* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Children’s explanations of different forms of
Glossary of psychiatry wikipedia , lookup
Bipolar disorder wikipedia , lookup
Selective mutism wikipedia , lookup
Factitious disorder imposed on another wikipedia , lookup
Excoriation disorder wikipedia , lookup
Postpartum depression wikipedia , lookup
Panic disorder wikipedia , lookup
Schizoaffective disorder wikipedia , lookup
Major depressive disorder wikipedia , lookup
Asperger syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Dissociative identity disorder wikipedia , lookup
Depersonalization disorder wikipedia , lookup
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder wikipedia , lookup
Controversy surrounding psychiatry wikipedia , lookup
Mental disorder wikipedia , lookup
Antisocial personality disorder wikipedia , lookup
Anxiety disorder wikipedia , lookup
Spectrum disorder wikipedia , lookup
Psychological evaluation wikipedia , lookup
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder controversies wikipedia , lookup
History of psychiatry wikipedia , lookup
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders wikipedia , lookup
Narcissistic personality disorder wikipedia , lookup
Classification of mental disorders wikipedia , lookup
Conversion disorder wikipedia , lookup
Causes of mental disorders wikipedia , lookup
Abnormal psychology wikipedia , lookup
History of mental disorders wikipedia , lookup
Separation anxiety disorder wikipedia , lookup
Generalized anxiety disorder wikipedia , lookup
Conduct disorder wikipedia , lookup
Felicia Meyer & William Bukowski Concordia University, Montreal, Canada 4th International Stigma Conference January 23rd, 2009 Children’s views of mental health and illness have received far less research attention than: • the views of adults (Wahl, 2002; Watson, Miller & Lyons, 2005) • children’s understanding of physical health (e.g. Bibace & Walsh, 1980) Peer relationships are an important part of children’s socialization (Rubin, Bukowski & Parker, 2006; Sullivan, 1953). Children who have socio-emotional and/or behavioural problems are more likely to be excluded or rejected (Deater-Deckard, 2001; Hay et al., 2004). Less is known about how children develop attitudes towards peers with such problems (Hennessy, Swords & Heary, 2007). Purpose • To integrate research on children’s perceptions of others, understanding of psychopathology and peer relationships. Specific aim • To assess children’s understanding of mental illness so as to learn why children with problems may be excluded from their peer group. 96 fifth and sixth graders • 46 girls, 50 boys • Mean age = 11 years old Community-based sample • Four classes in a public elementary school in Montreal, Quebec, Canada Children read four vignettes describing hypothetical boys/girls with different forms of psychopathology o Depression and conduct disorder o based on work by Hennessy & Heary (2003) o ADHD and anxiety o based on DSM-IV-TR (2004) symptomatology Order of presentation of vignettes and gender of hypothetical peer were randomized across participants. Although Clara usually does ok in school, she sometimes thinks that she is stupid and no good at anything. Clara doesn’t smile much and she doesn’t enjoy things as much as she used to. She spends a lot of time feeling sad and is rarely happy. She has little energy and often feels tired during the day. 1) Following each description, participants were asked: Why do you think Clara is like this? A list of reasons explaining why a child would have this disorder was presented. Participants rated each reason according to whether it explained why the child would have this disorder. 2) Participants were then asked to imagine that the child described in the vignette was in their class and to rate how much they would like the hypothetical peer. Why do you think (hypothetical peer) is like this? Family experiences (3 items) …because of how her parents brought her up. Peer experiences (3 items) …because he has no friends. Psychological states (3 items) …because she thinks other children are better than her. Physical conditions (2 items) …because there is something wrong with his brain. Inability to control (3 items) …because he can’t control how he feels. Lack of effort (2 items) …because she doesn’t try hard enough to: - relax (anxiety) - be happy (depression) - behave herself (conduct disorder) - pay attention and to focus (ADHD) To examine… 1) How children explained the etiology of four forms of psychopathology. 2) How much children liked each of the four hypothetical peers. 3) Whether liking of the hypothetical peer was associated with children’s use of reasons to explain psychopathology. Children used different explanations to describe the etiology of the four disorders. Lack of effort was rated as the most likely explanation across the four disorders. • more for externalizing disorders (ADHD and conduct disorder) than for internalizing disorders (anxiety and depression) Ratings of Reasons for Each Disorder 2.4 2.2 2 Inability to control Lack of effort Psychological Physical Peer Family 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 ADHD ADHD ANXIETY Anxiety DEPRESSION Depression CONDUCT DISORDER Conduct Disorder Ratings of Lack of Effort for Each Disorder 2.4 2.2 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 ADHD ADHD ANXIETY DEPRESSION CONDUCT DISORDER Anxiety Depression Conduct Disorder Liking Ratings of Hypothetical Peers with Symptoms of Psychological Disorders Somewhat 3 2.5 2 A little 1.5 1 Not at all ADHD ADHD ANXIETY DEPRESSION CONDUCT DISORDER Anxiety Depression Conduct Disorder Liking Ratings as a Function of Use of Reasons 2.1 Family Peer Psychological Liking 2 Physical Lack of effort Inability to control 1.9 1.8 Low emphasis High emphasis Differential use of reasons was found to affect the level of liking of the hypothetical peer. Attributing disorder to o family reasons, psychological reasons or lack of effort was associated with lower levels of liking. o reasons related to peer experiences was associated with higher levels of liking. 1) Children’s beliefs about the causes of psychological problems • are multidimensional (incorporate individual and environmental factors) • ascribe particular importance to lack of effort. 2) Children’s liking of their peers depends in part on the symptoms of psychopathology exhibited by peers. 3) Children’s liking of their peers depends in part on the reasons they use to explain the peer’s psychological problem. The findings of this study • show a link between children’s understanding of psychological disorders and their affective response to a hypothetical peer with a disorder. • have implications for how children perceive and respond to actual peers with psychological difficulties. Recent work points to the importance of children’s beliefs about peers’ personal responsibility for psychological problems (e.g., Corrigan et al., 2005; Hennessy, Swords & Heary, 2007). Future research should examine the possible peer rejection and stigma experienced by children with such problems. Further analyses will examine • hypothetical helping • children’s liking of hypothetical peers versus actual peers with symptoms of psychopathology This work can contribute to the development of prevention and intervention programs targeting children’s understanding and possible stigmatization of mental illness. Participants, parents and elementary school staff Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) Fonds de recherche sur la société et la culture (FQRSC) Concordia University Research Chair to W. M. Bukowski South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust Charitable Funds Thank you! Questions? Comments? For more information: [email protected]