* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Lagrangian and Hamiltonian forms of the Electromagnetic Interaction
Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup
Perturbation theory wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup
Wave function wikipedia , lookup
Perturbation theory (quantum mechanics) wikipedia , lookup
Matter wave wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup
Two-body Dirac equations wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Dirac equation wikipedia , lookup
Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup
Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Noether's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Lagrangian and Hamiltonian forms of the Electromagnetic Interaction (version 2.0 : Nov 20, 2008) Quantum mechanics is formulated in terms of of energies and potentials rather than forces, and the Hamiltonian formulation provides the basic framework. This describes electromagnetic interactions in terms of the vector and scalar potential rather than the E and B fields. I. The Lagrangian for electromagnetic interactions. The electromagnetic Lagrangian is given by e L 12 m 2 e A (1.1) c which leads to the correct equations of motion in the usual way. [I’m using “ e ” as the symbol for charge, rather than q, to avoid confusion with generalized coordinates. The charge of the electron is e .] Hamilton’s equations for this Lagrangian become (using implied summation for repeated indices): d L L 0 dt q j q j (1.2) d e e m j Aj e j j k Ak 0 dt c c m d j dt e j e dAj e j k Ak c dt c (1.3) But since A j in this equation is a function of the particle’s position, the total time derivative of A j depends on the particle’s velocity in addition to any explicit time dependence in the field. Thus dAj Aj Aj xk Aj k k Aj dt t xk t t Substituting this into (1.3) gives m d j 1 Aj e e j j k Ak k k Aj dt c t c (1.4) (1.5) Using the “BAC-CAB” rule, A ( B C ) B( A C ) ( B A)C , this becomes d 1 Aj (1.6) m j e j e A j dt c t Since the expressions in brackets are just the EM fields expressed in terms of and A , we have derived the force equation from the Lagrangian: m d e eE B dt c (1.7) [Note added in proof: The derivation of (1.6) from (1.5) can be done somewhat more rigorously using the definition of cross-product, 3 A B Ai B j ijk kˆ Ai B j ijk kˆ (implied summation on repeated indices) (1.8) i , j 1 This also provides a good exercise in managing indices. It’s easier if we work backwards from the third term in (1.6): A i A ijk kˆ i A j ijk kˆ j A A (1.9) i j ijk kˆ i j ijk kˆ x x A A i i k ijk kˆ xk xi Note that in the last line, the first term corresponds to k , i and the second term to i, k . These are the only possibilities, since ijk must all be different (otherwise ijk 0 ). The student should convince himself/herself that the last line of (1.9) is indeed identical to the last term in (1.6); this may not be immediately obvious because the dummy indices are all different.] 2. The Hamiltonian for electromagnetic interactions. In the Hamiltonian formulation, we define the Hamiltonian in terms of the Lagranian by H pi qi L where the canonical momentum pi is defined by L pi qi (2.1) (2.2) and all quantities in (2.1) are expressed in terms of the conjugate variables qi , pi . In the case of the electromagnetic Lagrangian, this leads to L e pi mi Ai (2.3) i c Note that pi is different from mi , but that is not really surprising. When the coordinate system is not Cartesian, the canonical momentum may not have the dimensions of a linear momentum (e.g., angular momentum). And when velocity-dependent potentials are used, then even in Cartesian coordinates the canonical momentum may be different from the usual mechanical momentum. The Hamiltonian can be derived from the Lagrangian following the usual prescription: L H qj L qj pj L q j (2.4) H is always expressed a function of the generalized momenta p j , so we must replace j in L with p j using (2.3). In the case of the electromagnetic Hamiltonian, this yields 2 1 e pk Ak e c k 2m The equations of motion can be derived in the usual way: 2 H 1 e 1 e xj p A k k pk Ak jk p j p j 2m c m c 1 e p j Aj m c which is equivalent to (2.3), and 2 H 1 e pj pk Ak e x j x j 2m c H 1 e e Ak pk Ak m c c x j e x j (2.5) (2.6) (2.7) To put this into the more familiar form of equation (1.7), we need to convert from p j back to j using (2.3) [on both sides of the equation, and being careful of indices] : m d j dt m e A 1 mk k m c x j e x j e Ak e dAj k c x c dt j e x j e dAj c dt d j dt 1 A x Aj e Ak e j k e k t xk c x j x j c t 1 Aj e Ak Aj e k c t x j c x j xk which is the same as equation (1.5). (2.8)