Download Lecture 7-protein design lecture (Mike).cdx

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup

Protein design wikipedia , lookup

Homology modeling wikipedia , lookup

Protein wikipedia , lookup

Bimolecular fluorescence complementation wikipedia , lookup

Proteomics wikipedia , lookup

Protein purification wikipedia , lookup

Western blot wikipedia , lookup

Protein folding wikipedia , lookup

Protein mass spectrometry wikipedia , lookup

Protein domain wikipedia , lookup

Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of proteins wikipedia , lookup

Intrinsically disordered proteins wikipedia , lookup

Implicit solvation wikipedia , lookup

Cyclol wikipedia , lookup

Protein–protein interaction wikipedia , lookup

Protein structure prediction wikipedia , lookup

Circular dichroism wikipedia , lookup

Alpha helix wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Protein design
Methods to characterize the secondary structure
of proteins:
-NMR
-X-ray crystallography
-Circular Dichroism (CD)
Designing alpha helicesChou-Fasman Method-empirical technique for prediction of secondary structure in proteins
-the method relies on examining the relative abundancies of specific amino acids
within secondary structures of naturally occuring proteins
-results of these studies indicate that alpha helices are preferrentially occupied
by Leucine and Alanine
Circular Dichroism
-proteins absorb circularly polarized light unequally as a
result of AA chirality
-alpha helices display a double minima on a molar
ellipticity plot at 208nm and 222nm
Alpha helix rational design by Baldwin-attempt at ab initio alpha helix design based on salt bridge stabilization
i,i+4 salt bridge interactions
Molar ellipticity
( , deg cm2 dmol-1)
nm
O
Ac-YEAAAKEAAAKEAAAKA
NH2
-N terminal acetylation to avoid N terminal dipole point charge interaction
-Tyrosine used for UV absorption
-Acetamide to remove carboxylate interaction with helix dipole
200nm 208nm
Fraction alpha helical
f =
222nm
i
max222
8
kf
kf
kb
Hn
H2
H1
C
kb
kb
~ 10-2 -10-3 (nucleation parameter)
s= kf / kb = ~ 1-2
-1
= -40,000 deg cm dmol
Coiled form equilibrium
kf
i"
2
8
n-4
max =
n
i+4
obs222
i''+4
i'
i'+4
-in principle the i,i+4 salt bridges should
increase helix stability
-salt bridge interactions should line all
sides of the helix thereby decreasing
aggregation potential (right) and
increasing overall stability
-designed sequence was 75% helical at pH 7
-in principle, lowering pH should destabilize helix by protonating carboxylate groups
to discourage salt bridge formation
-however, the helix was highly helical at pH 2
-in general, salt bridges do not have large effects on helix stability but do frequently
have important roles in assuring the correct helical orientation
-in this case, stability was largely derived from helical propensity of alanine
Methods to stabilize helical structures by chemical
modification of i, i+4 interactions (peptide stapling)
Amide formation-
H
N
O
Intermolecular interactions to stabilize helices
-a peptide with i , i+1 alternating hydrophobic
and hydrophilic residues should form a beta
sheet like structure when exposed to a
hydrophobic surface or hydrophilic surface
(e.g. air-water interface).
= hydrophobic side chain
=hydrophilic side chain
Hydrophobic surface
Disulfide linkage formation with extended Cysteine
D,L pairs
S
S
-a peptide with alternating periodicity of hydrobic and hydrophilic residues in the
i, i+4 configuration (as below) should form an amphipathic helix which has its
hydrophobic side bound to a hydrophobic surface
i, i+4 interaction
Metal coordination with histidinesHydrophobic surface
M2+
Im
Im
Amphiphilic helix-
Hydrophilic face
Hydrophobic face
Example of helix stabilized by a hydrophobic surfaceMelittin-protein found in bee venom
-helicity of peptide increases upon binding to plasma membranes
-surface-bound molecules induce lysis of erythrocytes
i, i+4 hydrophobic interactions resemble ampiphilic helix
O
NH2-G-I-G-A-V-L-K-V-L-T-T-G-L-P-A-L-I-S-W-I-K-R-K-R-Q-Q-
NH2
-highly cation rich sequence leads to membrane lysis
Design of synthetic amphiphilic bee venom
-synthetic venom is 2.5x more active at cell lysis
Coiled coils - Stabilizing a helix with another helix
- Coiled coils are frequently found in natural proteins
(e.g. myosin, tropomyosin, GCN4, GP41, etc.)
- Left-handed super helix composed of repeating
right-handed alpha helices composed of heptad
repeats
Talbot and hodges - Design of synthetic coiled coils
Heptad repeat (HR) : Leu, Glu, Ala, Leu, Glu, Gly, Lys
Interhelical angle 10°
General configuration of alpha helix heptad repeats
salt bridge interactions
hydrophobic
residues
(HR)n=1,2 - no helical structure
(HR)n=4,5 - dimers formed
- more stable than tropomyosin
(HR)n=5
-more stable at pH 2.5 than at pH 7
-increasing ionic strength increases stability
How to determine if helix is parallel or anti-parallel
hydrophobic
core
-insert a cysteine in first heptad repeat to form an interhelical disulfide
HR = KLEALEG
HR' = KCAELEG
S S
peptide seq = HR'(HR)5
A & D = hydrophobic side chains (Met,Ile, Leu)
B,C & F = hydrophilic side chains (Ser, Gln, etc.)
E & G = salt bridge forming side chains (Lys, Glu, Asp)
-salt bridges are only slightly stabilizing but frequently
lead to selective dimer orientation
-therefore the +, - configuration is highly preferred over
the +,+ configuration
-crosslinking indicates
helices are parallel
-In general, coiled coils are found in the parallel conformation
DeGrado - Design of 4 helix bundles
4 helix bundles
-4 helices connected by loops
-composed of repeating helix-loop-helix motif
salt
bridge
A,D = hydrophobic side chains
All else hydrophilic side chains
1-L- 2-L- 3-L- 4
Helix - GELEELLKKLKGLLKG
-frequently found in nature (e.g. hGH, GCSF)
-helices diverge due to larger interhelical angle
Glycine used to break helix
hydrophobic
core
20°
Loop - Pro, Arg, Arg
Loops composed of Pro and Arg to discourage
interpeptide loop-loop interactions. Proline
introduces kinks after each helix, and Arginine's
charge discourages loop-loop interactions.
restricted helical
segment
O
1
- Ac-helix-
2
- Ac-helix-loop-helix-
NH2
O
NH2
O
4
bundle assembly from
G = -22 kcal/mol
1
- Ac-helix-loop-helix-loop-helix-loop-helix-
bundle assembly from
G= -13 kcal/mol
2
NH2
bundle assembly from
G= -15.4 kcal/mol
4
Additional methods to assess secondary structureHydrogen-Deuterium exchange-measurable rate of exchange of hydrogen for
deuterium in protein backbone due to relative
acidity of amide NH
-amides exposed to solvent exchange faster than
those buried in protein core
O
D2O
O
DeGrado - Design of 4 helix bundles continued
-applying NMR, HD exchange, and ANS binding to the above designed
4 helix bundle, it was found that the core of the protein was a molten
globule (not well packed, resembling oil)
-attempts to stabilize a folded state would require that the core be better
packed.
-one such attempt uses Histidine residues coordinating a zinc cation to lock
the conformation of the protein
N
D
N
H
Zn2+
ANS Binding
-1- Anilino-naphthalene-8-sulfonic acid, ANS
-Fluorescent hydrophobic compound binds to
hydrophobic surfaces of proteins
NH
Im
Im
A,D= Leu
E= Lys
B,F= Lys, Glu
C,G= His
SO3H
no Zn2+
+ Zn2+
G= -2.5 kcal/mol
G= -10.3 kcal/mol
-NMR is highly dispersed
-Slow HD exchange
-Still binds ANS
NMR-Rapid exchange leads to low dispersity in NMR
(peak averaging)
Im
Im
Zn2+