Download Ch 16

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Unilineal evolution wikipedia , lookup

Evidence of common descent wikipedia , lookup

Inclusive fitness wikipedia , lookup

Sexual selection wikipedia , lookup

On the Origin of Species wikipedia , lookup

Catholic Church and evolution wikipedia , lookup

Punctuated equilibrium wikipedia , lookup

Natural selection wikipedia , lookup

Evolution wikipedia , lookup

Hologenome theory of evolution wikipedia , lookup

Theistic evolution wikipedia , lookup

The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex wikipedia , lookup

Introduction to evolution wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Chapter 16:
Evolution
Lamarck’s
Theory of Acquired Characteristics
Jean Baptiste de Lamarck
1809
suggested how species change
over time
Said that traits developed
during a parent organism’s
lifetime are inherited by its
offspring
We know today that this is
FALSE!!!
Darwin’s Epic JournEy
•
Charles Darwin was born in England on
February 12, 1809. He grew up at a time
when the scientific view of the natural
world was shifting dramatically.
•
Geologists were suggesting that Earth
was ancient and had changed over time,
and biologists were suggesting that life on
Earth had also changed.
•
The process of change over time is
called evolution.
•
Darwin developed a scientific theory of
biological evolution that explains how
modern organisms evolved over long
periods of time through descent from
common ancestors.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmphlbRhLu8
Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
(Natural Selection)
Charles Darwin
1831
HMS Beagle (ship) sailed from
England to S.American coast
Studied plants and animals he saw
Galapogas Islands
• Where most of his work was
conducted
• Studied finches, tortoises,
and iguanas
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCIacO
eB9cs
Artificial Selection
•
To find an explanation for change in nature, Darwin studied
change produced by plant and animal breeders.
•
Darwin called this selective breeding process artificial
selection, a process in which nature provides the variations, and
humans select those they find useful.
•
Darwin put artificial selection to the test by raising and breeding
plants and fancy pigeon varieties.
Natural Selection
•
Based on his findings with artificial selection, Darwin came up with a
theory called natural selection.
•
In natural selection it is the environment—not a farmer or animal
breeder—that influences fitness.
•
Natural Selection s the process by which organisms with variations
most suited to their local environment survive and leave more offspring.
•
Natural selection acts only on inherited traits because those are the
only characteristics that parents can pass on to their offspring.
The Speed of Evolution
Gradualism:
Evolution as a slow, ongoing process by which
one species changes to a new species
Punctuated Equilibrium:
One species suddenly changes to another;
rapid evolution
Biogeography
Biogeography is the study of where organisms live now
and where they and their ancestors lived in the past.
Two biogeographical patterns are significant to Darwin’s
theory.
The first pattern, called divergent evolution is when
closely related species differentiate in slightly different
climates.
The second is a pattern, called convergent evolution
is when distantly related species develop similarities in
similar environments.
Common Descent
Natural selection depends on the ability of organisms to
reproduce and leave descendants. Every organism alive
today is descended from parents who survived and
reproduced.
Darwin proposed that living species are descended,
with modification, from common ancestors—an idea
called descent with modification.
According to the principle of common descent, all
species—living and extinct—are descended from
ancient common ancestors.
Evidence for Evolution
1. Recent Fossil Finds
One recently discovered fossil series documents the evolution
of whales from ancient land mammals
2. Comparing Anatomy
For example, the front limbs of amphibians, reptiles,
birds, and mammals contain the same basic bones.
Homologous Structures
Structures that are shared by related species and that have been
inherited fro a common ancestor are called homologous
structures.
Analogous Structures
Body parts that share a common function, but not structure, are called
analogous structures. The wing of a bee and the wing of a bird are
analogous structures.
Vestigial Structures
Vestigial structures are inherited from ancestors, but have lost
much or all of their original function due to different selection
pressures acting on the descendant.
3. Comparing Embryology
Researchers noticed a long time ago that the early
developmental stages of many animals with
backbones (called vertebrates) look very similar.
4. Comparing DNA
All living cells use information coded in DNA and RNA to
carry information from one generation to the next and to
direct protein synthesis.
This genetic code is nearly identical in almost all organisms.
A Testable Hypothesis
Darwin hypothesized that the Galápagos finches he
observed had descended from a common ancestor.
He noted that several finch species have beaks of very
different sizes and shapes. Each species uses its beak like a
specialized tool to pick up and handle its food. Different
types of foods are most easily handled with beaks of
different sizes and shapes.
Darwin proposed that natural selection had shaped the
beaks of different bird populations as they became adapted
to eat different foods. No one thought there was a way to
test this hypothesis until Peter and Rosemary Grant of
Princeton University came along.
A Testable Hypothesis
Darwin hypothesized that the Galápagos finches he
observed had descended from a common ancestor.
He noted that several finch species have beaks of very
different sizes and shapes. Each species uses its beak
like a specialized tool to pick up and handle its food.
Different types of foods are most easily handled with
beaks of different sizes and shapes.
Darwin proposed that natural selection had shaped the
beaks of different bird populations as they became
adapted to eat different foods. No one thought there was
a way to test this hypothesis until Peter and Rosemary
Grant of Princeton University came along.
A Testable Hypothesis
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l25MBq8T77w&feature=related
A Testable Hypothesis
The Grants realized that Darwin’s hypothesis
rested on two testable assumptions.
First, for beak size and shape to evolve, there
must be enough heritable variation in those
traits to provide raw material for natural
selection.
Second, differences in beak size and shape
must produce differences in fitness.
A Testable Hypothesis
The Grants have tested these hypotheses on the medium
ground finch (Geospiza) on the island of Daphne Major.
This island is large enough to support good-sized finch
populations, yet small enough to allow the Grants to catch,
tag, and identify nearly every bird of the species.
A Testable Hypothesis
During their study, the Grants periodically
recapture the birds.
They record which individuals are alive and
which have died, which have reproduced and
which have not.
For each individual, the Grants record
anatomical characteristics like wing length, leg
length, beak length, beak depth, beak color,
feather color, and total mass.
Natural Selection
The Grants’ data have shown that individual finches with different-size
beaks have better or worse chances of surviving both seasonal
droughts and longer dry spells.
When food becomes scarce during dry periods, birds with the largest
beaks are more likely to survive. As a result, average beak size in this
finch population has increased dramatically.
Natural Selection
Changes in food supply created selection pressure that caused finch
populations to evolve within decades. This evolutionary change occurred
much faster than many researchers thought possible.
The Grants have documented that natural selection takes place in wild
finch populations frequently, and sometimes rapidly.
Natural Selection
The Grants’ data also confirm that competition and
environmental change drive natural selection.
Traits that don’t matter much under one set of environmental
conditions became adaptive as the environment changes
during a drought.
Without heritable variation in beak sizes, the medium ground
finch would not be able to adapt to feeding on larger, tougher
seeds during a drought.
The Grants’ work shows that variation within a species
increases the likelihood of the species’ adapting to and
surviving environmental change.
Evaluating Evolutionary Theory
Today, evolutionary theory—which includes
natural selection—offers insights that are vital
to all branches of biology, from research on
infectious disease to ecology.
That’s why evolution is often called the grand
unifying theory of the life sciences.
Evaluating Evolutionary Theory
Like any scientific theory, evolutionary theory is constantly
reviewed as new data are gathered.
Researchers still debate important questions, such as
precisely how new species arise and why species become
extinct.
There is also significant uncertainty about exactly how life
began.
However, any questions that remain are about how evolution
works—not whether evolution occurs. To scientists, evolution
is the key to understanding the natural world.