* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 1 Axial Vector Current Anomaly in Electrodynamics By regularizing
Wave function wikipedia , lookup
Coupled cluster wikipedia , lookup
Quantum chromodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Molecular Hamiltonian wikipedia , lookup
Compact operator on Hilbert space wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Topological quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Coherent states wikipedia , lookup
Gauge fixing wikipedia , lookup
Second quantization wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Self-adjoint operator wikipedia , lookup
Quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Dirac equation wikipedia , lookup
BRST quantization wikipedia , lookup
Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup
Noether's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Density matrix wikipedia , lookup
Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Yang–Mills theory wikipedia , lookup
Scale invariance wikipedia , lookup
Higgs mechanism wikipedia , lookup
Bra–ket notation wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup
1 Axial Vector Current Anomaly in Electrodynamics By regularizing potential infrared and gauge divergences in the Schwinger model, and examining the normal modes of the fermion and photon fields, we have seen that the axial vector current is not conserved: e ∂µj5µ = µν Fµν . 2π Fluctuations in the vector potential can create a fermion anti-fermion pair with opposite chiralities out of the vacuum. An adiabatic change ∆a1 = 2π/(eL) leaves the fermion spectrum unchanged. Unlike the Fermi sea in a non-relativistic solid-state system, the relativistic Dirac sea has an infinite number of filled energy levels. This ultraviolet divergence allows for a change in N+ − N−, which would not be possible if the number of energy levels were finite. The axial vector current in Quantum Electrodynamics with massless photons and massive electrons in 4-d is conserved at the classical level in the limit of zero electron mass. This Noether symmetry is broken when the theory is quantized, which results in the famous Adler-Bell-Jackiw anomaly: e2 µνκλ Fµν Fκλ . =− 16π 2 It is not possible to eliminate all of the gauge degrees of freedom except for one mode because real photons have an infinite number of transverse degrees of freedom. Different methods must be used to study the anomaly in d = 4. ∂µj5µ 1 2 OPERATOR EQUATIONS AND CURRENT CONSERVATION 2 Operator Equations and Current Conservation The equations of motion for the fermion field operators can be derived from the Lagrange density 1 L = − Fµν F µν − ψ̄γ µ(i∂µ − eAµ)ψ − mψ̄ψ , 4 where m is the mass of the fermion, by formally using the classical Euler-Lagrange equations of motion. Given a Lagrangian L(q, q̇, t), the Euler-Lagrange equations for a classical degree of freedom q are ∂L d ∂L − =0. ∂q dt ∂ q̇ For a classical field with Lagrange density L(φ, ∂µφ, xµ), these equations generalize to ∂L ∂L − ∂µ =0. ∂φ ∂µφ The fermion fields ψ and ψ̄ = ψ †γ 0 are independent degrees of freedom. The Euler-Lagrange equation for ψ̄ gives ∂L = γ µ(i∂µ − eAµ)ψ − mψ = 0 , ∂ ψ̄ which is Dirac’s equation for the field ψ. Using (γ µ)† = γ 0γ µγ 0, the equation for ψ̄ is (i∂µ + eAµ)ψ̄γ µ + mψ̄ = 0 . 2 2 OPERATOR EQUATIONS AND CURRENT CONSERVATION The field equations can be used to compute the divergence of the vector and axial vector currents j5µ = ψ̄γ µγ5ψ . j µ = ψ̄γ µψ , The divergence of the vector current is ∂µj µ = ∂µ(ψ̄γ µψ) = (∂µψ̄)γ µψ + ψ̄γ µ(∂µψ) = ieAµψ̄γ µψ + imψ̄ψ − ieψ̄γ µAµψ − imψ̄ψ = 0 . The divergence of the axial vector current is ∂µj5µ = = = = ∂µ(ψ̄γ µγ5ψ) (∂µψ̄)γ µγ5ψ − ψ̄γ5γ µ(∂µψ) ieAµψ̄γ µγ5ψ + imψ̄γ5ψ + ieψ̄γ5γ µAµψ + imψ̄γ5ψ 2imψ̄γ5ψ , where the anticommutation relation {γ µ, γ5} = 0 has been used. The formal operator equations predict that the vector current is strictly conserved. The divergence of the axial vector current is proportional to the fermion mass ∂µj5µ = 2im ψ̄ψ , and the current is therefore conserved in the case of massless fermions. The vector current is conserved in massless QED, but the axial vector current is not! What went wrong with this derivation? 3 3 ULTRAVIOLET DIVERGENCES OF OPERATOR PRODUCTS 3 Ultraviolet Divergences of Operator Products The origin of this problem lies in the singular nature of quantum fields. The types of classical fields that are useful in physics are generally smoothly varying continuous functions. If a classical function develops a singularity, it is usually isolated and physical quantities are not singular. Quantum fields can be much more singular than classical fields because the Uncertaintly Principle allows a very wide range of quantum fluctuations to take place. These fluctuations could not occur in the classical limit without violating conservation of energy or other conservation laws. Consider an expansion of a classical field in normal modes Z φ(x) = dk ak eikx . The mode amplitudes ak will tend rapidly to zero for large |k| if the field is smoothly varying. The field is a normal function and products of the field and its derivatives are well defined. The situation is very different for quantum field opeators. The quantity ak in the mode expansion is now an operator that creates or destroys normal mode quanta. The number of quanta that can be created is not restricted by classical conservation laws. In principle, a state can exist for a tiny instant of time in which all of the modes are excited. The field operator then behaves like Z φ(x) ∼ dk eikx = 2πδ(x) . 4 4 POINT SPLITTING REGLARIZATION Mathematically, a quantum field must be considered to be a generalized function or distribution, like the Dirac delta function and its derivatives. Distributions and their linear combinations are generally well defined. Physical quantites are computed by integrating them with smooth functions, which smear their singular behavior. A severe problem arises when generalized functions are combined nonlinearly. In the example above Z ∞ dk , |φ(x)|2 ∼ δ(x)δ(x) = δ(x) −∞ which is ultraviolet divergent and cannot be smeared with any smooth function. 4 Point Splitting Reglarization Products of field operators at different points in space-time are generally less singular than local products at the same space-time point. The point-splitting regularization method replaces local products with separated products. The limit of zero separation is taken at the end of the calculation. Separating the points in a local product can break formal symmetries satisfied by the original product. The most important of these is Poincaré invariance. The separation of any pair of space-time points is a new and arbitrary vector zµ which had no place in the original theory. Another very important symmetry is CPT which interchanges particles and antiparticles. 5 5 GAUGE INVARIANCE AND WILSON LINES As a first attempt at point-splitting, consider z µ z → ψ̄ x + γ γ5ψ x − . 2 2 Note that ψ̄ and ψ are treated as symmetrically as possible by splitting their arguments symmetrically in opposite directions. j5µ(x) To avoid any spurious dependence on the direction in space-time of z µ, the limit z → 0 must be taken such that tensor products of z depend only on the invariant metric tensor η µν . Vectors in z µ must vanish lim z µ = 0 , z→0 and second order tensors tend to the limit z µz ν η µν lim = . z→0 z 2 d 5 Gauge Invariance and Wilson Lines Point-splitting spoils the local gauge invariance of operator products. Under the local gauge rotation ψ(x) → eiα(x)ψ(x) , the split operator product changes by an z-dependent phase: z µ z z µ z i[α(x−z/2)−α(x+z/2)] ψ̄ x + γ γ5ψ x − → ψ̄ x + γ γ5 ψ x − e . 2 2 2 2 6 5 GAUGE INVARIANCE AND WILSON LINES Wilson invented a simple way of restoring local gauge invariance by inserting a “Wilson line” operator between ψ̄ and ψ: " # Z x+z/2 exp −ie dx0λAλ(x0) . x−z/2 Here, the integral in the exponent is the line integral along any continuous path between the two points. Under the local gauge transformation 1 Aλ(x0) → Aλ(x0) − ∂λ0 α(x0) , e the line integral in the exponent gets multiplied by the phase factor ei[α(x+z/2)−α(x−z/2)] , which exactly cancels the phase difference between ψ and ψ̄. The operator j5µ(x) → ψ̄ x + z 2 " Z µ x+z/2 γ γ5 exp −ie x−z/2 is now ultraviolet finite and gauge invariant. 7 # z dx Aλ(x ) ψ x − , 2 0λ 0 6 VACUUM STATE AND NORMAL ORDERING 6 Vacuum State and Normal Ordering A fundamental pathology of field theories with relativistic fermions is the continuum of negative energy states. To quantize such theories, the fermion field operator is expanded in normal modes XZ 1 1 d−1 −ik·x † ik·x √ d k bσ (k)uσ (k)e + dσ (k)vσ (k)e , ψ(x) = (2π)d−1 2E k 1 σ=± 2 where the σ is a spin eigenvalue and u and v are positive and negative energy spinors, respectively, and are normalized so that X X uσ (k)ūσ (k) = vσ (k)v̄σ (k) = γ µkµ . σ σ The operator b annihilates fermion modes, and the operator d† creates antifermion modes. The field operator ψ̄ creates fermions and annihilates antifermions. Dirac’s prescription of filling the negative energy sea is implemented in quantum field theory by defining operators bilinear in the fermion fields to have zero expectation value in the vacuum state, which is defined as the state for which b|0i = d|0i = 0 = h0|b† = h0|d† . Therefore, bilinear operators like j5µ must be “normal ordered” with creation operators to the left of annihilation operators. 8 7 DIVERGENCE OF THE AXIAL VECTOR CURRENT The anti-commutation relations must be taken into account in the normal-ordering process: {bσ (k), b†σ0 (k 0)} = {dσ (k), d†σ0 (k 0)} = δσ,σ0 (2π)d−1(2Ek )δ d−1(k − k 0) , and all other anti-commutators vanishing. 7 Divergence of the Axial Vector Current The divergence of the axial vector current in the Schwinger model can now be evaluated using the Dirac equation for the fermion fields ∂µψ̄(x + z/2) = ieψ̄(x + z/2)Aµ(x + z/2) , ∂µψ(x − z/2) = −ieAµ(x − z/2)ψ(x − z/2) , and by expanding Aµ(x ± z/2) and the Wilson line contributions in powers of z zλ Aµ(x ± z/2) = Aµ(x) ± ∂λAµ(x) + O(z 2) , 2 " # Z x+z/2 dx0λAλ(x0) = 1 − iez λAλ(x) + O(z 2) , exp −ie x−z/2 " Z # x+z/2 dx0λAλ(x0) = −iez λ∂µAλ(x) + O(z 2) . ∂µ exp −ie x−z/2 9 7 DIVERGENCE OF THE AXIAL VECTOR CURRENT The sum of the three contributions from ψ̄, ψ and the Wilson line is ∂µj5µ → −ieψ̄(x + z/2)γ µγ5ψ(x − z/2)z λ(∂µAλ − ∂λAµ) + O(z 2) . Before taking the limit z → 0, the fermion operators must be normal ordered. Using the normal mode expansions for the fermion fields, it is straightforward to show that Z i i µν zν ν µ 2 kν ik·z h0|ψ̄(x + z/2)γ µγ5ψ(x − z/2)|0i = Tr[γ γ γ ] d k e = . 5 (2π)2 k2 π z2 Taking the limit of the regularized and normal-ordered divergence e ∂µj5µ − h0|∂µj5µ|0i = µν Fµν . 2π This derivation of the anomaly can easily be generalized to massless QED in 4-d. The operator product is more singular than in 2-d and the calculation of its vaccum expectation value is more complicated. The final result is e2 µνκλ µ µ ∂µj5 − h0|∂µj5 |0i = − Fµν Fκλ . 16π 2 Homework Problem Fill in the missing steps in the derivation of the Schwinger model anomaly in the last section. 10