* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download November 7 DEVELOPMENTAL ISSUES
Neuroeconomics wikipedia , lookup
Behavioral modernity wikipedia , lookup
Observational methods in psychology wikipedia , lookup
Verbal Behavior wikipedia , lookup
Applied behavior analysis wikipedia , lookup
Thin-slicing wikipedia , lookup
Psychological behaviorism wikipedia , lookup
Operant conditioning wikipedia , lookup
Father absence wikipedia , lookup
Transtheoretical model wikipedia , lookup
Impression formation wikipedia , lookup
Theory of planned behavior wikipedia , lookup
Adherence management coaching wikipedia , lookup
Symbolic behavior wikipedia , lookup
Attribution (psychology) wikipedia , lookup
Unpopularity wikipedia , lookup
Theory of reasoned action wikipedia , lookup
Descriptive psychology wikipedia , lookup
Developmental psychology wikipedia , lookup
Cognitive development wikipedia , lookup
Cinderella effect wikipedia , lookup
Behaviorism wikipedia , lookup
Social cognitive theory wikipedia , lookup
• • • • Development The major issues Life-span development Areas of development How to conceptualize developmental changes Heredity vs. environment • Before 1970 or 1980 – – – – Life-span development Development covered basically ages 2-12 Infants were thought to be uninteresting Adolescents were creepy And adults didn’t change • Now the majority of work takes place at the ends – Major work on adult development – And infants have a lot more tricks than previously thought • • • • Areas of development Cognitive Social/personality Brain development is not hot area And aging Conceptualizing developmental changes • The traditional blank slate • Stages – Piaget • Modularization and evolution The traditional approach • At birth few skills or cognitive processes • Behaviorism – Tabula rasa – Everything is learned • Reinforcement based learning • Imitation • Development is basically linear • Many versions – Piaget The stages approach – Freud Piaget’s general version • Development is non-linear – Rapid changes at some points – And relatively static at others • Child has to have mental apparatus to benefit from experience and learn –schema – Assimilation – Contrast • Processing at each stage – Has its own integrity – works for the child – Yet seems immature • Not that the child lacks a few facts and skills • But seems to reason differently Sensorimotor Period • Age – 0–2 years • Major achievements – Object permanence – Imitation Preoperational Period • Age – 2–7 years • Major achievement – Conservation • Age Concrete Operations Period – 7–11 years • Major achievements – Classifying objects – Logic tied to physical world – Basic reversibility • Age Formal Operations Period – 11 years (at the earliest) • Major achievements – Abstract concepts – Logic – Reversibility – Hypothetical thinking Modularization and evolution • Children has certain competencies at birth or shortly after • May not show up immediately – maturation – Walking – Speech • • • • • Some examples Biology Object constancy Folk psychology Physics Number Some examples from biology • Children distinguish animate from inanimate movement • Have notion of essences from early age – “Insides” vs. “outsides” – Understand that flamingos are birds but bats are not • • • • Nature vs. nurture An issue since time of ancient Greeks Until about 1920 most psychologists emphasized heredity Then until recently experience Changes – New knowledge about genetics and the genome – New research showing importance of genetics – Evolutionary arguments The issue for developmental • How does the home environment affect children – Parental influences – Sibling influences • Obvious that such effects occur – Children similarity to parents is often obvious – Plus we know that children often do what their parents wish How might we study this formally? • Usual strategy is to correlate parental behavior with children’s behavior • Many examples – – – – – – Spanking and disobedient behavior Age of weaning and oral behaviors Parental style and children’s maturity Parental reading and IQ Parental responsiveness and secure attachment Parental behavior and gender stereotypic behavior • Also adoption and twin studies The usual problems with correlations • Could children behavior cause parental behavior? – – – – – Disobedient children get spanked more Children who are mature create parents who are more relaxed and flexible Children who have IQ enjoy being read to more often Children who are securely attached to moms encourage more responsive behavior Children want to do gender stereotypic things and parents find it easier to go with the program Also third variables may enter in • Genetic influences • Parents create compatible outside home environments – Churches – Schools – Children’s activities which affect friendship patterns Bushels of data • Literally millions of correlations • But problems – Correlates are often quite small – Inconsistent from study to study – Adoption studies show low to non-existent correlations between adopted sibs in same family The Harris argument • Judith Rich Harris (1995, 1999) • Correlations between parents and children are almost all genetic • Environmental influences are almost all peer – Even shared environmental influences within the family are largely peer – Same schools, same neighborhoods Genes in the family -- Reiss • High correlation between antisocial behavior by children and punitive parental behavior • Passive model – same genes that make child antisocial make parents explosive • Child effects evocative – genetic effects on antisocial which influence parental behavior • Parental effects evocative – genetic effects on child (not antisocial directly e.g., stubbornness) – Influence parent) – Parental behavior creates antisocial Habitability may increase over life span • For IQ genetic effects increase • Effects on genes on environment selection – Smarter kids select activities that make them smarter – Education • Genes affect peer groups – Kids of different abilities tend to become more isolated – “Smart” peer groups encourage academic achievement – And less smart ones tend to denigrate academics What about sibling influences? • Weak effects but mostly genetic – Almost no sib effects for adopted kids in same family – And effects can be accounted for by environment • Birth order – Weak to non-existent effects for personality – Some effects for ability • Small for IQ • Educational attainment • Prestige of occupation – Huge stereotypes • Within family perceptions • Not necessarily extended outside family The peer group • Harris argues that in all cultures peer groups do most of the socializing – Language spoken – important because not genetic – Peer cultures – Children obsessed with not being different • Peer groups often reflect shared environment Peer influence • Children do imitate adults – But much adult behavior is inappropriate for children – Tends to wane by school age • But peers are more important – Children don’t want to be like adults but like other children – So they adopt whatever is “cool” at any point in time Is Harris correct? • Correct in emphasizing importance of genetics in parent-child similarities • Correct in emphasizing the importance of peer effects • Probably incorrect in emphasizing the null role of parents Does parental behavior have any impact on children? • Inside family but not outside • Single episodes • Group vs. individual effects – Correlations are across individuals – Same parental behavior may have opposite effects on different children • May be stronger effects for some domains – Attitudes? – Values?