* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Document
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate resilience wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup
Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Closing Workshop- Adapt Cap November 22nd, 2013 Chennai Folie 1 Dokumentation Ergebnisse 29./30 August 2006 / Folie 1 The Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) System for AdaptCap Quick Recap Folie 2 Dokumentation Ergebnisse 29./30 August 2006 / Folie 2 The overall objective of M&E is to ensure and demonstrate project progress and impact M&E process M&E report Achieve continuous improvement Demonstrate the progress and impact of AdaptCap Assess progress, trends, changes and risks Implement measures to improve on progress Identify achievements and action needs Folie 3 Dokumentation Ergebnisse 29./30 August 2006 / Folie 3 The AdaptCap M&E System builds on the LogFrame Impact Outcome Expected result Output Support lasting poverty reduction (MDG 1) and ensure environmental sustainability ( MDG 7) , achievement of targets under the Indian National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC) Reduce the vulnerabilities of coastal communities in AP and TN to climate change risk, improve their living and environmental conditions, security, and health and Disseminate knowledge internationally Coastal communities implement well-directed and locally adapted concepts and approaches for adaptation and mitigation of climate change and disaster risk reduction. WP 1: Creating, Adapting and Implementing approaches for CCA, CCM and Reduction of Vulnerabilities in Coastal Communities Suitable CCM/CCA technology and methodology are applied in infrastructure of coastal communities WP 2: Pilot Initiatives to Adapt to and Mitigate Climate Change in Communities through Technology Transfer Technical and management capacities of local constituents to respond to climate change are strengthened by using CCA, CCM and DRM measures Enhanced local public awareness, national, regional and international experience exchange on coastal community CCA, CCM and DRM WP 3: Capacity Building for communities, local authorities and CBOs on CCA, CCM and DRM Folie 4 WP 4: Public Awareness Campaigns, Visibility and Networking Dokumentation Ergebnisse 29./30 August 2006 / Folie 4 The general M&E framework seeks to capture project progress and benefits across the work packages indicators Folie 5 Dokumentation Ergebnisse 29./30 August 2006 / Folie 5 (1) Vulnerability Reduction (2) Acceptance, feasibility, costs (3) Side effects Realisation of project evaluation criteria from EoI The M&E framework for pilot measures seeks to capture effectiveness and benefits of each pilot + Quantitative indicators for benefits of each pilot Folie 6 Dokumentation Ergebnisse 29./30 August 2006 / Folie 6 Work Packages and Data on Indicators Folie 7 Dokumentation Ergebnisse 29./30 August 2006 / Folie 7 Indicators for work package 1 Expected result Coastal communities implement well-directed and locally adapted concepts and approaches for adaptation and mitigation of climate change and disaster risk reduction translate into Success indicators (1) At least 12 local authorities on PRI level integrate CCA & CCM in their plans and strategie (2) At least 12 villages have adopted new approach to CC, e.g. Climate Action Plans (3) At least 12 villages conduct adaptation activities benefitting 6000 people at EOP (end of project) (4) 24 community task forces formed and strengthened, workshops conducted Folie 8 Dokumentation Ergebnisse 29./30 August 2006 / Folie 8 Further Monitoring Criteria Trends Risks Expected future development in terms of achievement of the indicators Part of table for assessment of indicators Factors which potentially inhibit or delay fulfilment of the indicators Changes Organisational changes (or similar) which affect the expected WP results Timelines Evaluation whether fulfillment of work package is within the timeline; reasons for divergence Separate table Folie 9 Dokumentation Ergebnisse 29./30 August 2006 / Folie 9 Templates facilitate collection of data per work package 1 3 Folie 10 2 Dokumentation Ergebnisse 29./30 August 2006 / Folie 10 Overview on Project Progress – WP 1 WP1 Expected result: Coastal communities implement well-directed and locally adapted concepts and approaches for adaptation and mitigation of climate change and disaster risk reduction Indicator Success mark Achieved number as per 2012 1. PRI bodies with integrated CCA & CCM in their plans 16 PRI, 6 districts At least 12 and 4 municipalities 2. Villages with a new approach to CC, e.g. Climate Action Plans At least 12 7 villages 3a. Communities with adaptation activities At least 12 3b. People benefitting 3. Formed and trained community task forces 6000 people 24 8 villages and 1 municipality >4000 Folie 11 19 CTFs Dokumentation Ergebnisse 29./30 August 2006 / Folie 11 Indicators for work package 2 Expected result Suitable CCM/CCA technology and methodology are applied in infrastructure of coastal communities translate into Success indicators (1) 18 CCM/CCA technology-based pilot initiatives implemented in rural communities (2) 6 of these initiatives selected for replication (3) 1 urban technology-based pilot (new indicator after ROM report) Folie 12 Dokumentation Ergebnisse 29./30 August 2006 / Folie 12 Overview on Project Progress – WP 2 WP 2 Expected result: Suitable CCM/CCA technology and methodology are applied in infrastructure of coastal communities Indicator Success mark Achieved number in 2012 1. Pilot initiatives implemented in rural communities 18 10 and 8 in final phase 2. Initiatives selected for replication 6 10 3. Urban Technology-based pilots implemented in cities 1 NIL Folie 13 Dokumentation Ergebnisse 29./30 August 2006 / Folie 13 The M&E framework for pilots connects to the progress evaluation of WP 2 M&E of WP 2 Expected result Suitable CCM/CCA technology and methodology are applied in infrastructure of coastal communities Success indicators (1) 18 CCM/CCA technology-based pilot initiatives implemented in rural communities (2) 6 of these initiatives selected for replication (3) 1 urban technology-based pilot (new indicator after ROM report) + M&E framework for pilot projects Specific questions for each pilot on… (1) Vulnerability reduction (2) Acceptance, feasibility, costs (3) Side effects Folie 14 (4) Quantified benefits Dokumentation Ergebnisse 29./30 August 2006 / Folie 14 Categories and indicators for pilot project evaluation Category Sub-categories Applied to Vulnerability reduction People benefitting Addressing of climate impacts Usage of RE All pilots Acceptance, feasibility and costs Cultural appropriateness Involvement of community Technical viability Economic viability of implemenntation O&M costs All pilots Side effects Positive side effects (e.g., inclusion and empowerment of women, no-regret pilot) Negative side effects All pilots Quantified benefits Specific to each pilot Folie 15 Individual pilot Dokumentation Ergebnisse 29./30 August 2006 / Folie 15 Templates facilitate collection of data for each pilot 1 2 Folie 16 3 Dokumentation Ergebnisse 29./30 August 2006 / Folie 16 Impact of Pilots Implemented in Andhra Pradesh – Few Glimpses • Nellore • Reduction in Non working days in the rainy season leading to an increase in income of small business owners in Sri Ramapuram • Saving of water and energy in Poovula Doruvu • Prakasham • Assured clean drinking water available in Dasraju Palli • Increased capacity for Rain water storage in Motumala • Saving of energy and Assured clean drinking water available in Vengamukka Palem • Vishakapatnam • Improvement in water quality in Chepala Dibbada Palem • Enhancement in health and safety for women and reduction in GHG emissions in Govupeta Folie 17 Dokumentation Ergebnisse 29./30 August 2006 / Folie 17 Impact of Pilots Implemented in Tamil Nadu– Few Glimpses • Nagapattinam • Protection of Agriculture land from flood and salt water intrusion in Kumarakudi • Protection of fishermen and families from flood events in Perumelpattai • Assured clean drinking water available in Pillai Colony • Cuddalore • Increased capacity for Rain water storage in Chinnakaramedu • Increase in harvest of crops in Kaduvetti • Protection of Agriculture land from flood and salt water intrusion in Nadupalayam • Thiruvallur • Saline free drinking water assured in Kadapakkam • Increase of agriculture command area in Thangal Perumpulam • Independence from grid power outages for street lightning in thirumalai Folie 18 Nagar Dokumentation Ergebnisse 29./30 August 2006 / Folie 18 Indicators for work package 3 Expected result Technical and management capacities of local constituents to respond to climate change are strengthened by using CCA, CCM and DRM measures translate into Success indicators (1) At least 36 local, 12 urban, 6 urban/rural, 2 regional capacity building workshops conducted with up to 1100 training participants enhancing their capabilities for decision making on CC (2) CCA and CCM guide for PRI bodies existent and are in use in 12 communities (3) At least 2 networks on climate change and DRM set up between Folie 19 local and regional bodies Dokumentation Ergebnisse 29./30 August 2006 / Folie 19 Overview on Project Progress – WP 3 WP 3 Expected result: Technical and management capacities of local constituents to respond to climate change are strengthened by using CCA, CCM and DRM measures Indicator Success mark 1. Local, urban and regional CB workshops conducted; Number of participants 36 local 12 urban 6 urban / local 2 regional 1100 particip. 2. Communities where LAMGs for PRI bodies exist and are in use 12 3. Networks on CC and DRM set up between local and regional bodies At least 2 Achieved number in 2012 43 rural 5 urban SLD 1478 particip. 18 NIL Folie 20 Dokumentation Ergebnisse 29./30 August 2006 / Folie 20 Indicators for work package 4 Expected result Create local public awareness, foster national, regional and international experience exchange and cooperation on coastal community CCA, CCM and DRM translate into Success indicators (1) 4500 local rural community members aware of action (2) District DRM exchange initiated (3) One international conference on best practices at EOP benefitting rural and urban communities worldwide and exploring rural and urban linkages (4) At least three published articles and papers on project results disseminated through scientific and practitioner community Folie 21 worldwide Dokumentation Ergebnisse 29./30 August 2006 / Folie 21 Overview on Project Progress – WP 4 WP 4 Expected result: Create local public awareness, foster national, regional and international experience exchange and cooperation on coastal community CCA, CCM and DRM Indicator 1. Local rural community members who are aware of AdaptCap 2. Initiation of District DRM exchange 3. One international conference on best practices at EOP 4. Disseminated articles and papers on project results Success mark Achieved number 4500 8700 Exchange initiated Initiated in both states 1 At least 3 NIL 1 published and 1 submitted Folie 22 Dokumentation Ergebnisse 29./30 August 2006 / Folie 22 THANKS Folie 23 Dokumentation Ergebnisse 29./30 August 2006 / Folie 23