* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Premigratory fat metabolism in hummingbirds: A Rumsfeldian
Survey
Document related concepts
Amino acid synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Microbial metabolism wikipedia , lookup
Butyric acid wikipedia , lookup
Biosynthesis wikipedia , lookup
Citric acid cycle wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacometabolomics wikipedia , lookup
Evolution of metal ions in biological systems wikipedia , lookup
Glyceroneogenesis wikipedia , lookup
Metabolic network modelling wikipedia , lookup
Biochemistry wikipedia , lookup
Fatty acid synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Current Zoology 59 (3): 371–380, 2013 Premigratory fat metabolism in hummingbirds: A Rumsfeldian approach Raul K. SUAREZ* Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA Abstract Hummingbird migration is a remarkable feat, given the small body sizes of migratory species, their high metabolic rates during flight and the long distances traveled using fat to fuel the effort. Equally remarkable is the ability of premigratory hummingbirds in the wild to accumulate fat, synthesized from sugar, at rates as high as 10% of body mass per day. This paper summarizes, using Rumsfeldian terminology, “known knowns” concerning the energetics of hummingbird migration and premigratory fattening. Energy metabolism during hover-feeding on floral nectar is fueled directly by dietary sugar through the pathway recently named the “sugar oxidation cascade”. However, flight without feeding for more than a few minutes requires shifting to fat as a fuel. It is proposed that behavior and metabolic fuel choice are coadapted to maximize the rate of fat deposition during premigratory fattening. The hummingbird liver appears to possess extraordinarily high capacities for fatty acid synthesis. The analysis of “known knowns” leads to identification of “known unknowns”, e.g., the fates of dietary glucose and fructose, the regulation of fat metabolism and metabolic interactions between liver and adipose tissue. The history of science behooves recognition of “unknown unknowns” that, when discovered serendipitously, might shed new light on fundamental mechanisms as well as human pathological conditions [Current Zoology 59 (3): 371–380, 2013]. Keywords 1 Lipid synthesis, Metabolic rate, Metabolic regulation, Muscle energy metabolism, Sugar oxidation Introduction The remarkable ability of hummingbirds to hover, an evolutionary adaptation that allows them to obtain most of their dietary calories from floral nectar (Powers and Nagy, 1988), has inspired numerous investigations concerning the biomechanics and energetics of flight. Some species have become especially well known for their long distance migrations. Rufous hummingbirds Selasphorus rufus, for example, are known to spend the summer as far north as Alaska and overwinter as far south as Mexico (Calder, 1987). Ruby-throated hummingbirds Archilochus colubris are known to fly across the Gulf of Mexico, traveling nonstop for several hundred kilometers (Lasiewski, 1962). Migratory hummingbird species are typically small and accumulate body fat synthesized mainly from dietary sugar. Like other species of birds (Blem, 1976), they oxidize fat as the main source of energy for migratory flight. Because of their small size and body morphology, stationary and directional flight both necessarily require high wingbeat frequencies and, therefore, high rates of energy expenditure (Suarez, 1992). Small body size also results in high rates of heat loss; this results in a high energetic cost of thermoregulation (Bicudo et al., 2002). StationaReceived Feb. 20, 2013; accepted May 7, 2013. ∗ Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] © 2013 Current Zoology ry hovering also requires a higher rate of energy expenditure than forward flight (Berger, 1985; Clark and Dudley, 2010). The ingestion of cold nectar on cold days imposes further thermoregulatory costs, further elevating the energetic cost of feeding (Lotz et al., 2003). Despite the high energetic cost of being a hummingbird, migratory species display the remarkable ability to make a daily energetic profit by taking in more dietary energy than they expend. Rates of fat deposition, representing the biochemical conversion of sugar to fat, have been observed to occur in the wild at rates as high as 10% of body mass per day (Carpenter et al., 1993). This invited essay focuses primarily on metabolism during the period of premigratory fattening. A “Rumsfeldian” approach is taken that begins with known knowns, proceeds with known unknowns and ends with unknown unknowns. This logical structure is based on former U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld’s words, uttered in a news briefing on Feb. 12, 2002. Rumsfeld’s statements, arranged as poetry (Seely, 2003), read: As we know, There are known knowns. There are things we know we know. We also know 372 Current Zoology There are known unknowns. That is to say We know there are some things We do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns, The ones we don’t know we don’t know. 2 Known Knowns 2.1 Energetic requirements of hummingbird flight It is well established that fat serves as the primary fuel for migratory flight in birds (Blem, 1976). The fatty acids made available from lipolysis are more highly reduced than glycogen and yield more energy per unit mass when oxidized to CO2 + H2O. Unlike glycogen, which is stored in hydrated form in muscle and liver as glycogen particles, fats are stored as lipid droplets in these organs as well as in adipose tissue. The combination of these factors endows a unit mass of fat with close to 8 times more energy than a unit mass of hydrated glycogen (Hochachka and Somero, 1973). Many studies over several decades have involved measuring the energetic cost of hovering in hummingbirds (Welch, 2011). Respiration rates obtained using modern techniques generally agree with those reported by Robert Lasiewski in the early 1960s of about 42 ml O2 per gram bird per hour (Lasiewski ,1962, 1963). Forward flight costs less energy than hovering (Berger, 1985; Clark and Dudley, 2010), so Lasiewski’s estimate of migratory flight range in ruby throated hummingbirds (Lasiewski, 1962) using hovering metabolic rate can be considered conservative. Given fat content amounting to 40% of body mass (Odum et al., 1961) and assuming that 1/6 of it is not depleted, Lasiewski calculated a non-stop, migratory range of about 800 km. Certainly, ruby-throated hummingbirds accumulate enough fat to allow them to cross the Gulf of Mexico (Robinson et al., 1996). Rufous hummingbirds, on the other hand, stop to refuel along their migratory route (Carpenter et al., 1983; Calder, 1987; Carpenter et al., 1993). Since they accumulate about as much fat as ruby-throated hummingbirds and the mass-specific metabolic rates of these species during flight are similar, Lasiewski’s estimate likely applies to rufous hummingbirds as well. During migration, ruby-throated hummingbirds deplete fat stores at a rate of 2% of body mass per meter per hour (Hedenstrom, 2010). This represents the highest energetic cost of long-distance locomotion (i.e., lowest “gas mileage”) known among migratory birds. Since the energetic requirements of steady-state, forward flight are more difficult to measure and less Vol. 59 No. 3 than that of hovering (Berger, 1985; Clark and Dudley, 2010), metabolic rates during hovering have served as the foundation for the integration of much information concerning the biomechanics of flight at the level of the whole animal with structure and function at the level of flight muscles, ATP turnover, mitochondrial respiration rate and flux through pathways of substrate catabolism (Suarez, 1992; Suarez et al., 2011). Hummingbirds possess high respiratory and cardiovascular capacities for O2 delivery to flight muscles (Fig. 1). During steadystate, aerobic exercise, rates of O2 flux through the respiratory and cardiovascular systems are regulated to match the demand for O2 by muscle mitochondria. In hummingbirds, these capacities for O2 flux are exceptionally high and so it is useful to briefly summarize some information, obtained mainly from rufous hummingbirds. In the flight muscles, mitochondria occupy about 35% of fiber volume; this mitochondrial content exceeds those in pigeons (Mathieu-Costello et al., 1994) as well as geese (Scott et al., 2009) and approaches those found in insects (Suarez 1996). Cristae surface area per unit mitochondrial volume is about 58 m2/cm3 Fig. 1 Diagram of hummingbird in flight, drawn to emphasize extraordinarily high muscle power output, supported by high mitochondrial, respiratory and cardiovascular capacities for gas transport through the O2 transport cascade, as well as high capacities for carbon flux from the digestive system to muscle mitochondria through the sugar oxidation cascade The diagram illustrates how ATP hydrolysis drives mitochondrial respiration rates within muscles. During aerobic exercise, e.g., hover-feeding and migratory flight, the rates of O2 flux through the respiratory and cardiovascular systems equal the rate of O2 consumption by muscles. During repeated bouts of hover-feeding, the time-averaged flux of dietary sugar through the intestinal epithelium equals or exceeds the rate of sugar oxidation by the flight muscles. From (Suarez, 1998) with permission. SUAREZ RK: Premigratory metabolism in hummingbirds (Suarez et al. 1991); this is similar to those in geese (Scott et al., 2009) and also within the range found in insects (Suarez, 1996; Suarez et al., 2000). These high cristae surface densities are close to a theoretical upper limit imposed, at least partly, by the need to accommodate Krebs cycle enzymes in the mitochondrial matrix (Srere, 1985). The maximal capacities for flux, i.e., Vmax values, at key enzymatic steps in pathways of carbohydrate and fatty acid oxidation are extremely high, reflecting high levels of expression of enzyme protein (Suarez et al., 1986; Suarez et al., 1990; Fernandez et al., 2011). During routine hovering flight, a 3-4 g hummingbird, displays a mass-specific, aerobic metabolic rate about 10-fold higher than the maximum rates achieved by human athletes. Under these conditions, hummingbird flight muscles sustain ATP turnover rates close to 500 µmol g-1 min-1 (Suarez et al. 1990; Welch et al. 2007). In the fed state, as the birds go from flower to flower, such ATP turnover rates are supported by glucose oxidation rates close to the maximal biochemical capacities for glucose phosphorylation, i.e., the Vmax values of muscle hexokinase (Suarez et al., 1990). During hovering in the fasted state, when fat stores are depleted and fatty acids are oxidized by the flight muscles, flux through a key enzyme in the pathway, i.e., carnitine palmitoyl transferase 2 (CPT2), is estimated to be 50% of Vmax of this enzyme. This is much higher than fractional velocities at this step during exercise in other species (Suarez et al., 1990). Thus, high metabolic rates are achieved as a consequence of high mechanical power outputs, directly supported by high rates of ATP hydrolysis. High steady-state rates of O2 transport from the external environment to the muscle mitochondria are made possible by structural and functional enhancement of capacities for flux through the cardio-respiratory system (Dubach, 1981; Johansen et al., 1987; MathieuCostello et al., 1992; Suarez, 1992). High rates of aerobic ATP synthesis are made possible by high mitochondrial oxidative capacities (Suarez et al., 1991), high levels of catabolic enzymes in pathways of carbohydrate and fatty acid oxidation and the operation of key enzymes in these pathways at high fractional velocities (Suarez et al., 1986; Suarez et al., 1990; Fernandez et al., 2011). Data currently available indicate that the organization (evolutionary design) of pathways of substrate oxidation is highly conserved across hummingbird species; interspecific variation in mass-specific hovering metabolic rates is driven mainly by variation in muscle power output (Fernandez et al., 2011). 373 2.2 Breakfast in cold meadows The challenges faced by hummingbirds during migration are dramatically illustrated by considering a rufous hummingbird on its way south in the late summer as it wakes up in a subalpine meadow in Oregon. Hummingbirds forage in such habitats at this time of the year, when morning temperatures can be close to freezing (C.L. Gass, personal communication). During the overnight fast, fat stores are depleted and fatty acid oxidation serves as a major source of energy (Powers, 1991). Low ambient temperature activates thermogenic mechanisms, possibly involving non-shivering thermogenesis (Bicudo et al., 2002), that greatly elevate resting metabolic rate (Lopez-Calleja and Bozinovic, 1995) and increase the energetic cost of overnight survival. The bird wakes up from sleep or arouses from torpor (Carpenter and Hixon, 1988; Bucher and Chappell, 1997) and flies to forage, still relying on fat as its main metabolic fuel. In the transition from rest to flight, the bird undergoes a physiological transition from a situation wherein various organs contribute (to various degrees) to whole-body resting metabolic rate to one in which flight muscles account for >90% of whole body metabolic rate (Suarez, 1992). Low ambient temperature also elevates the energetic cost of foraging flight (Schuchmann, 1979; Chai et al., 1998; Welch and Suarez, 2008) as well as the cost of warming up cold nectar (Lotz et al., 2003). Despite these combined energetic costs, hummingbirds have been known to accumulate fat in preparation for migration or along their migratory route (during refueling stopovers) up to about 40% of total body mass (Odum et al., 1961; Carpenter et al., 1983). Laboratory experiments were conducted in the morning during the late summer for 4 hour durations at 5oC to simulate conditions in the wild during refueling stopovers. Results reveal that, even under these harsh conditions, rufous hummingbirds are able to gain mass by accumulating fat when dietary sucrose is provided at a concentration of 30% (Gass et al., 1999) (Fig. 2). However, lower concentrations (15 and 20%) result in mass loss. When larger volumes of 15% sucrose are provided at each visit to the feeder, hummingbirds decrease foraging frequency and increase the amount of time spent sitting. 15% sucrose is within the range of concentrations found in hummingbird-visited flowers (Nicholson and Fleming, 2003) and rufous hummingbirds are able to stay in energy balance or gain mass when feeding on floral nectar containing less than 30% sucrose at higher 374 Current Zoology Fig. 2 Summary of results obtained in experiments wherein premigratory rufous hummingbirds were kept individually for 4 h on alternate mornings at 5oC in an environment chamber Within the chamber, one perch was provided on top of a digital balance interfaced with a computer; these allowed monitoring of mass and activity (perched or flying). One feeder was provided in the chamber that dispensed sugar solutions of various, randomly predetermined volumes of 15, 20 or 30% sucrose solution. During each experiment, a bird had to sit on the perch after a feeding bout to electronically trigger the release of another bolus of sugar solution. In this way, birds engaged in repeated bouts of sitting and hover-feeding. Feeding frequencies were high at low ambient temperature but further elevated when the amounts (volume and/or concentration) of sucrose declined. The graph shows that energy balance is achieved, i.e., energy intake = energy expenditure, when mass change = zero. This occurs at a time-averaged metabolic rate of 1 watt. Since birds weighed 4 g on average, this corresponds to a time-averaged metabolic rate of 250 watts/kg, the highest known for vertebrate animals under conditions wherein rates of energy intake = energy expenditure. Mass gain, which represents fat deposition, is possible at 5oC when birds are provided 30% sucrose for breakfast. This means that, under these conditions, energy intake rate > rate energy expenditure. Mass loss tends to result when birds are provided 15 and 20% sucrose, indicating energy expenditure > energy intake even when large volumes of dilute sugar are provided. From (Suarez et al., 2011) with permission. ambient temperatures (Sutherland et al., 1982). Therefore, it is possible that, at low ambient temperature, disposal of ingested water may limit the intake rate of dilute floral nectars. These results are supported by a theoretical model (Calder, 1979) that predicts hummingbirds should preferentially feed on floral nectars with higher sucrose concentrations at lower ambient temperatures. However, hummingbird-visited plant species found in higher, colder habitats do not tend to produce floral nectars with higher sugar concentrations (Stiles and Freeman, 1993). The patterns of relationships in the compositions of nectars and the nectarivores that consume them are more complex than physiology alone would predict (see review by Nicolson and Fleming, 2003). As fasted hummingbirds begin to feed on floral nec- Vol. 59 No. 3 tar, e.g., in the early morning after the overnight fast or after 1–2 h interruption of feeding, the ratio of CO2 produced to O2 consumed (RQ, the respiratory quotient) is close to 0.7, indicating that fatty acid oxidation fuels flight. As feeding on sucrose-rich nectar continues, the RQ rapidly increases to about 1.0 indicating a shift from fatty acid to carbohydrate oxidation (Suarez et al., 1990; Welch et al., 2006). The RQ of 1.0 is maintained during repeated hover-feeding. Stable carbon isotope experiments, combined with measurement of RQ values, reveal that, under these conditions, recently ingested sugar directly fuels close to 100% of the energy metabolism occurring in the flight muscles (Welch et al., 2006; Welch et al., 2007b). The pathway taken by sugar molecules from flowers, through the gut, the circulatory system and into oxidative pathways in muscles is called the “sugar oxidation cascade” (Suarez et al., 2011) (Fig. 3). It operates in parallel and converges with the pathway for O2 from the external environment to the muscle mitochondria. Thus, hummingbirds feeding on floral nectar rapidly switch to sugar oxidation as their main source of energy. Sugar in excess of that required to satisfy energy requirements is converted to fat (Fig. 4). Among small hummingbirds, the energetic cost of flight is so high that, in the absence of nectar-feeding, it is estimated that flight could be sustained for only several minutes using stored glycogen (Suarez et al., 1990). This means that flight without feeding for more than a several minutes necessarily requires switching to fatty acid oxidation (Fig. 4). Since the synthesis of fat costs energy, it has been proposed that the direct oxidation of dietary sugar enhances net energy gain because it avoids the inefficiency of investing energy to make fat, only to burn it shortly after to fuel foraging (Suarez et al., 1990). Hummingbird foraging behavior which, in the case of territorial individuals, involves brief foraging bouts (Diamond et al., 1986), ensures that metabolism is fueled mainly by dietary sugar. This coadaptation between behavior and metabolic regulation is hypothesized to enhance the rate of fat deposition (Suarez and Gass, 2002). In the wild, hummingbirds are able to gain mass at rates of up to about 10% per day (Carpenter et al., 1983). The energetic profit or net energy gain, stored as fat, represents the difference between daily energy intake rate and daily energy expenditure. Energy expenditure can be minimized, for example, by going into torpor at night or during inactive periods during the day (Carpenter and Hixon, 1988; Hiebert, 1990; 1993) while energy intake rate can be enhanced behaviorally, for example, by increasing feeding frequency (Gass et al., SUAREZ RK: Premigratory metabolism in hummingbirds 375 Fig. 3 The sugar oxidation cascade, as it operates in nectar-feeding hummingbirds during refueling stops Fig. 4 birds During repeated bouts of foraging, flight muscle energy metabolism is directly fueled by ingested sugar, resulting in VCO2/VO2 = 1.0. The diagram shows how the sugar oxidation cascade operates in parallel and intersects with the oxygen transport cascade. Sugar (white diamonds) in excess of that required to directly support energy needs is converted to fatty acids and esterified to form fat (triacylglycerol) in the liver. Triacylglycerol is combined with cholesterol, phospholipids and apolipoprotein B to form very low density lipoprotein (VLDL), then released by the liver into the blood. For simplicity, the diagram makes use of circles to represent VLDL, triacyglycerol and fatty acids. Fat deposition in adipose tissue involves triglyceride hydrolysis to fatty acids and glycerol by lipoprotein lipase, transport across cell membranes, reesterification and storage as lipid droplets. From (Suarez et al., 2011) with permission. Lipid substrate is transported mainly as VLDL in the blood. Again, white diamonds represent sugar and, for simplicity, circles represent VLDL, triacyglycerol and fatty acids. Sugar oxidation is inhibited in the flight muscles while oxidation of exogenous and endogenous lipid results in VCO2/VO2 = 0.7. This occurs during flight in the fasted state when birds wake up in the morning before feeding or when feeding is interrupted for 1-2 h and during long-distance migratory flight. 1999) and adjustment of territory size (Carpenter et al., 1983). 2.3 Fat-fueled hovering vs. forward flight Capacities for carbohydrate and fatty acid oxidation have been evaluated in light of the observation that hummingbirds are able to support the energetic requirements of hovering using either fuel. Pyruvate (derived mainly from glycolysis in vivo) and palmitoylCoA (an intermediate in long chain fatty acid oxidation) are oxidized at similar rates to support ADP phosphorylation to ATP by hummingbird flight muscle mitochondria in vitro (Suarez et al., 1986). This indicates that, at least at the level of mitochondria, capacities for ATP synthe- Fat-fueled flight in fasted or migrating humming- sis are similar, regardless of whether sugar or fats are metabolized to provide energy. The pathways for both these processes are highly conserved in cardiac, fast and slow oxidative muscles among vertebrate animals. As in other vertebrate species, fatty acid oxidation is carnitine-dependent and fatty acid oxidation inhibits pyruvate oxidation (Suarez et al., 1986). The latter serves as just one of several control mechanisms by which carbohydrate is “spared” when, for example, in the fasted state, fatty acids serve as the main fuel for oxidative metabolism. On the other hand, fatty acid oxidation is inhibited, partly through inhibition of carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1 (CPT1), by malonylCoA (McGarry, 1995; but see Kim et al., 2002). Such a scenario can be envisioned as hummingbirds forage while displaying an RQ of 1.0 as they oxidize dietary sugar to fuel foraging flight (Suarez et al.,1990; Welch et al., 2006). The oxidation of fatty acid requires about 15% more O2 per ATP synthesized than the oxidation of carbohydrate (Brand, 376 Current Zoology 2005). However, the mechanical power requirement and, therefore, the ATP hydrolysis rate required for hovering is independent of which fuel is oxidized. Thus, a fasted hummingbird, as it oxidizes fatty acid, consumes O2 at a rate about 15% higher than in the fed state when oxidizing dietary sugar (Welch and Suarez, 2007). An added benefit of sugar oxidation during foraging is the requirement for less O2, as many hummingbird species forage in hypodense, hypoxic air at high elevation (Altshuler et al., 2004). 3 Known Unknowns The Nobel prize winning biochemist, Albert Szent Gyorgyi (Szent-Gyorgyi, 1963), is widely quoted as having once said that “Discovery is seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought”. Certainly, the assessment of what is known can lead to new insights as well as the formulation of new questions. This is true in general and true of metabolism during premigratory fattening in hummingbirds. 3.1 Fatty acid oxidation in muscle That fatty acid oxidation can fully support the power requirements of stationary hovering (Suarez et al., 1990; Welch et al., 2007) implies that the lower energy requirements of forward flight are supported by enzymatic flux capacities in the pathway of fatty acid oxidation well in excess of physiological requirements. It is not known whether maximum rates of O2 consumption (VO2max) can be supported equally well by both carbohydrate and fatty acid oxidation. Hovering VO2 values have been reported to increase by significantly during hovering in mixtures of helium and O2 (Chai and Dudley, 1996); it would be interesting to determine whether the same VO2max values are displayed at RQ values of 1.0 and 0.7. It is also interesting that enhancement of enzymatic capacities for fatty acid oxidation is observed in various bird species as they prepare for or engage in migratory flight (Marsh, 1981; Lundgren and Kiessling, 1986; McFarlan et al., 2009). Whether similar upregulation of capacities for flux through pathways of fatty acid oxidation occurs in migratory hummingbirds has not been examined. Small hummingbird species can increase muscle power output, but only for brief durations, to lift loads of up to 80% of body mass (Chai et al., 1997). In migratory hummingbirds, it would be reasonable to hypothesize that the increased mechanical power requirements required to lift large stores of fat might require higher levels of enzyme and transporter protein expression in pathways of fatty acid oxidation in muscles. Therefore, seasonal changes in hormone levels Vol. 59 No. 3 and their biochemical consequences (Zajac et al., 2011), in general, might occur as preparation (physiological adaptation) for increased load-lifting using fat as a fuel, rather than preparation for long-distance flight per se. 3.2 Fat synthesis in liver and adipose tissue Given the observation that hummingbirds accumulate fat at high rates, two rather obvious questions follow. First, what are the biochemical pathways involved and, second, how are they regulated (e.g., “turned on”) to achieve these high rates? It is well known that most of the triacylglycerol synthesis in birds occurs in the liver (Hermier, 1997). After synthesis in hepatocytes, most of the triacylglycerol is combined with cholesterol, phospholipids and apolipoprotein B to form very low density lipoprotein (VLDL), which is then released into the blood. Most extrahepatic fat deposition occurs in adipose tissue and involves triglyceride hydrolysis to fatty acids and glycerol by lipoprotein lipase, transport across adipocyte cell membranes, reesterification and storage as lipid droplets (Hermier, 1997). Information specifically concerning triacyglycerol synthesis in hummingbirds is virtually nonexistent. However, rufous hummingbirds possesses extremely high acetylCoA carboxylase activities (Vmax values) in their livers (Reaction 16 in Fig. 5) (Suarez et al., 1988). Since this is a key regulatory step in fatty acid synthesis (catalyzing the ATP-dependent synthesis of malonylCoA from acetylCoA and bicarbonate), it is reasonable to hypothesize that hummingbird livers possesses high capacities for fatty acid synthesis (Fig. 5). A likely scenario is that during nectar-feeding, high blood sugar levels lead to elevated insulin levels, resulting in activation of hepatic acetylCoA carboxylase, at least partly by a change in its phosphorylation state (Brownsey et al., 2006). The resulting high rate of fatty acid synthesis is combined with elevated rates of triacyglycerol synthesis (Reaction 18 in Figure 5), VLDL formation and export into the blood (Hermier, 1997). Again, drawing from data acquired from chickens, it is known that the transition from the fasted to the (high-carbohydrate) fed state results in increased expression of hepatic acetylCoA carboxylase by transcriptional activation (Hillgartner et al., 1996). Isolated chicken hepatocytes provided high glucose concentration increase the expression of enzymes catalyzing other reactions essential to fatty acid synthesis, i.e., malic enzyme (which provides almost all of the NADPH required for fatty acid synthesis in chicken livers) and fatty acid synthase (which catalyzes the synthesis of palmitate from 1 acetylCoA, 7 malonylCoA, and 14 NADPH) (Reactions 15 and 17 in Fig. 5), SUAREZ RK: Premigratory metabolism in hummingbirds Fig. 5 377 Pathways of hepatic triacyglyerol synthesis from glucose and fructose Fatty acid synthesis occurs primarily in the liver in birds. Subsequent formation of VLDL, which makes use of the triacylglycerol synthesized from sugar, is not shown. Numbers in circles denote the following enzyme-catalyzed reactions: (1) glucokinase, (2) phosphoglucoisomerase, (3) phosphofructokinase, (4) fructokinase, (5) aldolase, (6) glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, (7) triose kinase, (8) triosephosphate isomerase, (9) pyruvate kinase, (10) pyruvate dehydrogenase, (11) pyruvate carboxylase, (12) citrate synthase, (13) ATP-citrate lyase, (14) malate dehydrogenase, (15) malic enzyme, (16) acetylCoA carboxylase, (17) fatty acid synthase, (18) esterification. Redrawn and modified from (Martin, 1987). through transcriptional activation (Hillgartner et al., 1998). Due to the highly conserved nature of metabolic pathways and their regulation in birds (Suarez et al., 1988; Fernandez et al., 2011), these regulatory mechanisms are likely to operate in hummingbirds as well. Thus, it is worth asking whether it would be worthwhile to perform research simply to determine whether hummingbird fat metabolism occurs as it does in chickens. Perhaps it might be more interesting to ask whether elevated rates of fat deposition in premigratory birds result from changes in hepatocyte or adipocyte enzyme expression, i.e., “hierarchical regulation”, or whether “metabolic regulation” occurs, involving the control of the activities of preexisting enzymes by allosteric mechanisms and/or covalent modification (ter Kuile and Westerhoff , 2001; Suarez et al., 2005). By quantifying the relative roles played by hierarchical and metabolic regulation, it should be possible to determine the mechanisms by which high rates of fat synthesis are achieved and to gain insights into their activation in premigratory birds. A question waiting to be answered concerns the rela- 378 Current Zoology tive contributions made by dietary glucose and fructose to the synthesis of triacyglycerol in nectarivorous animals. In humans, a large fraction of ingested fructose is metabolized by the liver to glucose (Delarue et al., 1993). The higher concentration of glucose in the blood and the greater abundance of membrane glucose transporters than fructose transporters, in combination, result in the preferential uptake and extrahepatic metabolism of glucose (Zierath et al., 1995; Kristiansen et al., 1997). As most of the energy contained in nectars of hummingbird-visited flowers is in the form of sucrose, glucose and fructose (Baker, 1975; Baker et al., 1998), the possibility that hummingbirds maintain high concentrations of fructose in their blood and that their tissues possess high capacities for fructose metabolism is worthy of investigation. 4 Unknown Unknowns Learning to ask good questions is one of the challenges faced by those training to become scientists because, of course, not all questions are worthy of study. As Peter Hochachka (see biography by Somero and Suarez, 2005) once put it, some hypotheses are the equivalent of “predicting that the sun will rise tomorrow morning”. Nevertheless, there are many “known unknowns” worth pursuing that form the bases for thesis proposals and grant applications worldwide. In addition to these, the history of science is full of examples of serendipitous discoveries, many of which occurred in the course of performing curiosity-driven research. Many such accidents occur as investigators delve deeply into the “how and why” of phenomena such as those described in this article. While a list of “unknown unknowns” is, by definition, impossible to construct, a fitting conclusion would be to call attention to the fact that one cannot predict what might be discovered or what new insights might come from studying the mechanisms underlying the phenomenal rates of fat deposition observed in migratory hummingbirds. The increasing ingestion of fructose by humans (largely due to the marketing of manufactured foods containing high-fructose corn syrup) over the past few decades has been proposed to contribute to the development of obesity (Elliott et al., 2002; Bremer et al., 2012). The detrimental effects of fructose ingestion are said to be partly due to the pathway for hepatic fructose metabolism that bypasses some of the reactions in glycolysis (Fig. 5). Thus, research concerning the pathways of sugar metabolism to triacylglycerol and their regulation in hummingbirds may yield unanticipated insights into Vol. 59 No. 3 the causes of human obesity and ailments referred to as the “metabolic syndrome” (Bremer et al., 2012). One would also hope that better understanding of the challenges faced by migratory, nectarivorous species such as hummingbirds would ultimately contribute to efforts to mitigate the effects of climate change and other negative human impacts on the diversity of life (Cooke et al. 2013). Acknowledgements I am deeply grateful to P.W. Hochachka, C.L. Gass, K.C. Welch, Jr., J.R.B. Lighton, C. Martinez del Rio and O. Mathieu-Costello for their contributions to the research that led to the ideas presented and questions raised in this paper. Research on which this article is based was funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation (IOB 0517694). References Altshuler DL, Dudley R, McGuire JA, 2004. Resolution of a paradox: Hummingbird flight at high elevation does not come without a cost. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 17731–17736. Baker H, 1975. Sugar concentrations in nectars from hummingbird flowers. Biotropica 7: 37–41. Baker H, Baker I, Hodges S, 1998. Sugar composition of nectars and fruits consumed by birds and bats in the tropics and subtropics. Biotropica 30: 559–586. Berger M, 1985. Oxygen consumption of hummingbirds (Colibri coruscans and C. thalassinus) during horizontal flight. In: Nachtigall W ed. BIONA Report 3. Stuttgart: G. Fischer, 307–314 (In German). Bicudo JEPW, Bianco AC, Vianna CR, 2002. Adaptive thermogenesis in hummingbirds. J. Exp. Biol. 205: 2267–2273. Blem CR, 1976. Patterns of lipid storage and utilization in birds. Amer. Zool. 16: 671–684. Brand MD, 2005. The efficiency and plasticity of mitochondrial energy transduction. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 33: 897–904. Bremer AA, Mietus-Snyder M, Lustig RH, 2012. Toward a unifying hypothesis of metabolic syndrome. Pediatrics 129: 557–570. Brownsey RW, Boone AN, Elliott JE, Kulpa JE, Lee WM, 2006. Regulation of acetyl-CoA carboxylase. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 34: 223–227. Bucher T, Chappell M, 1997. Respiratory exchange and ventilation during nocturnal torpor in hummingbirds. Physiol. Zool. 70: 45–52. Calder WA, 1979. On the temperature-dependency of optimal nectar concentrations for birds. J. Theor. Biol. 78: 185–196. Calder WA, 1987. Southbound through Colorado: Migration of rufous hummingbirds. National Geographic Research 3: 40–51. Carpenter FL, Hixon MA, 1988. A new function for torpor: fat conservation in a wild migrant hummingbird. Condor 90: 373–378. Carpenter FL, Hixon MA, Beuchat CA, Russell RW, Paton DC, 1993. Biphasic mass gain in migrant hummingbirds: Body composition changes, torpor, and ecological significance. Ecology 74: 1173–1182. Carpenter FL, Paton DC, Hixon MA, 1983. Weight gain and ad- SUAREZ RK: Premigratory metabolism in hummingbirds justment of feeding territory size in migrant hummingbirds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80: 7259–7263. Chai P, Chang AC, Dudley R, 1998. Flight thermogenesis and energy conservation in hovering hummingbirds. J. Exp. Biol. 201: 963–968. Chai P, Chen JSC, Dudley R, 1997. Transient hovering performance of hummingbirds under conditions of maximal loading. J. Exp. Biol. 200: 921–929. Chai P, Dudley R, 1996. Limits to flight energetics of hummingbirds hovering in hypodense and hypoxic gas mixtures. J. Exp. Biol. 199: 2285–2295. Clark CJ, Dudley R, 2010. Hovering and forward flight energetics in Anna's and Allen's hummingbirds. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 83: 654–662. Cooke SJ, Sack L, Franklin CE, Farrell AP, Beardall J et al., 2013. What is conservation physiology? Perspectives on an increasingly integrated and essential science. Conservation Physiol. 1: 1–23. Delarue J, Normand S, Pachiaudi C, Beylot M, Lamisse F et al., 1993. The contribution of naturally labelled 13C fructose to glucose appearance in humans. Diabetologia 36: 338–345. Diamond JM, Karasov WH, Phan D, Carpenter FL, 1986. Digestive physiology is a determinant of foraging bout frequency in hummingbirds. Nature 320: 62–63. Dubach M, 1981. Quantitative analysis of the respiratory system of the house sparrow, budgerigar and violet-eared hummingbird. Respir. Physiol. 46: 43–60. Elliott SS, Keim NL, Stern JS, Teff K, Havel PJ, 2002. Fructose, weight gain, and the insulin resistance syndrome. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 76: 911–922. Fernandez MJ, Bozinovic F, Suarez RK, 2011. Enzymatic flux capacities in hummingbird flight muscles: A "one size fits all" hypothesis. Can. J. Zool. 89: 985–991. Gass CL, Romich MT, Suarez RK, 1999. Energetics of hummingbird foraging at low ambient temperature. Can. J. Zool. 77: 314–320. Hedenstrom A, 2010. Extreme endurance migration: What is the limit to non-stop flight? Plos Biology 8: 1–6. Hermier D, 1997. Lipoprotein metabolism and fattening in poultry. J. Nutr. 127: 805S–808S. Hiebert SM, 1990. Energy costs and temporal organization of torpor in the rufous hummingbird Selasphorus rufus. Physiol. Zool. 63: 1082–1097. Hiebert SM, 1993. Seasonal changes in body mass and use of torpor in a migratory hummingbird. The Auk 110: 787–797. Hillgartner FB, Charron MJ, 1998. Glucose stimulates transcription of fatty acid synthase and malic enzyme in avian hepatocytes. Am. J. Physiol. 274: E493–E501. Hillgartner FB, Charron T, Chesnut KA, 1996. Alterations in nutritional status regulate acetylCoA carboxylase expression in avian liver by a transcriptional mechanism. Biochem. J. 319: 263–268. Hochachka PW, Somero GN, 1973. Strategies of Biochemical Adaptation. Philadelphia, London, Toronto: W.B. Saunders Co.. Johansen K, Berger M, Bicudo JEPW, Ruschi A, De Almeida PJ, 1987. Respiratory properties of blood and myoglobin in hummingbirds. Physiol. Zool. 60: 269–278. Kim JY, Koves TR, Yu GS, Gulick T, Cortright RN et al., 2002. 379 Evidence of a malonylCoA-insensitive carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1 activity in red skeletal muscle. Am. J. Physiol. 282: E1014–E1022. Kristiansen S, Darakhshan F, Richter EA, Handal HS, 1997. Fructose transport and GLUT5 protein in human sarcolemmal vesicles. Am. J. Physiol. 273: E543–E548. Lasiewski RC, 1962. The energetics of migrating hummingbirds. Condor 64: 324. Lasiewski RC, 1963. Oxygen consumption of torpid, resting, active, and flying hummingbirds. Physiol. Zool. 36: 122–140. Lopez-Calleja MV, Bozinovic F, 1995. Maximum metabolic rate, thermal insulation and aerobic scope in a small-sized Chilean hummingbird Sephanoides sephanoides. Auk 112: 1034–1036. Lotz CN, Martinez del Rio C, Nicholson SW, 2003. Hummingbirds pay a high cost for a warm drink. J. Comp. Physiol. 173B: 455–462. Lundgren BO, Kiessling KH, 1986. Catabolic enzyme activities in the pectoralis muscle of premigratory and migratory juvenile reed warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus (Herm.). Oecologia 68: 529–532. Marsh R, 1981. Catabolic enzyme activities in relation to premigratory fattening and muscle hypertrophy in the gray catbird Dumetella carolinensis. J. Comp. Physiol. 141: 417–423. Martin BR, 1987. Metabolic Regulation: A Molecular Approach. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific. Mathieu-Costello O, Suarez RK, Hochachka PW, 1992. Capillary-to-fiber geometry and mitochondrial density in hummingbird flight muscle. Respir. Physiol. 89: 113–132. McFarlan JT, Bonen A, Guglielmo CG, 2009. Seasonal upregulation of fatty acid transporters in flight muscles of migratory white-throated sparrows Zonotrichia albicollis. J. Exp. Biol. 212: 2934–2940. Mathieu-Costello O, Agey PJ, Logemann RB, Florez-Duquet M, Bernstein MH, 1994. Effect of flying activity on capillary-fiber geometry in pigeon flight muscle. Tissue and Cell 26: 57–73. McGarry JD, 1995. Malonyl-CoA and carnitine palmitoyltransferase I: An expanding partnership. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 23: 481–485. Nicholson SW, Fleming PA, 2003. Nectar as food for birds: The physiological consequences of drinking dilute sugar solutions. Plant Systematics and Evolution 238: 139–153. Odum EP, Connell CE, Stoddard HL, 1961. Flight energy and estimated flight ranges of some migratory birds. Auk 78: 515–527. Powers D, 1991. Diurnal variation in mass, metabolic rate, and respiratory quotient in Anna's and Costa's hummingbirds. Physiol. Zool. 64: 850–870. Powers DR, Nagy KA, 1988. Field metabolic rate and food consumption by free-living Anna's hummingbirds Calypte anna. Physiol. Zool. 61: 500–506. Robinson T, Sargent R, Sargent M, 1996. Ruby-throated hummingbirds Archilochus colubris. In: Poole A, Gill F ed. The Birds of North America. Philadelphia: The Academy of Natural Sciences and Washington DC, The American Ornithologists Union. Vol. 204, pp. 1–16. Schuchmann KL, 1979. Metabolism of flying hummingbirds. Ibis 121: 85–86. Scott GR, Egginton S, Richards JG, Milsom WK, 2009. Evolution of muscle phenotype for extreme high altitude flight in the 380 Current Zoology bar-headed goose. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 276: 3645–3653. Seely H, 2003. Pieces of Intelligence: The Existential Poetry of Donald H. Rumsfeld. New Yok, London: Free Press. Somero GN, Suarez RK, 2005. Peter Hochachka: Adventures in biochemical adaptation Ann. Rev. Physiol. 67: 25–37. Srere PA, 1985. Organization of proteins within the mitochondrion. In: Welch GR ed. Organized Multienzyme Systems: Catalytic Properties. New York, London: Academic Press, 1–61 Stiles F, Freeman C, 1993. Patterns in floral nectar characteristics of some bird-visited plant species from Costa Rica. Biotropica 25: 191–205. Suarez RK, 1992. Hummingbird flight: Sustaining the highest mass-specific metabolic rates among vertebrates. Experientia 48: 565–570. Suarez RK, 1996. Upper limits to mass-specific metabolic rates. Ann. Rev. Physiol. 58: 583–605. Suarez RK, 1998. Oxygen and the upper limits to animal design and performance. J. Exp. Biol. 201: 1065–1072. Suarez RK, Brown GS, Hochachka PW, 1986. Metabolic sources of energy for hummingbird flight. Am. J. Physiol. 251: R537–R542. Suarez RK, Brownsey RW, Vogl W, Brown GS, Hochachka PW, 1988. Biosynthetic capacity of hummingbird liver. Am. J. Physiol. 255: R699–R702. Suarez RK, Darveau C-A, Hochachka PW, 2005. Roles of hierarchical and metabolic regulation in the allometric scaling of metabolism in Panamanian orchid bees. J. Exp. Biol. 208: 3603–3607. Suarez RK, Gass CL, 2002. Hummingbird foraging and the relation between bioenergetics and behaviour. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 133: 335–343. Suarez RK, Herrera LG, Welch Jr, KC, 2011. The sugar oxidation cascade: Aerial refueling in hummingbirds and nectar bats. J. Exp. Biol. 214: 172–178. Suarez RK, Lighton JRB, Brown GS, Mathieu-Costello O, 1991. Mitochondrial respiration in hummingbird flight muscles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 4870–4873. Suarez RK, Lighton JRB, Moyes CD, Brown GS, Gass CL et al., 1990. Fuel selection in rufous hummingbirds: Ecological im- Vol. 59 No. 3 plications of metabolic biochemistry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87: 9207–9210. Suarez RK, Staples JF, Lighton JRB, Mathieu-Costello O, 2000. Mitochondrial function in flying honeybees Apis mellifera: Respiratory chain enzymes and electron flow from complex III to oxygen. J. Exp. Biol. 203: 905–911. Sutherland G, Gass CL, Thompson P, Lertzman K, 1982. Feeding territoriality in migrant rufous hummingbirds: Defense of yellow-bellied sapsucker Sphyrapicus varius feeding sites. Can. J. Zool. 60: 2046–2050. Szent-Gyorgyi A, 1963. Lost in the twentieth century. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 32: 1–15. ter Kuile BH, Westerhoff HV, 2001. Transcriptome meets metabolome: Hierarchical and metabolic regulation of the glycolytic pathway. FEBS Letts. 500: 169–171. Welch Jr. KC, 2011. The power of feeder-mask respirometry as a method for examining hummingbird energetics. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 158A: 276–286. Welch KC, Altschuler DL, Suarez RK, 2007. Oxygen consumption rates in hovering hummingbirds reflect substratedependent differences in P/O ratios: Carbohydrate as a 'premium fuel'. J. Exp. Biol. 210: 2146–2153. Welch KC, Bakken BH, Martinez del Rio C, Suarez RK, 2006. Hummingbirds fuel hovering flight with newly-ingested sugar. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 79: 1082–1087. Welch KC, Suarez RK, 2007. Oxidation rate and turnover of ingested sugar in hovering Anna's Calypte anna and rufous Selasphorus rufus hummingbirds. J. Exp. Biol. 210: 2154–2162. Welch KC, Suarez RK, 2008. Altitude and temperature effects on the energetic cost of hover-feeding in migratory rufous hummingbirds Selasphorus rufus. Can. J. Zool. 86: 161–169. Zajac DM, Cerasale DJ, Landman S, Guglielmo CG, 2011. Behavioral and physiological effects of photoperiod-induced migratory state and leptin on Zonotrichia albicollis: II. Effects on fatty acid metabolism. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 174: 269–275. Zierath JR, Nolte LA, Wahlstrom E, Galuska D, Shepherd PR et al., 1995. Carrier-mediated fructose uptake significantly contributes to carbohydrate metabolism in human skeletal muscle. Biochem. J. 311: 517–521.