* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Ethics, Morals, Codes, and Laws
Philosophy of healthcare wikipedia , lookup
Morality throughout the Life Span wikipedia , lookup
Moral relativism wikipedia , lookup
Ethics of eating meat wikipedia , lookup
Bernard Williams wikipedia , lookup
Declaration of Helsinki wikipedia , lookup
Cosmopolitanism wikipedia , lookup
Neuroethics wikipedia , lookup
Ethical intuitionism wikipedia , lookup
J. Baird Callicott wikipedia , lookup
Alasdair MacIntyre wikipedia , lookup
Kantian ethics wikipedia , lookup
Secular morality wikipedia , lookup
Sexual ethics wikipedia , lookup
Primary care ethics wikipedia , lookup
Morality and religion wikipedia , lookup
Consequentialism wikipedia , lookup
Marketing ethics wikipedia , lookup
Virtue ethics wikipedia , lookup
Ethics of technology wikipedia , lookup
Thomas Hill Green wikipedia , lookup
Compliance and ethics program wikipedia , lookup
Organizational technoethics wikipedia , lookup
Accounting ethics wikipedia , lookup
Aristotelian ethics wikipedia , lookup
Medical ethics wikipedia , lookup
Arthur Schafer wikipedia , lookup
Clare Palmer wikipedia , lookup
Business ethics wikipedia , lookup
Ethics, Morals, Codes, and Laws COMU2020 Phil Graham Week 4 Regulation and Codes of Conduct Overview of Australian regulatory bodies ABA PRIA ADMA AAA “Codes of Conduct” Ethics How do we ask and answer ethical questions? What are “ethics”? How do we identify ethical issues? How do these differ from moral issues? Is there a difference? Ethics .. cntd Ethics and morals are traditionally treated as separate Ethics are different intellectual framework and morality is patterns of practice Ways of “seeing” and ways of doing are treated as separate BUT … Ethics are always applied Ethical frameworks Origins of ethics The ethical question: how ought we live? Normative ethics Virtue Ethics, Consequentialism, Deontology Normative frameworks Virtue ethics (A. Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics) ‘Golden mean’ is a balance among all the virtues. ‘arête (excellence or virtue) phronesis (practical or moral wisdom) and eudaimonia (usually translated as happiness or flourishing.)’ Hursthouse (2003). Virtue do not inhere in a single good act, but is a way of being that is infused throughout a person. It is also called ‘character ethics’. The dominant form of ethics throughout the West for many centuries. What questions can we ask within this framework? eg the un-virtuous character, defining virtue, rules …? “Intelligence and courage” Normative frameworks Deontology Rule-based ethics. Says we are duty bound to live according to rules, regardless of the consequences. Kant’s categorical imperative is an updated deontology: “Since by nature (according to Kant) the moral law is universal and impartial and rational, the categorical is a way of formulating the criteria by which any action can pass the test of universality, impartiality, and rationality. That is its only function” (Pecorino, 2002). Kant is saying that any ethical principle must be applicable in a universal way, in all circumstances. Deontology is opposed to consequentialism. What are its weaknesses? What questions can we ask? Normative frameworks Consequentialism A part of utilitarian ethics. The overarching principle is that the rightness of an act depends on its effects upon society. The utilitarian bent is that the rightness of an act is assessed in terms of “the greatest good for the greatest many”. The principle privileges the social over the individual. What are the flaws? What questions can be asked. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consequentialism/ Metaethics Study of where ethics arise from. Moral philosophy, metaphysics of ethics Relativism—individual, cultural, temporal (?) ‘Objective vs realist’ perspectives ‘Psychological issues’ ‘Altruism vs egoism’ ‘Male vs female morality’ Fieser (2003). Questions? Assumptions? Criticisms? Applied Ethics According to some, that branch of ethics that is concerned with contentious issues, such as bioethics, cloning, abortion, human rights – in short, all the kinds of issues that inform new policies. But all ethics are applied in a very real sense. Therefore social practice is the most appropriate framework for applied ethics (Isaacs and Massey, 1994). Social Practice Ethics An applied ethics that is based in social context, socialisation, and professional contexts. It focuses on the human nature of engagement, and how engagements are shaped by ways of seeing, being, and acting that we acquire through our engagements. It is fundamentally a communicative ethics that recognises persons are those who engage in social life, not, eg, institutions, philosophies, and so on, though these most certainly It recognises power imbalances, social justice, and most importantly, that ethics are inseparable from all social interaction The “ought” of social practice is oriented towards having sensibilities towards others as persons and being aware that what we do has direct effects on those persons. In turn, this has a direct effect on the overall ethical character of the social systems we inhabit. Communication plays an integral role, including media practices. Conclusion Laws and codes are neither ethics nor morality Ethics are an aspect of every human interaction Ethics are always applied The ethical is a dimension of human experience concerned with producing the good life. It is incumbent upon each of us as individuals to be aware of our role in the constitution of the ethical dimension of social life. References Aristotle, A. The Nicomachean Ethics. Penguin. Hursthouse, R. (2003). "Virtue Ethics", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2003 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2003/entries/ethics-virtue/ Pecorino, P. A. (2002). Ethical Traditions. http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/pecorip/SCCCWEB/ETEXTS/MEDICAL_ETHICS _TEXT/Chapter_2_Ethical_Traditions/Categorical_Imperative.htm Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2003). "Consequentialism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2003 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2003/entries/consequentialism/ Fieser, J. (2003). Ethics. http://www.iep.utm.edu/e/ethics.htm