* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Turning consumers on or off
Bayesian inference in marketing wikipedia , lookup
Brand loyalty wikipedia , lookup
Elaboration likelihood model wikipedia , lookup
Product planning wikipedia , lookup
Targeted advertising wikipedia , lookup
Internal communications wikipedia , lookup
Visual merchandising wikipedia , lookup
Social media marketing wikipedia , lookup
Affiliate marketing wikipedia , lookup
Ambush marketing wikipedia , lookup
Food marketing wikipedia , lookup
Customer engagement wikipedia , lookup
Marketing strategy wikipedia , lookup
Marketing research wikipedia , lookup
Marketing plan wikipedia , lookup
Target audience wikipedia , lookup
Guerrilla marketing wikipedia , lookup
Multi-level marketing wikipedia , lookup
Consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup
Marketing mix modeling wikipedia , lookup
Digital marketing wikipedia , lookup
Viral marketing wikipedia , lookup
Youth marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing communications wikipedia , lookup
Target market wikipedia , lookup
Multicultural marketing wikipedia , lookup
Global marketing wikipedia , lookup
Street marketing wikipedia , lookup
Neuromarketing wikipedia , lookup
Integrated marketing communications wikipedia , lookup
Green marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing channel wikipedia , lookup
Advertising campaign wikipedia , lookup
Channelling The Message Striking the marketing balance to win the ‘two-minute window’ of consumer attention A Pitney Bowes Report – Summer 2009 The two classic challenges that face every marketing department – what’s the best route to the customer, and how can I get budgets approved - have intensified this year. On the one hand, the number of routes to the consumer continues to proliferate, making marketing decisions more involved than ever. On the other, there is fierce pressure on marketing communications to deliver in the current financial climate. To make matters worse, the ultimate object of all this agonising – the consumer – is being inundated with unprecedented levels of marketing messages and information. Analysts estimate that the typical consumer is exposed to between 1-2,000 promotional messages every day. This is easy to believe when one considers the sheer variety of methods used to attract consumer attention. Mail, email, web, SMS, TV and radio are the obvious channels. But marketing is everywhere – flashed up on the screen as you withdraw cash, under your feet as you walk through the concourse, on the side of your takeaway coffee cup. You push, we pull As the demands on attention have increased, consumers have taken more control over what information reaches them, and what doesn’t. But far from rejecting all marketing approaches, the consumer is simply more resistant to those that are badly thought-out. Amidst the deluge of information pushed their way it is the information that the consumer chooses to pull towards them that counts. With so many routes to the customer or prospect, businesses today are understandably looking for any guidance that will inform their marketing choices. This is particularly the case for decisions around email and direct mail. These techniques are prevalent simply because they are quick and easy to adopt and enable marketers to reach a broad audience for relatively little expense. What’s more, at a time when every marketing message must be seen to deliver return on investment, both email marketing and direct mail are measurable. This latter point is critical if budgets are to be approved. Against this backdrop, Pitney Bowes surveyed European consumers 1 across three key markets – the UK, France and Germany – to gauge their attitudes towards direct mail and email. This new research is especially timely given the proliferation of new marketing channels and the effect of the economic downturn on consumer attitudes. It is perhaps these similarities between the two techniques that all too often drive businesses to adopt an either/or strategy rather than developing a marketing model that plays to the strengths of each. But can both work together, or is today’s consumer leaning heavily in favour of one channel? Research results –The two-minute window Pitney Bowes asked consumers how long, on average, they spend looking at different types of direct marketing materials. How long do you look at the following types of document? A piece of direct mail that is well targeted and personalised to your profile and preferences A marketing email from a company you already buy from A marketing email from a company you have never bought from Minutes 1.94 1.89 1.30 Immediately, one factor becomes clear. On average, both email and mail marketing – if tailored to the consumer – can capture the consumer’s attention for a period of almost two minutes. At first glance, this may not seem like a particularly significant time span. But amongst the clamour of 1-2,000 additional messages each day, this ‘two-minute window’ of consumer reflection takes on increasing value. The results provide evidence of the fact that, if professionally produced, direct mail and email marketing are very much on a par. This parity may well come as a wake-up call, both to traditionalists that are untrusting of digital media, and also to a new generation of marketers who feel that direct mail no longer has the appeal of the latest digital techniques. Of course, given the fact that mail campaigns are more expensive to produce than their email counterparts, some observers may think – ‘why not stick to email if it gains the same level of consumer attention?’. Other results from the survey suggest why such a mindset misses the bigger picture. 1 Over three-quarters (76%) of consumers surveyed found direct email more intrusive than direct mail Conversely, this leaves a quarter of consumers (24%) believing direct email to be a perfectly acceptable marketing channel 1000 consumers surveyed in each of France, UK, Germany. Sample balanced by age, location, gender. A quarter of people stated that, in the current downturn, properly personalised direct mail is twice as likely as generic mailings to get them to respond. Almost two-thirds (62%) of consumers find personalised direct mail and direct response advertising the most effective advertising technique to make them visit a company’s website for the first time and seriously consider a purchase. These additional findings demonstrate that to focus all marketing effort on the email channel would be to ignore strong consumer endorsement for direct mail. At a time when marketers are looking for every message to deliver ROI, simply adopting email marketing because it’s less expensive is false economy. True return on investment comes from making different channels work together. This is emphasised by the final bullet point, where direct mail is shown to be one of the most effective methods of driving consumers to a website – not merely to browse, but to purchase. Targeting and personalisation Overriding all of these findings is one glaringly obvious fact. If messages are not accurately targeted to the consumer they stand little or no chance of success. In short, knowing the customer – i.e, spending time and resource on data collection and analysis and building customer profiles - is the critical component of successful direct marketing. Without this solid platform in place, companies focusing time and money on message creativity are wasting effort. Style over content will not fool the consumer. Integrating multiple channels Pitney Bowes’ European research found that 76% of people find direct email more intrusive than direct mail. Nevertheless, the research also identified a solid base of people (24%) who find direct email perfectly acceptable and non-intrusive. By confining themselves to one distribution channel, companies risk alienating significant customer segments. They also miss the opportunity to combine different channels – using direct mail to persuade consumers to visit their website and/or online shop or running integrated promotional campaigns via both email and mail for a more dynamic impact. Here again, the key to integrating channels successfully is knowledge. Knowledge of the consumer – through data collection and analysis - and knowledge of how to make different channels work together. Two aspects are key: consistency of message, and having the correct processes in place. First, consistency of message. Naturally, different consumer segments respond to different offers, but underlying this must come brand recognition and message recollection. Tone of voice, style and brand messages must be consistent across different media in order to maximise those. Secondly, processes. A company must have the processes in place to handle responses and enquiries at the right time and in the right manner. When using multiple-communication channels, the process has to be able to handle responses and enquiries from each touch-point used – whether it’s mail, email, web or phone. It’s important to recognise too that the speed or style of response required may vary for different channels – consumers responding to email or web channels may expect 24/7 responses or service, for example, whereas respondents to mail communications may not. So, businesses adopting digital marketing for the first time must be prepared to deal with these heightened customer service expectations. Conclusion Today’s consumer is inundated with marketing messages. The battle for consumer attention gets evermore furious as new channel choices are continuously added to the mix. Social networking is just the latest example, with sites such as Twitter and Facebook providing more routes to the consumer – and more confusion for marketers. In the current business climate, marketers are under real pressure to ensure that any decisions taken pay immediate dividends. Email marketing and direct mail remain popular marketing choices due to the fact that both are relatively simple to adopt, both have the scope to reach a large audience and, crucially, the results from both can be accurately measured. Debate has raged for several years about the relative merits of each technique, with supporters in each camp reluctant to acknowledge the potential benefits of the other. This latest Pitney Bowes report shows such a stance to be blinkered. Consumers across the UK, France and Germany are willing to give targeted direct mail and email marketing messages nearly two minutes of their time. This ‘two-minute window’ of attention is significant when one considers the sheer abundance of messages that are aimed each day at the consumer. Marketers should take note of the consumer endorsement of direct mail – particularly the statistic that shows mail as a hugely effective tool for driving customers to make web purchases. But equally, the survey shows that a quarter of all consumers are now comfortable receiving email marketing messages – a considerable audience. There is real value to be gained from embracing multiple marketing methods – as long as any messages are well targeted and display intelligence. With so much channel choice and so much hype around take-up of new marketing platforms these findings provide marketers with an accurate portrait of the European consumer in 2009. The message to businesses of every size is clear. Know your audience, work hard to understand your customers’ preferences and invest in marketing activity that truly engages your audience. Despite being bombarded with messages on a daily basis, today’s consumer remains open to marketing that speaks their language and fits their lifestyle. You have two minutes to make an impression. Your time starts now… Ends