Download Ethics and social responsibility

Chapter 3
Ethics and Social
Responsibility
© 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
3-1
Learning Objectives







Define ethics and understand the importance of ethical
behavior for organizations
Discuss four perspectives on ethics and arguments for
ethical relativism and universalism
Understand the efficiency and social responsibility
perspectives of corporate social responsibility
Know how ethics affect individual behavior in
organizations
Consider ways of scientifically studying organizational
ethics
Know methods for resolving cross-cultural ethical conflicts
Analyze your ethics and how they affect your
understanding of management and organizational
behavior.
© 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
3-2
Ethics
Moral standards, not governed by
law, that focus on the human
consequences of actions
© 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
3-3
Four Perspectives on Ethics

Descriptive Approach
Uses methods and theories of social science

Conceptual Approach
Focuses on the meaning of key ideas in ethics

Normative Approach
Involves constructing arguments in defense of
basic moral positions and prescribing correct
ethical behavior

Practical Approach
Involves developing a set of normative guidelines
for resolving conflicts of interest to improve
societal well-being
© 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
3-4
Relativism Vs. Universalism

Individual ethical relativism
No absolute principle of right and wrong,
good or bad, in any social situation

Cultural ethical relativism
What is right or wrong, good or bad,
depends on one's culture

Ethical universalism
Universal and objective ethical rules
located deep within a culture that also
apply across societies
© 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
3-5
The Social Responsibility of
Corporations

The Efficiency Perspective
The obligation of business is to
maximize profits for shareholders

The Social Responsibility
Perspective
Managers bear a fiduciary
relationship to stakeholders
© 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
3-6
Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral
Development

Stage 1 - Obedience and Punishment
Obedience to those in authority who have the
power to punish

Stage 2 - Individualism and Reciprocity
The greatest good for the individual person
making the decision

Stage 3 - Interpersonal Conformity
Expectations of others, including friends, family
members, and people in general
© 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
3-7
Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral
Development (cont.)

Stage 4 - Social System/Law and Order
Play one's role in the social system, do
one's duty, obey rules

Stage 5 - Social Contract
“The greatest good for the greatest
number"

Stage 6 - Universal Ethical Principles
Principles selected freely by a person and
that the individual is willing for everyone
to live by
© 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
3-8
Face and Ethical Behavior
Displays an individual’s
understanding of culturally defined
moral codes as they apply to and
maintain a particular social
situation
 Behavior that sustains the
definition of the situation supports
a person's face

© 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
3-9
Organizational Ethics

Internal Ethical Issues
Discrimination
 Safety
 Compensation
 Child Labor

© 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
3-10
Organizational Ethics (cont.)

Cross-Cultural Ethical Issues
Theft of Intellectual Property
 Bribery and Corruption
 Intentionally Selling Dangerous
Products
 Environmental Pollution
 Intentional Misrepresentation in
Negotiations

© 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
3-11
Studying Ethics
Social science methods
 Study comparing U.S. and U.K.



© 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Corporations vary in the emphasis
on different aspects of ethics and
how they manage them
Differences in perceptions of
corruption among countries
3-12
Resolving Cross-Cultural
Ethical Conflicts

U.S. approach


Global approach



© 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Transform ethics into laws
OECD views corruption in developing
countries to be particularly harmful to
their prospects for economic growth
Convention on Combating Bribery of
Foreign Public Officials in International
Business Transactions
Caux Round Table and the Conference
Board standards for global business
ethics and social responsibility
3-13
Resolving Cross-Cultural
Ethical Conflicts (cont.)

Codes of ethics
Codify behavior that is
unacceptable under certain
conditions
 Reduce ambiguity by specifying
appropriate behavior

© 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
3-14
Kohls and Buller’s Approaches
for Resolving Ethical Conflict

Avoiding
One party ignores or does not deal with the
conflict

Forcing
One party forces its will upon the other

Education-Persuasion
One party attempts to convert others to its
position through providing information,
reasoning, or appeals to emotion
© 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
3-15
Kohls and Buller’s Approaches
for Resolving Ethical Conflict
(cont.)

Infiltration
One party introduces its cultural values to
another society hoping that an appealing
idea will spread

Negotiation-Compromise
Both parties give up something to negotiate
a settlement

Accommodation
One party adapts to the ethics of the other

Collaboration-Problem Solving
Both parties work together to achieve a
mutually satisfying solution
© 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
3-16
Values: Core and Periphery
Leisure
Status
Customer satisfaction
Society
Friends
Knowledge
Job security
Honesty
Family
Worker safety
Human
Life
Health
Freedom
Trust
Peace
Property rights
Stockholder values
Living standards
Job satisfaction
Efficiency
Power
Ethics as a Competitive
Advantage in Global Business
Ethical capability related to
perceiving interdependence,
thinking ethically, responding
effectively
 Trust as a value among
multinational corporations

© 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
3-18
Convergence or Divergence?



© 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
A Bureaucratic
Ethic
International
Regulatory
Agencies
Diffusion of
Capitalism
Worldwide



Religious
Differences
Reassertion of
National and
Ethnic Cultures
Varying Economic
Systems and
Levels of
Development
3-19
Implications for Managers
Develop a Framework for Evaluating
Ethical Codes and Determining
Personal Ethics
 Understand Behaviors and Ethics of
Other Societies
 Consider Approaches to Resolving
Cross-Cultural Ethical Conflicts

© 2005 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
3-20