* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download (condensed)(large file! 10Mb) - Department of Physics and Astronomy
Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
Global warming controversy wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Instrumental temperature record wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on Australia wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Global warming hiatus wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Business action on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Selected Slides from Prof. Broccoli’s Two Guest Lectures • Required reading for Greenhouse Effect class at Rutgers University, Spring 2004 • Condensed by Sunil Somalwar Global Warming Alan Robock Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey USA [email protected] [email protected] http://envsci.rutgers.edu/~robock http://envsci.rutgers.edu/~broccoli Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Mann et al. (1999) Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences “The unequivocal detection of the enhanced greenhouse effect from observations is not likely for a decade or more.” Climate Change – The IPCC Scientific Assessment (1990) “The balance of evidence suggests a discernible human influence on global climate.” Climate Change 1995 – The Second Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) “There is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities.” Climate Change 2000 – The Third Assessment Report of the IPCC Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences At the request of U.S. President George W. Bush, the National Research Council of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences issued a special report, Climate Change Science: An Analysis of Some Key Questions, that endorsed the key conclusions of the IPCC assessment in 2001. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 2002 issued a report that again supported the IPCC assessement. Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Actual 1994-98 observations Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Climate System 1. Atmosphere 2. Hydrosphere (oceans) 3. Cryosphere (snow, ice, glaciers) 4. Biosphere (including people) 5. Lithosphere (soil, volcanoes) Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences The Climate System Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Temperature Feedbacks – + + + – – External forcing Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences – –+ Start with temperature increase, e.g., from more CO2 Fundamental Determinants of Climate 1. Input of solar radiation 2. Atmospheric composition (gases and aerosols) 3. Surface characteristics (albedo, roughness, potential evapotranspiration) Humans can change climate by affecting 2 or 3. Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences The climate system Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Planetary albedo (a) is the average reflectivity of the Earth = 107/342 0.3 Earth’s global, annual mean energy balance Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Greenhouse effect Earth’s global, annual mean energy balance Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Causes of Climate Change (Forcings) Natural: Anthropogenic: Solar variations Volcanic eruptions Chaotic weather variations El Niño/Southern Oscillation Other ocean-atmosphere interactions GHG: CO2, CH4, CFCs, N2O, O3 Tropospheric aerosols Sulfates, black carbon, organics, dust Direct and indirect effects Ozone depletion (indirect effect of CFCs) Land surface modification Contrails Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences (IPCC TAR, Chap. 3) Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Mountain Glacier Trends Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences 2002 1991 Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences General Circulation Models (GCMs) 1 Basic Physical Laws: Conservation of energy (First law of thermodynamics) Conservation of momentum (Newton’s second law of motion) Conservation of mass (Continuity equation) Conservation of moisture Hydrostatic equilibrium Gas law Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences General Circulation Models (GCMs) 2 Physical Processes That Must or Can Be Included: Wind Sea ice Radiation Snow Precipitation Glaciers Soil moisture Vegetation Ground water Ocean biota Aerosols Clouds, convective and large-scale Air-sea exchanges of moisture, energy, and momentum Air-land exchanges of moisture, energy, and momentum Chemistry, particularly O3 and CO2 Ocean temperature, salinity, and currents Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Typical grid spacing of a GCM is 4° x 5° latitude-longitude by 2 km in the vertical. In the near future, we will have global 1° x 1° models and the Japanese have designed the fastest computer in the world, the “Earth Simulator.” on which they will run a global 10 km x 10 km grid. Each time the horizontal resolution is increased by a factor of 2, the time needed to run the model goes up by a factor of 8. When the vertical resolution is doubled the time required doubles in general, but can go up by more, if winds become faster. Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences To include all the processes in a climate model which are of a scale smaller than is resolved by the model, they must be “parameterized.” One of the most important and difficult climate elements to parameterize is cloudiness. Clouds have a much smaller spatial and temporal scale than a typical GCM grid box. Usually, we consider separately 2 types of clouds, layer clouds and convective clouds. There is no fundamental prognostic equation for clouds (no conservation of clouds principle); rather they form when condensation takes place and dissipate due to precipitation and evaporation. Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Future Sea Level Projections Different scenarios Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Model ranges Third Assessment Report of the IPCC (2001): General circulation model results Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Third Assessment Report of the IPCC (2001): General circulation model results Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Third Assessment Report of the IPCC (2001): General circulation model results Pinatubo Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Vinnikov et al. (1999) Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences How will climate change affect us? Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Climate Change and other Environmental Stresses Land Use Change Loss of Biodiversity Invasive Species Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Air Pollution Acid Deposition Areas of Human Endeavor That Could Be Affected by Global Warming Agriculture Water Resources Fisheries Air Pollution Human Health Recreation Insurance Wetlands Forestry Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Electricity Demand Wind Energy Generation Solar Energy Generation Hydroelectricity Generation Ocean Transportation Air Transportation Land Transportation Political Systems Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences The Global Warming Dilemma (Mahlman, 2002) “On the one hand, large increases in atmospheric CO2 concentrations have occurred, with considerably more ‘in the pipeline.’ Yet, the magnitude of documented warming to date is comparatively small, about 0.6°C....Thus, there has been little motivation today to resort to a major effort to reduce global CO2 emissions. “On the other hand, delaying major CO2 emissions reductions until substantial climate warming occurs would very likely ‘wire in’ the world to globally troublesome global warming for many centuries....Therefore, the choices are quite daunting: we can make very large policy commitments now with little visible short-term payback, or we can delay policy action indefinitely (the de facto current strategy), with very large coping and adaptation costs decades and centuries from now.” Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences The Global Warming Dilemma (Mahlman, 2002) “The harsh reality of the Global Warming Dilemma: Consider the policymakers’ sincere question: “What can we do in a mitigation context to keep global warming from happening?” The blunt answer is almost nothing; climate change is well underway and it carries huge momentum. Clearly, the question needs to be restated: “What are the options available for us to manage this dauntingly difficult problem in the most globally responsible way?” In this form, the question is quite reasonable because it allows avenues for finding rational approaches for dealing with the real problem.” Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences The Global Warming Dilemma (Mahlman, 2002) “There are no quick policy fixes, nationally or globally. If we don't begin to chip away at the problem soon, it is very likely that serious consequences will be wired in for the world of our great-grandchildren and for their great-grandchildren. ... The long time scales and robustness of the problem almost guarantees that our descendants in the 22nd century will, with historical perspective, see that we were actually confronted with a major planet-scale stewardship/ management problem. They will most assuredly note how we responded, or how we did not respond to the problem.” Alan Robock & Tony Broccoli Department of Environmental Sciences Frequently Asked Questions • What is the global warming controversy? • Was the mild weather of some recent winters a result of global warming? • Does global warming mean that there won’t be snowy winters anymore? • If global warming is occurring, why was January so cold? • How can we project what the earth’s temperature will be 50 years from now if we don’t always get tomorrow’s weather forecast right? What is the global warming controversy? Media Coverage of Global Warming Climate change is a big and very complex scientific and political issue. Media coverage naturally reports on both of these aspects – often blending the two. Time Magazine April 9, 2001 “Climbing temperatures. Melting glaciers. Rising Seas. All over the earth we’re feeling the heat. Why isn’t Washington?” The Global Warming Controversy • Is the earth warming? (Detection) • Are human activities responsible for this warming? (Attribution) • What should we do about it? (Policy) Was the mild weather of some recent winters a result of global warming? A Baseball Analogy • John Doe is a five-year veteran with career averages of .303 BA, 9 HR, 57 RBI. • He undertakes an off-season weighttraining program. • In his first at-bat of the new season, he hits a towering, 470-foot home run. • Was this monstrous blast a result of his off-season weight training? Possible Answers • “Of course not. One home run doesn’t prove anything. The pitcher may have thrown a batting practice fastball that anybody could crush.” • “I knew all his off-season work would pay off. He’s always been able to get his bat on the ball, he just needed some more strength. I bet he wins the home run title.” A Better Answer • Global warming would alter the probability of warm winters, but the internal variability of the climate system is a powerful factor in year-to-year climate variations. • A warm winter could be evidence of global warming, but only if it is part of a long-term trend. • Time will tell. No Snowy Winters Anymore? • Global warming would alter the probability of snowy winters, but the internal variability of the climate system (e.g., El Niño, North Atlantic Oscillation) is a powerful factor in year-to-year climate variations. If global warming is occurring, why was January so cold? Global Temperature Trends Source: NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies How can we project what the earth’s temperature will be 50 years from now if tomorrow’s weather forecast isn’t always right? 2 Xn+1 = a Xn - Xn X0 a Precision (decimal places) 2.200 3.930 2.200 3.940 2.210 3.930 2.20 3.93 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 3.807 0.468 1.620 3.742 0.703 2.269 3.769 0.607 2.017 3.859 0.274 1.002 2.934 2.922 2.924 2.971 2.879 3.055 2.704 3.342 1.999 3.880 0.233 0.864 2.658 3.408 1.813 3.856 3.853 0.297 1.079 3.076 2.627 3.423 1.735 3.808 0.465 1.611 3.736 0.725 2.324 3.732 3.68 0.92 2.77 3.21 2.31 3.74 0.71 2.29 3.76 0.64 2.11 3.84 0.35 1.25 Consider a prediction using the above equation of 3 3 3 2 the future state of the variable X, say the surface air temperature. The subscript n indicates the Initial n (Time Step) Control Physics Rounding Conditions time, say the 0 day, 2.200 and a 2.200 is a constant representing 2.210 2.20 3.806 3.828 3.801 3.81 the physics of12 the climate system. X for any day 0.472 0.429 0.490 0.46 1.506 1.686 1.60 is a times its 34value 1.632 on the previous day minus X 3.750 3.666 3.783 3.73 5 previous 0.675 1.004 0.556 0.75 squared on the day. 6 2.197 2.948 1.876 2.39 With such a simple equation, it should be possible to predict X indefinitely into the future. Right? 2 Xn+1 = a Xn - Xn X0 a Precision (decimal places) 2.200 3.930 2.200 3.940 2.210 3.930 2.20 3.93 3 3 3 2 n (Time Step) Control Physics 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2.200 3.806 0.472 1.632 3.750 0.675 2.197 3.807 0.468 1.620 3.742 0.703 2.269 3.769 0.607 2.017 3.859 0.274 1.002 2.934 2.922 2.200 3.828 0.429 1.506 3.666 1.004 2.948 2.924 2.971 2.879 3.055 2.704 3.342 1.999 3.880 0.233 0.864 2.658 3.408 1.813 3.856 Initial Conditions 2.210 3.801 0.490 1.686 3.783 0.556 1.876 3.853 0.297 1.079 3.076 2.627 3.423 1.735 3.808 0.465 1.611 3.736 0.725 2.324 3.732 Rounding 2.20 3.81 0.46 1.60 3.73 0.75 2.39 3.68 0.92 2.77 3.21 2.31 3.74 0.71 2.29 3.76 0.64 2.11 3.84 0.35 1.25 Let’s assume that a is exactly 3.930 and that a prediction with three decimal places is the exact solution. Then let’s consider three types of errors: imprecise knowledge of the physics of the climate system, imprecise initial conditions, and rounding due to limited computer resources. This example is from Edward Lorenz. 2 Xn+1 = a Xn - Xn X0 a Precision (decimal places) 2.200 3.930 2.200 3.940 2.210 3.930 2.20 3.93 3 3 3 2 n (Time Step) Control 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 Xn 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0 1 2 Control 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Xn+1 =Physics a Xn Conditions - Xn2 2.200 3.806 0.472 1.632 3.750 0.675 2.197 3.807 0.468 1.620 3.742 0.703 2.269 5 63.7697 0.607 2.017 3.859 0.274 Physics 1.002 2.934 2.922 Initial Rounding 2.200 2.210 3.828 3.801 0.429 0.490 1.506 1.686 3.666 3.783 1.004 0.556 2.948 1.876 2.924 3.853 2.971 0.297 2.879 1.079 3.055 3.076 2.704 2.627 3.342 3.423 1.999 1.73512 13 8 9 10 11 3.880 3.808 0.233 n 0.465 0.864 1.611 2.658 3.736 Initial Conditions 3.408 0.725 1.813 2.324 3.856 3.732 2.20 3.81 0.46 1.60 3.73 0.75 2.39 3.68 0.92 2.77 3.21 2.31 3.74 0.71 14 2.29 3.76 0.64 2.11 3.84 0.35 1.25 15 16 17 18 Rounding 19 20 Sensitivity to Initial Conditions Results from three different simulations, each starting from different initial conditions. Changes in atmospheric composition are identical. Global Warming Occurs in All Three The global warming signal eventually emerges in all three simulations, despite the pronounced internal variability that is evident. My Global Warming Forecast • The global climate will continue to warm, and as it does, any scientific controversy about the detection of climate change will end. • Controversy about the attribution of climate change will last longer than controversy about the detection of climate change. • The controversy will eventually shift toward the policy questions and remain for a long time. However… • Virtually all forecasts should be expressed as probability forecasts, and mine is no exception. • We still have a lot to learn about how the climate system works. • More work will be required to narrow the range of uncertainties about the future spatial and temporal evolution of climate.