Download Diagnostics of complex plasmas using a dust grains

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup

Weakly-interacting massive particles wikipedia , lookup

Future Circular Collider wikipedia , lookup

Lepton wikipedia , lookup

ALICE experiment wikipedia , lookup

Strangeness production wikipedia , lookup

Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Standard Model wikipedia , lookup

ATLAS experiment wikipedia , lookup

Identical particles wikipedia , lookup

Electron scattering wikipedia , lookup

Compact Muon Solenoid wikipedia , lookup

Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
TEST GRAINS AS A NOVEL
DIAGNOSTIC TOOL
B.W. James, A.A. Samarian and W. Tsang
School of Physics, University of Sydney
NSW 2006, Australia
[email protected]
ICPP Sydney 2002
What is a dusty plasma?
• a low temperature plasma containing small particles
of diameters in nanometer and micrometer range
• particles acquire a net negative charge (at
equilibrium floating potential)
• particles levitated in sheaths where electric force
balances gravity
• particles can form liquid- and solid- like arrays
(plasma or Coulomb crystal) which can undergo
phase transitions
Forces on dust particle in plasma sheath
ions vi
sheath
boundary
FE, Fth
E
radius = a
charge = Zd
Fg, Fi
heq
hb
z
rf powered electrode
Figure 1: Schematic diagram of dust particle in plasma sheath
Forces on a dust particle
• Electric force
• Gravity force
• Ion drag force
FE  Zd E
4 3
Fg  a g
3


eZ
2
2
d 
Fi  a nimiv i 
1

2 
 amivi 
• Thermophoretic force
32 m 2 T
Fth 
a
15 8T
z
where
– a is particle radius
–  is particle density
– Zde is charge on particle
– mi is ion mass
– ni is ion density
– vi in ion velocity in sheath
– Te is electron temperature
– T is gas temperature
– m is mass of gas atoms
–  is thermal conductivity of plasma
Experimental arrangement
Figure 2: Experimental chamber and image of test dust particles levitated
above the electrode. The test grains are generated in the discharge (power up
to 200W, pressure up to 1 torr) by electrode sputtering.
Equilibrium position of dust particle
Using the force balance equation,
FE + Fg + Fi + Fth = 0
the equilibrium position has been calculated as a
function of radius a (see figure 3) using following
assumptions
–
–
–
–
–
–
Vs ~ 60 V, linear variation of electric field in sheath
vi from sheath model
Te ~ 2 eV
R = 2 g cm-3
dT/dz ~ 1-5 K cm-1 (varying with input power)
Zd calculated from OML theory
Equilibrium position vs. radius
wi = 106 s-1 (dashed)
5x106 s-1 (dotted),
107 s-1 (solid),
0,5
(h b -h eq )/h b
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
0
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
Dust radius, m
Figure 3: Equilibrium height of dust particles above electrode heq, relative
to height of sheath boundary hb as a function particles radius for several
values of ion plasma frequency,
wi  4nie2 / mi
Alternative estimates of sheath width
T, eV I, a.u.
3
1
heq
2,5
2
0.5
1,5
1
0,5
0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
h, mm
Figure 4: Electron temperature Te (points with error bars) measured using
Langmuir probe; discharge emission (solid line); the dashed line shows the
equilibrium position (heq =10.8 mm) of test grains (a~350 nm). Discharge
conditions: p = 90m Torr, P = 80 W.
Sheath width as function of pressure
h b (mm)
Position of sheath edge (hb) vs pressure at different rf-input powers
30
– 35W
25
– 60W
20
– 100W
15
10
5
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Pressure (mTorr)
Visualisation of rf sheath
• Sufficiently small particles cannot achieve force
equilibrium in the sheath - the sheath becomes a
particle-free region
• Particles occupy pre-sheath and positive column
• Provides a visualisation of the sheath-plasma
boundary - see Figure 5
QuickTime™ and a
Photo - JPEG decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Figure 5:
The shape of the potential well above the confining
electrode in a radio-frequency (rf) discharge with a
printed-circuit board electrode system (Cheung et al.,
2002) was visualised using fine dust grains that were
generated in the discharge. The well shape was
found to depend strongly on the confining potential
Transient motion technique
Side Observation
Window
Top View
Top Observation
Window
Particle
Dispenser
Top Ground
Electrode
DC Power
AC Power
Pin Electrodes
a
v1
 
Particle
Driving Pad
(2f 0 ) 2 m
ZD 
E'
Where
And
mas  F (v1 )s1  F (v2 )s2
Zd
where
4
F   mnn vTn a 2 v
3
Gas Inlet
f 0 is the resonant frequency
E 'is the electric field gradient
v2
s1 s2
RF Supply
15MHz
  f (r )
Effect of hot electrons in sheath
h  heq
Rd ~
h  heq
Figure 6: Square root of distance of particle from sheath edge as
a function of particle radius
Particle Data
Probe Data
Figure 7: Potential profile measured by a Langmuir probe,
and by transient motion analysis
Conclusions
• as particle radius decreases, equilibrium position moves closer
to edge of sheath
• sufficiently small particles avoid sheath region, occupying presheath and positive column. providing visualisation of sheath
• hot electrons affect equilibrium position
• potential and electric filed profiles determined from transient
motion analysis
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the Australian Research Council and the Science Foundation
for Physics within the University of Sydney
References
A.A. Samarian and B.W. James, Phys Letters A, 287 (2001) 125
F. Cheung, A. Samarian and B. James, Physica Scripta, T98 (2002) 143-5
Particle Data
Probe Data
Figure 8:
Radial electric field
derived from results
in figure 7.
Least Mean Square Fit for Particle Data
Least Mean Square Fit for Probe Data