* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download renaissance
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Renaissance period: A basic outline "The Renaissance was a period of exploration in many new directions - the advancement of humanistic and scientific knowledge; the discovery of new worlds by navigating the globe; the continued growth of cities, with wealth in the hands of the merchant class and expanding national states; and an unparalleled outburst of productivity in the Arts. Humanistic scholars saw the Renaissance as an intellectual awakening after a long medieval night. They searched the monasteries for neglected volumes and studied the Greco-Roman classics from a new view-point. After the fall of Constantinople, many Greek scholars found refuge in Italy, bringing with them their learning and ancient manuscripts. The humanists rediscovered the beauties of life in the here and now, rather than in the hereafter, and they reaffirmed the ancient belief that "nothing is more wonderful than man". The invention of printing made books more readily available, aiding in the spread of knowledge. In the fifty years after Gutenberg first published his Bible in 1456, more books were printed than had been copied by hand in the previous thousand years. More broadly, humanism promoted a revival of interest in the affairs of the everyday world, reasserted the faith of men and women in themselves, and reinforced the role of individuals in all spheres. Writers, dramatists, visual artists, and musicians flourished. Architects were inspired by the geometrical clarity and harmonious proportions of the ancient Roman style. Sculptors and painters studied geometry, optics, and anatomy in order to represent the world, objects, and the human figure in three dimensions as the eye beholds them. In northern Europe, Renaissance humanism expressed itself less in terms of the revival of antiquity and more in scientific observation and careful study of natural phenomena. In the Arts this meant a shift away from medieval symbolism and heavenly visions toward a more careful description of forms as seen in the natural world. The position of the Church, both as a powerful political force and as institution increasingly concerned with worldly affairs, came under close scrutiny. Abuses among the clergy in amassing worldly goods set the stage for the Reformation, as did the papal interest in winning victories on the battlefield rather than caring for human souls. Reformers rejected the central authority of the Church and the mediation of the priesthood. They held that by reading the scriptures individuals could know and interpret the word of God for themselves. During the Renaissance the merchant and artisan classes rose to challenge the entrenched position of the landed nobility. This progress of the new urban middle class was fortified by the expansion of trade in the wake of geographical explorations and by a broader spread of a political power among city officials and councils. With these momentous developments in thought, science, religion, exploration, statecraft, and the Arts, the Renaissance was truly a rebirth for humanity at the dawn of the modern era. Renaissance Ideas: In the Renaissance, the desire for personal prestige through art became of prime importance. Wealthy families and individuals commissioned artists to build memorial churches and chapels as well as create statues and paintings. The high regard for individual personality is also mirrored in the number and quality of portraits painted at this time. since artists wer so eagerly sought after, their status rose accordingly, and sculptors and painters became important personalities in their own right. The religious nature of the vast majority of the works of art has already been pointed out, but personal patronage was in the ascendancy. Brunelleschi build the Pazzi Chapel,Masolino and Masaccio decorated Brancacci Chapel, and Benozzo Gozzoli and Fra Filippo Lippi did the paintings for the Medici Chapel, all on commission from private donors as memorials to themselves and their families. San Lorenzo, the parish church of the Medici, was rebuilt and redecorated by Brunelleschi and Donatello - but the money came from Cosimo and not from the Church. Fra Angelico decorated the corridors of the monastery of San Marco, which was also under the protection of the Medici family. Piousness and the desire for spiritual salvation were not the only motives for such generosity. More important was the knowledge that the donor's present and future fame depended on building monuments and choosing artists to decorate them. In addition to the circumstances of patronage, certain technical considerations within the arts of themselves point in the same individualistic direction. The development of perspective drawing, for implied that the subject in the picture - whether a Madonna, a saint, or an angel was definitely placed in this world rather than symbolically in the next. Hence the figure was more on a basis of equality with the observer. The unification of space through the convergence of all the lines at the point on the horizon tended to flatter the spectator. By clear organization of lines and planes, linear perspective assumes that everything is seen from a single optical vantage point. While the point of view is actually that of the artist, it is made to seem as if it were also that of the observer. By closing the form, the artist further implies that nothing of importance lies outside the painting, and the whole of the picture can be taken in at a glance. Since nothing, then, is beyond the grasp of the viewer, and all can be understood with relatively little effort, the eye and mind of the onlooker are reassured. Human figures, whether rendered as prophets or portraits, tended to become more personal and individual. Each statue by Donatello, be it "Lo Zuccone" or his David, was an individual person who made a powerful, unique impression. Even Fra Angelico's Madonna is a personality more than an abstraction, and his figure of Angel Gabriel possessed genuine human dignity. Whether the medium was marble, terracotta, paint, there was a clear evidence of the new value placed on human individuality. Whether the picture was a disguised family group, like Botticelli's "Adoration of the Magi', or a personal portrait, like Verrocchio's bust of Lorenzo, the figures were authentic personages rather stylized abstractions; even though Lorenzode'Medici was the most powerful political figure of Florence, Verrocchio saw him as a man, not as an institution. The higher social status given to Florentine artists was evident in the inclusion of self-portraits in such paintings as that of Benozzo Gozzoli in his "Jorney of the Magi" and the prominent position Botticelli allowed himself in his "Adoration of the Magi". Giberti's personal reminiscences in his Commentaries were probably the first autobiography of an artist in history. His inclusion of the lives and legends of his famous 14th-century predecessors were the first biographies of individual artists. He also included a self-portrait in one of the round medallions in the center of his famous doors. Signatures of artists on their works became the rule, not the exception. The culmination came when Michelangelo realized his work was so highly individual that he no longer needed to sign it. The desire for personal fame grew to such an extent that Benvenuto Cellini no longer was content to let his work speak for him but wrote a lengthy autobiography filled with self-prize. The painter Giorgio Vasari likewise took up the pen to record the lives of the artists he knew personally and by reputation. In the late medieval and early Renaissance times, artists were content with their status as craftsmen. They were trained as apprentices to grind pigments, carve wooden chests, make engravings, and prepare wall surfaces for frescoes, as well as to carve marble reliefs and paint pictures. In the late 15th and early 16th centuries, however, it was not enough for artists to create works of art. They had to know the theory of art and the place of art and the artist in the intellectual and social atmosphere of their period. Roman Renaissance Style On April 18,1506,when the foundation stone of the new Basilica of St. Peter was Laid Rome was well on its way to becoming the undisputed artistic and intellectual capital of the Western world. Pope Julius was gathering about him the foremost living artists in all field and together they continued the transformation of the Eternal City from its medieval past into the brilliant Rome of today. Donato Bramante originally from Umbria but educated in Lomabardy, was the architect at work on the plans for the new St. Peter’s, the central church of the Christian world. Michelangelo Buanorroti from Florence was collecting the marble for a monumental tomb for Julius and was about to begin the painting of the Sistine Chapel ceiling. Raffaelo Sanzio of Umbria would soon be summoned from Florence to decorate the rooms of the Vatican Palace. The Florentine Andrea Sansovino was carving a cardinal’s tomb in one of Julius’s favorite roman churches Santa Maria del Popolo, where the Umbrian Pintoricchio was covering its choir volts with a series of frescoes. The papal court under Julius II and his successor Leo X, was such a powerful magnet that for three years the three greatest figures of the Renaissance – Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo and Raffael – found themselves at the Vatican. In 1517, however, the aged Leonardo abandoned the artistic field of honor there to join the court of Francis I of France. The flight of the Medici from Florence in 1494 had signaled a general exodus of artists. Many found temporary havens in the ducal courts of Italy, but Rome proved an irresistible attraction. Hence, during the days of the two great Renaissance popes, JuliusII and Leo X, the cultural capital shifted from Florence to Rome. And, since Leonardo, Andrea Sansovino, Michelangelo, and Pope Leo were from Florence, and since Bramante and Raphael had absorbed the Florentine styie and ideas in extended visits there, the cultural continuity was unbroken. It was, in fact, like a smooth transplantation from the confines of a nursery to an open field – a move that led artists to branch out from local styles into the universal air of Rome. Such project as the building of the world’s largest church, the construction of Julius II tomb, the painting of the Sistine ceiling, and the Vatican Palace murals could be found only in Rome. Nowhere else were monuments of such proportions or commissions of such magnitude possible. In Rome also resided the Cardinals, who maintained palaces that rivaled the brilliance of the papal court. The interest in antiquity had animated many other Italian centers, but when the Renaissance got underway in Rome, it was, so to speak, no home soil. When antique statues were excavated elsewhere, they caused a considerable stir. In Rome, however, many of the ancient monuments were still standing, and when the archeological shovels probed the proper places, a veritable treasure was waiting. One by one the “Apolo Belvedere” marble, height 2,5 m, Vatican museums Rome; the “Venus of the Vatican” and the “Laoocon Group” marble, height 2,50m Vatican museums, Rome, came to light to stimulate the work of Michelangelo and other sculptors. The frescoes from Nero’s Domus Aurea and the Baths of Titus, provided the first important specimens of ancient painting. While the art of painting on fresh plaster had never died out, these ancient Roman fragments gave fresco painting a new impetus. Julius II had received most of his training in diplomacy and state craft from his uncle, Pope Sixtus IV. Fortunately, a passionate love of the arts was included in this education. It was Sixtus who had built the chapel that has subsequently carried his name. Essentially a man of action, Julius II was an expert with the soldier’s sword as well as the bishop’s staff. He met his age on its own terms, and the spectacle of the pope riding a fiery horse into the smoke of battle had a remarkably demoralizing effect on his enemies. As one of the principal architects of the modern papacy, he also saw the need of a setting on a scale with the importance of the church founded by St. Peter and made it a matter of policy to command artists as well as soldiers. At the end of his career, Julius II became the subject of one of Raffaels most penetrating portraits: “Pope Julius II, National gallery, London, 100 x 80 sm.” When Leo X ascended on the papal throne one of the saying went: “Venus has had her day, and Mars his, now comes the term of Minerva.” Venus symbolized the reign of the Borgia Pope Alexander VI; Mars, of course referred to Julius II; and Minerva, the Roman equivalent of Athena, was Leo. As the sun of Lorenzo the Magnificent, he brought with him to Rome the intellectual spirit of Florence, the latter-day Athens. Michelangelo, whom Leo had know since his childhood at the Medici Palace, was unfortunately bound by the terms of his contract to serve the heirs of Pope Julius, but the suave and worldly Raffael was available – and more congenial to the personal taste of Pope Leo than was the gruff titan Michelangelo. Once again Raffael served as papal portraitist in an unusually fine study: “Leo X with two cardinals.” Galleria degli Uffizi, Florence.