29. Zouhar, J.; Rojo, E. Plant vacuoles: Where did they come from and where are they heading?
Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12, 677–684.
30. Hatsugai, N.; Hara-Nishimura, I. Two vacuole-mediated defense strategies in plants.
Plant Signal. Behav. 2010, 5, 1568–1570.
31. De Marchis, F.; Bellucci, M.; Pompa, A. Unconventional pathways of secretory plant proteins
from the endoplasmic reticulum to the vacuole bypassing the Golgi complex. Plant Signal. Behav.
2013, 8, e25129.
32. Viotti, C.; Krüger, F.; Krebs, M.; Neubert, C.; Fink, F.; Lupanga, U.; Scheuring, D.; Boutté, Y.;
Frescatada-Rosa, M.; Wolfenstetter, S.; et al. The endoplasmic reticulum is the main membrane
source for biogenesis of the lytic vacuole in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 3434–3449.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15
11038
33. Matile, P.; Moor, H. Vacuolation: Origin and development of the lysosomal apparatus in root-tip
cells. Planta 1968, 80, 159–175.
34. Mesquita, J.F. Electron microscope study of the origin and development of the vacuoles in root-tip
cells of Lupinusalbus L. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 1969, 26, 242–250.
35. Poustka, F.; Irani, N.G.; Feller, A.; Lu, Y.; Pourcel, L.; Frame, K.; Grotewold, E. A trafficking
pathway for anthocyanins overlaps with the endoplasmic reticulum-to-vacuole protein-sorting
route in Arabidopsis and contributes to the formation of vacuolar inclusions. Plant Physiol. 2007,
145, 1323–1335.
36. Robinson, D.G.; Jiang, L.; Schumacher, K. The endosomal system of plants: Charting new and
familiar territories. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147, 1482–1492.
37. Geldner, N.; Anders, N.; Wolters, H.; Keicher, J.; Kornberger, W.; Muller, P.; Delbarre, A.;
Ueda, T.; Nakano, A.; Jürgens, G. The Arabidopsis GNOM ARF–GEF mediates endosomal
recycling, auxin transport, and auxin-dependent plant growth. Cell 2003, 112, 219–230.
38. Di Sansebastiano, G.P.; Fornaciari, S.; Barozzi, F.; Piro, G.; Arru, L. New insights on plant cell
elongation: A role for acetylcholine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 4565–4582.
39. Zouhar, J.; Rojo, E.; Bassham, D.C. AtVPS45 is a positive regulator of the SYP41/SYP61/VTI12
SNARE complex involved in trafficking of vacuolar cargo. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 1668–1678.
40. Sanmartin, M.; Ordonez, A.; Sohn, E.J.; Robert, S.; Sanchez-Serrano, J.J.; Surpin, M.A.;
Raikhel, N.V.; Rojo, E. Divergent functions of VTI12 and VTI11 in trafficking to storage and
lytic vacuoles in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 3645–3650.
41. Viotti, C. ER and vacuoles: Never been closer. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 20.
42. Ebine, K.; Okatani, Y.; Uemura, T.; Goh, T.; Shoda, K.; Niihama, M.; Morita, M.T.; Spitzer, C.;
Otegui, M.S.; Nakano, A.; et al. A SNARE complex unique to seed plants is required for protein
storage vacuole biogenesis and seed development of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 2008, 20,
3006–3021.
43. De Benedictis, M.; Bleve, G.; Faraco, M.; Stigliano, E.; Grieco, F.; Piro, G.; Dalessandro, G.;
di Sansebastiano, G.P. AtSYP51/52 functions diverge in the post-Golgi traffic and differently
affect vacuolar sorting. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 916–930.
44. Faraco, M.; Latino, A.; de Benedictis, M.; Piro, G.; di Sansebastiano, G.P. Atsyp51 and Atsyp52
differently affect sorting of GFPChi and AleuGFP vacuolar markers. J. Plant Biochem. Physiol.
2013, 1, 2.
45. Di Sansebastiano, G.P. Defining new SNARE functions: The i-SNARE. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 99.
46. Kang, B.H.; Nielsen, E.; Preuss, M.L.; Mastronarde, D.; Staehelin, L.A. Electron tomography of
RabA4b-and PI-4Kβ1-labeled trans Golgi network compartments in Arabidopsis. Traffic 2011,
12, 313–329.
47. Cao, X.; Rogers, S.W.; Butler, J.; Beevers, L.; Rogers J.C. Structural requirements for ligand
binding by a probable plant vacuolar sorting receptor. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 493–506.
48. Ahmed, S.U.; Bar-Peled, M.; Raikhel, N.V. Cloning and subcellular location of an Arabidopsis
receptor-like protein that shares common features with protein-sorting receptors of eukaryotic
cells. Plant Physiol. 1997, 114, 325–336.
49. Jiang, L.; Phillips, T.E.; Rogers, S.W.; Rogers, J.C. Biogenesis of the protein storage vacuole
crystalloid. J. Cell Biol. 2000, 150, 755–770.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15
11039
50. Park, M.; Kim, S.J.; Vitale, A.; Hwang, I. Identification of the protein storage vacuole and protein
targeting to the vacuole in leaf cells of three plant species. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 625–639.
51. Park, M.; Lee, D.; Lee, G.J.; Hwang, I. AtRMR1 functions as a cargo receptor for protein
trafficking to the protein storage vacuole. J. Cell Biol. 2005, 170, 757–767.
52. Shen, Y.; Wang, J.; Ding, Y.; Lo, S.W.; Gouzerh, G.; Neuhaus, J.-M.; Jiang, L. The rice RMR1
associates with a distinct prevacuolar compartment for the protein storage vacuole pathway.
Mol. Plant 2011, 4, 854–868.
53. Wang, H.; Rogers, J.C.; Jian, L. Plant RMR proteins: Unique vacuolar sorting receptors that
couple ligand sorting with membrane internalization. FEBS J. 2011, 278, 59–68.
54. Castelli, S.; Vitale, A. The phaseolin vacuolar sorting signal promotes transient, strong membrane
association and aggregation of the bean storage protein in transgenic tobacco. J. Exp. Bot. 2005,
56, 1379–1387.
55. Stigliano, E. University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland. Unpublished work, 2014.
56. Scabone, C.M.; Frigerio, L.; Petruccelli, S. A fluorescent reporter protein containing AtRMR1
domains is targeted to the storage and central vacuoles in Arabidopsis thaliana and tobacco leaf
cells. Plant Cell Rep. 2011, 30, 1823–1833.
57. Hara-Hishimura, I.; Takeuchi, Y.; Inoue, K.; Nishimura, M. Vesicle transport and processing of
the precursor to 2S albumin in pumpkin. Plant J. 1993, 4, 793–800.
58. Batistic, O.; Kudla, J. Plant calcineurin B-like proteins and their interacting protein kinases.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2009, 1793, 985–992.
59. Levanony, H.; Rubln, R.; Altschuler, Y.; Gallli, G. Evidente for a novel route of wheat storage
proteins to vacuoles. J. Cell Biol. 1992, 119, 1117–1128.
60. Takahashi, H.; Saito, Y.; Kitagawa, T.; Morita, S.; Masumura, T.; Tanaka, K. A novel vesicle
derived directly from endoplasmic reticulum is involved in the transport of vacuolar storage
proteins in rice endosperm. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005, 46, 245–249.
61. Reyes, F.C.; Chung, T.; Holding, D.; Jung, R.; Vierstra, R.; Otegui, M.S. Delivery of prolamins to
the protein storage vacuole in maize aleurone cells. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 769–784.
62. Rivera-Serrano, E.E.; Rodriguez-Welsh, M.F.; Hicks, G.R.; Rojas-Pierce, M. A small molecule
inhibitor partitions two distinct pathways for trafficking of tonoplast intrinsic proteins in
Arabidopsis. PLoS One 2012, 7, e44735.
© 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).