* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Classical Mechanics and Minimal Action
Photon polarization wikipedia , lookup
Perturbation theory (quantum mechanics) wikipedia , lookup
Matrix mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Old quantum theory wikipedia , lookup
Internal energy wikipedia , lookup
Quantum chaos wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Kinetic energy wikipedia , lookup
Nuclear structure wikipedia , lookup
Hunting oscillation wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Work (physics) wikipedia , lookup
Classical central-force problem wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Heat transfer physics wikipedia , lookup
Classical mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Equations of motion wikipedia , lookup
Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup
First class constraint wikipedia , lookup
Noether's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Lagrangian mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Dirac bracket wikipedia , lookup
Routhian mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Classical Mechanics and Minimal Action August Geelmuyden University of Oslo I. The Action A big breakthrough in the formal description of physical processes is the Lagrange-Hamilton formalism of Classical mechanics. The main idea is that for any system with d dimensions of freedom {qi }, the evolution of the system from time tA to time tB is such that the quantity Z tB L(q, q̇, t)dt S= tA is minimal. The quantity S is referred to as the Action and the integrand L(q, q̇, t) the Lagrangian. The Lagrangian of a physical system is defined to be the difference between kinetic- and potential energy. That is, if T is the kinetic energy and V the potential energy, then L = T − V. The principle that S is minimal for the path of any classical system, conveniently dubbed the principle of least Action, should be considered more fundamental than the Newtonian prescription of nature. To see this, we first have to find the differential equation that describes the path of minimal action from time tA to time tB . This is done by considering a tiny change in the path resulting from a variation δqi of the i’th coordinate of the system. Such a variation in path leads to a variation in action given by Z Z ∂L ∂L d ∂L ∂L δqi + δq̇i dt = δqi + δqi dt δS = ∂qi ∂q̇i ∂qi ∂q̇i dt Z ∂L d ∂L d ∂L = δqi + δqi − δqi dt ∂qi dt ∂q̇i dt ∂q̇i tB Z ∂L d ∂L ∂L δqi + − δqi dt. = ∂q̇i ∂qi dt ∂q̇i tA Keeping the configuration of the system fixed at the endpoints means that δqi (tA ) = δqi (tB ) = 0 so that Z ∂L d ∂L δS = − δqi dt. ∂qi dt ∂q̇i In order for S to be at a minimum, we must have δS = 0 which implies the relation d ∂L ∂L − = 0, ∂qi dt ∂q̇i hereby referred to as the Euler-Lagrange equation. Considering a point mass m, described by three spatial coordinates r = (x, y, z), which is subject to a potential V(r), the Lagrangian can be expressed as 1 L(r, ṙ) = mṙ2 − V(r). 2 1 The Euler-Lagrange equation then reads d dV mx˙i = − , dt dxi which is Newton’s second law of motion for a point particle subjected to conservative forces only. II. Lagrange-Hamilton formalism Since L is of crucial importance, we might benefit from considering how it changes in time. First note that ∂L dL X ∂L ∂L ∂L X ∂L d ∂L d ∂L = = q˙i + q˙i + q¨i + q˙i + q˙i − dt ∂qi ∂q˙i ∂t ∂qi dt ∂q˙i dt ∂q˙i ∂t i i X X ∂L d ∂L d ∂L ∂L + = + q˙i + q̇i − dt ∂q˙i ∂qi dt ∂q˙i ∂t i i | {z } 0 d X ∂L ∂L = q˙i + . dt ∂q˙i ∂t i This means that the Legendre transform X ∂L H(q, p) = q˙i − L, ∂q˙i i where pi = ∂L ∂q̇i , referred to as the Hamiltonian, satisfies dH ∂L =− . dt ∂t That is, if L does not explicitly depend on time, then the Hamiltonian of the system is conserved. Now note that if the constraints of the system is time independent, then the physical velocities ṙk satisfies X ∂rk ṙk = qi . ∂qi i P 1 2 Hence, since the kinetic energy is always given by T = k 2 mṙk , the kinetic energy must be quadratic in generalized velocity q̇. Hence we can write L= X gij (q)q̇i q̇j − V(q) where gij (q) = ij Using this, we find that X ∂rk ∂rk . ∂qi ∂qj k X ∂L X q̇i = gij q̇j q̇i = 2T . ∂q̇i i ij This means that the Hamiltonian, in the case of time independent constraints, equals the total energy of the system H = T + V. If the Lagrangian of the system do not depend explicitly on time, then we are forced to conclude that the total energy of the system is a conserved quantity. 2 Now define the canonical momenta pi = ∂L , ∂q̇i which, from the Euler-Lagrange equation, has the property of being conserved if the Lagrangian does not explicitly depend on the generalized coordinate qi . Then, by definition of H, we have ∂H = q̇i ∂pi and ∂H ∂L d ∂L =− =− = −ṗi , ∂qi ∂qi dt ∂q̇i which is referred to as Hamilton’s equations of motion. By introducing the Possion bracket X ∂A ∂B ∂A ∂B , − {A, B} = ∂qj ∂pj ∂pj ∂qj j we may use the fact the properties ∂pi ∂qi ∂qi ∂pi = = δij and = =0 ∂pj ∂qj ∂pj ∂qj to write Hamilton’s eqations in the form ∂H ∂H = {qi , H}, = {pi , H}. ∂pi ∂qi By virtue of Hamilton’s equations of motion, any function F = F(q, q̇, t) of the generalized coordinates satisfies X X ∂F ∂H ∂F ∂H ∂F dpj dF ∂f ∂F dqj − − = − . {F, H} = = ∂qj ∂pj ∂pj ∂qj ∂qj dt ∂pj dt dt ∂t j j That is, its time evolution is completely determined by its explicit time dependence and its Poisson bracket with the Hamiltonian dF ∂F = {F, H} + . dt ∂t In this sense, the Hamiltonian can be seen as the generator of time-translations. 3