Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup
Tissue engineering wikipedia , lookup
Cell encapsulation wikipedia , lookup
Extracellular matrix wikipedia , lookup
Cell growth wikipedia , lookup
Cytokinesis wikipedia , lookup
Cell culture wikipedia , lookup
Organ-on-a-chip wikipedia , lookup
551 Plant stem cells: divergent pathways and common themes in shoots and roots Mary E Byrne, Catherine A Kidner and Robert A Martienssen Stem cells in plant shoot and root meristems are maintained throughout the life of the plant and produce somatic daughter cells that make up the body of the plant. Plant stem cells can also be derived from somatic cells in vivo and in vitro. Recent findings are refining our knowledge of signaling pathways that define stem cell fate and specify either shoot or root stem cell function. New evidence also highlights a role for epigenetic mechanisms in controlling stem cell fate. Addresses Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1 Bungtown Rd, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, USA e-mail: [email protected] Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 2003, 13:551–557 This review comes from a themed issue on Differentiation and gene regulation Edited by Azim Surani and Austin Smith 0959-437X/$ – see front matter ß 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. daughter cell following division is not restricted but the population of stem cells as a whole is maintained. In plants, two populations of cells, one comprising the shoot apical meristem and the other the root apical meristem, give rise to the plant body. These meristems are established early in embryogenesis, at opposite poles of the embryo, and are maintained throughout the life of the plant. Superficially, shoot and root meristems appear dissimilar. Shoot meristems are located at the extreme tip of the shoot and cell divisions contribute laterally and basally to terminally differentiated tissue including organs such as leaves. Root meristems, on the other hand, are subterminal to a protective root cap. Most cell divisions contribute apically and basally to mature root tissues. Despite these differences, shoot and root meristems each comprise a stepwise progression from totipotent to determined cell fate. Different genetic pathways operate to establish and maintain stem cell function in shoots and roots, but common mechanisms may guide maintenance of stem cells and acquisition of daughter cell fate. DOI 10.1016/j.gde.2003.08.008 Abbreviations AGO1 ARGONAUTE1 AS1 ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 AS2 ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2 BLR BELLRINGER BOP BLADE ON PETIOLE BP BREVIPEDICELLUS CLV CLAVATA GAI GIBBERELLIN-ACID INSENSITIVE GRAS GAI, RGA, SCR QC quiescent center RGA REPRESSOR OF GAI RNAi RNA interference SCR SCARECROW SHR SHORTROOT STM SHOOT MERISTEMLESS WUS WUSCHEL Introduction Stem cells are defined both by self-renewal and by their potential to differentiate to multiple cell types. Unicellular stem cell lineages occur in yeast: following division, the mother cell attains the ability to switch mating type, while the daughter cell does not. As in multicellular organisms, this difference is specified, at least in part, by asymmetric distribution of intracellular factors. In multicellular organisms, stem cells can be maintained as populations. External and internal influences establish a specialized niche where the fate of any one individual www.current-opinion.com Regulation of stem cell fate in the shoot apical meristem The organization of the shoot apical meristem in higher plants has been defined classically by histology and more recently by gene-expression patterns. Typically, discrete cell layers can be distinguished. The outer layer (L1) gives rise to outermost epidermal tissues. Either one or two inner cell layers (L2 and L3) contribute to internal ground tissue and vasculature of mature organs. Superimposed on this organization is a central zone of highly vacuolated and slowly dividing cells that are readily distinguished from more rapidly dividing, cytoplasmically dense peripheral zone cells (Figure 1). Cells on the margins of the peripheral zone are recruited into differentiating structures. Clonal analysis provides evidence that a small number of stem cells persist for some time at the apex contributing to many nodes through plant development. Other, presumably more peripheral, cells retain some stem-cell capability in that they contribute to multiple but fewer nodes [1]. The homeobox gene WUSCHEL (WUS) is expressed very early in embryogenesis and is rapidly confined to a few cells in the inner layers of the central zone (Figure 2) [2]. Mutations in WUS result in termination of the shoot meristem and loss of stem cell function whereas overexpression results in proliferation of stem cells [3,4]. WUS acts in concert with a signaling complex comprising the CLAVATA (CLV) genes. CLV1 encodes a leucine-rich Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 2003, 13:551–557 552 Differentiation and gene regulation Figure 1 (a) (b) Current Opinion in Genetics & Development The shoot and root apical meristems. (a) The layered structure of the shoot meristem. The outermost layer (L1) is shown in red, the second (L2), in yellow. Blue marks the slowly dividing central zone. (b) The root apical meristem is subterminal, but like the shoot apical meristem has a layered structure and a center of slowly dividing cells (the QC, shown in blue) surrounded by the initials for individual tissue (shown in green). repeat transmembrane kinase expressed in a small group of cells immediately above the region of WUS expression [5]. CLV1 interacts directly with another transmembrane leucine-rich repeat protein, CLV2 [6]. A third member of this pathway is CLV3, which encodes a secreted protein expressed in outer layers of the meristem in a domain partly overlapping that of CLV1 (Figure 2) [7]. CLV3 acts non-cell autonomously to regulate WUS expression and this is likely via interaction with CLV1 [8,9]. Mutations in CLV genes result in an enlarged meristem and an Figure 2 (a) (b) Current Opinion in Genetics & Development The gene expression patterns underlying meristem organization. (a) In the shoot CLV3 (green) is expressed in the central zone in the upper layers. CLV1 is expressed subterminally (yellow) and overlaps with WUS expression (red). WUS promotes CLV3 function in the cells above it (arrow) and CLV3 signals through CLV1 to repress spreading of WUS (bars). (b) in the root apical meristem SCR (yellow) is expressed in the QC, adjacent ground tissue initials and the endodermis, SHR (blue) is expressed in the stele and is trafficked into the adjacent cell layer, the endodermis, where it directs cell fate (arrows). Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 2003, 13:551–557 expanded domain of WUS expression. Conversely, constitutive CLV3 expression leads to loss of meristem function and WUS expression. The CLV complex, therefore, negatively regulates WUS. Furthermore, WUS is required for CLV1 expression. The interactions between WUS and CLV form a positive feedback loop to maintain a balanced population of stem cells in the central zone [4,10]. Additional components of the CLV1 complex includes a protein phosphatase (KAPP) and a Rho GTPase [11,12] whereas the protein phophatase POLTERGEIST acts downstream of CLV1 [13,14]. poltergeist mutants suppress clv and also enhance wus, but this is dependent on CLV1 function. Thus, POLTERGEIST appears to function downstream of CLV in both a WUS-dependent and WUS-independent pathway. Mutations in SHEPHERD result in expansion of the shoot meristem [15], like clv, and SHEPHERD encodes a HSP90-like protein predicted to be required for correct folding of CLV proteins. A second pathway required for maintenance of stem cell fate in the shoot meristem involves KNOX and BELL class genes both of which belong to a larger group of TALE class homeodomain transcription factors. Class 1 KNOX genes are expressed in the shoot apical meristem and downregulated in differentiating cells [16–18]. Mutations in the Arabidopsis KNOX gene SHOOT MERISTEMLESS (STM) result in loss of meristem function [17,19,20]. One means by which STM maintains stem cell function is via repression of differentiation program genes ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 (AS1) and ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2 (AS2) [21,22]. A closely related KNOX gene BREVIPEDICELLUS (BP) is able to promote meristem function in the absence of STM [22–24] but this is apparent only in the absence of either AS1 or AS2, indicating that KNOX genes function redundantly to maintain stem cell fate. STM and BP depend on a more distantly related BELL class homoeobox gene, BELLRINGER (BLR) [25], also called PENNYWISE [26]. Alone, blr mutants have a defect in organ positioning (phyllotaxy) indicative of respecification of peripheral zone cell fate. However, blr enhances the meristem defect in weak alleles of stm and in backgrounds where BP acts in meristem function. Consistent with these observations, BLR interacts directly with KNOX proteins and the expression domain of BLR in the shoot meristem overlaps with that of STM and BP. Induction of ectopic shoot meristems Misexpression of KNOX genes alone can induce ectopic meristems, suggesting that this class of genes has the potential to establish stem cell fate in differentiated cells. Furthermore, an increasing number of genes are now known to maintain cells in a differentiated state by repression of KNOX genes. One such gene is AS1, which encodes a myb domain transcription factor [21,27,28]. Undifferentiated outgrowths and ectopic meristems www.current-opinion.com Plant stem cells Byrne, Kidner and Martienssen 553 Figure 3 (a) (b) Current Opinion in Genetics & Development Reprogramming cell fate: ectopic shoot meristems on as1 mutant leaves. (a) Changes in cell-division patterns mark initial sites of ectopic meristem formation. (b) Later in development, ectopic shoot meristems give rise to lateral organs. appear on as1 mutant leaves (Figure 3). AS1 likely acts together with AS2, a member of the LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARIES family predicted to be transcription factors [22,28–31]. BLADE ON PETIOLE (BOP) also represses KNOX genes in lateral organs [32]. As with as1, mutations in bop result in lobed leaves and ectopic outgrowths appear on leaves, although in this case organized meristems are not observed. KNOX gene repressors include members of the YABBY family of potential transcription factors. The YABBY genes FILAMENTOUS FLOWER and YABBY3 are required for correct patterning of lateral organs [33]. However, filamentous flower yabby3 double mutants also generate shoots on cotyledons and leaves [34]. Genetic interactions between as1 and bop, as well as as1 and yabby mutants, point to multiple independent pathways for suppression of stem cell fate by regulation of KNOX gene expression [33,34]. WUS can also re-establish stem cell fate in differentiated organs. Overexpression of WUS can result in dedifferentiation and subsequent somatic embryogenesis from unspecialized callus cells [35]. In other cases, particularly when WUS is induced post-embryonically, only small outgrowths are formed from differentiated tissue [36,37]. The different affects of ectopic WUS are possibly a result of WUS expression levels, timing of misexpression, tissue-specific effects or a combination of these parameters. Likewise, overexpression of STM in some but not all instances results in ectopic meristems [35–38]. However, combined post-embryonic ectopic induction of STM and WUS can promote ectopic expression of CLV genes and production of ectopic meristems. This is consistent with genetic interactions whereby STM and WUS– CLV pathways converge to establish and maintain the shoot apical meristem. Stem cells of the root Like the shoot apical meristem, the root meristem has a central group of slowly dividing cells: the quiescent www.current-opinion.com center (QC) (Figure 1). The QC is established early in embryogenesis and is derived not from the embryoproper but from the uppermost cell of the suspensor. Clonal analysis has demonstrated that asymmetric division of QC cells generates daughter cells, which either retain QC cell function or replace an adjacent cell [39]. Immediate derivatives of the QC are themselves stem cells, or initials, each of which gives rise to specific tissue types within the root (Figure 1). After damage by laser ablation or radiation, stem cells of the root divide to repopulate the meristem. In maize, cultured root stem cells can regenerate the root [40]. Studies on root development in Arabidopsis, where patterns of cell division are particularly clear, have revealed that stem cells of the root meristem are maintained by positional information. When the QC is ablated, a new functional QC develops from proximal cells [41]. The QC also signals to adjacent initial cells to maintain meristem function [42]. Furthermore, when an initial cell is ablated an adjacent cell divides to produce a new initial. Specification of the new initial requires contact with adjacent initials indicating that these cells also respond to positional information [41]. One signal important for initiation and maintenance of the root meristem is auxin. Inhibitors of auxin transport result in expression of QC-specific markers in cells above the QC, indicating a role for auxin in longitudinal positioning of the QC [43]. Furthermore, the root is a sink for auxin and a maxima of auxin exists in the cells below the QC [43,44]. Additional evidence supporting the role of auxin in establishing and patterning the root meristem comes from analysis of mutants that disrupt auxin signaling. For example, AtPIN4, which encodes a putative auxin efflux carrier, is necessary for root meristem patterning [45]. The auxin response factor MONOPTEROS effects apical–basal patterning of the embryo. MONOPTEROS is required for initiation of the root meristem as monopteros mutants fail to specify QC cells and do not form a root [46]. Another gene, BODENLOS, encodes an auxin response regulator. Dominant gain-of-function mutations in BODENLOS result in loss of the root meristem in a manner similar to that of monopteros mutants. BODENLOS may act via inhibition of MONOPTEROS as these two proteins directly interact [47,48]. SCARECROW (SCR), a GRAS family transcription factor, is required for maintenance of the root meristem [49]. In the root, SCR is expressed in the QC, adjacent endodermis/cortex initials and in differentiated endodermis (Figure 2). Loss of SCR function leads to disruption of stem cell identity in the initials as well as the QC. The cell division that typically differentiates endodermal and cortical cells does not occur in scr mutants and derivatives of this initial assume a mixed fate of the two cell types. This defect is restored by cell-autonomous expression of SCR in the initial cells [50]. However, stem cell activity Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 2003, 13:551–557 554 Differentiation and gene regulation requires SCR expression in the QC, which is sufficient for QC cell identity and root growth. SCR, therefore, acts cell autonomously to maintain identity of initials and the QC, whereas non-cell autonomous signaling from the QC maintains adjacent stem cell divisions. SCR is also expressed in the L1 layer of the shoot meristem, but scr has no shoot meristem defects, although patterning in mature shoot tissues is disrupted [51]. It is possible that gating of protein movement between cells establishes a niche for maintaining stem cell function. In addition to proteins, RNA movement is well documented in plant cells. Viral RNA and RNA encoding regulatory genes such as KNOX genes are transported systemically [58–61]. The role of RNA in maintaining stem cells is discussed below. Epigenetic control of stem cell fate A related GRAS gene, SHORTROOT (SHR), is also required for patterning the root meristem [52]. shr mutants have irregular QC anatomy, loss of QC-specific markers and their roots cease growing. SHR is expressed in the stele (Figure 2) and the protein traffics to adjacent cell layers, including the QC [53]. In the endodermis/ cortex initial, SHR activates SCR, which promotes the asymmetric division characteristic of this cell type [52,53]. Both SCR and SHR are required for QC function as the QC defect in shr is not rescued by SCR expression in the QC [50]. Another potential component is SCHIZORIZA. In schizorizia mutants, additional internal cell layers are formed and internal tissue is mis-specified as epidermis. Double mutant analysis suggests that at least one function of SCHIZORIZA is suppression of SCR in the cortex/endodermis initial [54]. Genetic pathways required for shoot and root meristem function in general do not overlap, but the same classes of genes are likely to operate in each system. For example, in petunia HAIRY MERISTEM, a GRAS family gene related to SCR and SHR, acts non-cell autonomously to maintain stem cell fate in the shoot apical meristem [55]. Furthermore, the temperature-sensitive topless mutant converts shoots into roots [56]. This effect can be induced relatively late in embryogenesis implying loss of the shoot meristem program as well as gain of a root meristem program. The similar organization between shoot and root structures may represent a readily adopted solution to the problem of maintaining a balance between undifferentiated stem cells and differentiating derivatives in a growing tip. Genetic evidence suggests that stem cells in plants, as in animals, have a specialized chromatin structure. This may reflect their capacity for a variety of gene-expression programs, as well as their ability to divide repeatedly without either differentiation or senescence. Components of the chromatin assembly factor complex are encoded by the FASCIATA genes FAS1 and FAS2, which restrict WUS and SCR activity [62]. The SWI2/SNF2 chromatin remodeling gene PICKLE represses embryonic genes in germinating seedlings [63,64]. Furthermore pickle interacts synergistically with as1 indicating a role for chromatin remodeling in stem cell fate [27]. Orthologs of AS1 in other plants include PHANTASTICA from Antirrhinum and ROUGH SHEATH 2 from maize [65,66]. These genes share a SANT-class myb domain found in the SWI3 family of proteins in yeast, which interact with SWI2/SNF2 chromatin remodelers [67]. Autonomy and non-autonomy ARGONAUTE1 (AGO1) and the closely related gene PINHEAD/ZWILLE are also involved in Arabidopsis stem cell fate. In ago1 and pinhead single mutants shoot meristem function is frequently lost, although penetrance is variable [68–71]. Both genes are also required for organ polarity, but loss of shoot meristem function is severe and consistent in ago1 pinhead double mutants [68,70]. AGO1 expression is ubiquitous whereas expression of PINHEAD is confined to the shoot meristem, the adaxial (dorsal) side of lateral organs and shoot vasculature [70]. Ectopic expression of PINHEAD on the abaxial (ventral) side of lateral organs results in additional cotyledons that are occasionally fused as well as ectopic meristems along the zone of fusion [72]. PINHEAD may be required for specification of the plant apical–basal axis in that ectopic expression establishes novel growth axes. At least one common mechanistic theme in shoot and root meristem patterning is the use of positional cues to modulate cell fate. How plant cells specify positional information is poorly understood but is likely to involve movement of proteins via conduits, superficially resembling gap-junctions, known as plasmodesmata. Intercellular movement has been reported for several transcription factors. For example, in the shoot movement of KNOX genes from the L1 to inner layers of the meristem partially rescues meristem defects of stm [57]. Likewise in the root, movement of SHR from internal stele cell layers to the adjacent cell layer is required for activation of the downstream target SCR and specification of endodermal and QC cell fate [53]. AGO1, along with homologs in animals and yeast, is required for RNA interference (RNAi). One possible role for RNAi is regulating microRNA interaction with target genes, which frequently encode transcription factors in plants [73]. miRNA targets include the CUC2 gene, which is required redundantly with CUC1 for STM expression [74]. These transcription factors are unique to plants, however, and both plant and animal stem cells depend on RNAi for persistence and propagation. That is, AGO/ PIWI homologs in Drosophila, Caenorhabditis elegans and mouse are required to maintain stem cells in the germline [75]. This may point to a more universal mechanism. RNAi in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe is Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 2003, 13:551–557 www.current-opinion.com Plant stem cells Byrne, Kidner and Martienssen 555 involved in turnover of pericentromeric repeat transcripts and this promotes chromosome disjunction at mitosis by recruiting cohesin via histone lysine-9 methylation [76,77]. Similar mechanisms in Drosophila [78] and Arabidopsis (L Lippman et al., unpublished data) point to a conserved role for RNAi in chromosome segregation. Such a role could influence symmetric and asymmetric cell divisions that underlie stem cell fate. Conclusions Stem cells occupy a niche in both shoot and root meristems that is specified by cell–cell signaling. Maintenance of stem cell fate requires several homeodomain transcription factors, components of the RNAi machinery and chromatin remodeling factors that may promote pluripotency and stem cell proliferation. Although most of the components controlling these functions have diverged in roots and shoots, ancestral pathways controlling stem cell function in early eukaryotes may be shared with animal and fungal lineages. Update In a situation analogous to loss of root QC cells, ablation of central zone cells in the shoot meristem leads to WUS expression in peripheral zone cells and respecification as central zone cells [79]. Acknowledgements We apologize to those whose work was not cited for lack of space. We thank members of the Martienssen laboratory for useful discussions. The preparation of this manuscript was supported by USDA-NRI grant 2003-00967. References and recommended reading Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as: of special interest of outstanding interest 1. Tilney-Bassett RAE: Plant Chimeras. London: Edward Arnold; 1986. 2. Mayer KFX, Schoof H, Haecker A, Lenhard M, Jurgens G, Laux T: Role of WUSCHEL in regulating stem cell fate in the Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Cell 1998, 95:805-815. 3. Laux T, Mayer KFX, Berger J, Jurgens G: The WUSCHEL gene is required for shoot and floral meristem integrity in Arabidopsis. Development 1996, 122:87-96. 4. Schoof H, Lenhard M, Haecker A, Mayer KF, Jurgens G, Laux T: The stem cell population of Arabidopsis shoot meristems in maintained by a regulatory loop between the CLAVATA and WUSCHEL genes. Cell 2000, 100:635-644. 5. Clark SE, Williams RW, Meyerowitz EM: The CLAVATA1 gene encodes a putative receptor kinase that controls shoot and floral meristem size in Arabidopsis. Cell 1997, 89:575-585. 6. Jeong S, Trotochaud AE, Clark SE: The Arabidopsis CLAVATA2 gene encodes a receptor-like protein required for the stability of the CLAVATA1 receptor-like kinase. Plant Cell 1999, 11:1925-1934. 7. 8. Fletcher JC, Brand U, Running MP, Simon R, Meyerowitz EM: Signaling of cell fate decisions by CLAVATA3 in Arabidopsis shoot meristems. Science 1999, 283:1911-1914. Rojo E, Sharma VK, Kovaleva V, Raikhel NV, Fletcher JC: CLV3 is localized to the extracellular space, where it activates the www.current-opinion.com Arabidopsis CLAVATA stem cell signaling pathway. Plant Cell 2002, 14:969-977. GFP fusion constructs are used to visualize secretion of the small peptide CLV3 to the apoplast. Constructs blocking secretion or misdirecting CLV3 demonstrate that correct targeting is required for function. 9. Lenhard M, Laux T: Stem cell homeostasis in the Arabidopsis shoot meristem is regulated by intercellular movement of CLAVATA3 and its sequestration by CLAVATA1. Development 2003, 130:3163-3173. Directed expression of CLV3 and CLV1 shows that CLV3 acts non-cell autonomously to repress WUS expression in the upper layers of the shoot apical meristem. In the central zone of the meristem, this effect is limited by sequestration of CLV3 by CLV1. Lack of CLV1 laterally allows the lateral daughter cells to leave the stem cell niche. 10. Brand U, Fletcher JC, Hobe M, Meyerowitz EM, Simon R: Dependence of stem cell fate in Arabidopsis on a feedback loop regulated by CLV3 activity. Science 2000, 289:617-619. 11. Williams RW, Wilson JM, Meyerowitz EM: A possible role for kinase-associated protein phosphatase in the Arabidopsis CLAVATA1 signaling pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997, 94:10467-10472. 12. Stone JM, Trotochaud AE, Walker JC, Clark SE: Control of meristem development by CLAVATA1 receptor kinase and kinase-associated protein phosphatase interactions. Plant Physiol 1998, 117:1217-1225. 13. Yu LP, Simon EJ, Trotochaud AE, Clark SE: POLTERGEIST functions to regulate meristem development downstream of the CLAVATA loci. Development 2000, 127:1661-1670. 14. Yu LP, Miller AK, Clark SE: POLTERGEIST encodes a protein phosphatase 2C that regulates CLAVATA pathways controlling stem cell identity at Arabidopsis shoot and flower meristems. Curr Biol 2003, 13:179-188. 15. Ishiguro S, Watanabe Y, Ito N, Nonaka H, Takeda N, Sakai T, Kanaya H, Okada K: SHEPHERD is the Arabidopsis GRP94 responsible for the formation of functional CLAVATA proteins. EMBO J 2002, 21:898-908. 16. Jackson D, Veit B, Hake S: Expression of maize KNOTTED1 related homeobox genes in the shoot apical meristem predicts patterns of morphogenesis in the vegetative shoot. Development 1994, 120:405-413. 17. Long JA, Moan EI, Medford JI, Barton MK: A member of the KNOTTED class of homeodomain proteins encoded by the STM gene of Arabidopsis. Nature 1996, 379:66-69. 18. Lincoln C, Long J, Yamaguchi J, Serikawa K, Hake S: A knotted1like homeobox gene in Arabidopsis is expressed in the vegetative meristem and dramatically alters leaf morphology when overexpressed in transgenic plants. Plant Cell 1994, 6:1859-1876. 19. Barton MK, Poethig RS: Formation of the shoot apical meristem in Arabidopsis thaliana – an analysis of development in the wild type and in the shoot meristemless mutant. Development 1993, 119:823-831. 20. Endrizzi K, Moussian B, Haecker A, Levin JZ, Laux T: The SHOOT MERISTEMLESS gene is required for maintenance of undifferentiated cells in Arabidopsis shoot and floral meristems and acts at a different regulatory level than the meristem genes WUSCHEL and ZWILLE. Plant J 1996, 10:967-979. 21. Byrne ME, Barley R, Curtis M, Arroyo JM, Dunham M, Hudson A, Martienssen RA: Asymmetric leaves1 mediates leaf patterning and stem cell function in Arabidopsis. Nature 2000, 408:967-971. 22. Byrne ME, Simorowski J, Martienssen RA: ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 reveals knox gene redundancy. Development 2002, 129:1957-1965. See annotation [24]. 23. Douglas SJ, Chuck G, Dengler RE, Pelecanda L, Riggs CD: KNAT1 and ERECTA regulate inflorescence architecture in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2002, 14:547-558. See annotation [24]. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 2003, 13:551–557 556 Differentiation and gene regulation 24. Venglat P, Dumonceaux T, Parnell L, Rozwadowski K, Babic V, Keller W, Martienssen RA, Selvaraj G, Datla R: The Arabidopsis BREVIPEDICELLUS gene is an important regulator of pedicel and internode development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99:4730-4735. Three papers [22–24] reporting cloning of the KNOX gene BP (also known as KNAT1). Mutants affect stem and pedicle development. Byrne et al. [22] also demonstrate redundancy between STM and BP in shoot stem cell fate. 25. Byrne ME, Groover AT, Fontana JR, Martienssen RA: Phyllotactic pattern and stem cell fate are determined by the Arabidopsis homeobox gene BELLRINGER. Development 2003, 130:3941-3950. 40. Feldman LJ, Torey JG: The isolation and culture in vitro of the quiescent center of Zea mays. Am J Bot 1976, 63:345-355. 41. van den Berg C, Willemsen V, Hage W, Weisbeek P, Scheres B: Cell fate in the Arabidopsis root meristem determined by directional signalling. Nature 1995, 378:62-65. 42. van den Berg C, Willemsen V, Hendriks G, Weisbeek P, Scheres B: Short-range control of cell differentiation in the Arabidopsis root meristem. Nature 1997, 390:287-289. 43. Sabatini S, Beis D, Wolkenfelt H, Murfett J, Guilfoyle T, Malamy J, Benfey P, Leyser O, Bechtold N, Weisbeek P et al.: An auxindependent distal organizer of pattern and polarity in the Arabidopsis root. Cell 1999, 99:463-472. 26. Smith HMS, Hake S: The interaction of two homeobox genes, BREVIPEDICELLUS and PENNYWISE, regulates internode patterning in the Arabidopsis inflorescence. Plant Cell 2003, 15:1717-1727. 44. Jiang K, Meng YL, Feldman LJ: Quiescent center formation in maize roots is associated with an auxin-regulated oxidizing environment. Development 2003, 130:1429-1438. 27. Ori N, Eshed Y, Chuck G, Bowman JL, Hake S: Mechanisms that control knox gene expression in the Arabidopsis shoot. Development 2000, 127:5523-5532. 45. Friml J, Benkova E, Blilou I, Wisniewska J, Hamann T, Ljung K, Woody S, Sandberg G, Scheres B, Jurgens G et al.: AtPIN4 mediates sink-driven auxin gradients and root patterning in Arabidopsis. Cell 2002, 108:661-673. 28. Semiarti E, Ueno Y, Tsukaya H, Iwakawa H, Machida C, Machida Y: The ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana regulates formation of a symmetric lamina, establishment of venation and repression of meristem-related homeobox genes in leaves. Development 2001, 128:1771-1783. 46. Hardtke CS, Berleth T: The Arabidopsis gene MONOPTEROS encodes a transcription factor mediating embryo axis formation and vascular development. EMBO J 1998, 17:1405-1411. 29. Iwakawa H, Ueno Y, Semiarti E, Onouchi H, Kojima S, Tsukaya H, Hasebe M, Soma T, Ikezaki M, Machida C et al.: The ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana, required for formation of a symmetric flat leaf lamina, encodes a member of a novel family of proteins characterized by cysteine repeats and a leucine zipper. Plant Cell Physiol 2002, 43:467-478. 30. Shuai B, Reynaga-Pena CG, Springer PS: The LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARIES gene defines a novel, plant-specific gene family. Plant Physiol 2002, 129:747-761. 31. Xu L, Xu Y, Dong A, Sun Y, Pi L, Xu Y, Huang H: Novel as1 and as2 defects in leaf adaxial–abaxial polarity reveal the requirement for ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 and 2 and ERECTA functions in specifying leaf adaxial identity. Development 2003, 130:4097-4107. 32. Ha CM, Kim GT, Kim BC, Jun JH, Soh MS, Ueno Y, Machida Y, Tsukaya H, Nam HG: The BLADE-ON-PETIOLE 1 gene controls leaf pattern formation through the modulation of meristematic activity in Arabidopsis. Development 2003, 130:161-172. Description of a mutant affecting leaf patterning. bop mutants form ectopic leaf lamina and it is demonstrated that BOP is required for repression of KNOX genes in leaves. bop acts synergistically with as1 and as2, and suppresses stm meristem defects. BOP appears to define a novel pathway for regulation of KNOX genes. 33. Siegfried KR, Eshed Y, Baum SF, Otsuga D, Drews GN, Bowman JL: Members of the YABBY gene family specify abaxial cell fate in Arabidopsis. Development 1999, 126:4117-4128. 34. Kumaran MK, Bowman JL, Sundaresan V: YABBY polarity genes mediate the repression of KNOX homeobox genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2002, 14:2761-2770. 35. Zuo J, Niu QW, Frugis G, Chua NH: The WUSCHEL gene promotes vegetative-to-embryonic transition in Arabidopsis. Plant J 2002, 30:349-359. 36. Gallois JL, Woodward C, Reddy GV, Sablowski R: Combined SHOOT MERISTEMLESS and WUSCHEL trigger ectopic organogenesis in Arabidopsis. Development 2002, 129:3207-3217. 37. Lenhard M, Jurgens G, Laux T: The WUSCHEL and SHOOT MERISTEMLESS genes fulfil complementary roles in Arabidopsis shoot meristem regulation. Development 2002, 129:3195-3206. 38. Williams RW: Plant homeobox genes: many functions stem from a common motif. Bioessays 1998, 20:280-282. 39. Kidner C, Sundaresan V, Roberts K, Dolan L: Clonal analysis of the Arabidopsis root confirms that position, not lineage, determines cell fate. Planta 2000, 211:191-199. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 2003, 13:551–557 47. Hamann T, Benkova E, Baurle I, Kientz M, Jurgens G: The Arabidopsis BODENLOS gene encodes an auxin response protein inhibiting MONOPTEROS-mediated embryo patterning. Genes Dev 2002, 16:1610-1615. 48. Hamann T, Mayer U, Jurgens G: The auxin-insensitive bodenlos mutation affects primary root formation and apical-basal patterning in the Arabidopsis embryo. Development 1999, 126:1387-1395. 49. Di Laurenzio L, Wysocka-Diller J, Malamy JE, Pysh L, Helariutta Y, Freshour G, Hahn MG, Feldmann KA, Benfey PN: The SCARECROW gene regulates an asymmetric cell division that is essential for generating the radial organization of the Arabidopsis root. Cell 1996, 86:423-433. 50. Sabatini S, Heidstra R, Wildwater M, Scheres B: SCARECROW is involved in positioning the stem cell niche in the Arabidopsis root meristem. Genes Dev 2003, 17:354-358. The authors use promoter gene fusions and reporter genes to show that SCR is required cell autonomously for QC cell identity and consequent maintenance of stem cell fate in adjacent initials. The root stem cell population depends on the central group of QC cells. 51. Wysocka-Diller JW, Helariutta Y, Fukaki H, Malamy JE, Benfey PN: Molecular analysis of SCARECROW function reveals a radial patterning mechanism common to root and shoot. Development 2000, 127:595-603. 52. Helariutta Y, Fukaki H, Wysocka-Diller J, Nakajima K, Jung J, Sena G, Hauser MT, Benfey PN: The SHORT-ROOT gene controls radial patterning of the Arabidopsis root through radial signaling. Cell 2000, 101:555-567. 53. Nakajima K, Sena G, Nawy T, Benfey PN: Intercellular movement of the putative transcription factor SHR in root patterning. Nature 2001, 413:307-311. 54. Mylona P, Linstead P, Martienssen R, Dolan L: SCHIZORIZA controls an asymmetric cell division and restricts epidermal identity in the Arabidopsis root. Development 2002, 129:4327-4334. schizoriza mutants mis-specify ground tissue as epidermal. This suggests that SCHIZORIZA is a repressor of epidermal cell fate in ground tissue, and is required to suppress periclinal cell divisions in the endodermal lineage. 55. Stuurman J, Jaggi F, Kuhlemeier C: Shoot meristem maintenance is controlled by a GRAS-gene mediated signal from differentiating cells. Genes Dev 2002, 16:2213-2218. HAIRY MERISTEM, a putative transcription factor of the GRAS gene family, is required for maintenance of the shoot meristem. HAIRY MERISTEM is expressed in differentiating tissues under the meristem and within initiating organ primordia. Analysis of progeny from revertant sectors suggests that HAIRY MERISTEM acts non-cell autonomously possibly signaling from differentiating tissues to the stem cells. www.current-opinion.com Plant stem cells Byrne, Kidner and Martienssen 557 56. Long JA, Woody S, Poethig S, Meyerowitz EM, Barton MK: Transformation of shoots into roots in Arabidopsis embryos mutant at the TOPLESS locus. Development 2002, 129:2797-2806. Description of the semi-dominant, temperature sensitive topless mutant that converts shoots into roots. Phenotype transformation coincides with changes in marker gene expression patterns demonstrating loss of shoot meristem gene expression and gain of expression of root-specific genes. Temperature-shift experiments show that fate can be shifted as late as transition stage, after shoot and root specific meristem characteristics have developed. 57. Kim J-Y, Yuan Z, Jackson D: Developmental regulation and significance of KNOX protein trafficking in Arabidopsis. Development 2003, in press. The authors demonstrate a biological role for KNOX gene trafficking. GFP fusion constructs are used to demonstrate trafficking of KNOTTED1 and BP from the L1 to underlying cell layers in the meristem. Movement of KNOX gene from the L1 is able to rescue the meristem defect of stm mutants demonstrating a functional significance for trafficking of KNOX genes. 68. Bohmert K, Camus I, Bellini C, Bouchez D, Caboche M, Benning C: AGO1 defines a novel locus of Arabidopsis controlling leaf development. EMBO J 1998, 17:170-180. 69. Kidner CA, Timmermans MCP, Byrne ME, Martienssen RA: Developmental genetics of the angiosperm leaf. Adv Bot Res 38:191-234. 70. Lynn K, Fernandez A, Aida M, Sedbrook J, Tasaka M, Masson P, Barton MK: The PINHEAD/ZWILLE gene acts pleiotropically in Arabidopsis development and has overlapping functions with the ARGONAUTE1 gene. Development 1999, 126:469-481. 71. Moussian B, Schoof H, Haecker A, Jurgens G, Laux T: Role of the ZWILLE gene in the regulation of central shoot meristem cell fate during Arabidopsis embryogenesis. EMBO J 1998, 17:1799-1809. 72. Newman KL, Fernandez AG, Barton MK: Regulation of axis determinacy by the Arabidopsis PINHEAD gene. Plant Cell 2002, 14:3029-3042. 58. Kim M, Canio W, Kessler S, Sinha N: Developmental changes due to long-distance movement of a homeobox fusion transcript in tomato. Science 2001, 293:287-289. 73. Reinhart BJ, Weinstein EG, Rhoades MW, Bartel B, Bartel DP: MicroRNAs in plants. Genes Dev 2002, 16:1616-1626. 59. Lucas WJ, Bouche-Pillon S, Jackson DP, Nguyen L, Baker L, Ding B, Hake S: Selective trafficking of KNOTTED1 homeodomain protein and its mRNA through plasmodesmata. Science 1995, 270:1980-1983. 74. Aida M, Ishida T, Tasaka M: Shoot apical meristem and cotyledon formation during Arabidopsis embryogenesis: interaction among the CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON and SHOOT MERISTEMLESS genes. Development 1999, 126:1563-1570. 60. Palauqui JC, Elmayan T, Pollien JM, Vaucheret H: Systemic acquired silencing: transgene-specific post-transcriptional silencing is transmitted by grafting from silenced stocks to non-silenced scions. EMBO J 1997, 16:4738-4745. 75. Cox DN, Chao A, Baker J, Chang L, Qiao D, Lin H: A novel class of evolutionarily conserved genes defined by piwi are essential for stem cell self-renewal. Genes Dev 1998, 12:3715-3727. 61. Voinnet O, Baulcombe DC: Systemic signalling in gene silencing. Nature 1997, 389:553. 76. Volpe TA, Kidner C, Hall IM, Teng G, Grewal SIS, Martienssen RA: Regulation of heterochromatic silencing and histone H3 lysine9 methylation by RNAi. Science 2002, 297:1833-1837. See annotation [77]. 62. Kaya H, Shibahara K, Taoka K, Iwabuchi M, Stillman B, Araki T: FASCIATA genes for chromatin assembly factor-1 in Arabidopsis maintain the cellular organization of apical meristems. Cell 2001, 104:131-142. 63. Eshed Y, Baum SF, Bowman JL: Distinct mechanisms promote polarity establishment in carpels of Arabidopsis. Cell 1999, 99:199-209. 64. Ogas J, Kaufmann S, Henderson J, Somerville C: PICKLE is a CHD3 chromatin-remodeling factor that regulates the transition from embryonic to vegetative development in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999, 96:13839-13844. 65. Timmermans MC, Hudson A, Becraft PW, Nelson T: ROUGH SHEATH2: a Myb protein that represses knox homeobox genes in maize lateral organ primordia. Science 1999, 284:151-153. 66. Tsiantis M, Schneeberger R, Golz JF, Freeling M, Langdale JA: The maize rough sheath2 gene and leaf development programs in monocot and dicot plants. Science 1999, 284:154-156. 67. Boyer LA, Langer MR, Crowley KA, Tan S, Denu JM, Peterson CL: Essential role for the SANT domain in the functioning of multiple chromatin remodeling enzymes. Mol Cell 2002, 10:935-942. www.current-opinion.com 77. Volpe T, Schramke V, Hamilton GL, White SA, Teng G, Martienssen RA, Allshire RC: RNA interference is required for normal centromere function in fission yeast. Chromosome Res 2003, 11:137-146. These two papers [76,77] indicate a link between RNAi and chromatin structure that is required for centromere function. In the fission yeast S. pombe, components of the RNAi machinery are required for centromeric repeat silencing. Loss of silencing is accompanied by changes in chromatin structure including loss of histone H3 lysine-9 methylation and leads to disruption of chromosome segregation. 78. Aravin AA, Naumova NM, Tulin AV, Rozovsky YM, Gvozdev VA: Double-stranded RNA-mediated silencing of genomic tandem repeats and transposable elements in the D. melanogaster germline. Curr Biol 2001, 11:1017-1027. 79. Reinhardt D, Frenz M, Mandel T, Kuhlemeier C: Microsurgical and laser ablation analysis of interactions between the zones and layers of the tomato shoot apical meristem. Development 2003, 130:4073-4083. Cell ablation techniques are used to show that removal of central zone cells results in peripheral zone cells assuming central zone cell fate. The suggestion is that central zone cells maintain a specialized niche by inhibition of stem cell fate in adjacent peripheral cells. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 2003, 13:551–557