Download AB 32 - National Caucus of Environmental Legislators

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup

Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup

Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup

Emissions trading wikipedia , lookup

Climate governance wikipedia , lookup

Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup

Kyoto Protocol wikipedia , lookup

Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup

Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup

Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup

Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup

Global warming wikipedia , lookup

Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup

Climate change in New Zealand wikipedia , lookup

Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup

Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup

Effects of global warming on Australia wikipedia , lookup

Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup

Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup

Economics of climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup

Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup

2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup

German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup

Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup

Views on the Kyoto Protocol wikipedia , lookup

Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup

Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup

IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup

Years of Living Dangerously wikipedia , lookup

Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup

Business action on climate change wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
CLIMATE CHANGE
AND CALIFORNIA
FRAN
PAVLEY
Senior Climate Advisor
Natural Resources
Defense Council
Potential Climate Change
Impacts on California
Health
Air Quality - Respiratory Illness
Weather-related Mortality
Infectious and Tropical Diseases
Agriculture
Climate Changes
Temperature
Increase
Precipitation
Patterns and
Extremes
Sea Level
Rise
Crop Yields
Irrigation Demands
Forests
Forest Composition
Geographic Range of Forests
Forest Health and Productivity
Water Resources
Water Supply
Water Quality
Competition for Water
Coastal Areas
Erosion of Beaches
Inundation of Coastal Wetlands
Additional Costs to Protect
Coastal Communities
Source: Anne Grambsch, 1998
Species and Natural Areas
Loss of Habitat and Species
Assembly Bill 1493
July 22, 2002
Governor Gray Davis signed
Assembly Bill 1493, a law
that directed the California Air
Resources Board (CARB) to
adopt regulations to achieve
the “maximum feasible and
cost effective reduction of
greenhouse gases (GHG)
from motor vehicles
beginning with model year
2009”
AB 1493
The Regulations
Requires carmakers to reduce GHG
from their vehicle fleets by
approximately 30% by 2016
Developed two standards -Cars and lightest trucks
Heavier vehicles
Created near-term (2009-2012) and
mid-term standards (2013-2016)
CARB approximates cost for new cars
to increase by $300
AB 1493
Implementation
Under the Clean Air Act, other states can adopt California
standards or Federal standards. The following states have
adopted or will adopt California’s “Clean Car” regulations.
Connecticut
Oregon
Maine
Pennsylvania
Massachusetts
Rhode Island
New Jersey
Vermont
New York
Washington
In 2007, Texas and other states have also introduced
legislation.
AB 1493
Legal Challenges
Lawsuits were filed in CA, VT and RI by domestic and
foreign automobile companies in December 2005,
claiming…
Clean Air Act
CAFE Standard
EPA has determined that
Congress did not
authorize EPA to regulate
CO2 or any other
greenhouse gas under the
Act -- “precludes” EPA
granting a waiver of
preemption.
CA’s global warming regs
are preempted by the
federal CAFE in two ways:
they are “related to” fuel
economy, and they are
inconsistent with NHTSA
accomplishment of federal
objectives.
Mass. v. EPA
 Supreme Court ruled GHGs are “air pollutants”
under the Clean Air Act, and that EPA has
authority to set federal emissions standards.
 Court rules no conflict with CAFE
 Decision removes major obstacle to EPA waiver
for California’s global warming emission
standards
7
Canada Signs Landmark Agreement
With Its Auto Industry
 On April 5, 2005, the
Government of Canada and
the Canadian automotive
industry signed a major
Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) on
climate change.
 Under the MOU the Canadian
auto industry will take actions
to voluntarily reduce GHG
emissions of new vehicles in
Canada so that by 2010,
annual emission reductions will
reach 5.3 megatons.
Executive Order S-3-05
On June 1, 2005, Governor Arnold
Schwarzenegger issues order and
states that the debate on climate
change is over.
Further he said, “By working together
we can meet the needs of both our
economy and environment. Together
we can continue California’s
environmental heritage and legacy of
leadership in innovation in cutting
edge technology.”
Executive Order Targets
By 2010, reduce GHG
emissions to 2000 levels
By 2020, reduce GHG
emissions to 1990 levels
By 2050, reduce GHG
emissions to 80 percent
below 1990 levels
AB 32 (Nunez-Pavley)
Why California?
12th largest emitter of global warming
pollution in the world.
When California takes action, the impact is
felt around the country and the world.
California can gain a competitive
advantage in the clean energy market by
acting first.
AB 32
Main Provisions
Mandates reporting of emissions from significant
sources by January 1, 2008.
Requires the California Air Resources Board
(CARB) to cap GHG emissions at 1990 levels.
Emission reductions to begin in 2012 and be
achieved by 2020.
AB 32
Additional Provisions
Develops a list of early actions by July 1, 2007 and
adopts regulations by January 1, 2010.
Includes a scoping plan to achieve statewide GHG
emissions reductions by January 1, 2009.
Allows CARB to adopt regulations on the use of
market mechanisms to achieve reductions.
AB 32
Additional Provisions
Allows CARB to use a broad range of existing
authorities for enforcement.
Authorizes the use of fees with regulated entities
for the administering of the statute.
CARB will convene an environmental justice
advisory board representing impacted communities.
CARB will convene advisory committee to facilitate
investment, research and development, and other
technologies to reduce GHG.
AB 32
Supporters
42 Assembly co-authors and 15
Senate co-authors
U.S. Senators Feinstein and
Boxer and 8 members of
Congress
48 cities/counties
Air, water and utility districts
Health organizations and
professionals
Faith-based organizations
Business organizations and
leaders
Organized labor
Public interest groups
Entertainment industry
Investment communities
Technology and biotechnology
industries
Editorial support from media
Environmental and conservation
organizations
AB 32
Timeline to Implementation
June 30, 2007: Early Action Emission Reduction Measures
July 1, 2007: Environmental Justice and Economic/Tech advisory boards
convene
Jan. 1, 2008: Determination of 1990 baseline levels and report on biggest
emitters
Jan. 1, 2009: Approval of plan for maximum reduction by 2020 (update every
5 years)
Jan. 1, 2010: Adopt regulations for early action measures
Jan. 1, 2011: Adopt regulations on emission limits and reduction measure
which must be real, permanent, quantifiable, verifiable, and enforceable, in
addition to cap, in same period
Jan. 1, 2012: Emission limits begin
Jan. 2, 2020: Emission reductions achieved and stay in force beyond 2020
Eight Strategies for Reducing
California’s Emissions
What Else is California Doing?
Renewable Portfolio Standards 20%
Million Solar Roofs
AB 1007 - Alternative Fuels
Fuel Cell Partnership
Local Government Actions
Energy Efficient Appliances
Green Building Designs
SB 1368 (Greenhouse Gas
Performance Standard)
Low Carbon Fuel Standard
SB 1368 (Perata)
Main Provisions
GHG emissions from new or upgraded power plants for
baseload generation must be as low or lower than GHG
emissions from new, combined-cycle natural gas power
plants.
GHG performance standard will apply to all in-state and
out-of-state generators that provide power to California.
Electric Reliability -- ensures that the standards will not
negatively impact the reliability of the energy services that
California ratepayers receive.
CEC and CPUC Regulations -- these Commissions are
required to approve regulations through a public process.
Energy Efficiency Works
Per Capita Electricity Consumption
kWh/person
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
California
United States
2000
0
1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004
What’s Driving
Green-tech Investment?
Rising cost of fuel
Economic expansion of China, India and other
Asian nations.
Growing concerns on global warming
War in the Middle East and too much reliance
on foreign oil
Desire for a secure energy future
AB 32 sends a strong signal to the
market for clean technologies by
adopting an enforceable cap.
Conclusions
There is still time to avoid the worst
impacts of climate change, if we
take strong action now.
The Review estimates that if we
don’t act, the overall costs and risks
of climate change will be equivalent
to losing at least 5% of global GDP
each year, now and forever.
October 30,2006
Sir Nicholas Stern for
the Government of the
United Kingdom
In contrast, the cost of action—
reducing GHG emissions to avoid
the worst of climate change—can be
limited to around 1% of global GDP
each year.
We’re in an Environmental
and Economic Race
Impacts of Global Warming are
visible and accelerating
California is seizing this
opportunity to become the home of
clean technologies and alternative
fuels
FRAN
PAVLEY
[email protected]
NRDC
1314 Second Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401