Download ppt

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Renormalization wikipedia , lookup

Max Born wikipedia , lookup

Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup

Orchestrated objective reduction wikipedia , lookup

Ensemble interpretation wikipedia , lookup

Quantum fiction wikipedia , lookup

Quantum decoherence wikipedia , lookup

Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup

Quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Paul Dirac wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup

Quantum computing wikipedia , lookup

Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup

Wave function wikipedia , lookup

Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia , lookup

Identical particles wikipedia , lookup

Quantum machine learning wikipedia , lookup

Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup

Matter wave wikipedia , lookup

Dirac equation wikipedia , lookup

Many-worlds interpretation wikipedia , lookup

Quantum entanglement wikipedia , lookup

Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup

Quantum teleportation wikipedia , lookup

Quantum key distribution wikipedia , lookup

Bra–ket notation wikipedia , lookup

Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup

Quantum group wikipedia , lookup

Measurement in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Density matrix wikipedia , lookup

Coherent states wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Propagator wikipedia , lookup

Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup

Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup

History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup

Dirac bracket wikipedia , lookup

EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup

T-symmetry wikipedia , lookup

Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup

Canonical quantum gravity wikipedia , lookup

Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Quantum state wikipedia , lookup

Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup

Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Dirac’s Quantum Condition
Classical mechanics relates two conjugated variables by using the Poisson bracket.
Dirac’s quantum condition extends this relation to quantum mechanical operators:
The commutator between two operators must relate to the classical Poisson bracket
between the two corresponding functions through the following relationship
ˆ

i  f  g  f , gˆ 


HW #2
Operators which follow Dirac’s quantum condition form an internally consistent set,
though there may be more than one set (different representations)
for those of you who do not remember (or have not seen) the Poisson bracket...
for f  f  x, p  and g  g  x, p 
 f , g 
f g g f

x p x p
Poisson bracket and commutator
For example, for f(x,p)= x and g(x,p)=p the Poisson bracket is
 x, p 
x p p x

 1 0  1
x p x p
to construct the quantum mechanical operators related to position and momentum,
 xˆ, pˆ   i
choosing
x  xˆ
and
p  -i
x, p   xˆ, pˆ   i

x
we can see that it works by applying the commutator to a F
x F
 F
 
  
  
i
 xˆ, pˆ  F   x  i    i  x  F  i x
x  
x  
x
x
 

 F
 F 
 F
 F
 i x
i  F  x
i x
i F
  i x
x
x 
x
x

  xˆ, pˆ   i
i F

Variance
Finally, we can connect everything we know about commutators and the Dirac’s
quantum condition and obtain the most fundamental property of the Quantum World
For a state that is not an eigenstate of Aˆ , we get various possible results everytime
we measure the observable Aˆ in identical systems.
A measurement of the spread in the set of results
Ai  A is the deviation from the average.
individual
measurements
expectation
value
to avoid de cancellation of deviations (some are +, some are -), we use
A
VARIANCE   A 
2
 A2 
A A

 A2  A
2


A

2
A2  A
2
 2A A
(the average of the square of the deviations)

 A2  A
2
2 A A
2
and the STANDARD DEVIATION   A 
 A
2
Uncertainty Principle
For the product of the standard deviations of two properties of a quantum mechanical
system whose state wavefunction is y it can be shown (you’ll do it in your HW2)
1 ˆ ˆ
A  B   A, B 
2
if  Aˆ , Bˆ   0,
 A  B product can be zero  both standard deviations can be zero simultaneously.
There is a set of functions that are simultaneous eigenfunctions of both operators,
 the two observables can be obtained simultaneously with full precision
 an eigenvalue can be obtained in both observable measurements
if  Aˆ , Bˆ 
the A  B product cannot be zero  both  cannot be zero simultaneously.
 the two observables cannot be obtained simultaneously with full precision
The Born Interpretation
The explicit function representing a state of a system in a particular coordinate
system and in a particular representation is called WAVEFUNCTION: 
Born:
The probability of finding the particle in the volume d at the point in space r is
y  r  d
2
Remember? Probability of an event is given by |f|2 where f is a complex number
(probability amplitude)
Born equated the y  r  with an amplitude, and thus the equivalent intensity is
y  r   probability density
2
y  r  has no direct physical meaning, it can have any value
y r 
2
describes a physical property, and it is always
y  r   y *  r y  r 
2

and +
, , ,  
the probability of finding the particle in one point in space at a given time
y r ,t 
2
Normalization: The probability of finding the particle SOMEWHERE in space and
time MUST be =1
  y  r , t  dx dy dz dt
2

d
y *  r , t y  r , t  dx dy dz dt
 1
d
Wavefunctions which obey the eigenvalue equation are called eigenfunctions
Pˆ
 r 
eigenfunction
and
p
 r 
eigenfunction
represent wavefunctions, the scalar product of bras and kets
must be the same as the scalar product of the wavefunctions, that is
A B  y *A y B d
for eigenfunctions we have
a a    a  a d  1 (normalization)
a b    a b d  0 (orthogonality)