* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download REVIEW OF WAVE MECHANICS
Ensemble interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Topological quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Noether's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup
Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup
Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Tight binding wikipedia , lookup
Orchestrated objective reduction wikipedia , lookup
Atomic orbital wikipedia , lookup
Density matrix wikipedia , lookup
Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup
Compact operator on Hilbert space wikipedia , lookup
Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup
Second quantization wikipedia , lookup
Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup
Self-adjoint operator wikipedia , lookup
Dirac equation wikipedia , lookup
Molecular Hamiltonian wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup
Coupled cluster wikipedia , lookup
Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Quantum state wikipedia , lookup
Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup
Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia , lookup
Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup
Coherent states wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Wave function wikipedia , lookup
Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup
Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Matter wave wikipedia , lookup
Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
3/PH/SB Quantum Theory - Week 5 - Dr. P.A. Mulheran COMMUTATION RELATIONS AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES 5.1 Commutators and Compatibility The commutator of two operators Q and R is defined as RQ . Q , R QR To evaluate the commutator we operate on some arbitrary wave function with it. Clearly if the commutator is zero, the order in which the operators are written is unimportant and they commute. For example, P , P 0 x y and the operators for two different components of linear momentum commute. In contrast position and momentum operators do not necessarily commute. For two different components Px , y 0 , whereas for the same components P , x i . x Thus the x-component of position and the x-component of momentum do not commute. The significance of the commutation relations is that commuting operators represent compatible dynamical variables that can be simultaneously measured without uncertainty. This is because commuting variables share the same eigenfunctions. For example the wave function u(x , y , z ) exp(ik . r ) expi[k 1 x k 2 y k 3 z ] is simultaneously an eigenfunction of Px , Py and Pz . There are well defined components of momentum in all three direction ( k 1 etc.) but the position in space is infinitely uncertain ( x ). 1 3/PH/SB Quantum Theory - Week 5 - Dr. P.A. Mulheran 5.2 The Generalised Uncertainty Principle If q and r are, as usual, the root-mean-square uncertainties in the measured values of the quantities represented by the operators Q and R , then the Generalised Uncertainty Principle states that q. r 1 2 Q , R . In this inequality, the expectation value is evaluated as usual: Q , R RQ . d , * QR all space where the wave function is the same for the whole set of measurements used to obtain the uncertainties. Thus if Q and R commute, this product of uncertainties can be zero. This will happen if the wave function of the system is an eigenfunction of the operators. Of course if the initial wave function is not one the eigenfunctions, the product of uncertainties will be greater than zero. In contrast, if Q and R do not commute then the product of uncertainties will be larger than some minimum value. For example, we have seen that P , x i x so that 1 px . x . 2 This relation is true for all possible wave functions. 2 3/PH/SB Quantum Theory - Week 5 - Dr. P.A. Mulheran 5.3 Commutation Relations for the Angular Momentum Operators It is most convenient to work in Cartesian co-ordinates to derive the commutation relations between the various angular momentum operators. Classically, Lr P so by the Correspondence Principle (Postulate P3) we know that L r P L x i L y j L z k where L x yPz zPy i y z , etc. y z Then these operators for the components of the angular momentum satisfy the following cyclic commutation relations: L , L iL L , L iL L , L iL x y z y z x z x y Because these commutation relations are all nonzero they represent incompatible observables. This means that two different components of angular momentum cannot be measured simultaneously without uncertainties, since they do not have the same eigenfunctions. However consider the operator for the square of the total angular momentum. 2 Classically L L . L , so that the operator L2 L2x L2y L2z . It can be shown that L , L 0 2 z and this is left for a workshop exercise. This means that the z-component of angular momentum is compatible with the total square angular momentum, and they have the same eigenfunctions. We have met these eigenfunctions before, they are the Spherical Harmonics Ylm ( , ) . In fact any one, but only one, component of angular momentum can be simultaneously defined with the total square because there is no correct z-axis in the system until the symmetry is broken (e.g. by placing a magnetic field across an atom). 3 3/PH/SB Quantum Theory - Week 5 - Dr. P.A. Mulheran WORKSHOP QUESTIONS Hand your solutions to the following questions to Dr. Mulheran at the end of the first workshop in week 6. Some of your solutions will be marked as part of the continuous assessment of this course which contributes 20% of the overall module grade. Your solutions must be well presented; untidy work will be penalised. 5.1 (a) Show that the commutation relation between the x-component of momentum and the Hamiltonian operator obeys ˆ i V . Pˆx , H x [3 marks] (b) Under which circumstances may the x-component of momentum be known simultaneously with a particle’s total energy without uncertainty? [2 marks] 5.2 (a) Derive the Energy-Time Uncertainty Principle by using the total energy operator . E tot i t (b) 5.3 (The operator for time is just time t itself when the wave function is written as a function of time). [3 marks] Excited atomic energy levels decay spontaneously due to the quantum fluctuations of the electromagnetic field, and have typical half-lives of about 10-8 s. What is the uncertainty in the value of these energy levels and what is the typical natural line width you expect to observe in spectroscopic measurements? [2 marks] (a) Using Lˆx , Lˆy iLˆz , etc, show that 2 2 Lˆ y , Lˆ x Lˆ z , Lˆ x i Lˆ y Lˆ z Lˆ z Lˆ y . (b) Hence prove that Lˆ , Lˆ 0 [3 marks] x 2 . What is the consequence of this result? [2 marks] 5.4 A particle has the wave function u( x, y, z ) Ax exp x 2 y 2 z 2 where is a real number and the normalisation constant A does not have to be evaluated. Using Cartesian co-ordinates, show that this wave function is an 2 eigenfunction of both L and L̂ x , and find the corresponding eigenvalues. [5 marks] 4 3/PH/SB Quantum Theory - Week 5 - Dr. P.A. Mulheran WORKSHOP SOLUTIONS 5.1 The kinetic energy operator and that for the x-component of momentum commute: i 3 2 Px , T 2 0. 2 x x However Px does not necessarily commute with the potential energy term in the Hamiltonian: P , H P ,V (x, y, z ) i x (V ) V . x x x V i x This is only zero if V 0, x i.e. if the potential energy is independent of x. 5.2 (a) E , t i t (t . ) t . t i , i.e. E , t i . tot tot Thus by the Generalised Uncertainty Principle E . t (b) t 108 s , E 1 . 2 10 26 J . 8 210 . s Uncertainty in the frequency of the emitted light when an electron moves 8 1 from an excited state to the ground state is 10 s . This is in 15 1 comparison to the frequency of the light 10 s , so that the uncertainty in the light’s wavelength is 5.3 c 2 . 10 14 m. Start from the commutator between L̂ x and L̂ y operators: Lˆ , Lˆ iLˆ iLˆ Lˆ Lˆ Lˆ Lˆ . x y z z x y Operate on this with L̂ y , iLˆ y Lˆ z Lˆ y Lˆ x Lˆ y Lˆ y Lˆ y Lˆ x and then operate on L̂ y : iLˆ z Lˆ y Lˆ x Lˆ y Lˆ y Lˆ y Lˆ x Lˆ y . 5 y x 3/PH/SB Quantum Theory - Week 5 - Dr. P.A. Mulheran Adding these equations we find: i Lˆ y Lˆ z Lˆ z Lˆ y Lˆ x Lˆ y Lˆ y Lˆ y Lˆ y Lˆ x Lˆ2y , Lˆ x . Similarly for the other relation. Thus 2 2 2 Lˆ2 , Lˆ x Lˆ y , Lˆ x Lˆ z , Lˆ x Lˆ x , Lˆ z 0 . 5.4 u 1 2x u , x x u u 2 y u , 2zu . z y u u i 2yz 2yz .u 0.u Lˆ x u i y z y z Thus u is an eigenfunction of L̂ x with an eigenvalue of zero. iz Lˆ y u u , the wave function is not an eigenfunction of L̂ y . x iz 2 Lˆ y u i z x u z x x 2 z 2 2 x iz 2 u i 2 i u x 2u 2 2 Similarly Lˆ Z u 2 u , Lˆ x u 0 , so that L2 u 2 2 u , 2 2 and the wave function is an eigenfunction of L with eigenvalue 2 (the quantum numbers l 1 and m 0 ). 6