Download Professor Lance Endersbee on the Climate

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup

Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup

2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup

Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup

Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup

Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup

Climate governance wikipedia , lookup

Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup

Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup

Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup

United Nations Climate Change conference wikipedia , lookup

Carbon governance in England wikipedia , lookup

Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup

Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup

Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup

Decarbonisation measures in proposed UK electricity market reform wikipedia , lookup

Climate change in Canada wikipedia , lookup

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup

Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup

Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup

Views on the Kyoto Protocol wikipedia , lookup

Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup

Biosequestration wikipedia , lookup

Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup

IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup

Business action on climate change wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Professor Lance Endersbee on the Climate
By Lance Endersbee
23 October 2008
In the western nations there is a strong popular belief that mankind is causing
global warming, and that natural climate change has ceased. We are told that
man-made climate change will determine our future, with warmer climates,
increased droughts, and rising sea levels.
The media have become advocates in support of this view, and contrary debate
is suppressed. Western governments now plan to “stop” climate change, an
arrogant idea that has already caused enormous costs. In my view it is all a
scientific scandal, a political farce, and a financial calamity.
Meanwhile, certain other nations are profiting by the popular delusion in the west,
notably Russia, and China.
The Russian Academy of Sciences rejects the UN/IPCC view that the
combustion of carbon fuels causes global climate change. The Russian
government is alert to the fact that carbon dioxide is not a pollutant, and regard
emissions trading as financial game playing.
Air pollution in cities, and global climate change, are scientifically separate
matters.
The Kyoto Protocol is an international agreement to reduce carbon emissions.
Russia was not an original signatory, for scientific reasons. Even though they
regarded the IPCC conclusions as wrong, Russia finally signed the Protocol, for
commercial purposes. It was evident to the Russians that western governments
were being stampeded by false prophets, that the many of the actions proposed
in western nations were scientific nonsense, and enormously harmful to their
economies.
The financial opportunities for Russia were truly enormous. Because of the
decline in Russian industry with the end of the cold war, carbon emissions had
declined. This was a credit under the Kyoto Protocol.
The total value of Russian carbon credits was estimated at $40 to $60 billion. But
if future negotiations to extend the Kyoto Protocols were to collapse, the carbon
credits would be worth nothing. The Russian energy giant Gazprom moved
quickly to bundle carbon credits with contracts for sale of natural gas and oil to
Europe. Russia became the world’s largest exporter of oil and natural gas.
Russia is now very active in energy supply to Europe, helped by carbon trading.
It is all quite business like and pragmatic. Europe now buys over 40% of its oil
and gas from Russia, Germany 80%. The demand is rising rapidly, and almost all
the increase is from Russia. Because of environmental concerns, Europe is not
building any new coal or nuclear electricity generation, and using gas for
electricity generation. Plans for new electricity generation in Britain also depend
on Russian gas.
The future of the EU is now heavily dependent on Russia. Europe simply cannot
cut itself off from Russian oil and gas. Europe is concerned about this, but
helpless. It has all been a Russian geopolitical victory, made possible by the
popular delusion in the west about climate change. The Russian incursion into
Georgia, and their confident rejection of EU and US criticism, reveals the new
geopolitical reality. Meanwhile, it seems that the Russian government has not
moved to pass legislation to implement the Kyoto Protocol domestically.
Emeritus Professor Lance Endersbee AO FTSE is a civil engineer of long experience in water
resources development with the Snowy Mountains Hydro-Electric Authority, the Hydro-Electric
Commission of Tasmania and the United Nations in South-East Asia as an expert on dam design
and hydro power development. In 1976 he was appointed Dean of the Faculty of Engineering at
Monash University. In 1988-89 he was Pro-Vice Chancellor of the University. He is a former
President of the Institution of Engineers, Australia.