Download Love without boundaries, at the cost of truth, can wreak incredible

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

The Satanic Verses controversy wikipedia , lookup

Sources of sharia wikipedia , lookup

LGBT in Islam wikipedia , lookup

Islamism wikipedia , lookup

Islamic terrorism wikipedia , lookup

Fiqh wikipedia , lookup

Salafi jihadism wikipedia , lookup

Islam and Mormonism wikipedia , lookup

Love Jihad wikipedia , lookup

Islam and secularism wikipedia , lookup

International reactions to Fitna wikipedia , lookup

Muslim world wikipedia , lookup

Islamic ethics wikipedia , lookup

Islam in Pakistan wikipedia , lookup

Islam and war wikipedia , lookup

Islam and Sikhism wikipedia , lookup

Islamic missionary activity wikipedia , lookup

Islam in Egypt wikipedia , lookup

Islamofascism wikipedia , lookup

Islam and violence wikipedia , lookup

Criticism of Islamism wikipedia , lookup

Liberalism and progressivism within Islam wikipedia , lookup

Islamic democracy wikipedia , lookup

Dhimmi wikipedia , lookup

War against Islam wikipedia , lookup

Islamic Golden Age wikipedia , lookup

Schools of Islamic theology wikipedia , lookup

Islam in Bangladesh wikipedia , lookup

Censorship in Islamic societies wikipedia , lookup

Political aspects of Islam wikipedia , lookup

Islam and modernity wikipedia , lookup

Islamic culture wikipedia , lookup

Islamic schools and branches wikipedia , lookup

Islam and other religions wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Friday, September 26, 2014
Muslims Need Truth and Love
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
By Mark Durie
This article first appeared in Eternity Magazine.
The past few weeks have been hard ones for Australians, not least for Australian Muslims.
Various alleged plots by Islamic State supporters to slaughter Australians has Islam in the
news. Even as I write, five out of ten of the “most popular” articles on The Australian’s
website are about Islamic jihad and national security.
What are ordinary Australians to make of conspiracy theories aired by Muslims on the ABC’s
Q&A program, implying that recent police raids were staged as a cynical act to manipulate
public opinion? Are Muslims being unfairly victimized by all these security measures?
How are we to evaluate Senator Jacqui Lambie’s claim that sharia law “obviously involves
terrorism”? Or the Prime Minister’s decision to mobilise Australia troops against the Islamic
State?
What about the Islamic State’s grandiose claim that “We will conquer your Rome, break your
crosses, and enslave your women.” Or Mr Abott’s declaration that the balance between
freedom and security needs to be adjusted in favour of greater security and less freedom?
Earlier this month, an 18-year-old Melbourne man, Numan Haider, was shot dead by police
after he stabbed two officers outside a suburban police station. At the time of writing, news
was breaking that authorities believed he intended to behead a police officer and post the
photos online.
Prison officers in Goulburn jail have struggled to contain the worst riot in ten years, during
which rampaging prisoners were heard to be crying “Allahu Akbar.”
A Christian woman, who works in a church close by an Islamic centre has asked her
employer to install security measures to protect her and others at the church. Someone else, a
convert from Islam to Christianity, reports that his personal sense of being under threat has
risen, because he feels that people he knew from his earlier life as radical Muslim are more
likely to be activated to violence after the successes of the Islamic State and their global call
to arms. Are such responses reasonable? Or are they Islamophobic?
Many young Muslims have been using the hashtag #NotInMyName on social media. Many
are insisting that IS does not speak for them: as Anne Aly put it “This isn’t in my name, this
isn’t what Islam is about, I am against it and they don’t have my allegiance, they don’t have
my support.” How then can we know the truth about Islam?
What is a Christian response to all this? How can we find our way through these crises: does
protecting national security mean we risk losing some part of our soul?
A truly Christian response to the multi-faceted challenge of “Muslims behaving badly” must
embrace both truth and love in equal measure.
Truth will acknowledge that the Islamic State ideologues do claim to speak for Islam, and
that they justify their actions from the Koran and Muhammad’s example. Truth will
acknowledge that IS has recruited tens of thousands of Muslims to fight for their cause, but
apparently not a single Christian, Jew or Buddhist. As Brother Rachid, a Moroccan convert
to Christianity put it in a widely distributed letter to President Obama “ISIL’s 10,000
members are all Muslims. None of them are from any other religion. They come from
different countries and have one common denominator: Islam.”
Truth will recognise that the self-declared ‘caliph’ of the Islamic State, Abu Bakr AlBaghdadi has a PhD in Islamic studies: he is not ignorant of Islam. It will also acknowledge
that the very idea of a caliphate – a supra-national Islamic state – is a religious ideal widely
shared by many Muslims. However this ideal bodes ill for any non-Muslims who fall under
its power.
Truth will accept that there is a price to pay for increased security. Since 9/11 we wait in
line for queues at airports because of the actions of jihadis. As the level of threat increases, it
is inevitable that our need for increased security measures will only grow.
Truth will also acknowledge that many Muslims vehemently reject the methods and goals of
the Islamic state, and that the #NotInMyName hashtag campaign is genuine and heartfelt.
But this begs the question: “What is the real Islam?”
Love on the other hand, will reject stereotyping Muslims or denigrating them with labels of
hatred and suspicion. Love will reach out a hand of friendship. It will show grace instead of
fear, kindness instead of rejection or indifference. Love demands that we emphatically reject
speech which dehumanizes Muslims or pins labels on them. It will honour those Muslims
who reject the Islamic State’s ideology. Love will find new friends even on the blackest of
days.
It can be tempting at times such as this to chose between love and truth. Love without truth
can be gullible, opening the door to many threats. I am reminded of a Persian fable:
A Fox met a Heron and said “My, what lovely feathers you have, dear Heron. May I have
one?” The Heron obliged. The next day they met again. Day after day the Fox’s question
was repeated, and day after the day the Heron’s response was the same. One day they met for
the last time. The Heron had been plucked bar, so the Fox said “Heron, you look delicious.
Now I will eat you.” And he did.
Love without boundaries, at the cost of truth, can wreak incredible havoc on innocent lives.
In the end such love is false, and will prove profoundly unloving. Genuine love does not fear
the truth. True love will not deny or obscure the damaging effect of sharia law upon
Christians living in Islamic societies, or the atrocities being perpetrated in the name of Islam
against Christians and others by the “caliphate”. It will be mindful of the words in Proverbs
24:11-12: “Rescue those being led away to death; hold back those staggering towards
slaughter. If you say ‘But we knew nothing about this,’ does not he who weight the heart
perceive it.’ ”
On the other hand, truth without love can become merciless, excluding and cruel. Love
counts the cost of aggressive argument and rejecting rhetoric. It takes pains to understand the
other; it seeks to see the world through another’s eyes and to hear words through another’s
ears. Love nurtures life-giving relationships. It reaches out to enmity and answers it with
grace. It does not jump to conclusions, but is patient and careful. It delights to partner with
and nurture truth and does not fear it.
Professor Peter Leahy, former Army Chief and leading defence strategist has warned
Australians that we face a war that is ‘likely to last for the rest of the century’. If he is right,
then the troubles we are facing now as a nation are only the beginning, and dealing with the
potential horrors ahead will stretch us to our humanity to its limits.
As Christians we are called to be salt and light in the world. If this means anything, it means
staying true to Jesus’s two great statements “the truth shall set you free” and “love your
enemies, and do good to those who hate you”. This is no time for circling the wagons and
cowering behind them in fear.
This is a time for Australians to reach out to our Muslim neighbours, to show and receive
grace. In the present difficulties many Muslims will agree with Melbourne lawyer Shabnum
Cassim who stated that “the every-day Muslim just wants to get on with their day.” As a
nation the fact that we need to respond realistically to genuine threats to our peace, and seek a
true understanding of the religious beliefs that generate these threats, should not deflect us
from the everyday task of getting on with our lives together, graciously, inclusively and
generously.
Mark Durie is the pastor of an Anglican church, a Shillman-Ginsburg Writing Fellow at the
Middle East Forum, and Founder of the Institute for Spiritual Awareness. His book The
Third Choice explains the implications for Christians of living under Islamic rule.