* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Branding in the digital age – you`re spending your money in all the
Celebrity branding wikipedia , lookup
Music industry wikipedia , lookup
Marketing strategy wikipedia , lookup
Advertising management wikipedia , lookup
Social commerce wikipedia , lookup
Marketing research wikipedia , lookup
Guerrilla marketing wikipedia , lookup
Audience measurement wikipedia , lookup
Social media and television wikipedia , lookup
Street marketing wikipedia , lookup
Brand equity wikipedia , lookup
Multicultural marketing wikipedia , lookup
Brand ambassador wikipedia , lookup
Targeted advertising wikipedia , lookup
Brand awareness wikipedia , lookup
Target audience wikipedia , lookup
Food marketing wikipedia , lookup
Product planning wikipedia , lookup
Target market wikipedia , lookup
Viral marketing wikipedia , lookup
Social media marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing communications wikipedia , lookup
Direct marketing wikipedia , lookup
Global marketing wikipedia , lookup
Visual merchandising wikipedia , lookup
Marketing mix modeling wikipedia , lookup
Integrated marketing communications wikipedia , lookup
Brand loyalty wikipedia , lookup
Emotional branding wikipedia , lookup
Green marketing wikipedia , lookup
Online shopping wikipedia , lookup
Digital marketing wikipedia , lookup
Customer engagement wikipedia , lookup
Marketing channel wikipedia , lookup
Personal branding wikipedia , lookup
Youth marketing wikipedia , lookup
Consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup
Advertising campaign wikipedia , lookup
Branding in the digital age – you’re spending your money in all the wrong places. Source: David C Edelman McKinsey & Company 2010 The way that consumers engage with brands has changed dramatically over the past five years, yet most marketers are still relying heavily on traditional media, and traditional touch points like tv, radio and print. Consumers still want a clear brand promise and an offer that they value. However what has changed is when and at what touch points they are most open to influence, and how companies can best interact with them at these points. The old “funnel” metaphor showed consumers starting at the wide end of the funnel with many brands in mind then narrowing them down to a final choice. The traditional approach was to use paid-media push marketing (TV, radio etc.) at a few well defined points along the funnel to build awareness, drive consideration and ultimately inspire purchase. This metaphor no longer applies and as a result marketing dollars are being spent in the wrong places, often at the wrong time in the decision lifecycle….. In 2009 three McKinsey colleagues developed a new view of the Consumer Decision Journey based on a study of over 20,000 consumers across 5 industries and 3 continents. A major insight was that far from narrowing their choices, today’s consumers take a more iterative and less reductive journey in 4 stages: Consider Evaluate Buy and Enjoy Advocate and Bond Top of mind brands from ads, point of sale, friends etc.Today, with so many choices and media sources, consumers have already reduced the number of brands from the outset…. Today’s consumer may add to his brand choice and reject some of the original set as they take on information from various sources. Their active search for information will have more influence than the push advertising of the brand itself Consider Evaluate The loyalty loop Bond Advocate Enjoy Buy Increasingly consumers put off the purchase decision until they are in store and may be influenced at that moment. So point of purchase marketing exploiting placement, packaging, pricing, sales interaction becomes an even more powerful touch point. Enjoy, advocate, bond.. After purchase, a deeper connection builds as the consumer interacts with the product and with new online touch points. Over 60% of consumers of a facial skin care product conducted online research AFTER purchase. Happy consumers advocate by word of mouth and on-line to their tribes and communities via Facebook etc. Unhappy consumers use the same channels but with far reaching negative consequences for the brand owner. With a strong bond the consumer will enter into the enjoy advocate buy loop without entering the consider and evaluate stages. Key considerations for brands 1. instead of focusing on how to allocate spending across media – television, radio, online etc – brands should target stages in the decision journey. The research shows that there is a serious mismatch between marketing allocation and the touch points at which consumers are best influenced. 70% to 90% of marketing spend is going to advertising and retail promotions that reach consumers at the consider and buy stages. Yet there is more chance to influence at the evaluate and enjoy-advocate-bond stages. In many categories, the single biggest impetus to buy is someone else’s advocacy. Yet most marketing focuses on media spend rather than driving advocacy. 2. Marketers must distinguish between owned media (the channels a brand controls like its website, tv etc.) and earned media (customer created channels such as communities and brand enthusiasts). A higher proportion of budget needs to go to support the people and technology required to create and manage content for a profusion of channels and to monitor or participate in them. An in depth pilot of this approach by a global consumer electronics group discovered: Off line channels like TV advertising, in store browsing, and direct word of mouth were only influential during the consider stage. At the evaluate stage consumers were very open to influence and went to Amazon.com and retail product comparison sites, studying consumer and expert ratings of products. Only 1 in 10 went to the manufacturer’s site YET MOST COMPANIES ARE PUTTING THE BULK OF THEIR DIGITAL SPEND HERE. The research also highlighted the frequency of discussion about their purchases on social network and review sites online – particularly when they were stimulated by retailer’s post-purchase e-mails. About one third of shoppers who had considered a specific brand online during the evaluation stage walked out of a store during the buy stage confused and frustrated by the inconsistencies of information between online and offline sources. In online discussion groups and forums, there was confusion and inconsistencies of information due to the technical nature of the prouct and little was said about the brand itself, reducing the impact of any online advocacy – a key goal in these channels. Actions taken by the company: 1. Spending shifted away from paid media 2. Ensured consistency of links and information across all sites where the product is linked – include clear, jargon free technical data 3. Created content specifically for Amazon which was the key touch point in the evaluation stage 4. Agressively distributed positive third party reviews online and had its paid media direct consumers to online environments that included promotions and community initiatives, contests and email promotions. Tips Shift the percentage of marketing spend on owned media to earned media Make the customer’s experience coherent Extend the boundaries of the brand Conclusion Look at new roles for marketing to address the change of focus (content publisher) Start narrow to understand the impact of the change in approach before going companywide Make the consumer’s brand experience central to enterprise strategy