* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 6. Divisibility of atoms: from radioactivity to particle physics
Theory of everything wikipedia , lookup
Introduction to quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Weakly-interacting massive particles wikipedia , lookup
Technicolor (physics) wikipedia , lookup
Quantum chromodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Strangeness production wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
ALICE experiment wikipedia , lookup
Identical particles wikipedia , lookup
Future Circular Collider wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Mathematical formulation of the Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Nuclear structure wikipedia , lookup
Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
Nuclear force wikipedia , lookup
ATLAS experiment wikipedia , lookup
Grand Unified Theory wikipedia , lookup
Compact Muon Solenoid wikipedia , lookup
Electron scattering wikipedia , lookup
Atomic nucleus wikipedia , lookup
6. Divisibility of atoms: from radioactivity to particle physics 6.1 Discovery and classification •Becquerel 1896: Uranium salt on top of wrappedup photographic plate produces an image •Marie and Pierre Curie extract Polonium and Radium from the salt: much more radioactive •1gram Ra has power of 0.015 Watt •taking into account half-life of Ra (1500 years), emits 10000 times more energy than is released by burning 1g of coal three different types of radiation: • negatively charged particles (deflection in magnetic field) (β) • positively charged particles (deflection in magnetic field, but much weaker) () • radiation, not deflected using electromagnetic fields (γ) • β-particles identified as electrons by q/m value • -particles q/m = 4.826x107 C/kg, half as much as hydrogen ion • Faraday beaker for collection of charges and counting number of particles: q=2e, thus = 4He2+ • Radioactive decay: change of the type of element, atoms have no longer the unchangeable character attributed to them since the early days of Greek philosophy! Ra Rn 226 88 222 86 A 4 2 Z Element atomic number Z reduced by 2 in -decay, mass number A reduced by 4 : Z→Z-2, A→A-4; • β-decay: Z→Z+1, A→A; • Generally: resulting daughter nucleus also unstable, results in various decay series with end-product around lead. • 1919 Rutherford: artificial change of an element by bombarding Nitrogen with -particles. 14 7 N 24 189F 178O p Decay chains as long as decay is energetically possible it will occur rates at which the decays occur depends on both type of nucleus and type of decay number of neutrons, N succession of decays YF fig 43.8 inverse of rate is called lifetime of the nucleus, it equals the half-life (shown in figure) divided by ln(2) stable endpoint reached when it is no longer energetically feasible for nucleus to undergo either alpha- or beta-decay number of protons, atomic number Z 6.2 Discovery of the neutron • why is charge to mass ratio not the same for all nuclides? (isotopes of the same element, chemically not distinguishable) • 1930 Bethe and Becker, bombardment of Beryllium, Boron and Lithium with -particles: target particle emits radiation with greater penetration power than -particles • 1932 Chadwick: new particles electrically neutral, mass approximately equal to proton: neutrons 4 2 He 49Be126C 01n • Neutrons hard to detect directly (no charge, thus no ionisation). • Interaction with nuclei; they are slowed down (moderated) during scattering; can penetrate nucleus • Indirect detection of slow neutrons 1 0 n B Li He 10 5 7 3 4 2 6.3 Energy and Mass Definition of atomic mass unit Recall: 1 mole (SI unit): amount of a substance that contains as many elementary entities as there are atoms in 12 gram Carbon-12 (12C). The number of entities in a mole of a substance is given by Avogadro’s number NA. atomic mass unit u: 1u = 1/12 m(12C) = 1.66053886×10-27kg = 931.494MeV /c2 1g = 6.022142 x 1023 u Mass defect proton mass mp = 1.672622×10-27 kg = 1.007276 u neutron mass mn = 1.674927×10-27 kg = 1.008665 u electron mass me = 9.10938×10-31 kg = 0.000548580 u • Nucleus: neutrons and protons, BUT mass of atoms not simple sum of masses of its constituents • Example 12C-atom: m(6p+6n+6e) = 12.0989 u but by definition: m(C)= 12 u • Mass defect Δm: when nuclei are formed from nucleons, energy is released (e.g. γ–rays). Δm = ΔE/c2 Nuclear binding energy E B (ZM H Nmn – Z M)c A 2 Mass defect = EB/c2 1 MH: mass of neutral hydrogen M H 1 H 1.007825 u mn: mass of neutron (N: number of neutrons) A M mass of neutral atom Z and c2 = 931.5 MeV/u Note: atomic binding energy of electrons neglected since much smaller than nuclear binding energy Examples: 2 Deuterium 1 H , 1p, 1n, 1 electron; mass: 2.014102 u EB = (1×1.007825 u + 1×1.008665 u – 2.014102 u) × (931.5 MeV / u) = 2.224 MeV Helium, 2p, 2n: large mass defect EB =28.3 MeV (relevant for fusion) “Splitting the atom” In 1932 Cockcroft and Walton performed the following experiment in Rutherford’s group, Cavendish lab, Cambridge: 7 3 Li11p24 24 They found a release of energy of about 17MeV. First nuclear confirmation of Einstein’s relationship E=mc2 results in Nobel Prize for Cockcroft and Walton in 1951. Ernest Thomas Sinton Walton 1903-1995 • TCD 1922-26 undergraduate in maths and science 1926-27 MSc (hydrodynamics) • Cambridge 1927-34, PhD 1931 • TCD Physics Department 1934 – 1974 Erasmus Smith Professor of Natural and Experimental Philosophy and Head of Physics 6.4 Law of radioactive decay • Number N of decaying atoms (N large) • rate of decay (activity) proportional to N: -dN(t)/dt = λ N(t); λ, decay constant dN dt; • Separation of variables: N t N dN dt ; with N0= N(t=t0) • Integration: N N t 0 0 ln( N ) ln( N 0 ) ln( N ) (t t 0 ); N0 • thus N (t ) N 0 exp( t ) where we set t0=0. Half life T1/2 : time required for N to decrease from N0 to N0/2: N (T1/2 ) N 0 exp( T1/2 ) N 0 / 2; T1/2 (1/ ) ln(1/ 2) ln(2) / 0.693 / dN (t ) N (t ) Activity (decay rate): dt • 1 decay per second = 1 becquerel = 1 Bq (SI unit) • 1 curie = 1 Ci = 3.70 x 1010 Bq applet http://www.walter-fendt.de/ph14e/lawdecay.htm Quantifying radiation measure of old unit SI unit activity decay rate curie 1Ci=3.7 ×1010 Bq becquerel Bq [unit s-1] exposure ionisation in air roentgen coulomb per kg 1R = 2.58×10−4 C/kg absorbed dose D energy absorption of 1 rad = 0.01 J/kg tissue per unit mass dose equivalent DE = QF x D QF: Quality Factor biological effectiveness 1 rem = 10-2 Sv e.g. 200keV X-rays: QF=1; alpha-particles: QF=20; gray 1 Gy = 1J/kg sievert 1Sv = 1J/kg x QF 6.5 β-decay • Origin of electrons in β-decay? If inside nucleus, should have energies of about 20MeV (Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle). Experimentally: less than 1MeV. • β-decay: decay of neutron in the nucleus. n p ? • electrons produced in β-decay have wide energy spectrum; need third particle that is produced in the decay (Pauli 1931): anti-neutrino, e , electrically neutral, very small rest-mass. n p e N→N-1, M→M, Z→Z+1; • Anderson,1932, cosmic rays: “positively charged electron”, opposite charge and different magnetic (spin) properties. • Soon many other elementary particles were discovered. 6.6 Short history of discovery of elementary particle year 1897 1918 1932 1932 1946 particle electron proton neutron positron pion 1946 1955 1956 myon anti-proton anti-neutrino researcher Thomson Rutherford Chadwick Anderson (predicted by Dirac 1928) Powell (cosmic rays), predicted by Yukawa 1935 Anderson, Neddermeyer Cowan and Reines, (predicted by Pauli and Fermi, 1931) kaon hyperons resonance particles … a particle zoo! 6.7 Classification: the standard model (1970-1973) leptons electron electron-neutrino muon tau (with finite rest-mass) muon-neutrino tau-neutrino (rest-mass zero?) all of these also exist as anti-particles quarks (appear in pairs or triplets): up u 2/3 down d -1/3 d strange charm beauty top (finite rest-mass) s c b t -1/3 2/3 -1/3 2/3 non-integer electric charges quarks also carry “colour charge”: red, blue, green (quantum-chromodynamics) all of these also exist as anti-particles three quarks make up baryons, uud = proton; udd = neutron two quarks make up mesons, such as pion : ud Leptons and quarks are fermions, wave-function describing a pair of identical particles is anti-symmetric with respect to particle exchange. Particles with symmetric wave-function with respect to particle exchange: bosons. forces between particles are transmitted via bosonic field quanta Force field quantum Gravitation graviton (not yet discovered) Weak force (governing beta decay) W+,W-, Z0 Strong nuclear force (between quarks) 8 gluons (different colour combinations) Electromagnetic force photons Further required particle: Higgs bosons (to explain mass difference of photons (zero mass) and W+,W-, Z0) Fundamental Forces • A Theory Of Everything (TOE) would unify the theories for the four different fundamental forces. (But it would not mean the end of physics!) • Electro-magnetic and weak nuclear force have been unified: electro-weak theory. Theories unifying electro-weak theory with the strong nuclear force are called Grand Unified Theories (GUT). Problem: incorporation of gravity; attempted by string theories(10 or 26 dimensions) ongoing problem! Figure for standard model: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Particle_chart.jpg Large Hadron Collider at CERN (see Physics World, March 2011, p21-30) • particle accelerator with circumference 27km, 100m underground; four experimental caverns • Since 2008 study of proton-proton collisions, energies 7TeV, eventually 14TeV Investigating the standard model • are quarks and leptons really point particles? (experiments: d< 50 x 10-21 m) • Higgs particle is required to account for finite mass of W+,W-,Z bosons; Dec. 2011: “tantalising hints” of new particle (mass about 125 GeV); 2013: Nobel prize for Higgs and Englert • Gravity is not included in standard model • Alternative theories exist: SUperSYmmetry theory predicts further particles (additional generations), detectable at higher energies? Large Extra Dimension theory, to explain weakness of gravity String theory: still does not seem to provide experimentally testable predictions September 2011: “faster than light” neutrinos? (which would falsify relativity theory!) February 2012: Dodgy optical fibre cables? Muon-neutrinos produced in CERN, detected at OPERA detector, Gran Sasso, Italy (730km apart), did they arrive 60.7 nanoseconds too early? June 2012: not faster than speed of light (there were indeed measurement errors!) Interesting times for physicists!