Download A Learning Progression for Complex Numbers In mathematics

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Line (geometry) wikipedia , lookup

Ethnomathematics wikipedia , lookup

Foundations of mathematics wikipedia , lookup

Infinitesimal wikipedia , lookup

Georg Cantor's first set theory article wikipedia , lookup

List of important publications in mathematics wikipedia , lookup

Infinity wikipedia , lookup

Large numbers wikipedia , lookup

Real number wikipedia , lookup

System of polynomial equations wikipedia , lookup

Arithmetic wikipedia , lookup

Elementary mathematics wikipedia , lookup

Addition wikipedia , lookup

Mathematics of radio engineering wikipedia , lookup

Fundamental theorem of algebra wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
A Learning Progression for Complex Numbers
In mathematics curriculum development around the world, the opportunity for students
to study complex numbers in secondary schools is decreasing. Given that the study of
complex numbers offers a space for the development of such mathematical ideas as
relationships between algebra and geometry and the extension of the real number
system, this brief offers suggestions in a variety of contexts that curriculum developers
might use to incorporate the study of complex numbers in secondary school
mathematics.
A curriculum developer is an individual who defines standards and expectations at a
broader perspective, i.e., individuals who work in policy. At the same time a curriculum
developer is an individual engaged in developing textbooks, and a curriculum developer
is a classroom teacher choosing mathematical topics to teach secondary students. A
central element in developing curriculum is the need to think about how the ideas
relating to a particular concept unfold over time. This brief describes a possible
progression of the concepts related to complex numbers and also mentions
misconceptions that students may have in their understanding of complex numbers in
both standard and polar forms.
Comments about the Development of Concepts
One necessary concept for developing an understanding of the complex number system
is to recognize the need for such a system from the perspective of both algebra and
geometry. Depending on the historical perspective of mathematics curriculum
development within a particular context, a curriculum developer could emphasize an
algebraic approach or a geometric approach. However, students studying the
properties of complex numbers using both algebraic and geometric approaches may
develop a deeper understanding of the properties of complex numbers.
Students’ understanding of both the algebraic and geometric approaches of complex
numbers in standard form may be extended to the algebraic and geometric perspectives
of complex numbers in polar form. When the study of complex numbers includes the
polar form and de Moivre’s Theorem, students have the opportunity to develop another
perspective on geometrical representations of multiplication and division of complex
numbers, finding the powers and the roots of complex numbers, rotations in a plane,
and trigonometry. A further extension of the study of complex numbers in standard and
polar forms examines the complex roots of a polynomial, algebraic structures or systems
such as β€˜quaternion’ as proposed by Hamilton in 1833.
How might this brief be used?
This brief explicates the conceptual development of the study of complex numbers by
examining three main concepts that could be included in the secondary school
mathematics curriculum and suggests an additional concept that could be used for
further study. The concepts are tightly linked, and concept 1 should be studied prior to
concept 2; concept 2 prior to concept 3; and concept 3 prior to concept 4.
Figure 1 illustrates ways in which the concepts related to an understanding of complex
numbers are embedded.
Concept 4
Concept 3
Concept 2
Concept
1
Concept 1: Existence of a
complex number system.
Concept 2: Geometric
and algebraic prospective
of a complex number in
standard form.
Concept 3: Geometric
and algebraic prospective
of a complex number in
polar form.
Concept 4:
Beyond/delving into the
complex number system.
Figure 1: Progression of the complex number system
Concept 1: The Creation of a Complex Number System
Students examine the creation of a complex number system beginning with solutions
obtained from the process of solving equations; in particular complex numbers can be
created to find solutions for a quadratic equation. The examples in Table 1 show how
solutions to particular equations exist in different number systems before the complex
number system is created.
Table 1
Solve the
following
equations:
a) π‘₯ + 1 = 0
b) 3x-1=0
c) π‘₯ 2 βˆ’ 5 = 0
Students may say:
a) I cannot find a solution in the natural
numbers. I should find the solution in
the integers.
b) I cannot find a solution in the integers.
I should find the solution in the
rational numbers.
c) I cannot find a solution in the rational
numbers. I should find the solution in
the real numbers.
Purpose of each equation:
a) The solution is a negative
integer
b) The solution is a rational
number
c) The solutions are irrational
and real numbers
d) π‘₯ 2 + 4 = 0
d) I cannot find a solution in the real
numbers.
d) The solutions involve the
square root of a negative
number
Thus, the creation of the set of complex numbers may start with the idea that there is
no real solution for the βˆšπ‘› when n is a negative number or there is no solution to the
given equation in the real number system.
The need for a solution leads to describing the equation π‘₯ 2 + 4 = 0 as having imaginary
solutions that cannot be represented in the set of real numbers. In the imaginary
solutions, i is used where 𝑖 2 = βˆ’1, or 𝑖 = βˆšβˆ’1.
Writing the imaginary solutions of π‘₯ 2 + 4 = 0 is seen as follows:
π‘₯2 + 4 = 0
(π‘₯ + βˆšβˆ’4)(π‘₯ βˆ’ βˆšβˆ’4) = 0
π‘₯ = βˆšβˆ’4, or π‘₯ = βˆ’βˆšβˆ’4
π‘₯ = √4(βˆ’1), or π‘₯ = βˆ’βˆš4(βˆ’1)
π‘₯ = 2βˆšβˆ’1, or x = βˆ’2βˆšβˆ’1
Thus, π‘₯ = 2𝑖, or π‘₯ = βˆ’2𝑖
As is described in Figure 2, the solution of each equation in Table 1 led to a different
number system.
New number system?? π‘₯ 2 + 5 = 0
Real numbers π‘₯ 2 βˆ’ 5 = 0
Integers π‘₯ + 5 = 0
Natural
π‘₯βˆ’5=0
Figure 2: Number Systems
At this point students know that an equation may not have a solution in the set of real
numbers but that it does have one in the set of imaginary numbers. The next step is to
consider how a quadratic equation π‘Žπ‘₯ 2 + 𝑏π‘₯ + 𝑐 = 0 (a β‰  0) can be represented as a
function on the Cartesian plane, and how to find solutions (or zeroes) of the equation
graphically and algebraically. Students should explore the 3 cases of a quadratic
equation:
ο‚·
ο‚·
ο‚·
Quadratic equation with two real solutions (or zeroes), represented on a graph
as intersecting the x-axis two times
Quadratic equation with one real solution (or zero) represented on a graph as
intersecting the x-axis one time
Quadratic equation with no real solutions (or zeroes) when the graph does not
intersect the x-axis
Concept 2: Geometric and Algebraic Perspectives of Complex Numbers
(For a more detailed explanation, see the brief Integrating Algebra and Geometry with
Complex Numbers.)
A complex number z is represented as an ordered pair: a + bi = (a, b) in the complex
plane where the horizontal axis consists of real numbers and the vertical axis represents
imaginary numbers. Note that real numbers may be represented on a number line (one
dimension), but the standard form of a complex number, z = a + bi, can be represented
geometrically on a complex plane (Argand complex plane; two dimensions). Each
complex number corresponds to exactly one point on the complex plane, thus exhibiting
a one-to-one correspondence between the set of complex numbers and the set of
points in the plane.
This number system satisfies most of the properties of the real number system, with the
exception of order. The set of complex numbers is closed under the four arithmetic
operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication and division, with the exception of
division by 0. The commutative, associative, distributive, identity and inverse properties
hold with respect to addition and multiplication of complex numbers just as they do for
the set of real numbers. In the complex number system, division involves the concept of
the conjugate of a complex number.
Think about It:
In the standard form of quadratic equation π‘Žπ‘₯ 2 + 𝑏π‘₯ + 𝑐 = 0, (a β‰  0) a, b, and c are
typically real numbers. If one of a, b, or c is not a real number, is the quadratic formula
still valid? How about the formula to find a sum and product of quadratic solutions?
Answer: The quadratic formula and the formula to find a sum and product of quadratic
solutions are still true.
Think about It:
Think about this statement:
1 = (-1)(-1) = -1
-1 = i
Answer:
βˆšπ‘§1 βˆšπ‘§2 is not necessarily equal to βˆšπ‘§1 . 𝑧2 ; the algebraic property works for real
numbers.
For example, some of the geometric representations that should be examined include:
ο‚·
Conjugate
The conjugate, a – bi, of a complex number, a + bi, is the reflection of a + bi in
the x-axis.
ο‚·
Absolute value
The absolute value of a complex numbers can be represented as the distance
between the origin and the point (a, b) in the complex plane.
ο‚·
Addition
The addition of two complex numbers yields a translation.
Suppose z1= a + bi and z2 = c + di; z1 + z2 can be seen as the translation of z1, c
units horizontally and d units vertically.
ο‚·
Subtraction
The absolute value of the subtraction of two complex numbers is equal to the
distance between the two numbers.
ο‚·
Multiplication
1. If a complex number 𝑧 = π‘Ž + 𝑏𝑖 is multiplied by i, then
𝑧𝑖 = (π‘Ž + 𝑏𝑖)𝑖
𝑧𝑖 = βˆ’π‘ + π‘Žπ‘–
Graphically, the multiplication of a complex number, z, by i is a 90ο‚° rotation
of point z.
Graphically, the multiplication of a complex number, z, by –i is a clockwise
rotation of 90ο‚° of z.
2. Multiplying a complex number 𝑧 = π‘Ž + 𝑏𝑖 by (–1) results in 𝑧(βˆ’1) = βˆ’π‘Ž βˆ’
𝑏𝑖.
Graphically, the multiplication of a complex number, z, by (-1) is a 180°
rotation of point z or the reflection of z in the origin.
A representation of z, zi, and –z in the complex plane is seen in Figure 3.
I
zi
z
O
-z
Figure 3. Complex plane representation
R
The geometrical meaning of the multiplication of a complex number by i can
be proved using a variety of methods including the use of slope, the
Pythagorean Theorem, or the scalar product of vectors. The slope method is
demonstrated here:
The slope of the line through point z and the origin is m1=b/a, and the slope
of the line through point zi and the origin is m2= –a/b.
𝑏
π‘Ž
π‘š1 . π‘š2 = . (βˆ’ ) = βˆ’1
π‘Ž
𝑏
Thus, the two lines are perpendicular showing that multiplication of a
complex number by I results in a 90° rotation of the complex number.
3. Multiplication of a Complex Number by a Real Number
Students may explore multiplication of complex numbers by a real number as
a dilation. This multiplication can be investigated using the Pythagorean
Theorem, or by applying the definition of absolute value. Other explorations
may include using similar triangles and multiplication of a vector by a real
number.
Think about It:
Gamow’s Problem: A treasure is hidden on an island. On the island, there are just two
trees, one oak and one pine. All you know is that if you start from a point, walk all the
way to the oak tree, make a 90ο‚° turn right, take the same number of steps, and put a
spike (S1) in the ground. Now return to the initial point, walk to the pine, make a 90ο‚°
turn left, take the same number of steps, and put another spike (S2) in the ground. If the
hidden treasure is on the midpoint of the segment between two spikes then where is
the initial point? (See Nahin, 1998.)
Answer: Name the right point as S which can be represented by the number (a+bi) in
the complex plane. Put a coordinate system with the real axis drawn through the line
segment joining the two trees, and with the imaginary axis positioned so that the oak
and the pine trees are symmetrically located at (–1,0) and (1, 0) respectively.
Begin by first imagining a temporary shift of the origin to the oak. In this new coordinate
system, (a + bi) becomes (a + 1) + bi. To locate the first spike, we must rotate this point
by +90ο‚°, which means to multiply by i. The location of S1 is now –b + (a + 1)i. Returning
to the original coordinates gives the location of S1 as (–b – 1) + (a + 1)i.
Next, imagine a second temporary shift of the origin to the pine. In this new coordinate
system, (a + bi) becomes (a – 1) + bi. To locate the second spike, we must rotate this
point by –90ο‚°, which means multiply by –i. The location of S2 is now b + (–a + 1)i.
Returning to the original coordinates gives the location of S2 as (b + 1) + (–a + 1)i.
The location of the treasure is the midpoint of the segment joining S1 and S2, the
treasure is at { (–b – 1) + (a + 1)i + (b + 1) + (–a + 1)i}/2 = i. In Figure 4, the location of
the treasure (midpoint of the segment S1 and S2) is independent of both a and b.
S1
S
S2
-1
Oak
1
Pine
Figure 4: Drawing for Treasure Island problem
Concept 3: Complex Numbers with Polar Representation
A complex number can also be represented in a polar coordinate system; using
trigonometry, a complex number z = x + iy is represented in polar form as
z = |z|(cos+ isin ). When using polar form, students should be aware that it is not
sufficient to express an argument  of a complex number as  = arctan (y/x) because
arctan (y/x) gives only angles such that  οƒŽ(-/2,  / 2) whereas  οƒŽ (-, ). One way to
determine the angle used is to plot the complex number in the complex plane. For
example, if z = –1 – i is plotted in the complex plane, then the argument is -3 /4 and
not simply the angle obtained by arctan (1). The complex number z = –1 – i in polar form
is z = √2(cos(-3 /4) + i sin (-3 / 4)).
Multiplication of Complex Numbers in Polar Form
To multiply complex numbers in polar form, students must know the compound angle
formulas for sine and cosine. To get the reciprocal of z, or |z|-1 (cos(-)+ isin (-)),
students should know also that the cosine is an even function and the sine is an odd
function. Additionally, students learn that when multiplying complex numbers,
arguments are added and when dividing complex numbers, arguments are subtracted.
These lead to a geometrical meaning of multiplication and division of complex numbers.
Multiplication of complex numbers in polar form is directly connected to de Moivre’s
theorem, which can be proved by mathematical induction for natural number values of
n. Further, de Moivre’s theorem is used to find roots and powers of complex numbers.
The latter requires students to know the periodic properties of trigonometric functions.
Additionally, de Moivre’s theorem can be used to express cos(n) and sin(n) as
polynomials of cos  and sin  leading to other results in trigonometry.
Concept 4: Delving into the Complex Number System
Advanced work in complex numbers may lead students to study the complex roots of a
polynomial, algebraic structures, or systems such as quaternion as proposed by
Hamilton in 1833.
Misconceptions
The study of complex numbers can create student misconceptions or difficulties.
Examples follow:
ο‚· z = a + bi is a single number in the complex number system. A misconception is
thinking of z as two numbers, a and bi, rather than as a single value that in and
of itself has properties.
ο‚· i is considered as a variable mainly because the calculation of (a + bi)(c + di) is
accomplished as the multiplication of binomials.
ο‚· The quadratic formula works when the coefficients are complex numbers. A
misconception is that the quadratic formula is only valid when the coefficients
are real numbers.
ο‚· A single number has multiple representations. For example:
Ο€
Ο€
1+√3 = 2(cos 3 + i sin 3), but a misconception is that a single number has only
one representation.
ο‚·
√i is a complex number which may be represented as
√2
𝑖. A
2
√2
+
2
misconception is that √i is not a complex number. For example, 3 is a
rational number while √3 is an irrational number. And i is already an imaginary
number and √i should be another number other than imaginary number.
Reference
Nahin, P. An imaginary tale: the story of βˆšβˆ’1. Princeton: Princeton University Press,
1998.