Download Gennady Jatchevitch, Ph.D

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Introduction to gauge theory wikipedia , lookup

History of electromagnetic theory wikipedia , lookup

Time in physics wikipedia , lookup

Maxwell's equations wikipedia , lookup

Lorentz force wikipedia , lookup

Circular dichroism wikipedia , lookup

Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup

Electric charge wikipedia , lookup

Four-vector wikipedia , lookup

Free fall wikipedia , lookup

Field (physics) wikipedia , lookup

Weightlessness wikipedia , lookup

Electrostatics wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
CALCULATION OF THE ELECTRIC FIELD DISTORTION IN FREE SPACE
DUE TO APPEARANCE OF THE OBJECT WITH CONDUCTIVE SUREACE
Gennady Jatchevitch, Ph.D
Saint-Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation,
Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Abstract
For the development alarm systems, using
the electrostatic field, it is necessary to evaluate the
electric field distortion due to appearance of the
object with conductive surface. We introduce the
concept of the electric field distortion as the
deflection of the electric field intensity vector E at
each point of the check space due to appearance of
the object with conductive surface [1].
We examine four cases:
1. Free space with the uniform electric
field, the object is right circular cylinder with the
conductive side surface of infinite extent.
2. Free space with the point electric
charge, the object is plane conductive surface of
infinite extent.
3. Free space with the electric dipole, the
object is plane conductive surface of infinite extent.
The axis of the dipole is paralleled to the surface.
4. Free space with the electric dipole, the
object is plane conductive surface of infinite extent.
The axis of the dipole is perpendicular to the
surface.
On the first case we solve the Laplace’s
equation in cylindrical coordinates and use the
boundary conditions on the conductive surface of
the cylinder. For the second, the third and the fourth
cases we use the method of images.
1        1      
                     0
           z  z 
,
(1.1)
where  – is potential at the check point of the
space.
Fig.1.1 Uniform external electric field and the object
As potential  doesn’t depend on Z
coordinate, we have
1   2 1  2




0
   2  2  2
Let us assume that potential  is equal

I. FREE SPACE WITH THE UNIFORM
EXTERNAL ELECTRIC FIELD AND THE
OBJECT IS RIGHT CIRCULAR CYLINDER
WITH THE CONDUCTIVE SIDE SURFACE
OF INFINITE EXTENT
In order to calculate electric field strength
vector it is necessary to solve Laplace’s equation in
cylindrical coordinates [2], [3] fig (1.1)
Laplace’s equation is
f 1   f 2 
f1  f2
,
(1.3)
where f1 depends on coordinate , and f2 depend on
coordinate .
Substituting (1.3) into (1.2), we obtain
1 f
2 f
1 2 f
f 2   1  f 2  21  f1  2  22  0 (1.4)
 

 
After separating variables we have
 f1  2  2 f1


 2  2
f1  f1 
20
(1.2)
1 2  f2

 p2 ,
f 2  2
(1.5)
where p – is constant.
In our case
f2

(1.6)
Consequently
1
(1.7)

d e d ¸
d
d

e

df 1
d
d
d2  f 1

2
e
d
(1.8)
E


e
   d2  f 1   df 1 
 e  2  e  
d  (1.10)
d

A1  e
2
A1   
 A2  e
¸
(1.11)
(1.17)
 a2 
 1  sin
2


(1.18)
E0  
E0 for the
E
1
E
E0  cos
(1.19)
E0  sin
(1.20)
E=E .e+ E .e
(1.21)
relatively vector E0
E0=E1 .e+ E1 .e
A2
.

(1.12)
A2 

A



 1
  cos



(1.22)
Angle of deflection  is given by the
following formula [2]

Unknown potential  equals

 a2 
 1  cos
2


E0  
And distortion of the electric field is the
deflection of electric vector
and function f1 become
f1
(1.16)
free space are
1
Common integral of this equation
f1
(1.15)
The components of electric field
(1.9)
1
  sin

.
Then we have
df 1
A2 
For cylinder surface =a
The components of electric field are given by
the following formulas
E
 e ¸
  A1   
A1   E0
Let us introduce the new variable  such that


 
1
 cylinder doesn’t affect upon
For 
the electric field, therefore
cos
p2
E

The results of calculation     with
the help of Matlab 7.0 are illustrated on fig. 2.1,
where x=/a,
y~
(1.13)
Therefore the components of electric field
are
E



 A1 
A2 
  cos
 
2
(1.14)
21
z
Ez
q
a

2
3
4   a  a
   2  z 2
     
 a   a  
(2.3)
After appearance of the object potential at
the point M(,z) of system of point charge is equal
to the sum of the potential created at a given point
by each of the charges [2] The potential at the point
M(,z) is given by
 1  z
Fig.1.2 Angle of deflection Z due to X, Y
II. FREE SPACE WITH THE POSITIVE
POINT CHARGE, THE OBJECT IS PLANE
SURFACE OF INFINITE EXTENT
q
 
1
4  Ea    z2
2


  2a  z2
1
2
(2.4)
And the components of electric field will be
This case is illustrated on fig. 2.1
E
1


q

2
4    a  a 






3
3
   2  z 2    2  z 2 
          2     
 a   a    a   a   

2
a

a
(2.5)
z
z




q
a
a
Ez


2 

2
2
2 3
2 3
4    a  a





z

z








           2     
  a   a    a   a   
1
Fig. 2.1 Positive point charge and the object in free space
The potential of the paint M (,z) fig 2.1 in
free space
q
    z
4 Еa

Using Eq.(2.2), (2.3), (2.5) and (2.6) we can
write [2]
1
2
  z2 ,
(2.1)
where Ea – capacitivity of the medium.
The components of electric field vector is
equal to [2],[3],[4]
E

22
q
4
  a  a2

(2.6)

a
   2  z 2
     
 a   a  
    z arccos 
E  E  Ez  Ez1
 1
E  Ez  E1  Ez1
2
2
2
(2.7)
After calculating with the help of Matlab 7.0
we have the results which are illustraited on fig 2.2,
where x=/a, y=z/a
3
(2.2)
2
Fig2.2 Angle of deflection Z due to X,Y
III. FREE SPACE WITH THE ELECTRIC
DIPOLE,
THE
OBJECT
IS
PLANE
CONDUCTIVE SURFACE OF INFINITE
EXTENT WHICH IS PARALLELED TO THE
AXIS OF THE DIPOLE.
This case is illustrated on fig 3.1.
Potential at the point M in free space [2]
 ( M)
q
 
1
4   a  2  ( z  l) 2



 z
1
2
2
(3.1)
Fig.3.1 Electric dipole in free space and the object
The components of electrical field vector are equal to
E

Ez




q
l
l




2
2
2 3
2 3 
4    a  l    2
    z  
  z  



1

      





  l   l  
 l   l   
(3.2)

q

2
4    a  l 


(3.3)

l


2
2
2 3
2 3 
    z  
    z  
      1 
      
 l   l  
 l   l   
z
1
l
z
After appearance of the object (fig 2.1) the components of electric field vector are equal to
E
1








2
2
q
l
l
l
l






2
3
3
3
3
4    a  l    2
   2  z 2
   2  z 2
   2  z 2 
   z 2
   2    
     
   2    1  
       1 
  l   l  
 l   l  
 l   l  
 l   l   
(3.4)
23
Ez1
z
z
z
z


1
1
l
l
l
l





2
2
2
2
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3
4    a  l    2
    z  
    z  
    z  
  z  
   2    
     
   2    1  
   l    l  1 
l
l
l
l
   


  
    
 l   l   
q
(3.5)
Using Eq. (3.2), (3.3), (3.4) and (3.5) we can write [2]
    z
E E
arccos 

1
 Ez  Ez1
E   Ez  E1  Ez1
2
2
2
2
(3.6)
After calculating Eq. (3.6) with the help of Matlab 7.0 we have the results which are illustrated on fig. 3.2,
where x=/a, y=z/a
IV. FREE SPACE WITH ELECTRIC DIPOLE,
THE OBJECT IS PLANE CONDUCTIVE
SURFACE OF INFINITE EXTENT. THE AXIS
OF THE DIPOLE IS PERPENDICULAR TO
THE SURFACE
Fig.3.2 Angle of deflection Z due to X,Y
Fig.4.1 Electric dipole and the object
This case is illustrated on fig 4.1. In free space the components
of electrical field vector are equal to
E

Ez

z


q
l
l



2
3
3
2
2
2
2
4    a  l   
    z
  z
 
  



0.5



0.5
  

 
  l l
   

 l   l
 
(4.1)
z
z


 0.5
 0.5
q
l
l



2
3
3
2
2
2
2
4    a  l   

    z
 
  z


      0.5  
   l    l  0.5 
   

 l   l
 
(4.2)
After appearance of the object (fig 4.1) the components of electric field vector are equal to
24
E
1
Ez1






l
l
l
l





2
2
2
2
2 3
2 3
2 3
2 3 
4    a  l    2








z

z

z
  z







      2.5 
      0.5 
      1.5  
   l    l  0.5 
   

 l   l

 l   l

 l   l
   (4.3)
q
z
z
z


 0.5
 2.5
 0.5
q
l
l
l




2
3
3
2
2
2
2
2 3
4    a  l    2
    z

    z

  z

      2.5 
      0.5  
   l    l  0.5 
   

 l   l

 l   l
 
(4.4)
Using Eq (4.1), (4.2), (4.3) and (4.4) we can write
    z
E E
arccos 

1
 Ez  Ez1
E   Ez  E1  Ez1
After calculating Eq (4.5) with the help of
Matlab 7.0 we have the results which are illustrated
on fig 4.2, where x=/a, y=z/a
2
2
2
2
(4.5)
Preliminary results show that the value of distortion
at the check point of the space depends on the
distance from check point to the object, on
orientation of the object, and position of check
point in the free space.
The received results prove the possibility of
development alarm system using electrostatic field.
We developed the transducer of electric field
distortion and we investigated experimentally the
deflection of the electric field intensity vector at the
same check points, that performed theoretically,
due to appearance of the object of finite sizes and
we had the confirmation of calculation results.
But these results are topics of the another articles.
REFERENCES
[1]
Fig.4.2 Angle of deflection Z due to X,Y
[2]
V. CONCLUSION
[3]
The received results are preliminary and have
conceptual meaning.
[4]
Яцевич Г.Б. Варжапетян А.Г. Устройство
охранной сигнализации. Свидетельство на
полезную модель №23511 от 20.06.2002г.
Smyth W.R. Static and dynamic electricity. New
York-Toronto-London 1950.
Стрэттон Дж. А. Теория электромагнетизма.
М.1949г.
Matveev A.N. Electricity and Magnetism Mir,1986
.
25