* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Quantum Theory of Light, PY4T02 Problem Set 2 Paul Eastham
Fundamental interaction wikipedia , lookup
Phase transition wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Casimir effect wikipedia , lookup
Electrostatics wikipedia , lookup
Superconductivity wikipedia , lookup
Quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Lorentz force wikipedia , lookup
Condensed matter physics wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Quantum vacuum thruster wikipedia , lookup
Introduction to gauge theory wikipedia , lookup
Kaluza–Klein theory wikipedia , lookup
Photon polarization wikipedia , lookup
Mathematical formulation of the Standard Model wikipedia , lookup
Maxwell's equations wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Field (physics) wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Electromagnetism wikipedia , lookup
Quantum Theory of Light, PY4T02 Problem Set 2 Paul Eastham 1. (a) Consider the electromagnetic cavity discussed in lectures. Show, from Maxwell’s equations, that for a time-dependent electric field s X 2ω 2 m n sin(kn z)qn (t) Ex = V 0 n the corresponding magnetic field is By = X µ n s k 2ωn2 m cos(kn z)q̇n (t). V 0 (b) Show that inserting this decomposition into the electromagnetic field energy Z 1 1 2 (d3 r)0 Ex2 + H= B 2 2µ0 y gives H= X mω 2 n 2 n 2 qn + p2n . 2m (c) (Optional) Confirm directly that Maxwell’s equations reduce to the equations for a set of harmonic oscillators. 2. (a) Consider the single-mode electric field operator Ex = E0 sin(kz)(a + a† ). Calculate the expectation value and variance of the electric field when this mode is in a number state |ni. (b) What is the characteristic scale of the electric field fluctuations for a mode of volume 1µm3 at a wavelength of 500 nm? (c) Compare this characteristic field strength to the Coulomb field on the electron in atomic hydrogen. Hence argue that one expects quantum electrodynamics to introduce corrections of order 1GHz to the frequencies of atomic transitions. (The best known such correction is the splitting between the otherwise degenerate degenerate 2 S1/2 and 2 P1/2 levels – the Lamb shift.) 3. Consider the coherent state satisfying â|λi = λ|λi. By using commutation relations to rewrite in normal-order, or otherwise, derive expressions for the first three “moments” of the photon number: hn̂p i = hλ|(↠â)p |λi, for p = 1, 2, 3. Show that this gives the result for the variance, hn̂2 i − hn̂i2 , quoted in lectures. 4. (a) Consider a single mode of the electromagentic field, and the associated quadrature operators 1 (â + ↠) 2 1 X̂2 = (â − ↠), 2i X̂1 = (5) where for the ladder operators [â, ↠] = 1. Show that the uncertainties in X1 and X2 satisfy ∆X1 ∆X2 ≥ 1 . 4 (You may quote the result that if [Â, B̂] = c, with complex number c, ∆A∆B ≥ |c|/2. ∆A2 = hÂ2 i − hÂi2 ) (b) Calculate the expectation values and quadrature uncertainties for the state (5) |ψi = cos(θ)|0i + sin(θ)|1i, where θ is a real parameter. (c) Are there any states of this form for which a quadrature uncertainty is less than in the vacuum state |0i? If so, show that the state does not violate the uncertainty relation. 5. (a) Consider the coherent state defined by (5) (5) â|λi = λ|λi, with complex parameter λ, and the quadrature operators 1 (â + ↠) 2 1 X̂2 = (â − ↠). 2i X̂1 = Show that the quadrature uncertainties are 2 hX̂12 i − hX̂12 i2 = 1 , 4 and give expressions for the expected values of the quadrature measurements. (b) Sketch these results on a phase-space portrait. Indicate the size of the uncertainty circle, and the position of the circle in terms of the mean photon number n̄ in the state. (5) (c) When a coherent state propagates in time, the evolution of the quadrature operators corresponds to a rotation by angle φ = ωt, corresponding to the phase of the associated classical wave. Thus this phase may be identified with the polar angle in the phase space portrait. By considering your sketch above when n̄ 1, obtain an expression for the uncertainty ∆φ. (5) (d) For the Michelson interferometer shown below, the output intensity classically reflects the phase difference between the two arms of the interferometer, (5) I = I0 cos2 (φ), where φ = k∆l with k = 2π/λ the wavevector. Use your result above to obtain an order-ofmagnitude expression for the maximum possible sensitivity of this instrument to differences in distance, when the input source is a laser, in terms of the average number of photons involved in the experiment, n̄. (e) Assuming that λ = 514nm, the laser power is 1mW, and the size of the interferometer arms is approximately 1 m, estimate the maximum sensitivity achievable. Page 2 (5) Mirrors Laser Detector Page 3