Download The past decade has seen a substantial rejuvenation of interest in

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup

Franck–Condon principle wikipedia , lookup

Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup

Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia , lookup

Matter wave wikipedia , lookup

Measurement in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup

Delayed choice quantum eraser wikipedia , lookup

Ensemble interpretation wikipedia , lookup

Basil Hiley wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup

Density matrix wikipedia , lookup

Bell test experiments wikipedia , lookup

Quantum decoherence wikipedia , lookup

Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup

Topological quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup

Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup

Quantum dot wikipedia , lookup

Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Quantum entanglement wikipedia , lookup

Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup

Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup

Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup

Quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Coherent states wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization wikipedia , lookup

Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Max Born wikipedia , lookup

Quantum fiction wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup

Many-worlds interpretation wikipedia , lookup

Quantum computing wikipedia , lookup

Orchestrated objective reduction wikipedia , lookup

Quantum teleportation wikipedia , lookup

EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup

Quantum machine learning wikipedia , lookup

Quantum group wikipedia , lookup

Quantum key distribution wikipedia , lookup

Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup

Quantum state wikipedia , lookup

Quantum cognition wikipedia , lookup

T-symmetry wikipedia , lookup

History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
The past decade has seen a substantial rejuvenation of interest in the study of quantum phase
transitions, driven by experiments on the cuprate superconductors, the heavy fermion materials,
organic conductors, and related compounds. Although quantum phase transitions in simple spin
systems, like the Ising model in a transverse field, were studied in the early 1970s, much of the
subsequent theoretical work examined a particular example: the metal-insulator transition. While
this is a subject of considerable experimental importance, the greatest theoretical progress was
made for the case of the Anderson transition of noninteracting electrons, which is driven by the
localization of the electronic states in the presence of a random potential. The critical properties of
this transition of noninteracting electrons constituted the primary basis upon which most
condensed matter physicists have formed their intuition on the behavior of the systems near a
quantum phase transition. However, it is clear that strong electronic interactions play a crucial role
in the systems of current interest noted earlier, and simple paradigms for the behavior of such
systems near quantum critical points are not widely known. .
It is the purpose of this book to move interactions to center stage by describing and classifying the
physical properties of the simplest interacting systems undergoing a quantum phase transition. The
effects of disorder will be neglected for the most part but will be considered in the concluding
chapters. Our focus will be on the dynamical properties of such systems at nonzero temperature,
and it shall become apparent that these differ substantially from the noninteracting case. We shall
also be considering inelastic collision-dominated quantum dynamics and transport: Our results
will apply to clean physical systems whose inelastic scattering time is much shorter than their
disorder-induced elastic scattering time. This is the converse of the usual theoretical situation in
Anderson localization or mesoscopic system theory, where inelastic collision times are
conventionally taken to be much larger than all other time scales.
One of the most interesting and significant regimes of the systems we shall study is one in which
the inelastic scattering and phase coherence times are of order h/kB T, where T is the absolute
temperature. The importance of such a regime was pointed out by Varma et al. [552, 553] by an
analysis of transport and optical data on the cuprate superconductors. Neutron scattering
measurements of Hayden et al. [237] and Keimer et al. [289] also supported such an interpretation
in the low doping region. It was subsequently realized [469, 103, 449] that the inelastic rates are in
fact a universal number times kBT/h, and they are a robust property of the high-temperature limit
of renormalizable, interacting quantum field theories that are not asymptotically free at high
energies. In the Wilsonian picture, such a field theory is defined by renormalization group flows
away from a critical point describing a second-order quantum phase transition. It is not essential
for this critical point to be in an experimentally accessible regime of the phase diagram: The
quantum field theory it defines may still be an appropriate description of the physics over a
substantial intermediate energy and temperature scale. Among the implications of such an
interpretation of the experiments was the requirement that response functions should have pre
factors of anomalous powers of T and a singular dependence on the wavevector; recent
observations of Aeppli et al. [2], at somewhat higher dopings, appear to be consistent with this.
These recent experiments also suggest that the appropriate quantum critical points involve
competition between phases with or without conventional superconducting, spin- or
charge-density-wave order. There is no global theory yet for such quantum transitions, but we
shall discuss numerous simpler models here that capture some of the basic features.
It is also appropriate to note here theoretical studies [365, 24, 540, 109, 110] on the relevance of
finite temperature crossovers near quantum critical points of Fermi liquids [245] to the physics of
the heavy fermion compounds.
A separate motivation for the study of quantum phase transitions is simply the value in having
another perspective on the physics of an interacting many-body system. A traditional analysis of
such a system would begin from either a weak-coupling Hamilt0nian, and then build in
interactions among the nearly free excitations, or from a strong-coupling limit, where the local
interactions are well accounted for, but their coherent propagation through the system is not fully
described. In contrast, a quantum critical point begins from an intermediate coupling regime,
which straddles these limiting cases. One can then use the powerful technology of scaling to set up
a systematic expansion of physical properties away from the special critical point. For many
low-dimensional strongly correlated systems, I believe that such an approach holds the most
promise for a comprehensive understanding. Many of the vexing open problems are related to
phenomena at intermediate temperatures, and this is precisely the region over which the influence
of a quantum critical point is dominant. Related motivations for the study of quantum phase
transitions appear in a recent discourse by Laughlin [318]. ..
The particular quantum phase transitions that are examined in this book are undoubtedly heavily
influenced by my own research. However, I do believe that my choices can also be justified on
pedagogical grounds and lead to a logical development of the main physical concepts in the
simplest possible contexts. Throughout, I have also attempted to provide experimental motivations
for the models considered; this is mainly in the form of a guide tothe literature, rather than
in-depth discussion of the experimental issues. I have highlighted some especially interesting
experiments in a recent popular introduction to quantum phase transitions [458]. An
experimentally oriented introduction to the subject of quantum phase transitions can also be found
in the excellent review article of Sondhi, Girvin, Carini, and Shahar [503]. Readers may also be
interested in a recent introductory article [558], intended for a general science audience.
Many important topics have been omitted from this book owing to the limitations of space, time,
and my expertise. The reader may find discussion on the metal insulator transition of electronic
systems in the presence of disorder and interactions in a number of reviews [324, 75, 160, 48, 258].
The fermionic Hubbard model and its metal insulator transition are discussed in the most useful
treatises by Georges, Kotliar, Krauth, and Rozenberg [189] and Gebhard [184]. I have also omitted
discussions of quantum phase transitions in quantum Hall systems: These are reviewed by Sondhi
et al. [503] and by Huckenstein [250] and also in the collections edited by Prange and Girvin [418]
and Das Sarma and Pinczuk [127](however, some magnetic transitions in quantum Hall systems
[401,402] will be briefly noted). Quantum impurity problems are also not discussed, although
these have been the focus of much recent theoretical and experimental interest; useful discussions
of significant developments may be found in Refs. [393], [327], [563], [12], [154], [284], [328],
[554], [112], [113], [398], and [400].
Some recent books and review articles offer the reader a complementary perspective on the topics
covered: I note the works of Fradkin [174], Auerbach [31 ], Continentino [109], Tsvelik [539], and
Chakrabarti, Dutta, and Sen [85], and I will occasionally make contact with some of them.
How to Use This Book
I wrote most of this book at a level that should be accessible to graduate students who have
completed the standard core curriculum of courses required for a master's degree. In principle, I
also do not assume a detailed knowledge of the renormalization group and its application to the
theory of second-order phase transitions in classical systems at nonzero temperature. I provide a
synopsis of the needed background in the context of quantum systems, but my treatment is surely
too concise to be comprehensible to students who have not had a prior exposure to this
well-known technology. I decided it would be counterpro-ductive for me to enter into an in-depth
discussion of topics for which numerous excellent texts are already available. In particular, the
texts by Stanley [508], Ma [342], Itzykson and Drouffe [268], and Goldenfeld [196] and the
review article by Brezin et al. [65] can serve as useful companions to this book.
An upper-level graduate course on quantum statistical mechanics can be taught on selected topics
from this book, as I have done at Yale. I suggest that such a course begin by covering all of Part I
(excluding Section 3.2), followed by Chapters 4, 5, and 8 from Part II. The material in Chapter 8
should be supplemented by some of the readings on the renormalization group mentioned above.
Depending upon student interest and time, I would then pick from Chapters 10-12 (as a group),
Chapter 13 (until Section 13.3.1), and Chapter 14 from Part III. A more elementary course should
skip Chapters 8 and 10-12. The chapters not mentioned in this paragraph are at a more advanced
level and can serve as starting points for student presentations.
Readers who are newcomers to the subject of quantum phase transitions should read the chapters
selected above first. More advanced readers should go through all the chapters in the order they
appear.