* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Properties, Statistics and the Identity of Quantum Particles
Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup
Coherent states wikipedia , lookup
Matter wave wikipedia , lookup
Topological quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup
Quantum dot wikipedia , lookup
Quantum fiction wikipedia , lookup
Quantum chromodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Quantum computing wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Orchestrated objective reduction wikipedia , lookup
Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup
Many-worlds interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Quantum machine learning wikipedia , lookup
Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Quantum group wikipedia , lookup
Quantum key distribution wikipedia , lookup
Quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup
Quantum entanglement wikipedia , lookup
Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup
Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Quantum teleportation wikipedia , lookup
Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup
EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup
Quantum state wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup
Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup
Properties, Statistics and the Identity of Quantum Particles Matteo Morganti INFN Training School 19-21 December 2016 Frascati 19/12/2016 Introduction • What sort of things is quantum theory about? Starting points: 1) Entrenched intuition that reality is made of individual objects 2) It is a widespread belief that quantum theory refutes the intuition, as it is a theory of non-individuals • ‘Received View’, dating back to (some of) the founding fathers of the theory - e.g., Born, Heisenberg • «It is impossible for either of these individuals to retain his identity so that one of them will always be able to say ‘I’m Mike’ and the other ‘I’m Ike.’ Even in principle one cannot demand an alibi of an electron!» (Weyl, 1931) Properties, statistics and the identity of quantum particles 2 Introduction Aim here: to assess the widespread belief, via a critical analysis of options • • • • • ‘Naturalistic’ approach whereby science and philosophy complement each other Input coming from our best physics is essential, but empirical data underdetermine the interpretation of the theory Clarification of concepts and arguments rather than final answers Considerations re. non-relativistic quantum mechanics and (more briefly) quantum field theory Properties, statistics and the identity of quantum particles 3 Plan 1. Definitions 2. (Non-relativistic) Quantum Mechanics: Properties, Statistics and the Received View 3. Alternatives: A Theory of Individuals after All? 4. Quantum Field Theory 5. Conclusions Properties, statistics and the identity of quantum particles 4 1. Definitions • 1. • (Material/physical) entity x is an individual object iff: x is a thing/object Not an event, property, fact or… Not obvious: think, e.g., of the difference between an actual coin and a money unit in a bank account 3. x is self-identical x is numerically distinct from everything else • x may also possess: 4. Diachronic (in addition to synchronic) identity Sharp localisability 2. 5. • Individual object ≠ object according to classical mechanics/common sense – Particle? Properties, statistics and the identity of quantum particles 5 2.1 Non-Relativistic QM: Statistics • Individuality a problem with respect to statistics: • Assume two systems 1 and 2 and two available states x and y Available arrangements, classically: • – |x>1|x>2 – |y>1|y>2 – |x>1|y>2 – |y>1|x>2 Properties, statistics and the identity of quantum particles 6 2.1 Non-Relativistic QM: Statistics • Individuality a problem with respect to statistics: • Assume two systems 1 and 2 and two available states x and y Available arrangements, quantum case: • – |x>1|x>2 – |y>1|y>2 – 1/2(|x>1|y>2|y>1|x>2) • BOSONS FERMIONS Only (anti-)symmetric states available in QM • Permutation Symmetry • Confirmation of the Received View? • ‘Particles’ more like money units in a bank than real coins Properties, statistics and the identity of quantum particles 7 2.2 Non-Relativistic QM: Properties In classical mechanics (although not an axiom of the theory!), impenetrability guarantees difference in spatial location/trajectories (The same in, e.g., Bohmian Mechanics) Not in (standard) quantum mechanics! • Properties correspond to probabilities (Born Rule) • Two entities can ‘have the same position’, i.e., share the same possible values for position measurements Properties, statistics and the identity of quantum particles 8 Introduce a permutation operator Perm1,2 having the properties that Perm1,2 O1 Perm1,2 = O2 and (Perm1,2)2 = I (with I being the identity operator) For all known particles the Indistinguishability Postulate holds, according to which for any n-particle state of particles of the same type and observable O, <Perm |O|Perm > = <|O|> (with Perm being associated with an arbitrary exchange of particles). Therefore, one obtains | Prob ( x ) O1 = <|P O1 x|> = <|Perm1,2 P O2 x Perm1,2|> = | ( x ) O2 <|P x|> = Prob O2 That is, for any observable O (now including location!) and any specific | | ( x ) O1 value x for it possessed as a monadic property, Prob = Prob ( x )O 2 Properties, statistics and the identity of quantum particles 9 For relational properties, one can prove that Prob (( x)O1 |(y )O 2 ) | | = Prob (( x)O 2 |(y )O1 ) (again for any observable and any value) as follows: By a fundamental property of probabilities, the above equality is the same as | | | | Prob (( x)O &(y )O ) / Prob ( y )O = Prob (( x)O 2 &(y )O1 ) / Prob ( y )O1 1 2 2 The denominators have just been shown to be equal. As for the numerators, they are also equal. For, | Prob (( x)O1 &(y )O 2 ) <|Perm1,2 P O2 <|Perm1,2 P x = <|P O1 x (Perm1,2)2 P O2 x P O1 y P O2 O1 y y|> = Perm1,2|> = Perm1,2|> = <|P O2 x P O1 y|> | (( x ) |( y ) ) O2 O1 Prob Properties, statistics and the identity of quantum particles 10 = Underlying intuition: things are individuated by their properties An important philosophical tradition: Leibniz Quine, Hilbert and Bernays, etc. • Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles (PII): xyP(PxPy)(x=y) xy((xy)P(Px&Py)) (P not ranging over properties such as ‘is identical to a’…) • QM statistics+violation of PIIReceived View? Properties, statistics and the identity of quantum particles 11 3. Alternatives (1) • Individuation via (qualitative) relations, not properties – Consider, e.g., ‘…is taller than…’, ‘… goes in the opposite direction to…’ – But, not reducible to monadic properties of relata and symmetric – (Existence and features of relata not ontologically prior) • Singlet state of two fermions 1/2(|>1|>2+|>1|>2) • • No well-defined spin properties separately Yet, Prob=1 of opposite spins! Properties, statistics and the identity of quantum particles 12 Mass x Charge y Spin probability z … Mass x Charge y Spin probability z … Encoded in states like 1/2(|>1|>2+|>1|>2) Properties, statistics and the identity of quantum particles 13 Some remarks: The result is good news for Leibnizians • Individuation via qualitative physical features Due to the Exclusion Principle, ‘identical’ fermions in the same physical system can only be found in states such as the one just described • Basic ontological distinction between bosons and fermions? • Actually a controversial result: • • • • Can relations be prior to their relata? Are the relevant properties always physically meaningful? Are weakly discernible entities individuals? Do we really have a relation between parts? Properties, statistics and the identity of quantum particles 14 Spin Spin correlation A Spin B Time t1 Time t2 (after measurement) Properties, statistics and the identity of quantum particles 15 3. Alternatives (2) An alternative philosophical view: Not necessary to use PII as a principle of individuation Individuality is a primitive, ‘brute’ fact • Duns Scotus: «Common natures are ‘contracted’ in particular things by haecceitates» Individuality based on ‘transcendental’ identities Properties, statistics and the identity of quantum particles 16 • What about primitive identities for quantum entities? • Makes sense of violations of PII • However, two objections: • • 1) Seems ruled out by permutation symmetry – quantum statistics • 2) Methodologically suspect What is a primitive identity? How can such a thing be empirically relevant? • • As well as of the use of particle names or ‘labels’ in QM Replies Properties, statistics and the identity of quantum particles 17 1) Primitive identities are compatible with permutation symmetry • For instance, state-dependent properties of many-particle quantum systems (of identical particles) may be holistic • Notice that this accounts for the impossibility of nonsymmetric states, which must be explained anyway • Obvious difference: |x>1|y>2 and 1/2(|x>1|y>2|y>1|x>2) • 2) Indiscernibles could in fact make a qualitative difference For example, a system with n indiscernible fermions has n times the unit mass • (Compare with the Leibniz vs. Newton dispute on the nature of space (and time)) • Primitive identities need not be ‘mysterious metaphysics’ • Properties, statistics and the identity of quantum particles 18 4. Quantum Field Theory • More elements to take into account: • QFT has no ‘labels’ for particles, but rather occupation numbers and annihilation/creation operators The number operator N can be in a superposition of states! • • How many ‘things’?? • The relativistic theory makes things even worse: • Not clear that we have a fully consistent theory of both free and interacting fields (Haag’s Theorem) • Expectation values for certain quantities do not vanish for the vacuum state Properties, statistics and the identity of quantum particles 19 4. Quantum Field Theory • Moreover, in relativistic QFT: – Local measurements do not allow to distinguish a ‘vacuum state’ from any n-particle state (Reeh-Schlieder Theorem) – An accelerated observer in a vacuum detects a ‘thermal bath’ of particles (Unruh Effect) – Particles cannot be localised in finite regions (Malament’s Theorem) • In short, facts about numbers of ‘things’ fail to be completely determinate in QFT • Even the distinction between vacuum and nonvacuum is not clear-cut • Localisation cannot be taken for granted either Properties, statistics and the identity of quantum particles 20 This may seem to lead us away from individuals and particles • • Notice, however, that: • The allegedly problematic results are open to discussion • At any rate, they carry over to an ontology of fields • More importantly, recall that individual object(classical) particle Properties, statistics and the identity of quantum particles 21 • 1. • (Material/physical) entity x is an individual object iff: x is a thing/object Not an event, property, fact or… 3. x is self-identical x is numerically distinct from everything else • x may also possess: 4. Diachronic (in addition to synchronic) identity Sharp localisability 2. 5. Properties, statistics and the identity of quantum particles 22 This may seem to lead us away from individuals and particles • • Notice, however, that: • The allegedly problematic results are open to discussion • At any rate, they carry over to an ontology of fields • More importantly, recall that individual object(classical) particle • If we stick to 1.-3. and drop 4.-5., results concerning number and localisability become perhaps less worrisome • (Frame-dependent) individual objects but not (classical) particles? • The ontological question remains open… Properties, statistics and the identity of quantum particles 23 5. Conclusions Philosophical issues with identity and individuality • Obvious relevance of science - naturalism • Individuals vs. non-individuals, particles vs. fields vs. … • Non-relativistic quantum mechanics and quantum field theories • Issues not settled: Received View with non-individual entities not an obvious winner • Need for further study of: • • • • • • Empirical evidence Physical theory Philosophical assumptions Underlying methodology This case study indicates the importance of the interplay between physics and philosophy: empirical data do not determine a unique interpretation Properties, statistics and the identity of quantum particles 24 THANK YOU! Properties, statistics and the identity of quantum particles